Free. Exclusive. Just for you.
Four unique services that make learning easier, faster, and smarter - only on our website.

Find the length of BD in triangle ABC, given side lengths and angle θ.

Triangle ABC with point D on side BC, showing lengths AC = 4.8, BC = 5.9, and CD = 3.1, with angle θ at A and BD to be calculated.

Triangle ABC with point D on side BC, showing lengths AC = 4.8, BC = 5.9, and CD = 3.1, with angle θ at A and BD to be calculated.

JPG 256×256 7.4 KB Free · Personal Use
Quality Assured by Worksheets Library Team
Reviewed for educational accuracy and age-appropriateness
ID: #430876
Show Answer Key & Explanations Step-by-step solution for: Angle bisector theorem | Khan Academy Wiki | Fandom
We are given triangle $ \triangle ABC $ with the following information:

- $ AC = 4.8 $
- $ BC = 3.1 $
- $ AB = 5.9 $
- Point $ D $ lies on $ BC $, and $ BD $ is a segment from $ B $ to $ D $ on $ AC $ — but wait, let's clarify.

Wait: Looking at the diagram (based on your description), point $ D $ appears to be on side $ AC $, and we're asked to find the length of $ BD $. But in the diagram, it looks like $ D $ is on $ BC $, and $ BD $ is part of $ BC $? Wait — actually, the labels suggest:

- $ C $ is at the top
- $ A $ is at bottom-left
- $ B $ is at bottom-right
- $ D $ is a point on $ AC $, and there’s a line from $ B $ to $ D $

But then the segment $ BD $ connects $ B $ to $ D $, where $ D $ is on $ AC $. So $ BD $ is a cevian from $ B $ to side $ AC $.

Wait — but in the diagram, $ D $ is labeled on $ AC $, and we are told:

- $ AC = 4.8 $
- $ BC = 3.1 $
- $ AB = 5.9 $
- $ \angle CAD = \theta $, $ \angle BAD = \theta $ — so both angles at $ A $ are equal? That suggests that $ AD $ bisects angle $ A $?

Wait — the diagram shows two angles marked as $ \theta $: one between $ AC $ and $ AD $, and one between $ AD $ and $ AB $. So yes: $ AD $ is the angle bisector of $ \angle CAB $, and $ D $ lies on $ BC $? No — wait: if $ D $ is on $ AC $, then $ AD $ would be part of $ AC $, which doesn't make sense.

Let’s re-express based on standard labeling:

Looking again:

- Points: $ A $, $ B $, $ C $
- Side $ AB = 5.9 $
- Side $ AC = 4.8 $
- Side $ BC = 3.1 $
- Point $ D $ is on $ BC $, and $ AD $ is drawn, splitting $ \angle A $ into two equal angles $ \theta $

Wait — but $ D $ is labeled near $ C $, and $ BD $ is being asked.

Actually, looking carefully: the diagram likely shows:

- Triangle $ ABC $
- $ D $ is a point on $ AC $
- $ BD $ is drawn
- Angles $ \angle CAD $ and $ \angle BAD $ are both labeled $ \theta $, meaning $ AD $ bisects $ \angle A $

So $ AD $ is the angle bisector of $ \angle CAB $, and $ D $ lies on $ BC $? No — if $ AD $ is the bisector, and $ D $ is on $ BC $, then $ D $ should be on $ BC $, not $ AC $.

But in the diagram, $ D $ is on $ AC $? That can’t be.

Wait — let's re-analyze the positions:

- $ A $ at bottom-left
- $ B $ at bottom-right
- $ C $ at top
- $ D $ is somewhere inside the triangle
- $ BD $ is a segment from $ B $ to $ D $
- $ D $ is on $ AC $? Or on $ BC $?

But the label says: $ D $ is on $ AC $, since $ AC = 4.8 $, and $ D $ is marked along $ AC $, and $ CD = ? $, but no.

Wait — actually, the segment $ CD $ is shown as $ 3.1 $, but $ BC = 3.1 $? That suggests $ CD = 3.1 $, but $ BC = 3.1 $, so maybe $ D $ is on $ BC $? Then $ CD = 3.1 $, but $ BC = 3.1 $, so $ D $ would coincide with $ B $? That can’t be.

Wait — perhaps I misread.

Let me reconstruct:

From the image description:

- $ AC = 4.8 $
- $ BC = 3.1 $
- $ AB = 5.9 $
- $ D $ is a point on $ AC $, and $ BD $ is drawn
- Two angles at $ A $: $ \angle CAD = \theta $, $ \angle BAD = \theta $ → so $ AD $ splits $ \angle A $ into two equal parts

Ah! So $ AD $ is the angle bisector of $ \angle CAB $, and $ D $ lies on $ BC $? No — if $ D $ is on $ AC $, then $ AD $ is part of $ AC $, so it can't split $ \angle A $ unless $ D $ is on $ BC $.

This is confusing.

Wait — let's suppose the correct configuration is:

- Triangle $ ABC $
- $ AB = 5.9 $
- $ AC = 4.8 $
- $ BC = 3.1 $
- $ D $ is on $ BC $
- $ AD $ is the angle bisector of $ \angle A $
- Then by the Angle Bisector Theorem, we have:

$$
\frac{BD}{DC} = \frac{AB}{AC} = \frac{5.9}{4.8}
$$

And since $ BD + DC = BC = 3.1 $, we can solve for $ BD $.

