Addition worksheet with no regrouping for three-digit numbers.

Let’s solve each addition problem one by one. Remember, we’re adding numbers with no regrouping, which means in every column (ones, tens, hundreds), the sum will be 9 or less — so no carrying over!

---

First row:

1. 192 + 702
- Ones: 2 + 2 = 4
- Tens: 9 + 0 = 9
- Hundreds: 1 + 7 = 8
→ 894

2. 474 + 222
- Ones: 4 + 2 = 6
- Tens: 7 + 2 = 9
- Hundreds: 4 + 2 = 6
→ 696

3. 526 + 332
- Ones: 6 + 2 = 8
- Tens: 2 + 3 = 5
- Hundreds: 5 + 3 = 8
→ 858

---

Second row:

4. 918 + 361
- Ones: 8 + 1 = 9
- Tens: 1 + 6 = 7
- Hundreds: 9 + 3 = 12 ← Wait! That’s 12? But the worksheet says “No Regrouping”... Hmm. Let me double-check.

Actually, looking again — maybe I misread. The problem is written as:

> 918
> +361

But 9 + 3 = 12 in the hundreds place — that *would* require regrouping. But the title says “Addition With No Regrouping”. So perhaps this is a trick? Or maybe it’s still okay because the student is just supposed to add digit by digit without worrying about carry? Let’s check all problems to see if any actually need regrouping.

Wait — let’s look at the actual digits:

In 918 + 361:
- Ones: 8+1=9 ✔
- Tens: 1+6=7 ✔
- Hundreds: 9+3=12 ✘ → This requires regrouping.

But the worksheet says “With No Regrouping”. Maybe there’s a typo? Or maybe I’m misunderstanding?

Let me check another one: 539 + 540

- Ones: 9+0=9 ✔
- Tens: 3+4=7 ✔
- Hundreds: 5+5=10 ✘ → Also needs regrouping.

Hmm… interesting. It seems like some of these DO require regrouping, even though the title says “No Regrouping”.

Perhaps the title is misleading, or maybe it’s meant to say “Practice Addition” and the “No Regrouping” part is incorrect? Or maybe the student is expected to do them anyway?

Since the user asked to solve the problems accurately, I’ll solve them correctly — including any necessary regrouping — because math must be accurate.

So let’s redo them properly, allowing for regrouping where needed.

---

Let’s go back and solve each correctly:

---

Problem 1: 192 + 702

```
192
+ 702
-----
894 ← Correct, no regrouping needed.
```

✔ Final: 894

---

Problem 2: 474 + 222

```
474
+ 222
-----
696 ← All columns under 10, no regrouping.
```

✔ Final: 696

---

Problem 3: 526 + 332

```
526
+ 332
-----
858 ← All columns under 10.
```

✔ Final: 858

---

Problem 4: 918 + 361

```
918
+ 361
-----
Start from right:
Ones: 8 + 1 = 9
Tens: 1 + 6 = 7
Hundreds: 9 + 3 = 12 → write down 2, carry 1 to thousands
→ So result is 1279? Wait, that can’t be right — 900+300=1200, yes.

Wait — 918 + 361:

Break it down:
900 + 300 = 1200
10 + 60 = 70
8 + 1 = 9
Total: 1200 + 70 + 9 = 1279

But that’s a 4-digit number. Is that acceptable? Yes, mathematically correct.

But let’s verify with standard algorithm:

```
1
918
+ 361
------
1279
```

Yes, correct.

BUT — the worksheet has only 3-digit answers expected? Looking at the layout, all boxes are sized for 3-digit answers. And the title says “No Regrouping”, which suggests they don’t expect carries.

This is confusing.

Wait — let me check the original image description again. The user said: “Addition With No Regrouping”.

Maybe the problems were intended to have no regrouping, but some do? Or perhaps I misread the numbers?

Let me re-express all problems clearly:

From the grid:

Row 1:
- 192 + 702 → 894 ✔
- 474 + 222 → 696 ✔
- 526 + 332 → 858 ✔

Row 2:
- 918 + 361 → Let's calculate: 918 + 361 = 1279 → but that’s 4 digits. Maybe it’s a mistake? Or perhaps it’s 918 + 361 = ? Let me use calculator-style:

918
+361
= 1279 → yes.

But if the worksheet expects 3-digit answers, maybe it’s a different problem? Or perhaps the student is to leave it as is?

Alternatively — could it be that “no regrouping” means we ignore the carry and just write the digit? That would be wrong mathematically, but sometimes worksheets do that for practice.

For example, in 918 + 361, if we do:

Hundreds: 9 + 3 = 12 → write 2 (ignoring the 1) → then answer would be 279? But that’s incorrect.

That doesn’t make sense.

Another possibility: maybe the numbers are misaligned? Let me check the original text:

The user wrote:

```
192 474 526
+ 702 + 222 + 332

918 539 488
+ 361 + 540 + 311

255 665 148
+ 243 + 522 + 431
```

All seem aligned properly.

Let’s try Problem 5: 539 + 540

539
+540
= 1079 → again 4 digits.

Problem 6: 488 + 311 = 799 → that’s fine.

Problem 7: 255 + 243 = 498 → fine.

Problem 8: 665 + 522 = 1187 → 4 digits.

Problem 9: 148 + 431 = 579 → fine.

So several problems result in 4-digit sums.

Given that, and since the instruction is to solve accurately, I will provide the correct mathematical answers, even if they are 4-digit numbers.

Perhaps the “No Regrouping” title is a mistake, or it refers to something else.

To be safe, I’ll solve each correctly.

---

Let’s list all nine problems with correct solutions:

1. 192 + 702 = 894
2. 474 + 222 = 696
3. 526 + 332 = 858
4. 918 + 361 = 1279
5. 539 + 540 = 1079
6. 488 + 311 = 799
7. 255 + 243 = 498
8. 665 + 522 = 1187
9. 148 + 431 = 579

Now, to confirm, let’s verify a couple:

- 918 + 361: 900+300=1200, 18+61=79, total 1279 ✔
- 539 + 540: 500+500=1000, 39+40=79, total 1079 ✔
- 665 + 522: 600+500=1100, 65+22=87, total 1187 ✔

All correct.

Even though the worksheet says “No Regrouping”, the actual problems require regrouping in some cases. Since the task is to solve accurately, I’ll go with the correct sums.

Final Answer:
894, 696, 858, 1279, 1079, 799, 498, 1187, 579