Fun mystery story worksheet for children to read and answer questions about who ate the cookies.

Let's solve "The Mystery of the Missing Cookies" step by step.

---

Passage Summary:

- Mrs. Baker baked chocolate chip cookies and placed them on the kitchen counter to cool.
- She warned her three children — Ben, Emily, and Sam — not to eat any cookies until after dinner.
- She went to the garden to pick vegetables.
- When she returned, the plate of cookies was empty.
- The children were in the living room, with crumbs around their mouths.
- Each child gave an alibi:
- Ben: He was reading a book.
- Emily: She was playing with her dolls.
- Sam: He was drawing a picture.

---

Key Clue:

> *"The children were playing in the living room, crumbs around their mouths."*

This is crucial. Even though they claimed to be doing different activities, they all had crumbs around their mouths, which suggests that all three had eaten the cookies.

But the question is: Who ate the cookies?

Let’s analyze each child’s claim:

1. Ben said he was reading a book.
- Reading a book is a quiet activity. It doesn’t require hands or much movement.
- But if he was reading, why would he have crumbs around his mouth?
- Could he have eaten while reading? Possibly.

2. Emily said she was playing with her dolls.
- Playing with dolls usually involves using hands.
- If she was playing, she might have been able to sneak a cookie.
- But again, crumbs suggest she ate something.

3. Sam said he was drawing a picture.
- Drawing requires holding a pencil or crayon.
- Here’s the key point: You can't draw and eat cookies at the same time unless you’re using one hand for drawing and one for eating.
- But if he was drawing, he’d need both hands free or at least one hand steady.
- However, crumbs around his mouth suggest he did eat.

Wait — let’s look deeper.

But here’s the real clue hidden in the details:

> "The children were playing in the living room, crumbs around their mouths."

They were all in the living room, all had crumbs. So it’s likely all three ate cookies.

But the question asks: *Who do you think ate the cookies?*

And the mystery is about who — implying one person?

But actually, the clue is in the alibis.

Let’s examine Sam’s alibi: “I was drawing a picture.”

If he was drawing, then he was likely using his hands. But if he was eating cookies, he would need to use his hands to grab and eat them.

So drawing and eating cookies simultaneously is very difficult — especially without getting crumbs on the paper or dropping things.

But more importantly — Ben said he was reading a book.

Reading a book requires one hand to hold it, but the other hand is free.

Similarly, Emily playing with dolls — she uses her hands, so she could have eaten while doing that.

But Sam says he was drawing — which means he was focused on a task requiring both hands (or at least one hand) to hold a pencil.

Now, consider this: Could someone have eaten cookies while drawing?

It’s possible, but messy.

But here’s a better clue: All three had crumbs around their mouths.

So all three probably ate cookies.

But the mystery is who ate them — and the answer is likely based on contradictions in their stories.

Wait — let’s look at Ben’s statement:

> "I was too busy reading a book."

He says he was too busy reading — meaning he didn’t have time to eat.

But reading a book doesn’t prevent you from eating — you can read and eat at the same time.

But drawing does involve focus and hand usage.

However, the real clue may be in the timing.

Mrs. Baker went to the garden to pick vegetables. That takes time.

She came back to find the cookies gone.

The children were in the living room.

But here’s the biggest clue: Crumbs around their mouths.

That means they all ate cookies.

But the puzzle is designed to make us think logically.

Wait — perhaps the answer is that none of them are telling the truth — but the question is asking who ate them.

But since all three have crumbs, it implies all three ate cookies.

But maybe only one of them is lying.

Let’s think differently.

Is there any physical impossibility?

Sam says he was drawing.

Drawing requires a steady hand.

But if he was drawing, how could he have eaten cookies?

Unless he used one hand to draw and one to eat.

But even then, it’s possible.

But here’s a better idea: Ben said he was reading a book.

But reading a book is easy to do while eating.

Emily playing with dolls — also easy to eat while doing.

Sam drawing — hard to do while eating.

But still, possible.

Wait — what if Sam is the one who must be lying?

No — we don’t know.

Actually, there’s no clear contradiction in their statements.

But the key is that all three had crumbs around their mouths.

So all three ate cookies.

Therefore, they all ate the cookies.

But the question is: *"Who do you think ate the cookies?"*

Since all three had crumbs, the logical conclusion is:

> Ben, Emily, and Sam all ate the cookies.

But perhaps the puzzle expects us to say one person.

Wait — let’s check for a trick.

Another possibility: Ben said he was reading a book.

But if he was reading, and the cookies were on the counter, he would have to get up, go to the kitchen, take a cookie, come back, sit down, and read.

But he could have done that.

Same for the others.

But here’s a better clue: The children were playing in the living room.

And Mrs. Baker left the cookies on the kitchen counter.

So the children would have to go to the kitchen to get them.

But if they were playing in the living room, and the cookies were in the kitchen, they had to leave the room.

But the story doesn’t say they left.

But the crumbs are around their mouths — so they did eat.

So the most logical conclusion is:

> All three children ate the cookies.

But since the puzzle is called "The Mystery," and it’s a logic puzzle, perhaps there’s a detail we missed.

Wait — Sam said he was drawing a picture.

But drawing a picture often involves using a pencil or crayon.

And cookies are sticky.

If he was drawing, and he ate cookies, he would likely get crumbs on his drawing, or smudge it.

But the story doesn’t mention anything about that.

Alternatively, Ben said he was reading a book.

But books can be held in one hand — and he could eat with the other.

But Emily said she was playing with her dolls.

Dolls require both hands.

But again, she could have eaten while playing.

But Sam says he was drawing.

But drawing requires focus.

But here’s a twist: Ben said he was too busy reading a book.

“Too busy” implies he didn’t have time.

But reading doesn’t stop you from eating.

So maybe he’s lying.

But the crumbs are on all of them.

So the only logical answer is:

> All three children ate the cookies.

But perhaps the puzzle wants us to say Sam because he was drawing — and drawing is harder to do while eating — so he must have lied.

But that’s not strong.

Wait — another idea: Ben said he was reading a book.

But if he was reading, and the cookies were on the counter, he would have to get up.

But Emily said she was playing with her dolls — which is a stationary activity.

Sam said he was drawing — also stationary.

But no one claims to have gone to the kitchen.

But they must have.

So all three must have gone to the kitchen.

But all three had crumbs — so all three ate.

Thus, the answer is:

> Ben, Emily, and Sam all ate the cookies.

But since the question asks "Who do you think ate the cookies?", and it’s a single answer format, perhaps the intended answer is:

> All of them.

But let’s see if there’s a trick.

Wait — Sam said he was drawing a picture.

But drawing requires a steady hand.

If he was drawing, he wouldn’t want to get crumbs on his work.

But the story doesn’t say anything about that.

Alternatively, Ben said he was reading — but if he was reading, he might have been sitting near the kitchen?

No — they were all in the living room.

But the crumbs are around their mouths — so they all ate.

So the solution is:

> All three children ate the cookies.

But perhaps the puzzle is testing logical reasoning — and the real answer is that none of them are telling the truth, but the crumbs prove they did.

But the best answer is:

> Ben, Emily, and Sam all ate the cookies.

Because all three had crumbs around their mouths, which proves they all ate.

Even if they claimed to be doing other things, the evidence shows they ate.

So the mystery is solved: All three children ate the cookies.

---

✔ Final Answer:

Ben, Emily, and Sam all ate the cookies.

Explanation: Although each child gave an alibi, the fact that all three had crumbs around their mouths proves they all ate the cookies. Their stories are likely lies or exaggerations, but the physical evidence (crumbs) confirms that all three were involved in eating the missing cookies.