Find the length of BD in triangle ABC, given side lengths and angle θ.
Triangle ABC with point D on side BC, showing lengths AC = 4.8, BC = 5.9, and CD = 3.1, with angle θ at A and BD to be calculated.
JPG
256×256
7.4 KB
Free · Personal Use
Quality Assured by Worksheets Library Team
Reviewed for educational accuracy and age-appropriateness
ID: #430876
⭐
Show Answer Key & Explanations
Step-by-step solution for: Angle bisector theorem | Khan Academy Wiki | Fandom
▼
Show Answer Key & Explanations
Step-by-step solution for: Angle bisector theorem | Khan Academy Wiki | Fandom
We are given triangle $ \triangle ABC $ with the following information:
- $ AC = 4.8 $
- $ BC = 3.1 $
- $ AB = 5.9 $
- Point $ D $ lies on $ BC $, and $ BD $ is a segment from $ B $ to $ D $ on $ AC $ — but wait, let's clarify.
Wait: Looking at the diagram (based on your description), point $ D $ appears to be on side $ AC $, and we're asked to find the length of $ BD $. But in the diagram, it looks like $ D $ is on $ BC $, and $ BD $ is part of $ BC $? Wait — actually, the labels suggest:
- $ C $ is at the top
- $ A $ is at bottom-left
- $ B $ is at bottom-right
- $ D $ is a point on $ AC $, and there’s a line from $ B $ to $ D $
But then the segment $ BD $ connects $ B $ to $ D $, where $ D $ is on $ AC $. So $ BD $ is a cevian from $ B $ to side $ AC $.
Wait — but in the diagram, $ D $ is labeled on $ AC $, and we are told:
- $ AC = 4.8 $
- $ BC = 3.1 $
- $ AB = 5.9 $
- $ \angle CAD = \theta $, $ \angle BAD = \theta $ — so both angles at $ A $ are equal? That suggests that $ AD $ bisects angle $ A $?
Wait — the diagram shows two angles marked as $ \theta $: one between $ AC $ and $ AD $, and one between $ AD $ and $ AB $. So yes: $ AD $ is the angle bisector of $ \angle CAB $, and $ D $ lies on $ BC $? No — wait: if $ D $ is on $ AC $, then $ AD $ would be part of $ AC $, which doesn't make sense.
Let’s re-express based on standard labeling:
Looking again:
- Points: $ A $, $ B $, $ C $
- Side $ AB = 5.9 $
- Side $ AC = 4.8 $
- Side $ BC = 3.1 $
- Point $ D $ is on $ BC $, and $ AD $ is drawn, splitting $ \angle A $ into two equal angles $ \theta $
Wait — but $ D $ is labeled near $ C $, and $ BD $ is being asked.
Actually, looking carefully: the diagram likely shows:
- Triangle $ ABC $
- $ D $ is a point on $ AC $
- $ BD $ is drawn
- Angles $ \angle CAD $ and $ \angle BAD $ are both labeled $ \theta $, meaning $ AD $ bisects $ \angle A $
So $ AD $ is the angle bisector of $ \angle CAB $, and $ D $ lies on $ BC $? No — if $ AD $ is the bisector, and $ D $ is on $ BC $, then $ D $ should be on $ BC $, not $ AC $.
But in the diagram, $ D $ is on $ AC $? That can’t be.
Wait — let's re-analyze the positions:
- $ A $ at bottom-left
- $ B $ at bottom-right
- $ C $ at top
- $ D $ is somewhere inside the triangle
- $ BD $ is a segment from $ B $ to $ D $
- $ D $ is on $ AC $? Or on $ BC $?
But the label says: $ D $ is on $ AC $, since $ AC = 4.8 $, and $ D $ is marked along $ AC $, and $ CD = ? $, but no.
Wait — actually, the segment $ CD $ is shown as $ 3.1 $, but $ BC = 3.1 $? That suggests $ CD = 3.1 $, but $ BC = 3.1 $, so maybe $ D $ is on $ BC $? Then $ CD = 3.1 $, but $ BC = 3.1 $, so $ D $ would coincide with $ B $? That can’t be.
Wait — perhaps I misread.
Let me reconstruct:
From the image description:
- $ AC = 4.8 $
- $ BC = 3.1 $
- $ AB = 5.9 $
- $ D $ is a point on $ AC $, and $ BD $ is drawn
- Two angles at $ A $: $ \angle CAD = \theta $, $ \angle BAD = \theta $ → so $ AD $ splits $ \angle A $ into two equal parts
Ah! So $ AD $ is the angle bisector of $ \angle CAB $, and $ D $ lies on $ BC $? No — if $ D $ is on $ AC $, then $ AD $ is part of $ AC $, so it can't split $ \angle A $ unless $ D $ is on $ BC $.
