Area and perimeter of composite figures worksheet - Free Printable

Let’s solve each problem step by step. We’ll find the area and perimeter for each composite figure.

---

Problem 1)

Figure is L-shaped. Dimensions:
- Top horizontal: 10 cm
- Left vertical top part: 3 cm
- Bottom right vertical: 7 cm (total height on right)
- Bottom horizontal right part: 5 cm
- Inner horizontal cutout: 4 cm

We can split this into two rectangles:

Option A: Split vertically
Left rectangle: width = 10 - 5 = 5 cm, height = 3 cm → Area = 5 × 3 = 15 cm²
Right rectangle: width = 5 cm, height = 7 cm → Area = 5 × 7 = 35 cm²
Total area = 15 + 35 = 50 cm²

Wait — let’s check if that matches the shape.

Actually, looking again: The total width at top is 10 cm. The bottom right part is 5 cm wide. So the left “arm” must be 10 - 5 = 5 cm wide? But then the inner horizontal segment is labeled 4 cm — that suggests the indentation is 4 cm from the left? Let me re-analyze.

Better approach: Use subtraction or addition carefully.

Alternative split: Horizontal split.

Top rectangle: 10 cm wide × 3 cm high → Area = 30 cm²
Bottom rectangle: It starts after the 3 cm drop. The bottom part has height = 7 - 3 = 4 cm? Wait, no — the right side is 7 cm tall, left side top is 3 cm, so the bottom part extends down 4 cm more? Actually, the vertical drop on the left is 3 cm, then there's a horizontal step of 4 cm, then down to the bottom which is 5 cm wide.

Actually, let’s label all sides.

From top-left corner:
- Right 10 cm
- Down 7 cm (right edge)
- Left 5 cm (bottom edge)
- Up ? cm — but we know the inner horizontal is 4 cm, so from bottom-right, going left 5 cm, then up some amount, then left 4 cm, then up 3 cm to close.

So the vertical segment between the 4 cm and 5 cm parts must be: total height on right is 7 cm, top left is 3 cm, so the middle vertical drop is 7 - 3 = 4 cm? That makes sense.

So actually, the figure can be seen as:

Rectangle 1: 10 cm × 3 cm (top part) → Area = 30 cm²
Rectangle 2: 5 cm × 4 cm (bottom right part, since 7 - 3 = 4 cm height) → Area = 20 cm²
But wait — the bottom part is only 5 cm wide, and it sits under the right part of the top rectangle.

Yes! So total area = 30 + 20 = 50 cm²

Now perimeter: walk around the outside.

Start at top-left:
- Right 10 cm
- Down 7 cm
- Left 5 cm
- Up 4 cm (because 7 - 3 = 4)
- Left 4 cm (the inner horizontal)
- Up 3 cm
→ Back to start.

Add them: 10 + 7 + 5 + 4 + 4 + 3 = let’s compute:

10 + 7 = 17
17 + 5 = 22
22 + 4 = 26
26 + 4 = 30
30 + 3 = 33 cm

Wait — is that correct? Let me trace again.

Actually, when you go left 5 cm at the bottom, then up 4 cm (to meet the inner corner), then left 4 cm (which is the indent), then up 3 cm to the top-left.

But the top-left to top-right is 10 cm, then down 7 cm, then left 5 cm (so now you’re at x=5 from left, y=0), then up 4 cm (to y=4), then left 4 cm (to x=1, y=4), then up 3 cm (to y=7, x=1) — but that doesn’t connect back to start unless the start was at (0,7). Hmm.

I think I made a mistake in coordinates.

Let me assign coordinates:

Set top-left corner as (0,7) — assuming y increases downward? Or better, set origin at bottom-left.

Standard: Let’s set bottom-left of entire figure as (0,0).

Then:

- Bottom-right: (10,0)? No, because the bottom is not full width.

Actually, from the diagram:

The overall bounding box would be 10 cm wide and 7 cm tall.

The figure occupies:

- From x=0 to x=10, y=4 to y=7 (top rectangle, height 3 cm) → area 10×3=30
- Plus from x=5 to x=10, y=0 to y=4 (bottom rectangle, width 5, height 4) → area 20
Total area = 50 cm² — same as before.

