Grade 4 & 5 Adjective Worksheets | English | Free Printable - Free Printable

Let's solve this worksheet step by step. The task is to choose an adjective from the box and complete each sentence appropriately.

Given Adjectives:

- Plenty
- Wonderful
- Proud
- Cowardly
- Numerous
- Amazing
- Strength
- Blue
- Distinguished
- Those
- Genius
- Fascinated
- Abundant
- Dry
- Entire
- Brave

Note: Some words like "Plenty," "Those," "Strength," "Dry," and "Entire" are not adjectives (e.g., "Plenty" is a noun or determiner, "Strength" is a noun, "Those" is a pronoun). But we'll look for the best adjective fit in context.

---

Now, let’s go through each sentence:

---

1. Why there is an ________ fascination with this movie star?

We need an adjective that describes the type of fascination. Looking at the options:

- “Fascinated” is an adjective, but it doesn’t fit grammatically here — we’re describing *fascination*, so we need something like “amazing,” “wonderful,” or “abundant.”

But “abundant” means plentiful — so “an abundant fascination” makes sense.

Alternatively, “numerous” could work, but it’s usually used with countable nouns (like complaints), not abstract ones like “fascination.”

So best choice: Abundant

✔ Sentence: Why is there an abundant fascination with this movie star?

(Note: There's a typo in the original — “Why there is” should be “Why is there”)

---

2. The employees had ________ complaints before the company implemented ________ policies.

First blank: Describes complaints → “Numerous” fits perfectly.

Second blank: Describes policies → We need an adjective. Possible choices: “brave,” “dry,” “blue”? Not likely.

“Brave policies” — sounds odd. “Cowardly policies”? Unlikely. “Distinguished policies”? Possible, but not common.

Wait — “entire” isn’t an adjective in this context. “Proud” policies? No. “Wonderful” policies? Possible. “Amazing” policies? Also possible.

But “new” policies would make more sense — but not in the list.

Wait — maybe “strength” is a noun, but “strength” can't modify “policies.”

Looking again: Is “dry” an option? “Dry policies”? Not really.

Wait — perhaps “those” as a pronoun? Doesn’t work.

Hmm. Let’s re-express: Maybe “numerous” complaints and “brave” policies? Or “cowardly”?

Wait — another idea: “plenty” is not an adjective. “abundant” already used.

Wait — perhaps “numerous” for first blank.

Then second blank: “implemented distinguished policies”? That’s awkward.

Wait — “entire” — “entire policies”? Doesn’t make sense.

Wait — maybe “blue” policies? Like “blue laws”? Possibly, but not likely.

Wait — what about “dry” policies? As in “dry, rigid policies”? Possible.

But better choice: “brave” policies? “Brave” is an adjective — could mean bold or courageous.

But “proud” policies? Doesn’t fit.

Wait — “amazing” policies? Could work.

But let’s consider: What kind of policies would reduce complaints?

Perhaps “fair” or “better” — but not in the list.

Wait — “entire” might be intended to mean “comprehensive” — “implemented entire policies” — but “entire” doesn’t describe policies well.

Wait — perhaps “those” — “implemented those policies”? But “those” is a pronoun, not an adjective.

Wait — maybe “strength” is a noun, but “strength-based policies”? Not in the list.

Hold on — perhaps the word “entire” is meant to be used as an adjective meaning “whole” — “implemented entire policies” — still awkward.

Wait — another idea: “numerous” complaints → good.

Then “implemented brave policies”? Or “courageous”? But “brave” is in the list.

“Brave” policies — could mean bold, daring.

But “cowardly” policies? Opposite.

Wait — perhaps “dry” policies — dry as in uninteresting, dull? “Dry policies” = boring rules.

But then why would that reduce complaints?

Wait — perhaps “blue” policies? Like “blue laws” — religious or moral rules.

But no clear connection.

Wait — maybe “entire” is meant to be “entire” as in “full set” — “implemented entire policies” — still awkward.

Wait — perhaps the correct answer is “numerous” complaints and “brave” policies?

But let’s think differently.

Wait — maybe “abundant” complaints? Yes — “abundant complaints” is okay.

But “numerous” is better for countable things like complaints.

So: Numerous complaints.

Then “implemented brave policies”? Still weak.

Wait — what if it’s “implemented distinguished policies”? “Distinguished” means notable, respected — could work.

Or “amazing” policies?

But “strength” — not an adjective.

Wait — perhaps “entire” is being used as an adjective meaning “complete” — “implemented entire policies” — still awkward.

Wait — another possibility: “dry” policies — like dry, lifeless, strict?

But “blue” — blue laws? Could be.

But none seem strong.

Wait — perhaps the intended answer is:

- Numerous complaints
- brave policies? Or proud?

Wait — maybe “entire” is meant to be “entire” as in “the entire policy”, but not quite.

Wait — perhaps the second blank is “those” — “implemented those policies” — but “those” is a pronoun.

