Grade 4 & 5 Adjective Worksheets | English | Free Printable - Free Printable

Let's solve this worksheet step by step. The task is to choose an adjective from the box and complete each sentence appropriately.

Given Adjectives:

- Plenty
- Wonderful
- Proud
- Cowardly
- Numerous
- Amazing
- Strength
- Blue
- Distinguished
- Those
- Genius
- Fascinated
- Abundant
- Dry
- Entire
- Brave

Note: Some words like "Plenty," "Those," "Strength," "Entire," and "Dry" are not adjectives (e.g., "Plenty" is a noun or determiner, "Strength" is a noun, "Those" is a pronoun). But in context, we’ll focus on adjective usage. Let’s analyze each sentence carefully.

---

Sentence 1:

> 1. Why there is an ________ fascination with this movie star?

We need an adjective that describes the type of fascination. Looking at the list, "abundant" fits well:
- "An abundant fascination" means a large amount of fascination.

But let’s check alternatives:
- "Fascinated" is an adjective, but it would be “a fascinated fascination” — incorrect.
- "Numerous" is for countable things; "fascination" is uncountable.
- "Amazing" could work: “an amazing fascination” — possible, but less natural than "abundant".
- "Plenty" isn't an adjective here.

✔ Best choice: Abundant
> Why is there an abundant fascination with this movie star?
(Note: There's a typo — "Why there is" should be "Why is there")

---

Sentence 2:

> 2. The employees had ________ complaints before the company implemented ________ policies.

We need two adjectives:
- First blank: describe complaints → likely numerous or plenty? But "plenty" isn’t an adjective.
- "Numerous" = many → perfect fit.
- Second blank: describe policies → what kind?
- From the list: brave, blue, dry, wonderful, strength (not adjective), etc.
- "Brave" policies? Not typical.
- "Blue" policies? Unlikely.
- "Wonderful"? Possible, but maybe too vague.
- "Proud"? No.
- "Cowardly"? Maybe — if they were weak policies?
- "Distinguished"? Could mean respected, but odd.
- Wait — "entire"? "Entire policies"? Doesn’t make sense.
- "Dry"? As in "dry policy"? Possibly bureaucratic, but not ideal.

Wait — perhaps "numerous" and "strong"? But "strength" is not an adjective.

Wait — "strength" is a noun. So no.

But look: "amazing"? "Amazing policies"? Possible.

Alternatively, consider "cowardly" policies — if they were weak, maybe.

But better: "numerous" complaints + "brave" policies? That could work.

But let’s think: people had many complaints, so numerous fits.

Then, the company implemented policies — what kind? Perhaps brave or courageous? But "brave" is in the list.

"Brave policies" is awkward.

Wait — "entire"? "Implemented entire policies"? No.

Another idea: "blue"? "Blue policies"? No.

Wait — "dry"? "Dry policies"? Like dry as dust? Bureaucratic?

But perhaps the intended answer is:

- Numerous complaints
- Brave policies?

But that seems odd.

Wait — perhaps "plenty" is used as an adjective? No, it’s not.

Wait — maybe "abundant"? "Abundant complaints"? Yes, possible.

But "numerous" is better.

But both numerous and abundant are available.

Now, second blank: perhaps "wonderful" policies?

That makes sense: "implemented wonderful policies"

So:
> The employees had numerous complaints before the company implemented wonderful policies.

That sounds good.

Or: abundant complaints + amazing policies?

But "abundant complaints" is okay, but "numerous" is more common.

Also, "abundant" is usually used with uncountable nouns — "abundant water", but "complaints" is countable → so numerous is better.

So:
- Numerous complaints
- Wonderful policies

✔ Final:
> The employees had numerous complaints before the company implemented wonderful policies.

---

Sentence 3:

> 3. "Try not to be said," said the ________ Elizabeth.

This is tricky. "Try not to be said" — that doesn’t make sense.

Wait — probably a typo. Should be:
> "Try not to be said" → likely meant to be "sad"?

Yes! Probably:
> "Try not to be sad," said the ________ Elizabeth.

Now, we need an adjective describing Elizabeth.

From the list: proud, distinguished, brave, fascinated, genius, cowardly, blue, etc.

But "blue" can mean sad — as in "feeling blue".

Ah! "Blue" = sad.

So:
> "Try not to be sad," said the blue Elizabeth.

Perfect.

✔ Answer: Blue

---

Sentence 4:

> 4. They were a ________ family and heirs to a ________ heritage.

First blank: describe the family → options: distinguished, proud, brave, entire, numerous, etc.

"Distinguished" family — yes, very common.

"Proud" family — also possible.

"Genius" family? Not really.

"Brave" family? Possible, but less common.

Second blank: heritage → what kind?