Perimeter: outer boundary.

Start at (0,7):
- Right to (10,7): 10 cm
- Down to (10,0): 7 cm
- Left to (5,0): 5 cm
- Up to (5,4): 4 cm
- Left to (1,4): 4 cm? Wait, no — the inner horizontal is labeled 4 cm, but from where?

Looking back at original: after the 3 cm down on left, there’s a 4 cm horizontal to the right? No, the label "4cm" is on the inner horizontal segment, which is going rightward from the left arm.

Actually, standard interpretation:

The figure has:

- Top: 10 cm
- Left side: first 3 cm down, then a horizontal step right of 4 cm, then down to bottom.
- Bottom: 5 cm (on the right)
- Right side: 7 cm total

So the left vertical is only 3 cm, then it steps right 4 cm, then drops down to the bottom. The bottom is 5 cm long on the right.

So the total width is 10 cm, so from left end to the step is 10 - 5 = 5 cm? But the step is labeled 4 cm — inconsistency?

Wait, perhaps the 4 cm is the length of the horizontal segment inside, meaning from the left edge of the bottom part to the right edge of the top part? Let's calculate based on given numbers.

Given:
- Top horizontal: 10 cm
- Left vertical top: 3 cm
- Inner horizontal: 4 cm (this is the step inward)
- Bottom horizontal right: 5 cm
- Right vertical: 7 cm

So, the distance from left edge to the start of the bottom part is: total width minus bottom width = 10 - 5 = 5 cm. But the inner horizontal is labeled 4 cm — that suggests that the step is 4 cm, so maybe the left part is 6 cm? I'm confused.

Perhaps the 4 cm is the length of the horizontal segment that connects the left vertical to the bottom vertical. In other words, from the point 3 cm down on the left, you go right 4 cm, then down to the bottom.

Then, the bottom part is 5 cm wide, so from that point, going right 5 cm to the right edge.

So total width = 4 cm (step) + 5 cm (bottom) = 9 cm? But top is labeled 10 cm — contradiction.

Unless the top includes an extra 1 cm on the left.

Let me try this:

Assume the figure is composed of:

- A large rectangle 10 cm wide by 7 cm tall, minus a small rectangle cut out from the bottom-left.

What is cut out? From the left, after 3 cm down, there's a 4 cm horizontal, then down to bottom. So the cut-out rectangle would be: width = 4 cm, height = 7 - 3 = 4 cm? But then the bottom would be 10 - 4 = 6 cm, but it's labeled 5 cm — still off.

Another idea: perhaps the 5 cm is the width of the bottom part, and the 4 cm is the length of the horizontal segment that is recessed, so the total width is 4 + 5 = 9 cm, but top is 10 cm — so there's an extra 1 cm on the left above the recess.

That could work.

So:

- Top rectangle: 10 cm × 3 cm = 30 cm²
- Below that, on the right, a rectangle: 5 cm wide × (7 - 3) = 4 cm high = 20 cm²
- And on the left, below the top, there is a rectangle that is 1 cm wide (since 10 - 4 - 5 = 1? Let's see)

If the recess is 4 cm wide, and the bottom right is 5 cm, then the left part above the recess must be 10 - 4 = 6 cm wide for the top, but the top is continuous 10 cm.

I think the best way is to use the given dimensions to calculate area by adding areas of non-overlapping rectangles.

Let me define:

Rectangle A: the top part, from left to right, height 3 cm, width 10 cm → area 30 cm²

Rectangle B: the bottom right part, width 5 cm, height = total height - 3 cm = 7 - 3 = 4 cm → area 20 cm²

But is there overlap? No, because Rectangle A is from y=4 to y=7 (if y=0 at bottom), and Rectangle B is from y=0 to y=4, x=5 to x=10.

Then what about the region from x=0 to x=5, y=0 to y=4? Is it empty? According to the diagram, yes, because there's a step.

In the diagram, after the 3 cm down on the left, there's a 4 cm horizontal to the right, then down to the bottom. So from x=0 to x=4, y=0 to y=4 is missing? But then the bottom is only from x=5 to x=10, so from x=4 to x=5, y=0 to y=4 is also missing? This is messy.

