Compound Shapes (A) | 4th Grade PDF Measurement Worksheets - Free Printable

Let’s solve each problem step by step. We’ll find area and perimeter for each compound shape.

---

Problem 1)
Shape is made of two rectangles: (A) on top, (B) on bottom.

- Rectangle (A): width = 4 cm, height = 3 cm → Area = 4 × 3 = 12 cm²
- Rectangle (B): width = 8 cm, height = 3 cm → Area = 8 × 3 = 24 cm²
- Total area = 12 + 24 = 36 cm²

Perimeter: Walk around the outside.
Top: 4 cm
Right side of A: 3 cm
Then right side of B: 3 cm
Bottom: 8 cm
Left side: 6 cm (total left side from top to bottom)
But wait — there’s a horizontal part in the middle? Let’s trace carefully:

Actually, better way: add all outer edges.

From top-left corner:
→ Right 4 cm (top of A)
↓ Down 3 cm (right of A)
→ Right 4 cm (top of B, since total bottom is 8, and A is 4 wide, so overhang is 4)
↓ Down 3 cm (right of B)
← Left 8 cm (bottom)
↑ Up 6 cm (left side)
That’s it? Wait — we missed the inner horizontal? No, perimeter is only outer edge.

Wait — actually, when you go down the right side of A (3 cm), then you go right 4 cm (that’s the top of the lower rectangle’s right part), then down 3 cm, then left 8 cm, then up 6 cm, then... but we started at top-left, went right 4, down 3, right 4, down 3, left 8, up 6 — that brings us back? Let’s add:

4 (top A) + 3 (down A right) + 4 (right along top of B’s right part) + 3 (down B right) + 8 (bottom) + 6 (left side) = 4+3+4+3+8+6 = 28 cm

But wait — the left side is 6 cm total, which includes the 3 cm of A and 3 cm of B? Actually, yes — because A sits on top of B, so left side is continuous 6 cm.

Alternatively, think of full outline:

Imagine walking around:

Start at top-left of A:
- Right 4 cm
- Down 3 cm (to where A meets B on right)
- Right 4 cm (along top of B’s extension)
- Down 3 cm (right side of B)
- Left 8 cm (bottom)
- Up 6 cm (left side)

Total: 4 + 3 + 4 + 3 + 8 + 6 = 28 cm

✔ Perimeter = 28 cm

---

Problem 2)
L-shape. Can split into two rectangles.

Option: Split vertically or horizontally.

Let’s split into:
- Top rectangle (A): width 7 cm, height 1 cm → Area = 7 × 1 = 7 cm²
- Bottom rectangle (B): width 4 cm, height 6 cm → Area = 4 × 6 = 24 cm²

Wait — check dimensions.

The whole right side is 7 cm tall. The top part is 1 cm high, so bottom part must be 6 cm high? Yes.

Width of bottom part: labeled as 4 cm at bottom.

Top part extends left 3 cm beyond the bottom part? Because total top width is 7 cm, and bottom width is 4 cm, so overhang is 3 cm on left.

So yes:

Rectangle A (top): 7 cm × 1 cm = 7 cm²
Rectangle B (bottom): 4 cm × 6 cm = 24 cm²
Total area = 7 + 24 = 31 cm²

Perimeter: Trace outer edges.

Start at top-left of top rectangle:
→ Right 7 cm
↓ Down 1 cm (right side of top)
↓ Down 6 cm (right side of bottom) → total down 7 cm on right
← Left 4 cm (bottom)
↑ Up 6 cm (left side of bottom)
← Left 3 cm (the overhang part on top-left)
↑ Up 1 cm? Wait no — after going up 6 cm on left of bottom, we are at the bottom-left of the top rectangle? Then we need to go up 1 cm to close? But that would be inside.

Better to list all outer segments:

Top: 7 cm
Right: 7 cm (1 + 6)
Bottom: 4 cm
Left side of bottom: 6 cm
Then the “notch” on top-left: we have a horizontal segment going left 3 cm (from the left end of the top rectangle to the start of the bottom rectangle’s left side) — but that’s actually part of the top? Wait.

Actually, let's label points.

Think of coordinates:

Set bottom-left of entire shape as (0,0).

Bottom rectangle: from x=0 to x=4, y=0 to y=6
Top rectangle: from x=0 to x=7, y=6 to y=7? Wait no — if top is 1 cm high, and sits on top of bottom, then top should be from y=6 to y=7? But then the left side would be aligned? But diagram shows top extending left.

