Division worksheet with 12 problems for practicing long division of whole numbers.

Let’s solve each division problem step by step. We’ll divide the big number (dividend) by the smaller number (divisor) and find how many times the divisor fits into the dividend — that’s the quotient. Sometimes there’s a remainder, but since these are whole number problems, we’ll just write the quotient unless told otherwise.

We’ll go one by one:

---

1) 7200 ÷ 68

Let’s estimate:
68 × 100 = 6800 → too low
68 × 105 = 68×100 + 68×5 = 6800 + 340 = 7140
7200 - 7140 = 60 → so 105 with remainder 60
But since we’re doing whole number division and not asked for remainder, maybe they want exact? Wait — let’s check if it divides evenly.

Actually, let’s do long division properly:

68 ) 7200

68 goes into 72 once → 1 × 68 = 68 → subtract from 72 → 4
Bring down 0 → 40
68 doesn’t go into 40 → write 0 in quotient
Bring down next 0 → 400
68 × 5 = 340 → 400 - 340 = 60
So quotient is 105, remainder 60.

But looking at the answer sheet format, it seems to expect just the quotient (whole number part). So 105

Wait — let me double-check with calculator-style math:

7200 ÷ 68 = ?

68 × 105 = 7140 → as above
7200 - 7140 = 60 → yes, so 105 R60 → but since instructions say “Dividing Whole Numbers” and no mention of remainders, perhaps they want integer quotient only → 105

BUT — wait! Maybe I made a mistake. Let me try another way.

Actually, let's compute exactly:

7200 ÷ 68 = 7200 / 68 = simplify fraction: divide numerator and denominator by 4 → 1800 / 17 ≈ 105.88 → so integer part is 105.

Okay, moving on — but let’s hold off finalizing until we see pattern.

Wait — actually, looking at problem 12: 2600 ÷ 40 — that should be easy: 2600 ÷ 40 = 65. And in the bottom right corner, it shows “11-12 [8] [0]” — which might mean answers for 11 and 12 are 8 and 0? That can’t be right.

Wait — look again at bottom right: “1-10 [92] [57] [5] [67] [5] [50] [42] [52] [25] [17]” — that’s probably answers for 1 through 10.

Then “11-12 [8] [0]” — so answer 11 is 8, 12 is 0? But 8360 ÷ 95 can't be 8.

That must be a typo or misprint. Probably those boxes are for something else.

Better to ignore that and calculate correctly.

Let me recalculate all carefully.

---

I think I should just compute each one accurately using long division or mental math.

Let’s list them:

---

1) 7200 ÷ 68

Do 68 × 100 = 6800
7200 - 6800 = 400
68 × 5 = 340 → 400 - 340 = 60
So total 100 + 5 = 105, remainder 60 → quotient = 105

---

2) 2280 ÷ 40

Easy: 2280 ÷ 40 = 228 ÷ 4 = 57 → because divide both by 10 first → 228 ÷ 4 = 57 → so 57

---

3) 2327 ÷ 38

Estimate: 38 × 60 = 2280
2327 - 2280 = 47
38 × 1 = 38 → 47 - 38 = 9 → so 61 with remainder 9 → quotient = 61

Check: 38 × 61 = 38×60 + 38×1 = 2280 + 38 = 2318 → 2327 - 2318 = 9 → yes → 61

---

4) 3899 ÷ 64

64 × 60 = 3840
3899 - 3840 = 59 → less than 64 → so quotient = 60, remainder 59 → so 60

---

5) 1015 ÷ 21

21 × 48 = ?
21 × 50 = 1050 → too big
21 × 48 = 21×50 - 21×2 = 1050 - 42 = 1008
1015 - 1008 = 7 → so quotient = 48

---

6) 4117 ÷ 94

94 × 40 = 3760
4117 - 3760 = 357
94 × 3 = 282 → 357 - 282 = 75 → so 40 + 3 = 43, remainder 75 → quotient = 43

Check: 94 × 43 = 94×40 + 94×3 = 3760 + 282 = 4042 → 4117 - 4042 = 75 → yes → 43

Wait — earlier I thought 43, but let me confirm: 94 × 43 = let's compute: 100×43=4300 minus 6×43=258 → 4300-258=4042 → yes → 4117-4042=75 → so quotient 43.

But wait — is there a better fit? 94 × 44 = 4042 + 94 = 4136 → which is more than 4117 → so yes, 43 is correct.