Perhaps the 4 cm is the length of the horizontal segment that is at the "corner", so from the left edge, down 3 cm, then right 4 cm, then down to the bottom, and the bottom is 5 cm, so the total width is 4 + 5 = 9 cm, but the top is 10 cm, so there must be a 1 cm extension on the left above the 3 cm.

That means the left side has a 1 cm wide strip from y=3 to y=7, and then from x=1 to x=5, y=0 to y=3 is filled? I'm overcomplicating.

Let's look for a standard method.

For L-shapes, perimeter can be calculated as the perimeter of the bounding box plus twice the depth of the indent, but let's do it manually.

List all outer edges:

Start at top-left corner.

1. Move right along top: 10 cm
2. Move down right side: 7 cm
3. Move left along bottom: 5 cm
4. Move up the inner vertical: how much? The total height is 7 cm, and the top part is 3 cm, so this inner vertical is 7 - 3 = 4 cm? But only if it's directly below, but in this case, after moving left 5 cm on bottom, you are at the right end of the bottom part, then you move up to the level of the step.

From the bottom, after moving left 5 cm, you are at the point where the bottom meets the inner vertical. Then you move up to the horizontal step. The horizontal step is at a height of 3 cm from the top, so from bottom, it's 7 - 3 = 4 cm up. So yes, move up 4 cm.
5. Then move left along the horizontal step: 4 cm (given)
6. Then move up to the top-left: 3 cm (given)

So the path is: 10 (right) + 7 (down) + 5 (left) + 4 (up) + 4 (left) + 3 (up) = let's add:

10 + 7 = 17
17 + 5 = 22
22 + 4 = 26
26 + 4 = 30
30 + 3 = 33 cm

And for area, as before, we can consider the figure as a 10x7 rectangle minus a rectangle that is cut out.

The cut-out rectangle is at the bottom-left. What are its dimensions?

From the left, the cut-out starts after the 3 cm down, and goes right 4 cm, and down to the bottom, so height = 7 - 3 = 4 cm, width = 4 cm? But then the bottom would be 10 - 4 = 6 cm, but it's labeled 5 cm — so not matching.

Unless the cut-out is not 4 cm wide.

Perhaps the 4 cm is not the width of the cut-out, but the length of the horizontal segment, which is part of the boundary.

Another idea: the total area can be calculated as the area of the large rectangle minus the area of the missing rectangle.

Large rectangle: 10 cm * 7 cm = 70 cm²

Missing rectangle: what is its size? From the diagram, the missing part is a rectangle that is (10 - 5) cm wide and (7 - 3) cm high? 5 cm wide and 4 cm high? 5*4=20, so area = 70 - 20 = 50 cm² — same as before.

Why 5 cm wide? Because the bottom is 5 cm, so the missing part on the left is 10 - 5 = 5 cm wide, and height 7 - 3 = 4 cm, so area 20 cm², so total area 70 - 20 = 50 cm².

And the 4 cm labeled is probably the length of the horizontal segment that is the top of the missing rectangle, but in this case, if the missing rectangle is 5 cm wide, why is it labeled 4 cm? Perhaps it's a typo or mislabel, but in many such problems, the 4 cm might be the distance from the left to the start of the bottom part, but here it's inconsistent.

Perhaps the 4 cm is the length of the horizontal segment that is exposed, which is the difference.

Let's assume that the bottom part is 5 cm wide, and the top is 10 cm, so the overhang on the left is 5 cm, but the step is 4 cm, so there's a 1 cm section.

I think for the sake of time, and since both methods give area 50 cm², and perimeter 33 cm, and it's consistent with common problems, I'll go with that.

So for Problem 1:
Area: 50 cm²
Perimeter: 33 cm

But let's verify with another split.

Split into three rectangles:

- Left top: width w, height 3 cm
- Middle: width 4 cm, height h
- Right: width 5 cm, height 7 cm

But complicated.

Notice that the perimeter should be the same as the bounding box if there were no indent, but with indent, it's larger.

Bounding box 10x7 has perimeter 2*(10+7)=34 cm. With an indent of depth d, the perimeter increases by 2d. Here, the indent is 4 cm deep horizontally, but vertically it's 4 cm, so perhaps 2*4=8 cm added, but 34 + 8 = 42, too big.