Looking at diagram: top rectangle has width 7 cm, and below it, the vertical drop is 6 cm on the right, and the bottom width is 4 cm. Also, there’s a 3 cm label on the left side of the top part — meaning the top rectangle sticks out 3 cm to the left of the bottom rectangle.

So:

Bottom rectangle: width 4 cm, height 6 cm → positioned such that its right side aligns with the right side of the top rectangle? Or left?

Diagram says: from top-left, go right 7 cm (top), then down 1 cm, then left 3 cm (so now we’re above the bottom rectangle?), then down 6 cm, then right 4 cm (bottom), then up 7 cm? That doesn’t make sense.

Standard way: for L-shape like this, perimeter can be calculated by adding all outer sides.

List all outer edges:

- Top: 7 cm
- Right side: 7 cm (since total height is 7 cm)
- Bottom: 4 cm
- Left side of bottom part: 6 cm
- Then, the "inner" horizontal on top-left: but that’s not outer — wait, no.

Actually, from the diagram description:

It’s an L rotated clockwise.

Start at top-left corner of the whole shape:

→ Move right 7 cm (top edge)
↓ Move down 1 cm (right edge of top arm)
← Move left 3 cm (this is the top of the vertical stem? No — after moving down 1 cm, we are at the top-right of the vertical part? I'm getting confused.

Alternative method: use the fact that for rectilinear shapes, perimeter can be found by doubling the sum of max width and max height, minus any overlaps? Not reliable.

Better: count all outer segments as per diagram labels.

Given:

- Top horizontal: 7 cm
- Right vertical: 7 cm (labeled on right)
- Bottom horizontal: 4 cm
- Left vertical of bottom part: 6 cm (labeled)
- Then, the horizontal segment connecting the left of the top to the left of the bottom: that’s 3 cm (labeled as 3 cm on the left side of the top part) — but is that outer? Yes, because it’s the top of the "step".

And finally, the vertical segment on the far left: from bottom of that 3 cm segment down to the bottom? No.

Let me sketch mentally:

Imagine the shape:

At the top, a horizontal bar 7 cm long, 1 cm high.

Attached to the right end of this bar, a vertical bar going down 6 cm, and this vertical bar is 4 cm wide? No.

From the diagram:

After the top 7 cm, you go down 1 cm (so now you're at the same level as the top of the vertical part).

Then you go left 3 cm — this means the vertical part starts 3 cm from the left end of the top bar.

Then you go down 6 cm — this is the left side of the vertical part? No, if you go left 3 cm from the right end, you're at x=4 if top was from x=0 to x=7.

Assume top bar: from x=0 to x=7, y=6 to y=7 (height 1).

Then, the vertical part: from x=3 to x=7, y=0 to y=6? But then width would be 4 cm (7-3=4), which matches the bottom label.

Yes!

So:

- Top rectangle: x=0 to 7, y=6 to 7 → area 7*1=7
- Bottom rectangle: x=3 to 7, y=0 to 6 → area 4*6=24
- Total area = 31 cm²

Now perimeter: trace boundary.

Start at (0,7) — top-left of top rectangle.

→ to (7,7) : 7 cm
↓ to (7,6) : 1 cm
↓ to (7,0) : 6 cm (but wait, from y=6 to y=0 is 6 cm, yes)
← to (3,0) : 4 cm (since bottom is from x=3 to x=7)
↑ to (3,6) : 6 cm
← to (0,6) : 3 cm
↑ to (0,7) : 1 cm

Now add them:

7 (top) + 1 (down right top) + 6 (down right bottom) + 4 (bottom) + 6 (up left of bottom) + 3 (left along top of bottom) + 1 (up left of top) =

7+1=8; +6=14; +4=18; +6=24; +3=27; +1=28 cm

But is the last ↑ necessary? From (0,6) to (0,7) is 1 cm, yes, to close the shape.

So perimeter = 28 cm

Note: the segment from (3,6) to (0,6) is the top of the bottom rectangle, which is exposed, so yes, it's part of perimeter.

✔ Perimeter = 28 cm

---

Problem 3)
Another L-shape.

Dimensions: total height 10 cm, total width 9 cm.

Split into two rectangles.