This is confusing.
Wait — let's suppose the correct configuration is:
- Triangle $ ABC $
- $ AB = 5.9 $
- $ AC = 4.8 $
- $ BC = 3.1 $
- $ D $ is on $ BC $
- $ AD $ is the angle bisector of $ \angle A $
- Then by the Angle Bisector Theorem, we have:
$$
\frac{BD}{DC} = \frac{AB}{AC} = \frac{5.9}{4.8}
$$
And since $ BD + DC = BC = 3.1 $, we can solve for $ BD $.
Yes — this makes sense.
So even though the diagram might be hard to interpret, the key is:
- $ AD $ is the angle bisector of $ \angle A $
- It intersects $ BC $ at point $ D $
- We are to find $ BD $
The Angle Bisector Theorem states:
> If a ray bisects an angle of a triangle, then it divides the opposite side into segments proportional to the adjacent sides.
So:
$$
\frac{BD}{DC} = \frac{AB}{AC} = \frac{5.9}{4.8}
$$
Let $ BD = x $, then $ DC = 3.1 - x $
So:
$$
\frac{x}{3.1 - x} = \frac{5.9}{4.8}
$$
Now solve for $ x $:
Cross-multiply:
$$
4.8x = 5.9(3.1 - x)
$$
$$
4.8x = 5.9 \times 3.1 - 5.9x
$$
Calculate $ 5.9 \times 3.1 $:
$$
5.9 \times 3.1 = (6 - 0.1)(3.1) = 6 \times 3.1 - 0.1 \times 3.1 = 18.6 - 0.31 = 18.29
$$
So:
$$
4.8x = 18.29 - 5.9x
$$
Add $ 5.9x $ to both sides:
$$
4.8x + 5.9x = 18.29
\Rightarrow 10.7x = 18.29
$$
Now divide:
$$
x = \frac{18.29}{10.7} \approx ?
$$
Compute:
$$
10.7 \times 1.7 = 10.7 \times 1 + 10.7 \times 0.7 = 10.7 + 7.49 = 18.19
$$
$ 18.29 - 18.19 = 0.10 $, so add $ \frac{0.10}{10.7} \approx 0.0093 $
So $ x \approx 1.7 + 0.0093 = 1.7093 $
So $ x \approx 1.7 $ (to one decimal place)
Wait — check more precisely:
$$
x = \frac{18.29}{10.7} = ?
$$
Do division:
$ 10.7 \times 1.7 = 18.19 $, as above
Subtract: $ 18.29 - 18.19 = 0.10 $
So $ x = 1.7 + \frac{0.10}{10.7} \approx 1.7 + 0.0093 = 1.7093 $
So $ x \approx 1.71 $, round to one decimal place: $ \boxed{1.7} $
But wait — is that correct?
Wait — $ \frac{5.9}{4.8} \approx 1.2292 $
So $ BD / DC = 1.2292 $
Let $ BD = x $, $ DC = 3.1 - x $
Then $ x / (3.1 - x) = 1.2292 $
$ x = 1.2292(3.1 - x) $
$ x = 1.2292 \times 3.1 - 1.2292x $
$ x + 1.2292x = 3.81052 $
$ 2.2292x = 3.81052 $
$ x = 3.81052 / 2.2292 \approx ? $
Calculate:
$ 2.2292 \times 1.7 = 2.2292 \times 1 + 2.2292 \times 0.7 = 2.2292 + 1.55944 = 3.78864 $
$ 3.81052 - 3.78864 = 0.02188 $
Now $ 0.02188 / 2.2292 \approx 0.0098 $
So $ x \approx 1.7098 $
So $ x \approx 1.7 $ when rounded to one decimal place.
But wait — earlier I used the ratio $ \frac{5.9}{4.8} $, but in the Angle Bisector Theorem, it's:
$$
\frac{BD}{DC} = \frac{AB}{AC} = \frac{5.9}{4.8}
$$
Yes, correct.
So $ BD \approx 1.7 $
But let’s do exact calculation:
$$
\frac{BD}{DC} = \frac{5.9}{4.8} = \frac{59}{48}
$$
Let $ BD = \frac{59}{59+48} \times BC = \frac{59}{107} \times 3.1 $
Because total parts = 59 + 48 = 107
So:
$$
BD = \frac{59}{107} \times 3.1
$$
Compute:
First, $ \frac{59}{107} \approx 0.5514 $
Then $ 0.5514 \times 3.1 \approx ? $
$ 0.5514 \times 3 = 1.6542 $
$ 0.5514 \times 0.1 = 0.05514 $
Total: $ 1.6542 + 0.05514 = 1.70934 $
So $ BD \approx 1.70934 $
Rounded to one decimal place: $ \boxed{1.7} $
---
Answer: $ \boxed{1.7} $
- $ AC = 4.8 $
- $ BC = 3.1 $
- $ AB = 5.9 $
- Point $ D $ lies on $ BC $, and $ BD $ is a segment from $ B $ to $ D $ on $ AC $ — but wait, let's clarify.