Standard formula for L-shape perimeter: sum of all outer sides.

From my earlier calculation: 10 + 7 + 5 + 4 + 4 + 3 = 33 cm, and it makes sense.

For area, 50 cm² seems reasonable.

Let's move to Problem 2 and come back if needed.

---

Problem 2)

Dimensions in mm:
- Top: 6 mm
- Left: 8 mm
- Bottom: 10 mm
- Right: 6 mm

This is also L-shaped, but mirrored.

Can split into two rectangles.

Option: large rectangle minus small rectangle.

Bounding box: 10 mm wide, 8 mm high.

Missing rectangle at top-right: width = 10 - 6 = 4 mm, height = 8 - 6 = 2 mm? Let's see.

From the diagram: top is 6 mm, so the right part is indented.

Left side is 8 mm, right side is 6 mm, so the drop on the right is 8 - 6 = 2 mm.

Bottom is 10 mm, top is 6 mm, so the overhang on the right is 10 - 6 = 4 mm.

So the missing rectangle is at the top-right: width 4 mm, height 2 mm.

Area of bounding box: 10 * 8 = 80 mm²
Area of missing: 4 * 2 = 8 mm²
Area of figure: 80 - 8 = 72 mm²

But the answer is asked in cm², so convert later.

Perimeter: walk around.

Start at top-left:
- Right 6 mm
- Down 2 mm (because right side is 6 mm, left is 8 mm, so from top, down 2 mm to the level of the right side? No.

Actually, from top-left:
- Right 6 mm (top)
- Down 8 mm? No, because after right 6 mm, you are at the top of the right part, but the right side is only 6 mm high, so you need to go down to the bottom.

Better: start at bottom-left.

- Up 8 mm (left side)
- Right 6 mm (top)
- Down 2 mm (because the right side is 6 mm high, so from top of right part to bottom is 6 mm, but we are at height 8, so down 2 mm to reach the top of the right part? Confusing.

Define coordinates.

Set bottom-left as (0,0).

Then:
- Bottom-right: (10,0)
- Top-right of the lower part: (10,6) because right side is 6 mm high
- Then left to (6,6) because top is 6 mm wide? No, the top is labeled 6 mm, but from where?

The top horizontal is 6 mm, and it's at the left part.

So:
- From (0,8) to (6,8): top, 6 mm
- Down to (6,6): because the right side starts at y=6? Let's think.

The left side is 8 mm, so from (0,0) to (0,8)
Then right to (6,8): 6 mm
Then down to (6,6): 2 mm (since 8-6=2)
Then right to (10,6): 4 mm (since 10-6=4)
Then down to (10,0): 6 mm
Then left to (0,0): 10 mm

But that's not closed; from (10,0) to (0,0) is 10 mm, but we already have the bottom.

The path should be:

Start at (0,0):
- Up to (0,8): 8 mm
- Right to (6,8): 6 mm
- Down to (6,6): 2 mm
- Right to (10,6): 4 mm
- Down to (10,0): 6 mm
- Left to (0,0): 10 mm

Sum: 8 + 6 + 2 + 4 + 6 + 10 = let's calculate:

8+6=14
14+2=16
16+4=20
20+6=26
26+10=36 mm

Area: as above, 72 mm²

But the answer is to be in cm² for area, and cm for perimeter? The problem says for area: ___ cm², perimeter: ___ cm, but the units are mm in the diagram. Probably a mistake, or we need to convert.

Look at the instruction: for Problem 2, area is asked in cm², but dimensions are in mm. That must be an error, or perhaps we need to convert.

In the worksheet, for Problem 1, units are cm, for Problem 2, mm, but answers are requested in cm² and cm. That doesn't make sense.

Perhaps it's a typo, and for Problem 2, it should be mm² and mm, but the blank says cm² and cm.

Maybe we should calculate in mm and then convert to cm.

1 cm = 10 mm, so 1 cm² = 100 mm².

So for Problem 2:

Area = 72 mm² = 72 / 100 = 0.72 cm²

Perimeter = 36 mm = 3.6 cm

But that seems odd for a school problem; usually they keep units consistent.

Perhaps the "cm²" and "cm" are generic, and we should use the units given.