Option: vertical split or horizontal.

Let’s do horizontal split.

Top part: width 2 cm, height ?

From diagram: left side total 10 cm, and there’s a 7 cm label on the right side of the top part? Let's see.

Actually, diagram shows:

- Left vertical: 10 cm
- Top horizontal: 2 cm
- Then down 7 cm (on the right of the top part)
- Then right 7 cm
- Then down 3 cm
- Then left 9 cm (bottom)

So, the shape has a "notch" on the bottom-right? No, it's like a backwards L.

Better: split into two rectangles.

Rectangle A: the tall thin one on left: width 2 cm, height 10 cm → area = 2×10 = 20 cm²

But then the bottom part extends right 7 cm more? Total width is 9 cm, so if left is 2 cm, then the bottom part is 7 cm wide? And height 3 cm? Because from the bottom, up 3 cm is labeled.

Yes:

- Rectangle A (left vertical): 2 cm wide × 10 cm high = 20 cm²
- Rectangle B (bottom horizontal): but it overlaps with A? No, if we take the part that sticks out.

Actually, the bottom part is from x=2 to x=9 (width 7 cm), and y=0 to y=3 (height 3 cm). But the left part already covers x=0 to 2, y=0 to 10, so the bottom part is additional only from x=2 to 9, y=0 to 3.

So area of B = 7 × 3 = 21 cm²

Total area = 20 + 21 = 41 cm²

But is that correct? The total height is 10 cm, and the bottom part is only 3 cm high, so yes.

We could also think of the whole thing as a big rectangle minus a missing part, but this is fine.

Perimeter: trace outer edges.

Start at top-left (0,10):

→ right 2 cm (top of left rectangle)
↓ down 7 cm (right side of top part — to y=3)
→ right 7 cm (top of bottom part)
↓ down 3 cm (right side of bottom part)
← left 9 cm (bottom)
↑ up 10 cm (left side)

Add: 2 + 7 + 7 + 3 + 9 + 10 = let's calculate: 2+7=9; +7=16; +3=19; +9=28; +10=38 cm

Is that all? From (0,0) to (0,10) is 10 cm, yes.

But when we go down from (2,10) to (2,3) — that's 7 cm, then right to (9,3), then down to (9,0), then left to (0,0), then up to (0,10).

Segments:

- (0,10) to (2,10): 2 cm
- (2,10) to (2,3): 7 cm
- (2,3) to (9,3): 7 cm
- (9,3) to (9,0): 3 cm
- (9,0) to (0,0): 9 cm
- (0,0) to (0,10): 10 cm

Sum: 2+7+7+3+9+10 = 38 cm

✔ Perimeter = 38 cm

---

Problem 4)
T-shape.

Top rectangle: 12 cm wide, 4 cm high → area = 12×4 = 48 cm²

Bottom rectangle: 2 cm wide, 9 cm high → area = 2×9 = 18 cm²

But they overlap? In T-shape, the bottom rectangle is centered under the top, so no overlap in area calculation if we consider them separate, but actually, the bottom rectangle is attached to the bottom of the top, so total area is sum.

However, in this case, the bottom rectangle is narrower, so no overlap issue.

Total area = 48 + 18 = 66 cm²

But let's confirm dimensions.

Top: 12 cm × 4 cm

Bottom: 2 cm × 9 cm, and it's centered, so from the diagram, the overhang on each side is 5 cm, since 12 - 2 = 10, divided by 2 is 5 cm on each side — which matches the "5 cm" labels on the sides.

So yes.

Perimeter: trace outer edges.

Start at top-left of top rectangle:

→ right 12 cm
↓ down 4 cm (right side of top)
← left 5 cm (because the bottom rectangle starts 5 cm from left? After going down 4 cm, we are at the top-right of the bottom rectangle? No.

After going down 4 cm on the right, we are at the bottom-right of the top rectangle. Since the bottom rectangle is only 2 cm wide and centered, from x=5 to x=7 if top is x=0 to 12.

So from (12,4) [assuming y=0 at bottom], but let's set coordinates.

Set bottom of bottom rectangle as y=0.

Bottom rectangle: x=5 to 7, y=0 to 9? Height 9 cm, so from y=0 to y=9.

Top rectangle: x=0 to 12, y=9 to 13 (since height 4 cm).

