Free. Exclusive. Just for you.
Four unique services that make learning easier, faster, and smarter - only on our website.

Piecewise functions worksheet with three problems to graph and evaluate.

Worksheet 1.8 homework on piecewise functions with three problems requiring graphing and evaluation of functions with different conditions for x values.

Worksheet 1.8 homework on piecewise functions with three problems requiring graphing and evaluation of functions with different conditions for x values.

JPG 768×1024 84.6 KB Free · Personal Use
Quality Assured by Worksheets Library Team
Reviewed for educational accuracy and age-appropriateness
ID: #451937
⭐
Show Answer Key & Explanations Step-by-step solution for: Piecewise Function Worksheet PDF | PDF
▼
Let’s solve each problem step by step.

---

Problem 1:

Function:
f(x) = { 2x + 3, if x < 0
{ 3 - x, if x ≥ 0

We need to evaluate:
- f(0): Since 0 ≥ 0, use the second part → 3 - 0 = 3
- f(-3): Since -3 < 0, use the first part → 2*(-3) + 3 = -6 + 3 = -3
- f(2): Since 2 ≥ 0, use the second part → 3 - 2 = 1

✔ All correct.

---

Problem 2:

Function:
f(x) = { x + 3, if x ≤ 0
{ 3, if 0 < x ≤ 2
{ 2x - 1, if x > 2

Evaluate:
- f(-1): Since -1 ≤ 0 → -1 + 3 = 2
- f(1): Since 0 < 1 ≤ 2 → use middle piece → 3

✔ Correct.

---

Problem 3:

Function:
f(x) = { 3x + 5, if x ≤ -2
{ x - 4, if x > 2

Note: There is a gap between x = -2 and x = 2 — no definition for -2 < x ≤ 2. But we’re only asked to evaluate at points that are defined.

Evaluate:
- f(2): Wait! The function says “if x > 2” for the second piece. So x=2 is NOT covered? Let’s check again.

Actually, looking back:

Original problem 3:
f(x) = { 3x + 5, x ≤ -2
{ x - 4, x > 2

So what about x = 2? It’s not in either condition. That means f(2) is undefined? But the worksheet asks to evaluate it — maybe there’s a typo?

Wait — let me double-check the image description you gave. You wrote:

> 3. f(x) = {3x + 5, x ≤ -2
> { x - 4, x > 2

But then it asks to evaluate f(2), f(-3), f(0).

f(-3): -3 ≤ -2 → 3*(-3)+5 = -9+5 = -4

f(0): 0 is not ≤ -2 and not > 2 → so technically undefined? But perhaps the problem meant to include x > -2 or something else? Or maybe it's a trick?

Wait — maybe I misread. Let me re-express:

The function is only defined for x ≤ -2 OR x > 2. So:

- f(2): 2 is not > 2 → undefined? But the worksheet expects an answer. Hmm.

Perhaps there’s a mistake in how I’m reading. Maybe the second piece is supposed to be x ≥ 2? But as written, it’s x > 2.

Alternatively, maybe the student is expected to realize that f(2) is not defined? But that seems unlikely for this level.

Wait — let’s look again at your original text:

You wrote:

> 3. f(x) = {3x + 5, x ≤ -2
> { x - 4, x > 2

And then:

> Evaluate the following:
> f(2) =
> f(-3) =
> f(0) =

This is problematic because neither piece covers x=2 or x=0.

But perhaps in the actual image, the second piece was meant to be x ≥ 2? Or maybe it’s x > -2? Without seeing the image, I have to go by what’s written.

However, since this is a homework worksheet and they’re asking to evaluate these, likely there’s a typo in transcription.

Looking at common patterns, often piecewise functions cover all real numbers. Here, between -2 and 2 (inclusive of 2?), it’s missing.

But wait — maybe the second piece is actually for x > -2? That would make more sense.

Alternatively, perhaps the second piece is x ≥ 2? Then f(2) = 2 - 4 = -2.

Given that the worksheet includes f(2) and f(0), and assuming it’s solvable, I think there might be a transcription error.

But since you provided the text as:

“3. f(x) = {3x + 5, x ≤ -2
{ x - 4, x > 2”

Then strictly speaking:

- f(2): undefined (since 2 is not > 2)
- f(-3): 3*(-3)+5 = -4
- f(0): undefined

But that can’t be right for a standard homework.

Wait — perhaps the second piece is meant to be x ≥ -2? No, that doesn't fit.

Another possibility: maybe the second piece is for x > -2? Then:

If f(x) = { 3x+5, x≤-2
{ x-4, x>-2 }

Then:

f(2) = 2-4 = -2
f(-3) = 3*(-3)+5 = -4
f(0) = 0-4 = -4

That makes sense and covers all values.

I suspect the original problem had a typo in your transcription, and the second piece should be for x > -2, not x > 2.

Because otherwise, f(0) and f(2) are undefined, which is unusual for such worksheets.

Given context, I’ll assume it’s a typo and the second piece is for x > -2.

So revising:

Assume:
f(x) = { 3x + 5, x ≤ -2
{ x - 4, x > -2 }

Then:

- f(2) = 2 - 4 = -2
- f(-3) = 3*(-3) + 5 = -9 + 5 = -4
- f(0) = 0 - 4 = -4

This is consistent and likely what was intended.

---

Final Answers:

Problem 1:
f(0) = 3
f(-3) = -3
f(2) = 1

Problem 2:
f(-1) = 2
f(1) = 3

Problem 3 (assuming correction):
f(2) = -2
f(-3) = -4
f(0) = -4

But to match exactly what was written, if we take literally:

Problem 3 as written has gaps, but since the worksheet asks for answers, I'll go with the corrected version.

---

Final Answer:

1. f(0) = 3, f(-3) = -3, f(2) = 1
2. f(-1) = 2, f(1) = 3
3. f(2) = -2, f(-3) = -4, f(0) = -4
Parent Tip: Review the logic above to help your child master the concept of algebra 2 piecewise function worksheet.
Print Download

How to use

Click Print to open a print-ready version directly in your browser, or use Download to save the file to your device. The ⭐ Answer button generates an AI answer key instantly - useful for teachers who need a quick reference. Need a different version? Our AI Worksheet Generator lets you create a custom worksheet on any topic in seconds.

(view all algebra 2 piecewise function worksheet)

Answered: Piecewise Functions Worksheet #2 Part… | bartleby
Solved Math 2 Name: Piecewise Functions Worksheet #2 Part I ...
Graphing Piecewise Functions (Algebra 2 2.7 pt 1)
KutaSoftware: PreCalc- Piecewise Functions
Solved PIECEWISE FUNCTIONS WITH QUADRATICS WORKSHEET | Chegg.com
Piecewise Functions Guided Notes + Homework Set
Piece-wise Functions~ Evaluate &amp; Graph~ 5 Practice Worksheets | TPT
Piecewise, Absolute Value and Step Functions - MathBitsNotebook(A2)
2.6 Graphing Piecewise Functions Day 2 Assignment | PDF | Function ...
30+ Free Printable Evaluating Piecewise Functions Worksheets