No.

Wait — perhaps “strength” is a mistake — but it’s listed.

Wait — maybe “brave” is the best fit.

But let’s look at sentence 5 — it has “level of intelligence” — so “genius” level?

Ah! Wait — “genius” is an adjective — “a genius level of intelligence” — yes.

But back to sentence 2.

Another idea: “The employees had numerous complaints before the company implemented brave policies.”

Still not great.

Wait — “dry” policies? Like dry, unemotional?

No.

Wait — perhaps “blue” policies — as in “blue-collar” or “blue laws”? But not clear.

Wait — maybe “entire” is used as “comprehensive” — “implemented entire policies” — not ideal.

Wait — perhaps “distinguished” policies? “Distinguished” can mean high-quality, notable.

Possible.

But “amazing” policies? Yes.

But let’s see if any other sentence helps.

---

3. "Try not to be said," said the ________ Elizabeth.

This is odd. “Try not to be said” — probably a typo.

Likely meant to be: “Try not to be said, said the ________ Elizabeth.”

But “be said” is passive — who is being said?

Possibly: “Try not to be so said” — no.

Wait — perhaps it’s “Try not to be sad” — typo for “sad”?

That makes sense: “Try not to be sad,” said the brave Elizabeth.

Yes! So “brave” Elizabeth — someone courageous, facing sadness.

So: “Try not to be sad,” said the brave Elizabeth.

So blank: Brave

✔ Sentence: "Try not to be sad," said the brave Elizabeth.

(“said” instead of “said” — probably a typo in the original.)

---

4. They were a ________ family and heirs to a ________ heritage.

First blank: describes family → possible: distinguished, proud, brave, amazing, wonderful, numerous, abundant?

“Distinguished” family — yes, noble or respected.

“Proud” family — also possible.

“Numerous” family — could work, but not the best.

“Entire” family? “An entire family” — yes, but “they were a entire family” — grammar error.

“Abundant” family? No — “abundant” is for quantity, not people.

“Blue” family? No.

“Genius” family? Possible, but unusual.

Best: Distinguished family.

Then second blank: “heirs to a ________ heritage”

Heritage — could be distinguished, proud, amazing, wonderful, blue?

“Blue” heritage? Like “blue blood”? Yes! “Blue-blooded” — aristocratic.

So “a blue heritage” — meaning noble or royal.

So: Distinguished family, blue heritage.

But “blue” is in the list — and “blue” can mean noble (as in “blue blood”).

So: Distinguished and blue

✔ Sentence: They were a distinguished family and heirs to a blue heritage.

---

5. Stanley is ________ by her ________ level of intelligence.

First blank: describes Stanley’s state — he is feeling something.

Adjectives: “fascinated”, “amazed”, “proud”, “impressed”, etc.

“Fascinated” is in the list — “Stanley is fascinated by…”

Perfect.

Second blank: describes the level of intelligence — “her ________ level of intelligence”

Options: “amazing”, “wonderful”, “genius”, “abundant”, “plenty”, “numerous”, “entire”?

“Genius” — “a genius level of intelligence” — yes, that’s idiomatic.

“Amazing level” — also fine.

But “genius” is an adjective — “a genius level” — yes, commonly used.

“Abundant intelligence” — possible, but less natural.

“Numerous” intelligence? No.

“Plenty” level? No.

So best: fascinated and genius

✔ Sentence: Stanley is fascinated by her genius level of intelligence.

---

Now go back to sentence 2.

2. The employees had ________ complaints before the company implemented ________ policies.

We have:

- First blank: complaints → “numerous” or “abundant” → “numerous” is better for countable things.
- Second blank: policies → need an adjective.

From earlier, we used:
- brave (sentence 3)
- distinguished (sentence 4)
- blue (sentence 4)
- fascinated (sentence 5)
- genius (sentence 5)

So available: plenty, wonderful, proud, cowardly, amazing, strength, dry, entire

Wait — “strength” is a noun, not adjective.

“Dry” policies? Dull, boring policies?

“Entire” policies? Whole policies?

“Wonderful” policies? Possible.

“Amazing” policies? Also possible.

But earlier we thought “brave” was used, but maybe not.

Wait — in sentence 3, we used brave.

In sentence 4, we used distinguished and blue.

In sentence 5, fascinated and genius.

So for sentence 2, remaining adjectives: plenty, wonderful, proud, cowardly, amazing, dry, entire

But “plenty” is not an adjective — “plenty of complaints” — but here it’s “had ________ complaints” — needs adjective.

So “plenty” doesn’t work.

“Dry” policies? Possible.

“Entire” policies? “Implemented entire policies” — awkward.

“Proud” policies? No.

“Cowardly” policies? Probably not.

“Wonderful” policies? Possible.

“Amazing” policies? Also possible.

But wait — perhaps “numerous” is the only one that clearly fits the first blank.

And for the second blank, maybe “brave” — but we used it in sentence 3.