But in diagram, the bottom rectangle is labeled 9 cm high, and top is 4 cm high, and they are stacked, so total height 13 cm? But diagram doesn't show total height, but from labels, yes.

In the diagram, the bottom rectangle has height 9 cm, and top has height 4 cm, and they are connected, so the connection is at y=9 for bottom top, y=9 for top bottom.

So:

- Bottom rectangle: x=5 to 7, y=0 to 9
- Top rectangle: x=0 to 12, y=9 to 13

Now perimeter:

Start at (0,13) — top-left of top.

→ to (12,13): 12 cm
↓ to (12,9): 4 cm
← to (7,9): 5 cm (since bottom rectangle starts at x=5, so from x=12 to x=7 is 5 cm)
↓ to (7,0): 9 cm
← to (5,0): 2 cm
↑ to (5,9): 9 cm
← to (0,9): 5 cm
↑ to (0,13): 4 cm

Now add:

12 (top) + 4 (down right top) + 5 (left along top of bottom) + 9 (down right bottom) + 2 (bottom) + 9 (up left bottom) + 5 (left along bottom of top) + 4 (up left top) =

Calculate: 12+4=16; +5=21; +9=30; +2=32; +9=41; +5=46; +4=50 cm

Is that correct? Let's list the segments again:

1. Top: 12 cm
2. Right side of top: 4 cm down
3. Horizontal from right of top to right of bottom: 5 cm left (since bottom is narrower)
4. Right side of bottom: 9 cm down
5. Bottom: 2 cm left
6. Left side of bottom: 9 cm up
7. Horizontal from left of bottom to left of top: 5 cm left? From (5,9) to (0,9) is 5 cm left, yes
8. Left side of top: 4 cm up to (0,13)

Yes, all covered.

Sum: 12+4+5+9+2+9+5+4 = let's group: (12+2)=14, (4+4)=8, (5+5)=10, (9+9)=18; total 14+8=22; +10=32; +18=50 cm

✔ Perimeter = 50 cm

---

Problem 5)
U-shape or rectangle with a bite taken out.

Outer rectangle: 15 cm wide, 11 cm high → area = 15×11 = 165 cm²

Inner rectangle (the hole): 7 cm wide, 6 cm high → area = 7×6 = 42 cm²

But is it a hole? Looking at diagram: it's a rectangle with a rectangular notch at the bottom center.

So total area = outer area minus inner area = 165 - 42 = 123 cm²

Confirm dimensions.

Outer: width 15 cm, height 11 cm.

Notch: from bottom, up 6 cm, and width 7 cm, and it's centered, since left and right are both 4 cm (15 - 7 = 8, /2 = 4 cm on each side).

Yes.

So area = 15*11 - 7*6 = 165 - 42 = 123 cm²

Perimeter: now, when you have a notch, the perimeter increases because you add the inner edges.

Original outer perimeter without notch: 2*(15+11) = 52 cm

But with the notch, we remove the bottom part where the notch is, but add the three sides of the notch.

Specifically, the bottom side of the outer rectangle is interrupted: instead of 15 cm straight, we have two segments of 4 cm each on the sides, and then the notch adds two vertical sides and a horizontal bottom.

So, compared to full rectangle, we lose the middle 7 cm of the bottom, but gain two vertical sides of 6 cm each and one horizontal of 7 cm at the bottom of the notch.

So change in perimeter: -7 (removed) + 6 + 6 + 7 = +12 cm

Thus, perimeter = 52 + 12 = 64 cm

Trace to verify.

Start at top-left (0,11):

→ right 15 cm to (15,11)
↓ down 11 cm to (15,0)
← left 4 cm to (11,0) [since right side of notch is at x=11? Outer width 15, notch width 7, centered, so notch from x=4 to x=11? 15-7=8, so from x=4 to x=11 is 7 cm, yes. Left margin 4 cm, right margin 4 cm.

So from (15,0) ← to (11,0): 4 cm
↑ up 6 cm to (11,6) [height of notch]
← left 7 cm to (4,6)
↓ down 6 cm to (4,0)
← left 4 cm to (0,0)
↑ up 11 cm to (0,11)

Now add segments:

1. Top: 15 cm
2. Right side: 11 cm down
3. Bottom right: 4 cm left
4. Up right of notch: 6 cm
5. Bottom of notch: 7 cm left
6. Down left of notch: 6 cm
7. Bottom left: 4 cm left
8. Left side: 11 cm up

Sum: 15 + 11 + 4 + 6 + 7 + 6 + 4 + 11

Calculate: 15+11=26; +4=30; +6=36; +7=43; +6=49; +4=53; +11=64 cm

✔ Perimeter = 64 cm

---

Problem 6)
Complex L-shape or zigzag.

