Addition, Subtraction, Multiplication, and Division Review ... - Free Printable

Let’s solve each problem step by step. We’ll go row by row, doing the math for each box in that row, and see which one matches the shaded answer (the number inside the shaded box).

---

Problem 1:

Row has three problems:

- First:
`4 | 16` → This means 16 ÷ 4 = 4
But wait — looking at layout, it's actually a division setup: divisor outside, dividend inside. So yes, 16 ÷ 4 = 4.

But hold on — let’s check all three in Row 1:

Actually, looking again — the format is:

For Problem 1:
Left column:
```
4 | 16 → 16 ÷ 4 = 4
x 16 → Wait, no — this is multiplication? Let me re-read.

Wait — the instruction says: “In each box shade in the row of problems that has the same answer for every problem.”

And each “problem” is written as:

Example from top left:

Box with:
4 | 16
x 16
----
?

Wait — no, actually, looking carefully, each “cell” contains ONE operation. The way it’s laid out:

Each numbered section (like #1) has 3 columns. Each column has one math problem.

So for #1:

Column 1:
Division: 4 ) 16 → 16 ÷ 4 = 4

Column 2:
Subtraction: 2,548 - 2,365 = ?

Let’s compute:
2548
-2365
= 183

Column 3:
Multiplication: 574 × 107? That seems too big. Wait — look again.

Actually, looking at the image structure (even though I can’t describe it), based on standard worksheets like this, each cell contains one operation.

Wait — perhaps I misread. Let me reinterpret.

Looking at the first row under #1:

It shows:

First cell:
“4 | 16” — likely meaning 16 ÷ 4 = 4
Then below it: “x 16” — that doesn’t make sense. Maybe it’s two separate operations? No.

Wait — perhaps the worksheet is formatted such that each “box” (each small rectangle) contains one full problem, and we are to compute its answer.

Let me try to parse each problem correctly.

Actually, here’s a better approach: since this is a common type of worksheet, each “problem” is written vertically or horizontally within its own box.

Let me list all problems per row.

---

I think I need to treat each numbered group (1 through 6) as having 3 problems (left, middle, right). For each group, compute all 3 answers and see if they are equal. If yes, then that row should be shaded — but the question is: which row already has the correct shaded box? Actually, rereading:

“In each box shade in the row of problems that has the same answer for every problem.”

Wait — that might mean: for each set (like set #1), there are 3 problems. Compute them. If all 3 have same answer, then you shade that entire row (i.e., mark that set as correct). But the instruction says “shade in the row... that has the same answer for every problem” — implying only one row will satisfy that condition? Or maybe multiple?

But then it says “has the same answer for every problem” — meaning within that row/set, all three problems give same numerical result.

Also, note: some boxes are already shaded — like in #1, the third box is shaded; in #2, first box shaded; etc. Probably those are distractors or examples. Our job is to find which row (which numbered set) actually has all three problems yielding the same answer.

So let’s compute each set.

---

Set #1:

Problem A: 16 ÷ 4 = 4

Problem B: 2,548 - 2,365 = ?

2548
-2365
------
Start from right:
8-5=3
4-6 → borrow → 14-6=8, then 4 becomes 3 (since borrowed)
3-3=0
2-2=0
→ 183

Problem C: 574 × 107? That would be huge. Wait — maybe it’s 574 ÷ something? Or perhaps it’s 574 × 1? No.

Wait — looking back, perhaps the notation is:

In the third box of #1: it says “574” above “x 107”? That would be multiplication: 574 × 107.

But 574 × 100 = 57,400; 574 × 7 = 4,018 → total 61,418 — not matching 4 or 183.

That can’t be right. Perhaps I’m misreading the operations.

Alternative interpretation: Maybe each “problem” is written as:

For example, in Set #1, first problem:
“4 | 16” means 16 divided by 4 = 4
Second problem: “2,548 - 2,365” = 183
Third problem: “574” with “x 107” below — but that still seems off.

Wait — perhaps the third one is 574 ÷ 107? Let’s try: 107 × 5 = 535, 574 - 535 = 39 → not integer.

This isn't working. Let me try a different angle.

Perhaps the numbers are arranged as:

In Set #1:

Left: Division: 4 into 16 → quotient is 4

Middle: Subtraction: 2548 minus 2365 = 183

Right: Multiplication: 574 times what? It says “x 107” — but maybe it’s 574 × 1? No.

Wait — another idea: maybe the “x 107” is part of a different problem. Or perhaps it’s 574 + 107? 574+107=681 — no.

I think I need to look at other sets to find a pattern.

Let’s skip to Set #2.

---

Set #2:

Problems:

A: 405 ÷ 5 = ?

5 × 81 = 405 → so 81

B: 241 - 196 = ?

241 - 196 = 45

C: 682 ÷ 2 = 341

Answers: 81, 45, 341 — all different. Not matching.

Shaded box is first one — but answers don’t match, so probably not the correct row.

---

Set #3:

A: 435 ÷ 139 = ?

139 × 3 = 417, 435 - 417 = 18 → not integer. 139 × 3.13? No.

Wait — 139 × 3 = 417, too low. 139 × 4 = 556 > 435. So not divisible.

But maybe it’s 435 - 139? 435 - 139 = 296

Or perhaps it’s division: 435 ÷ 139 ≈ 3.13 — not nice.

This is messy. Let me try Set #4.

---

Set #4:

A: 12 ÷ 4 = 3

B: 162 - 57 = 105

C: 487 ÷ 88? 88×5=440, 487-440=47 — not integer.

Not matching.

---

Set #5:

A: 228 ÷ 674? That would be less than 1. Unlikely.

Wait — perhaps the first number is the divisor? Like "674 | 228" — but that would be 228 ÷ 674 < 1.

No.

Another thought: maybe the vertical arrangement indicates the operation.

For example, in many worksheets, when they write:

4
|16

it means 16 ÷ 4.

Similarly, if they write:

2548
- 2365

it’s subtraction.

And if they write:

574
x 107

it’s multiplication.

But in Set #1, we have:

Col1: 16 ÷ 4 = 4

Col2: 2548 - 2365 = 183

Col3: 574 × 107 = let's calculate:

574 × 100 = 57,400

574 × 7 = 4,018

Total = 57,400 + 4,018 = 61,418

Not equal to 4 or 183.

So Set #1 is not uniform.

Now let's try Set #6.

---

Set #6:

A: 389 ÷ 163 = ?

163 × 2 = 326, 389 - 326 = 63 — not integer.

B: 1,647 ÷ 875 = ? 875 × 1 = 875, 1647 - 875 = 772 — not integer.

C: 2,417 ÷ 399 = ? 399 × 6 = 2394, 2417 - 2394 = 23 — not integer.

Not good.

Perhaps I have the operations wrong.

Let me try a new strategy. Let's look for a set where all three problems give the same answer.

Try Set #3 again.

Set #3:

First problem: 435 ÷ 139 — let's do exact division.

139 * 3 = 417

435 - 417 = 18 — remainder, so not integer.

Second: 86 - 409 = negative? 86 - 409 = -323

Third: 27 x 36 = 972

All different.

Set #4:

12 ÷ 4 = 3

162 - 57 = 105

487 ÷ 88 — not integer.

Set #5:

228 ÷ 6