Wait: Looking at the diagram (based on your description), point $ D $ appears to be on side $ AC $, and we're asked to find the length of $ BD $. But in the diagram, it looks like $ D $ is on $ BC $, and $ BD $ is part of $ BC $? Wait — actually, the labels suggest:
- $ C $ is at the top
- $ A $ is at bottom-left
- $ B $ is at bottom-right
- $ D $ is a point on $ AC $, and there’s a line from $ B $ to $ D $
But then the segment $ BD $ connects $ B $ to $ D $, where $ D $ is on $ AC $. So $ BD $ is a cevian from $ B $ to side $ AC $.
Wait — but in the diagram, $ D $ is labeled on $ AC $, and we are told:
- $ AC = 4.8 $
- $ BC = 3.1 $
- $ AB = 5.9 $
- $ \angle CAD = \theta $, $ \angle BAD = \theta $ — so both angles at $ A $ are equal? That suggests that $ AD $ bisects angle $ A $?
Wait — the diagram shows two angles marked as $ \theta $: one between $ AC $ and $ AD $, and one between $ AD $ and $ AB $. So yes: $ AD $ is the angle bisector of $ \angle CAB $, and $ D $ lies on $ BC $? No — wait: if $ D $ is on $ AC $, then $ AD $ would be part of $ AC $, which doesn't make sense.
Let’s re-express based on standard labeling:
Looking again:
- Points: $ A $, $ B $, $ C $
- Side $ AB = 5.9 $
- Side $ AC = 4.8 $
- Side $ BC = 3.1 $
- Point $ D $ is on $ BC $, and $ AD $ is drawn, splitting $ \angle A $ into two equal angles $ \theta $
Wait — but $ D $ is labeled near $ C $, and $ BD $ is being asked.
Actually, looking carefully: the diagram likely shows:
- Triangle $ ABC $
- $ D $ is a point on $ AC $
- $ BD $ is drawn
- Angles $ \angle CAD $ and $ \angle BAD $ are both labeled $ \theta $, meaning $ AD $ bisects $ \angle A $
So $ AD $ is the angle bisector of $ \angle CAB $, and $ D $ lies on $ BC $? No — if $ AD $ is the bisector, and $ D $ is on $ BC $, then $ D $ should be on $ BC $, not $ AC $.
But in the diagram, $ D $ is on $ AC $? That can’t be.
Wait — let's re-analyze the positions:
- $ A $ at bottom-left
- $ B $ at bottom-right
- $ C $ at top
- $ D $ is somewhere inside the triangle
- $ BD $ is a segment from $ B $ to $ D $
- $ D $ is on $ AC $? Or on $ BC $?
But the label says: $ D $ is on $ AC $, since $ AC = 4.8 $, and $ D $ is marked along $ AC $, and $ CD = ? $, but no.
Wait — actually, the segment $ CD $ is shown as $ 3.1 $, but $ BC = 3.1 $? That suggests $ CD = 3.1 $, but $ BC = 3.1 $, so maybe $ D $ is on $ BC $? Then $ CD = 3.1 $, but $ BC = 3.1 $, so $ D $ would coincide with $ B $? That can’t be.
Wait — perhaps I misread.
Let me reconstruct:
From the image description:
- $ AC = 4.8 $
- $ BC = 3.1 $
- $ AB = 5.9 $
- $ D $ is a point on $ AC $, and $ BD $ is drawn
- Two angles at $ A $: $ \angle CAD = \theta $, $ \angle BAD = \theta $ → so $ AD $ splits $ \angle A $ into two equal parts
Ah! So $ AD $ is the angle bisector of $ \angle CAB $, and $ D $ lies on $ BC $? No — if $ D $ is on $ AC $, then $ AD $ is part of $ AC $, so it can't split $ \angle A $ unless $ D $ is on $ BC $.
This is confusing.
Wait — let's suppose the correct configuration is:
- Triangle $ ABC $
- $ AB = 5.9 $
- $ AC = 4.8 $
- $ BC = 3.1 $
- $ D $ is on $ BC $
- $ AD $ is the angle bisector of $ \angle A $
- Then by the Angle Bisector Theorem, we have:
$$
\frac{BD}{DC} = \frac{AB}{AC} = \frac{5.9}{4.8}
$$
And since $ BD + DC = BC = 3.1 $, we can solve for $ BD $.