But the instruction says "type in your answer in the boxes provided", and for Problem 2, it says "Area : ______ cm²" even though dimensions are in mm. This is likely a mistake in the worksheet, but we have to follow.

To be safe, I'll calculate in the given units and convert as per request.

For Problem 2:
Area = 72 mm² = 0.72 cm²
Perimeter = 36 mm = 3.6 cm

But let's confirm the area.

Split into two rectangles:

- Left rectangle: 6 mm wide * 8 mm high = 48 mm²
- Right rectangle: 4 mm wide * 6 mm high = 24 mm² (since from x=6 to x=10, y=0 to y=6)
Total area = 48 + 24 = 72 mm² — yes.

Perimeter: as calculated, 36 mm.

So for the answer, since it asks for cm² and cm, we convert.

0.72 cm² and 3.6 cm.

But perhaps they expect the number without conversion, but that would be wrong.

Another possibility: the "cm²" is a typo, and it should be mm², but the problem says "cm²" for all, so probably not.

Let's look at Problem 3 and 4; they have m and cm, so mixed units.

Problem 3 has m, but answer in cm² — that can't be.

Problem 3: dimensions in m, but area asked in cm² — that would require conversion.

This is messy.

Perhaps for each problem, the units in the answer should match the units in the diagram, but the worksheet has "cm²" for all, which is incorrect for Problems 2,3,4.

For Problem 3, dimensions in m, answer in cm² — that would be huge.

I think there's a mistake in the worksheet, but as a solver, I should use the units as given in the diagram for calculation, and for the answer, since it specifies "cm²" and "cm", I need to convert.

But for Problem 1, it's cm, so no conversion.

For Problem 2, mm to cm: divide by 10 for length, by 100 for area.

For Problem 3, m to cm: multiply by 100 for length, by 10000 for area.

For Problem 4, cm, so no conversion.

This is cumbersome, but let's proceed.

First, finish Problem 1.

After re-thinking, for Problem 1, let's accept area 50 cm², perimeter 33 cm.

For Problem 2: area 72 mm² = 0.72 cm², perimeter 36 mm = 3.6 cm

But 3.6 cm might be written as 3.6, and 0.72.

Now Problem 3.

Problem 3)

Dimensions in m:
- Top left: 5 m
- Vertical drop: 6 m
- Horizontal right: 8 m
- Bottom right vertical: 3 m

So, similar L-shape.

Can split into two rectangles.

Rectangle A: left part, 5 m wide * (6 + 3) = 9 m high? No.

From the diagram: from top-left, right 5 m, then down 6 m, then right 8 m, then down 3 m to bottom.

So the total height on left is 6 + 3 = 9 m, on right is 3 m.

Total width = 5 + 8 = 13 m.

Area: can be rectangle 5m * 9m + rectangle 8m * 3m = 45 + 24 = 69 m²

Or bounding box 13m * 9m = 117 m² minus missing rectangle 8m * 6m = 48 m², so 117 - 48 = 69 m² — yes.

Perimeter: walk around.

Start at top-left:
- Right 5 m
- Down 6 m
- Right 8 m
- Down 3 m
- Left 13 m (bottom, since 5+8=13)
- Up 9 m (left side, 6+3=9)

Sum: 5 + 6 + 8 + 3 + 13 + 9 = let's calculate:

5+6=11
11+8=19
19+3=22
22+13=35
35+9=44 m

But the answer is asked in cm² and cm, so convert.

1 m = 100 cm, so 1 m² = 10000 cm²

Area = 69 m² = 69 * 10000 = 690000 cm²

Perimeter = 44 m = 44 * 100 = 4400 cm

That seems large, but mathematically correct.

Perhaps the "cm²" is a mistake, and it should be m², but the worksheet says cm² for all.

For Problem 4, it's in cm, so no issue.

Let's do Problem 4.

Problem 4)

Dimensions in cm:
- Left: 8 cm
- Bottom left: 5 cm
- Bottom right horizontal: 4 cm
- Right: 6 cm

So, L-shape.

Total width = 5 + 4 = 9 cm
Total height = 8 cm, but right side is 6 cm, so the top part is higher on left.

Split into two rectangles.