Let's split into rectangles.

From diagram:

- Bottom-left: 5 cm wide, 3 cm high → rectangle A: 5×3 = 15 cm²
- Above it: a rectangle 2 cm wide, 6 cm high? But labeled 6 cm on the left, and 2 cm on the bottom of that part.
Actually, looking:

There is a part on the left: from bottom, up 3 cm, then right 5 cm (bottom), then up 6 cm? But labeled 6 cm on the left side of the upper part.

Perhaps better to divide vertically or horizontally.

Notice the overall bounding box.

Or follow the path.

List the rectangles:

1. Bottom rectangle: width 5 cm, height 3 cm → area 15 cm²
2. Middle rectangle: attached to the top of the first, but shifted? From the diagram, after the bottom 5x3, there is a vertical part going up 6 cm, but width? Labeled 2 cm on the left of that vertical part.

Actually, from the bottom-left corner:

- Right 5 cm (bottom)
- Up 3 cm (left side of bottom)
- Then, from there, up 6 cm? But labeled 6 cm on the left, and then right 2 cm?

Look at labels:

- Bottom: 5 cm
- Left side of bottom: 3 cm
- Then above that, a vertical segment labeled 6 cm — this is the left side of the next part.
- Then at the top of that, a horizontal segment labeled 2 cm to the right.
- Then down 7 cm? Labeled 7 cm on the right of that part.
- Then right 10 cm
- Then up 2 cm
- Then left 13 cm (top)

This is messy. Better to identify rectangles.

From the shape, it seems composed of three rectangles:

- Rectangle A: bottom-left, 5 cm × 3 cm
- Rectangle B: above A, but only 2 cm wide? Since from the left, after going up 3 cm, we go up 6 cm, but the width might be 2 cm, as labeled "2 cm" on the left of the upper vertical part.
- Rectangle C: the top-right part, 10 cm × 2 cm? But labeled 10 cm and 2 cm.

Also, there is a connection.

Assume:

- Rectangle A: 5 cm (w) × 3 cm (h) = 15 cm²
- Rectangle B: 2 cm (w) × 6 cm (h) = 12 cm² — this is stacked on top of A, but since A is 5 cm wide, and B is 2 cm wide, it might be aligned to the left or right. From diagram, likely aligned to the left, so B is from x=0 to 2, y=3 to 9 (since 3+6=9)
- Then, from the top of B, we go right 2 cm? But labeled 2 cm on the top of B? No, after going up 6 cm from the top of A, we are at (0,9) if A is from y=0 to 3, B from y=3 to 9, x=0 to 2.

Then from (2,9), we go right? But the next label is "10 cm" on a horizontal, and "7 cm" on a vertical.

From the diagram: after the 6 cm up, there is a 2 cm right (probably the top of B), then down 7 cm, then right 10 cm, then up 2 cm, then left 13 cm.

So, from (2,9) — after going up 6 cm from (0,3) to (0,9), then right 2 cm to (2,9) — that's the top of B.

Then down 7 cm to (2,2)? But y=2 is below A? That doesn't make sense.

Perhaps the 6 cm is not from y=3.

Let's define coordinates based on bottom-left corner as (0,0).

From diagram:

- Start at (0,0)
- Right 5 cm to (5,0) — bottom
- Up 3 cm to (5,3) — but labeled 3 cm on left, so probably from (0,0) up to (0,3), then right to (5,3)? No, typically we go around.

Assume the shape is drawn with:

- Bottom edge: from (0,0) to (5,0) — length 5 cm
- Left edge: from (0,0) to (0,3) — length 3 cm
- Then from (0,3) up to (0,9) — length 6 cm (labeled)
- Then from (0,9) right to (2,9) — length 2 cm (labeled)
- Then from (2,9) down to (2,2) — length 7 cm? 9-2=7, yes
- Then from (2,2) right to (12,2) — length 10 cm (labeled)
- Then from (12,2) up to (12,4) — length 2 cm (labeled)
- Then from (12,4) left to (-1,4)? No, labeled 13 cm left, but 12 - (-1) =13, but negative x? That can't be.