Yes — this makes sense.
So even though the diagram might be hard to interpret, the key is:
- $ AD $ is the angle bisector of $ \angle A $
- It intersects $ BC $ at point $ D $
- We are to find $ BD $
Step-by-step solution using Angle Bisector Theorem:
The Angle Bisector Theorem states:
> If a ray bisects an angle of a triangle, then it divides the opposite side into segments proportional to the adjacent sides.
So:
$$
\frac{BD}{DC} = \frac{AB}{AC} = \frac{5.9}{4.8}
$$
Let $ BD = x $, then $ DC = 3.1 - x $
So:
$$
\frac{x}{3.1 - x} = \frac{5.9}{4.8}
$$
Now solve for $ x $:
Cross-multiply:
$$
4.8x = 5.9(3.1 - x)
$$
$$
4.8x = 5.9 \times 3.1 - 5.9x
$$
Calculate $ 5.9 \times 3.1 $:
$$
5.9 \times 3.1 = (6 - 0.1)(3.1) = 6 \times 3.1 - 0.1 \times 3.1 = 18.6 - 0.31 = 18.29
$$
So:
$$
4.8x = 18.29 - 5.9x
$$
Add $ 5.9x $ to both sides:
$$
4.8x + 5.9x = 18.29
\Rightarrow 10.7x = 18.29
$$
Now divide:
$$
x = \frac{18.29}{10.7} \approx ?
$$
Compute:
$$
10.7 \times 1.7 = 10.7 \times 1 + 10.7 \times 0.7 = 10.7 + 7.49 = 18.19
$$
$ 18.29 - 18.19 = 0.10 $, so add $ \frac{0.10}{10.7} \approx 0.0093 $
So $ x \approx 1.7 + 0.0093 = 1.7093 $
So $ x \approx 1.7 $ (to one decimal place)
Wait — check more precisely:
$$
x = \frac{18.29}{10.7} = ?
$$
Do division:
$ 10.7 \times 1.7 = 18.19 $, as above
Subtract: $ 18.29 - 18.19 = 0.10 $
So $ x = 1.7 + \frac{0.10}{10.7} \approx 1.7 + 0.0093 = 1.7093 $
So $ x \approx 1.71 $, round to one decimal place: $ \boxed{1.7} $
But wait — is that correct?
Wait — $ \frac{5.9}{4.8} \approx 1.2292 $
So $ BD / DC = 1.2292 $
Let $ BD = x $, $ DC = 3.1 - x $
Then $ x / (3.1 - x) = 1.2292 $
$ x = 1.2292(3.1 - x) $
$ x = 1.2292 \times 3.1 - 1.2292x $
$ x + 1.2292x = 3.81052 $
$ 2.2292x = 3.81052 $
$ x = 3.81052 / 2.2292 \approx ? $
Calculate:
$ 2.2292 \times 1.7 = 2.2292 \times 1 + 2.2292 \times 0.7 = 2.2292 + 1.55944 = 3.78864 $
$ 3.81052 - 3.78864 = 0.02188 $
Now $ 0.02188 / 2.2292 \approx 0.0098 $
So $ x \approx 1.7098 $
So $ x \approx 1.7 $ when rounded to one decimal place.
But wait — earlier I used the ratio $ \frac{5.9}{4.8} $, but in the Angle Bisector Theorem, it's:
$$
\frac{BD}{DC} = \frac{AB}{AC} = \frac{5.9}{4.8}
$$
Yes, correct.
So $ BD \approx 1.7 $
But let’s do exact calculation:
$$
\frac{BD}{DC} = \frac{5.9}{4.8} = \frac{59}{48}
$$
Let $ BD = \frac{59}{59+48} \times BC = \frac{59}{107} \times 3.1 $
Because total parts = 59 + 48 = 107
So:
$$
BD = \frac{59}{107} \times 3.1
$$
Compute:
First, $ \frac{59}{107} \approx 0.5514 $
Then $ 0.5514 \times 3.1 \approx ? $
$ 0.5514 \times 3 = 1.6542 $
$ 0.5514 \times 0.1 = 0.05514 $
Total: $ 1.6542 + 0.05514 = 1.70934 $
So $ BD \approx 1.70934 $
Rounded to one decimal place: $ \boxed{1.7} $
✔ Final Answer: $ \boxed{1.7} $
---
Answer: $ \boxed{1.7} $
Parent Tip: Review the logic above to help your child master the concept of angle bisector problems.