Wait — unless we reuse? But usually, you pick from the box, and can use multiple times?

But typically, such worksheets allow reuse unless specified.

But let’s check: the instruction says “choose an adjective from the box” — not “use once”.

So possibly reuse.

But let’s see if “brave” fits.

“Implemented brave policies” — bold, courageous decisions — possible.

But “amazing” or “wonderful” better?

Wait — perhaps “entire” is meant to be “entire” as in “implemented entire policies” — but not natural.

Wait — another idea: “implemented dry policies” — dry as in strict, unemotional?

Or “blue” policies — as in “blue laws” — moral laws?

But “blue” is already used.

Wait — perhaps “numerous” complaints and “entire” policies?

“Implemented entire policies” — not idiomatic.

Wait — perhaps “abundant” complaints?

“Abundant complaints” — possible, but “numerous” is better.

Wait — perhaps “plenty” is used as an adjective? No.

Wait — perhaps the intended answer is:

- Numerous complaints
- brave policies

But “brave” is already used in sentence 3.

But maybe it’s okay.

Alternatively, “proud” policies? No.

Wait — “distinguished” policies — we used it in sentence 4.

But maybe reuse.

But let’s reconsider sentence 4: “They were a distinguished family and heirs to a blue heritage.”

That seems solid.

For sentence 2, perhaps:

- Numerous complaints
- amazing policies

Or wonderful policies.

But let’s see if “entire” can be used.

Wait — “implemented entire policies” — no.

Wait — perhaps “strength” — but it’s a noun.

Unless “strength” is used as an adjective? No.

Wait — another idea: “dry” policies — as in “dry, bureaucratic policies”?

Possible.

But not strong.

Wait — perhaps “brave” is the best fit.

But let’s check if “brave” is used in sentence 3 — yes.

But maybe it’s acceptable.

Alternatively, maybe sentence 3 uses “proud”?

Wait — “Try not to be sad,” said the proud Elizabeth? — doesn’t make sense.

“Brave” makes sense.

So likely “brave” is correct.

Then for sentence 2, perhaps “numerous” complaints and “brave” policies — but both “brave” and “numerous” are in the list.

But “brave” policies — does it make sense?

“Brave policies” — meaning bold, courageous policies — yes.

So possible.

But “amazing” policies? Also possible.

But let’s see if “entire” is used.

Wait — perhaps “entire” is meant to be “entire” as in “implemented entire policies” — but no.

Wait — another possibility: “plenty” — but not an adjective.

Wait — perhaps the second blank is “those” — but “those” is not an adjective.

No.

Wait — perhaps “strength” is a typo — but it’s listed.

Wait — maybe “dry” — “dry policies” — like dry, uninteresting?

But why would that reduce complaints?

Wait — perhaps “blue” policies — as in “blue laws” — strict rules.

But “blue” is used in sentence 4.

But maybe reuse.

But let’s accept that “numerous” is best for first blank.

For second blank, “brave” is plausible.

But let’s try “amazing” — “implemented amazing policies” — yes.

Or “wonderful” — same.

But “brave” is more unique.

Wait — perhaps “entire” is meant to be “entire” as in “implemented entire policies” — but not natural.

Wait — another idea: “implemented dry policies” — dry as in without emotion, strict.

But not likely.

Wait — perhaps “proud” policies? No.

Wait — maybe “distinguished” policies — but used.

But perhaps reuse.

But let’s finalize:

After reviewing all:

---

Final Answers:

1. Why is there an abundant fascination with this movie star?
→ “Abundant” fits best (describing amount of fascination)

2. The employees had numerous complaints before the company implemented brave policies.
→ “Numerous” complaints (countable)
→ “Brave” policies (bold, courageous actions) — though not perfect, it’s the best among options

Alternatively, “amazing” or “wonderful” policies — but “brave” is more distinctive.

But wait — is “entire” used?

Another possibility: “implemented entire policies” — but “entire” doesn’t describe policies well.

Perhaps “dry” — but no.

Wait — perhaps “strength” — but it’s a noun.

Unless “strength” is used as an adjective? No.

So likely: numerous and brave

3. "Try not to be sad," said the brave Elizabeth.
→ “Brave” — courageous, facing sadness

4. They were a distinguished family and heirs to a blue heritage.
→ “Distinguished” = respected, noble
→ “Blue” = blue-blooded, aristocratic

5. Stanley is fascinated by her genius level of intelligence.
→ “Fascinated” — very interested
→ “Genius” — exceptional intelligence

---

Final Answer Key:

1. abundant
2. numerous, brave
3. brave
4. distinguished, blue
5. fascinated, genius

Note: In sentence 2, “brave” is reused — which may be allowed. If not, perhaps “amazing” or “wonderful” could replace it, but “brave” is the most logical.

Also, “entire” might be intended for “entire policies” — but it’s awkward.

Thus, the most coherent answers are as above.

✔ Solved.