Mistake.

From (12,2) up 2 cm to (12,4), then left 13 cm to (-1,4)? But the top is labeled 13 cm, and it should connect back.

Perhaps the leftmost point is not x=0 for the top.

Let's read the labels carefully.

The top horizontal is labeled 13 cm.

The rightmost vertical is labeled 2 cm.

The bottom-left has 5 cm and 3 cm.

Also, there is a 7 cm vertical on the right of the middle part.

Another approach: use the given lengths to find areas by dividing into rectangles whose dimensions are clear.

From the diagram, we can see three main rectangles:

1. The bottom-left rectangle: 5 cm wide, 3 cm high → area 15 cm²

2. The vertical rectangle on the left: 2 cm wide, 6 cm high → area 12 cm² — this is above the first, but since the first is 5 cm wide, and this is 2 cm wide, it might be that this 2x6 is attached to the left side, so from x=0 to 2, y=3 to 9.

3. The top-right rectangle: 10 cm wide, 2 cm high → area 20 cm² — but where is it? From the diagram, after the 2 cm right at y=9, we go down 7 cm to y=2, then right 10 cm to x=12, then up 2 cm to y=4, then left 13 cm to x= -1? That doesn't work.

Perhaps the 10 cm is from x=2 to x=12 at y=2, then up to y=4, then left to x= -1, but that would mean the top is from x= -1 to x=12, width 13 cm, which matches the 13 cm label.

So, the top rectangle is from x= -1 to x=12, y=4 to y=6? But height is not given.

Let's calculate the area by considering the entire shape as a combination.

Notice that the shape can be divided into:

- Rectangle 1: 5 cm × 3 cm = 15 cm² (bottom-left)

- Rectangle 2: 2 cm × 6 cm = 12 cm² (left-middle, from y=3 to y=9, x=0 to 2)

- Rectangle 3: 10 cm × 2 cm = 20 cm² (bottom-right, from x=2 to x=12, y=2 to y=4? But then how does it connect)

From the path:

After going down 7 cm from (2,9) to (2,2), then right 10 cm to (12,2), then up 2 cm to (12,4), then left 13 cm to (-1,4), then down? But we need to close to (0,0).

From (-1,4) down to (-1,0)? But not labeled.

Perhaps the left side from (0,0) to (0,3) is 3 cm, then to (0,9) is 6 cm, so from (0,9) to (2,9) is 2 cm, then down to (2,2) is 7 cm, then right to (12,2) is 10 cm, then up to (12,4) is 2 cm, then left to (-1,4) is 13 cm, then down to (-1,0) is 4 cm, then right to (0,0) is 1 cm.

But that introduces new lengths not labeled, and the area would include negative x, which is unusual.

Perhaps the 13 cm top is from x=0 to x=13, but then the right part is at x=12, etc.

Let's look for a different division.

Another idea: the shape consists of:

- A large rectangle on the bottom: but it's irregular.

Use the fact that the total area can be found by adding the areas of the parts as per the labels.

From the diagram, the following rectangles are evident:

1. The very bottom-left: 5 cm by 3 cm = 15 cm²

2. The part above it on the left: 2 cm by 6 cm = 12 cm² — this is directly above the first, but since the first is 5 cm wide, and this is 2 cm wide, it is probably aligned to the left, so it occupies x=0 to 2, y=3 to 9.

3. The part on the right: from x=2 to x=12, y=2 to y=4 — but why y=2 to 4? Because from the diagram, after going down 7 cm from y=9 to y=2 at x=2, then right 10 cm to x=12 at y=2, then up 2 cm to y=4 at x=12, then left 13 cm to x= -1 at y=4, but then to close, from (-1,4) down to (-1,0) and right to (0,0), but that would require additional area.

Perhaps the 13 cm top is from x=0 to x=13, and the right part is within.

Let's calculate the area by subtraction or other means.

Notice that the shape can be seen as a large rectangle minus some parts, but it's complicated.

Let's list all the rectangular regions that make up the shape without overlap.

From the path described in the diagram:

- Start at (0,0)
- Go right 5 cm to (5,0)
- Go up 3 cm to (5,3) — but this is not standard; usually we go along the boundary.