"Heritage" is often described as rich, amazing, wonderful, abundant, distinguished, entire, etc.

But "entire heritage"? Not quite.

"Abundant heritage"? Possible.

"Amazng heritage"? Yes.

But best fit: distinguished family and distinguished heritage?

But only one "distinguished" in the list.

Wait — "distinguished" is only once.

But look: "entire" — "entire heritage"? Possible.

"Abundant heritage"? Okay.

But "distinguished" is best for family.

For heritage: "distinguished" might be repeated, but we can't use twice.

Alternative: "proud" family and "proud" heritage? No, "proud heritage" is odd.

"Brave" family and "brave" heritage? No.

"Numerous" family? Possible, but not elegant.

"Plenty" — not adjective.

Wait — "amazing" heritage? Yes.

But "amazing" is already used.

Wait — "entire" heritage? "Heirs to an entire heritage"? Sounds odd.

Better: "distinguished" family and "abundant" heritage?

"Abundant heritage" — possible, but not standard.

"Numerous" heritage? No.

Wait — "wonderful" heritage? Yes.

But we used "wonderful" earlier.

Let’s see: the word "entire" — maybe it’s meant to be used?

"Entire heritage" — means complete heritage — possible.

But "distinguished" is stronger.

Wait — another idea: "proud" family and "proud" heritage? Still awkward.

Wait — "distinguished" family and "distinguished" heritage? But only one copy.

No.

Perhaps: "distinguished" family and "abundant" heritage?

"Abundant" is in the list.

"Abundant heritage" = rich heritage — acceptable.

But better: "distinguished" family and "amazing" heritage?

But "amazing" was used.

Wait — "blue"? No.

Wait — "genius"? "A genius family"? No.

Wait — "those"? No.

Wait — "entire"? "A distinguished family and heirs to an entire heritage" — "entire" = whole, complete.

That could work.

But "entire heritage" is acceptable.

But "distinguished" is better for family.

Wait — is there a word missing?

Wait — "proud" family and "proud" heritage? Still odd.

Wait — perhaps "distinguished" and "entire"?

But "entire heritage" is acceptable.

But better: "distinguished" family and "abundant" heritage?

"Abundant" = plentiful, which fits heritage.

But "abundant" is used.

Wait — "numerous" family? "A numerous family" = big family — possible.

But "heirs to a numerous heritage"? No.

"Numerous" applies to countable things.

"Heritage" is uncountable.

So "abundant heritage" is better.

But "abundant" is an adjective — yes.

So:

> They were a distinguished family and heirs to an abundant heritage.

That works.

Alternatively: "proud" family and "amazing" heritage?

But let’s go with distinguished and abundant.

But wait — "abundant" is used in sentence 1.

But we can reuse? The instruction says "choose an adjective from the box" — doesn't say use once only.

So reuse is allowed.

But let’s see if there’s a better fit.

Wait — "entire" — "heirs to an entire heritage" — means they inherited the full heritage — plausible.

But "distinguished" is stronger.

Alternatively: "distinguished" family and "entire" heritage.

That’s possible.

But I think "distinguished" and "abundant" is better.

But let’s look again.

Wait — "entire" is in the list — could be used.

But "abundant" is better for heritage.

Final decision:
> They were a distinguished family and heirs to an abundant heritage.

✔

---

Sentence 5:

> 5. Stanley is ________ by her ________ level of intelligence.

First blank: how is Stanley affected? He is fascinated by her intelligence.

"Fascinated" is in the list — yes.

Second blank: describe the level of intelligence → what kind?

"Genius" level? "Genius" is an adjective? Yes, "a genius level" — but usually "genius-level" or "genius".

But "genius" can be used as an adjective: "a genius student".

So "her genius level of intelligence" — a bit awkward.

Better: "her amazing level of intelligence" — yes.

"Her wonderful level" — possible.

"Her abundant level" — no.

"Her plenty level" — no.

"Her numerous level" — no.

"Her entire level" — no.

"Her brave level" — no.

"Her proud level" — no.

"Her distinguished level" — no.

"Her blue level" — no.

So best: amazing or wonderful.

But "amazing" is more natural.

So:
> Stanley is fascinated by her amazing level of intelligence.

Perfect.

✔

---

Final Answers:

1. Why is there an abundant fascination with this movie star?
2. The employees had numerous complaints before the company implemented wonderful policies.
3. "Try not to be sad," said the blue Elizabeth.
4. They were a distinguished family and heirs to an abundant heritage.
5. Stanley is fascinated by her amazing level of intelligence.

---

Note:

- Sentence 1 has a typo: "Why there is" → should be "Why is there"
- Sentence 3: "be said" → likely "be sad"
- Reuse of adjectives is allowed unless specified otherwise.

All answers use adjectives from the box.

✔ Complete solution.