---

7) 4592 ÷ 41

41 × 100 = 4100
4592 - 4100 = 492
41 × 12 = 492 → exactly!
So 100 + 12 = 112 → 112

Check: 41 × 112 = 41×100 + 41×12 = 4100 + 492 = 4592 → perfect → 112

---

8) 9733 ÷ 76

76 × 100 = 7600
9733 - 7600 = 2133
76 × 28 = ? 76×20=1520, 76×8=608 → 1520+608=2128
2133 - 2128 = 5 → so 100 + 28 = 128, remainder 5 → quotient = 128

Check: 76 × 128 = 76×100 + 76×28 = 7600 + 2128 = 9728 → 9733 - 9728 = 5 → yes → 128

---

9) 6948 ÷ 12

This is easy: 6948 ÷ 12

Divide by 3 first: 6948 ÷ 3 = 2316, then ÷4 = 579? No — better direct.

12 × 500 = 6000
6948 - 6000 = 948
12 × 79 = 948? 12×80=960 → too big, 12×79=12×80 - 12 = 960-12=948 → yes
So 500 + 79 = 579 → 579

Check: 12 × 579 = 12×500=6000, 12×79=948 → total 6948 → perfect → 579

---

10) 5648 ÷ 99

99 × 57 = ? 100×57=5700 minus 1×57=57 → 5700-57=5643
5648 - 5643 = 5 → so quotient = 57

---

11) 8360 ÷ 95

95 × 88 = ? 100×88=8800 minus 5×88=440 → 8800-440=8360 → exactly! → 88

Oh! So 95 × 88 = 8360 → so quotient is 88

Earlier I saw "11-12 [8] [0]" — that must be wrong or for something else. This is clearly 88.

---

12) 2600 ÷ 40

2600 ÷ 40 = 260 ÷ 4 = 65 → 65

Because 40 × 65 = 2600 → yes.

---

Now let’s compile all answers:

1) 105
2) 57
3) 61
4) 60
5) 48
6) 43
7) 112
8) 128
9) 579
10) 57
11) 88
12) 65

Wait — but in the bottom right, it says for 1-10: [92][57][5][67][5][50][42][52][25][17] — that doesn’t match our calculations. For example, problem 2 we got 57, which matches second box. Problem 5 we got 48, but box says 5 — mismatch.

Perhaps those boxes are not answers? Or maybe I miscalculated?

Let me recheck problem 3: 2327 ÷ 38

38 × 61 = 2318, as before, 2327 - 2318 = 9 → so 61 — but box says 5? No.

Problem 6: 4117 ÷ 94 — we got 43, box says 50? Not matching.

Perhaps the boxes are for something else — like page numbers or codes. I should trust my calculation.

Another possibility: maybe the problems are written differently? Let me read the image description again.

In the user input, it's written as:

1) 68 | 7,200 → which means 7200 ÷ 68 — same as I did.

Similarly, 2) 40 | 2,280 → 2280 ÷ 40 = 57 — correct.

3) 38 | 2,327 → 2327 ÷ 38 = 61.289... → integer 61.

But let's check if any divide evenly.

For problem 3: 2327 ÷ 38 — is 2327 divisible by 38? 38=2×19, 2327 ÷ 19 = ? 19×122=2318, 2327-2318=9 — not divisible. So 61 is correct.

Perhaps the answer key in the image is incorrect or for different problems.

I think I should go with accurate math.

Let me verify problem 4: 3899 ÷ 64

64 × 60 = 3840, 3899 - 3840 = 59 — so 60 — but box says 67? No.

Problem 5: 1015 ÷ 21 = 48.333 — we said 48 — box says 5? No.

This is confusing. Perhaps the commas are decimal points? But in US notation, comma is thousand separator.

In some countries, comma is decimal, but here it's likely thousand separator because 7,200 is seven thousand two hundred.

Moreover, problem 12 is 2,600 ÷ 40 = 65 — makes sense.

Another idea: perhaps the vertical bar means something else? But in division worksheets, it's standard for long division setup.

I think my calculations are correct. The boxes at bottom might be distractors or for teacher use.

So I'll stick with:

1) 105
2) 57
3) 61
4) 60
5) 48
6) 43
7) 112
8) 128
9) 579
10) 57
11) 88
12) 65

But let's double-check problem 6: 4117 ÷ 94

94 × 43 = 4042, as before, 4117 - 4042 = 75 — so 43.

Is 94 × 44 = 4136 > 4117 — yes.

Problem 7: 4592 ÷ 41 = 112 — confirmed.

Problem 8: 9733 ÷ 76 = 128.065... — 76×128=9728, 9733-9728=5 — so 128.

Problem 9: 6948 ÷ 12 = 579 — confirmed.

Problem 10: 5648 ÷ 99 = 57.05... — 99×57=5643, 5648-5643=5 — so 57.

Problem 11: 8360 ÷ 95 = 88 — since 95×88=8360 — exact.

Problem 12: 2600 ÷ 40 = 65 — exact.

All seem correct.

Perhaps the answer key at bottom is for a different version or has typos.

I will provide the mathematically correct answers.

Final Answer:
1) 105
2) 57
3) 61
4) 60
5) 48
6) 43
7) 112
8) 128
9) 579
10) 57
11) 88
12) 65