Perhaps the shape is:

- From (0,0) to (5,0) to (5,3) to (0,3) to (0,9) to (2,9) to (2,2) to (12,2) to (12,4) to (-1,4) to (-1,0) to (0,0) — but again, negative x.

To avoid negative x, perhaps the leftmost point is x=0, and the 13 cm top is from x=0 to x=13, but then the right part is at x=12, so from (12,4) left to (0,4) is 12 cm, but labeled 13 cm, so not.

Unless the top is from x= -1 to x=12, width 13 cm, and we accept that.

So, let's assume the shape includes x from -1 to 12, y from 0 to 9.

Then, the area can be calculated as the union of rectangles:

- Rectangle A: x=0 to 5, y=0 to 3 → 5*3 = 15
- Rectangle B: x=0 to 2, y=3 to 9 → 2*6 = 12
- Rectangle C: x=2 to 12, y=2 to 4 → 10*2 = 20
- Rectangle D: x= -1 to 0, y=0 to 4 → 1*4 = 4 (since from (-1,0) to (0,0) to (0,4) to (-1,4))
- But is there more? From (0,4) to (0,3) is already included in B? B is from y=3 to 9, so from y=3 to 4 is included, but from y=0 to 3 at x=0 to 2 is not fully covered.

At x=0 to 2, y=0 to 3: this is not covered by A (which is x=0 to 5, y=0 to 3) — A covers x=0 to 5, y=0 to 3, so it includes x=0 to 2, y=0 to 3.

Then B covers x=0 to 2, y=3 to 9.

C covers x=2 to 12, y=2 to 4.

D covers x= -1 to 0, y=0 to 4.

But at x=0 to 2, y=2 to 3: covered by A.

At x=2 to 12, y=2 to 4: covered by C.

At x= -1 to 0, y=0 to 4: covered by D.

Is there a gap? For example, at x=0 to 2, y=4 to 9: covered by B.

At x=2 to 12, y=0 to 2: not covered yet. Oh! We have from (2,2) to (12,2) to (12,0)? But in the path, from (12,2) we go up to (12,4), not down to (12,0).

In the boundary, from (12,2) we go up to (12,4), so the region below y=2 at x>2 is not part of the shape? But then how do we close to (0,0)?

From the boundary description:

After (12,2) -> (12,4) -> (-1,4) -> (-1,0) -> (0,0) -> (5,0) -> (5,3) -> (0,3) -> (0,9) -> (2,9) -> (2,2) -> back to (12,2)? No, from (2,2) to (12,2) is already done.

The boundary is:

- (0,0) to (5,0) : 5 cm
- (5,0) to (5,3) : 3 cm? But labeled 3 cm on left, so perhaps (0,0) to (0,3) : 3 cm
I think I have a confusion in orientation.

Let's read the diagram labels as placed.

In the diagram for problem 6:

- At the bottom-left, there is "5 cm" on the bottom edge, and "3 cm" on the left edge of the bottom part.
- Then, above that, on the left, "6 cm" on a vertical edge.
- Then, at the top of that, "2 cm" on a horizontal edge to the right.
- Then, "7 cm" on a vertical edge down.
- Then, "10 cm" on a horizontal edge to the right.
- Then, "2 cm" on a vertical edge up.
- Then, "13 cm" on the top horizontal edge to the left.
- Also, "2 cm" on the right vertical edge of the top part.
- And "6 cm" on the left vertical edge of the middle part — already used.
- "7 cm" on the right vertical edge of the middle part — already used.
- "10 cm" on the bottom of the top-right part.
- "2 cm" on the right of the top-right part.
- "13 cm" on the top.
- "5 cm" on the bottom-left.
- "3 cm" on the left of bottom-left.
- "6 cm" on the left of the middle-left.
- "2 cm" on the top of the middle-left.
- "7 cm" on the right of the middle-left.
- "10 cm" on the bottom of the top-right.
- "2 cm" on the right of the top-right.
- "13 cm" on the top.
- Also, "2 cm" on the right of the top-right — already have.
- And "6 cm" on the left of the middle — already have.

Perhaps the shape is:

- Bottom-left rectangle: 5 cm (w) × 3 cm (h) = 15 cm²
- Above it, a rectangle 2 cm (w) × 6 cm (h) = 12 cm² — this is attached to the top-left of the first, so if first is from (0,0) to (5,3), then this is from (0,3) to (2,9)
- Then, from