Yes — this makes sense.

So even though the diagram might be hard to interpret, the key is:

- $ AD $ is the angle bisector of $ \angle A $
- It intersects $ BC $ at point $ D $
- We are to find $ BD $

Step-by-step solution using Angle Bisector Theorem:



The Angle Bisector Theorem states:

> If a ray bisects an angle of a triangle, then it divides the opposite side into segments proportional to the adjacent sides.

So:

$$
\frac{BD}{DC} = \frac{AB}{AC} = \frac{5.9}{4.8}
$$

Let $ BD = x $, then $ DC = 3.1 - x $

So:

$$
\frac{x}{3.1 - x} = \frac{5.9}{4.8}
$$

Now solve for $ x $:

Cross-multiply:

$$
4.8x = 5.9(3.1 - x)
$$

$$
4.8x = 5.9 \times 3.1 - 5.9x
$$

Calculate $ 5.9 \times 3.1 $:

$$
5.9 \times 3.1 = (6 - 0.1)(3.1) = 6 \times 3.1 - 0.1 \times 3.1 = 18.6 - 0.31 = 18.29
$$

So:

$$
4.8x = 18.29 - 5.9x
$$

Add $ 5.9x $ to both sides:

$$
4.8x + 5.9x = 18.29
\Rightarrow 10.7x = 18.29
$$

Now divide:

$$
x = \frac{18.29}{10.7} \approx ?
$$

Compute:

$$
10.7 \times 1.7 = 10.7 \times 1 + 10.7 \times 0.7 = 10.7 + 7.49 = 18.19
$$

$ 18.29 - 18.19 = 0.10 $, so add $ \frac{0.10}{10.7} \approx 0.0093 $

So $ x \approx 1.7 + 0.0093 = 1.7093 $

So $ x \approx 1.7 $ (to one decimal place)

Wait — check more precisely:

$$
x = \frac{18.29}{10.7} = ?
$$

Do division:

$ 10.7 \times 1.7 = 18.19 $, as above

Subtract: $ 18.29 - 18.19 = 0.10 $

So $ x = 1.7 + \frac{0.10}{10.7} \approx 1.7 + 0.0093 = 1.7093 $

So $ x \approx 1.71 $, round to one decimal place: $ \boxed{1.7} $

But wait — is that correct?

Wait — $ \frac{5.9}{4.8} \approx 1.2292 $

So $ BD / DC = 1.2292 $

Let $ BD = x $, $ DC = 3.1 - x $

Then $ x / (3.1 - x) = 1.2292 $

$ x = 1.2292(3.1 - x) $

$ x = 1.2292 \times 3.1 - 1.2292x $

$ x + 1.2292x = 3.81052 $

$ 2.2292x = 3.81052 $

$ x = 3.81052 / 2.2292 \approx ? $

Calculate:

$ 2.2292 \times 1.7 = 2.2292 \times 1 + 2.2292 \times 0.7 = 2.2292 + 1.55944 = 3.78864 $

$ 3.81052 - 3.78864 = 0.02188 $

Now $ 0.02188 / 2.2292 \approx 0.0098 $

So $ x \approx 1.7098 $

So $ x \approx 1.7 $ when rounded to one decimal place.

But wait — earlier I used the ratio $ \frac{5.9}{4.8} $, but in the Angle Bisector Theorem, it's:

$$
\frac{BD}{DC} = \frac{AB}{AC} = \frac{5.9}{4.8}
$$

Yes, correct.

So $ BD \approx 1.7 $

But let’s do exact calculation:

$$
\frac{BD}{DC} = \frac{5.9}{4.8} = \frac{59}{48}
$$

Let $ BD = \frac{59}{59+48} \times BC = \frac{59}{107} \times 3.1 $

Because total parts = 59 + 48 = 107

So:

$$
BD = \frac{59}{107} \times 3.1
$$

Compute:

First, $ \frac{59}{107} \approx 0.5514 $

Then $ 0.5514 \times 3.1 \approx ? $

$ 0.5514 \times 3 = 1.6542 $

$ 0.5514 \times 0.1 = 0.05514 $

Total: $ 1.6542 + 0.05514 = 1.70934 $

So $ BD \approx 1.70934 $

Rounded to one decimal place: $ \boxed{1.7} $

Final Answer: $ \boxed{1.7} $



---

Answer: $ \boxed{1.7} $
Parent Tip: Review the logic above to help your child master the concept of angle bisector problems.
Print Download

How to use

Click Print to open a print-ready version directly in your browser, or use Download to save the file to your device. The ⭐ Answer button generates an AI answer key instantly - useful for teachers who need a quick reference. Need a different version? Our AI Worksheet Generator lets you create a custom worksheet on any topic in seconds.

(view all angle bisector problems)

Prove: Angle Bisector Theorem
Angle Bisector Theorem
Angle Bisector of a Triangle – Definition, Theorem, Examples
Angle Bisector - GCSE Maths - Steps, Examples & Worksheet
Angle bisector theorem and its converse — lesson. Mathematics ...
geometry - Applying Angle Bisector Theorem - Mathematics Stack ...
Angle bisector theorem proof -2 | Sumants 1 page of Math
Examples: Solving For Unknown Values Using Properties of Angle Bisectors
Angle Bisector Theorem - Proof, Converse, Formula, Examples
Angle Bisector Theorem - Proof, Converse, Formula, Examples