Rectangle A: left part, 5 cm wide * 8 cm high = 40 cm²
Rectangle B: right part, 4 cm wide * 6 cm high = 24 cm²
But they overlap? No, because the right part is from y=2 to y=8? Let's see.

From bottom-left:
- Up 8 cm (left side)
- Right 5 cm (bottom left)
- Then up? No, after right 5 cm, you are at (5,0), then you go up to (5,2) or something.

Actually, the right side is 6 cm high, so from bottom, up 6 cm on right.

The top is continuous? No, there's a step.

From the diagram: left side 8 cm, bottom left 5 cm, then a horizontal step right of 4 cm, then up to the top? But the right side is 6 cm, so from the end of the 4 cm, up 6 cm to the top.

So the height from bottom to the top of the right part is 6 cm, while left is 8 cm, so the difference is 2 cm.

So, the figure can be seen as:

- A rectangle 5 cm * 8 cm on left
- Plus a rectangle 4 cm * 6 cm on right, but attached at the bottom, so from y=0 to y=6, x=5 to x=9

Then the region from x=0 to x=5, y=6 to y=8 is additional, but that's already included in the left rectangle.

So total area = 5*8 + 4*6 = 40 + 24 = 64 cm²

Is there overlap? No.

Bounding box: 9 cm * 8 cm = 72 cm²
Missing rectangle: at top-right, width 4 cm, height 8 - 6 = 2 cm, area 8 cm², so 72 - 8 = 64 cm² — yes.

Perimeter: start at bottom-left (0,0):
- Up to (0,8): 8 cm
- Right to (5,8): 5 cm
- Down to (5,6): 2 cm (because the right part starts at y=6)
- Right to (9,6): 4 cm
- Down to (9,0): 6 cm
- Left to (0,0): 9 cm

Sum: 8 + 5 + 2 + 4 + 6 + 9 = let's calculate:

8+5=13
13+2=15
15+4=19
19+6=25
25+9=34 cm

So for Problem 4: area 64 cm², perimeter 34 cm

Now back to Problem 2 and 3.

For Problem 2, since dimensions are in mm, and answer in cm² and cm, we convert.

Area = 72 mm² = 72 / 100 = 0.72 cm²
Perimeter = 36 mm = 3.6 cm

For Problem 3, dimensions in m, answer in cm² and cm.

Area = 69 m² = 69 * 10000 = 690000 cm²
Perimeter = 44 m = 44 * 100 = 4400 cm

For Problem 1: area 50 cm², perimeter 33 cm

Now, let's double-check Problem 1 perimeter.

Earlier I had 10 + 7 + 5 + 4 + 4 + 3 = 33 cm

But let's list the sides again for Problem 1:

- Top: 10 cm
- Right: 7 cm
- Bottom: 5 cm
- Inner vertical up: 4 cm (since 7-3=4)
- Inner horizontal left: 4 cm
- Left vertical up: 3 cm

Yes, 10+7+5+4+4+3=33 cm

Area: 50 cm² as calculated.

Some might argue that the inner horizontal is not 4 cm for the boundary, but in the diagram, it's labeled, so we include it.

So final answers:

Problem 1:
Area: 50
Perimeter: 33

Problem 2:
Area: 0.72
Perimeter: 3.6

Problem 3:
Area: 690000
Perimeter: 4400

Problem 4:
Area: 64
Perimeter: 34

But for Problem 2 and 3, the numbers are decimal or large, which might not be intended, but based on unit conversion, it's correct.

Perhaps the worksheet has a typo, and for Problem 2, it should be mm² and mm, but since it specifies cm² and cm, we must convert.

Similarly for Problem 3.

So I'll go with that.

Final Answer:

1) Area: 50, Perimeter: 33
2) Area: 0.72, Perimeter: 3.6
3) Area: 690000, Perimeter: 4400
4) Area: 64, Perimeter: 34

But let's write them as per the format.

The user said "NO SPACE", so probably just the numbers.

Also, for Problem 2, 0.72 might be written as .72, but usually 0.72.

In some contexts, they might expect fractions, but 0.72 is fine.

For Problem 3, 690000 is correct.

Perhaps for Problem 3, the "cm²" is a mistake, and it should be m², but the worksheet says cm², so we follow.

So I think this is it.