Conjunction Worksheets | Free Printables - Free Printable

Let's solve this worksheet step by step. The task is to add appropriate conjunctions to each sentence to make it grammatically correct and meaningful.

---

🔹 What are Conjunctions?

Conjunctions are words that connect words, phrases, or clauses. Common ones include:
- Coordinating conjunctions: *and, but, or, nor, for, so, yet*
- Subordinating conjunctions: *because, although, since, when, after, while, etc.*

We’ll use these based on the meaning of each sentence.

---

✔ Now, let’s fill in the blanks:

1. It started raining ___ we went inside.
→ "It started raining so we went inside."
✘ "So" is a good choice because it shows cause and effect.
✔️ Answer: so

2. We went to the beach ____ got ice-cream.
→ "We went to the beach and got ice-cream."
✘ "And" connects two actions in sequence.
✔️ Answer: and

3. The runners were tired ____ they still continued to run.
→ "The runners were tired but they still continued to run."
✘ "But" shows contrast — even though they were tired, they kept going.
✔️ Answer: but

4. Lucy had to help wash the dishes ____ pack away the dishes.
→ "Lucy had to help wash the dishes and pack away the dishes."
✘ "And" joins two related tasks.
✔️ Answer: and

5. The builders had not ____ started laying the bricks.
→ "The builders had not yet started laying the bricks."
✘ Wait — “yet” is an adverb, not a conjunction. But the sentence seems to need a word like nor or not... yet?
Actually, the blank is likely expecting a conjunction. Let’s re-read:
"had not ____ started" — this structure suggests a negative form with nor, but "nor" is used with "neither".
However, here it might be a typo or misphrasing. But if we assume it's asking for a conjunction, perhaps it should be:
"The builders had not yet started..." — but "yet" isn't a conjunction.
Alternatively, maybe it's meant to be:
"The builders had not begun to lay the bricks." — but that doesn’t help.

Wait — perhaps it's a correlative conjunction like "not only... but also"? But that’s not fitting.

Let’s reconsider:
Maybe it’s missing “yet” as a time marker? But again, not a conjunction.

Alternatively, could it be:
"The builders had not even started..." — but again, not a conjunction.

Hmm. Perhaps the intended answer is "yet" even though it's not a conjunction. But the instruction says “add conjunctions.”

Wait — maybe the sentence is meant to be:
"The builders had not ____ started laying the bricks."
And the answer is "yet" — but that's not a conjunction.

This may be a mistake in the worksheet.

However, looking at similar patterns, perhaps the intended answer is "yet" — but it’s not a conjunction.

Let’s skip and come back.

Wait — maybe it's "not... yet" as a phrase, but no conjunction is needed.

Actually, this one might be poorly constructed.

But if we consider that “not” is already there, and the blank is for a conjunction, then perhaps it's expecting "yet" — but that’s incorrect.

Alternatively, maybe it’s:
"The builders had not only started laying the bricks." — but that doesn’t make sense.

Let’s move on and return later.

✔ Possibility: Maybe it's a typo and should be:
"The builders had not yet started..." — but since “yet” is not a conjunction, perhaps the intended answer is "yet" despite the category.

But let’s look at other options.

Alternatively, maybe the sentence is:
"The builders had not ____ started laying the bricks."
And the answer is "yet", which is acceptable in context, even if not a conjunction.

But since the instruction says “add conjunctions”, maybe this one is off.

Let’s check online or common usage.

Actually, upon review: "yet" is not a conjunction — it's an adverb.

So perhaps the sentence is meant to be:
"The builders had not ____ started laying the bricks."
And the answer is "yet" — but it’s not a conjunction.

Alternatively, maybe it's "nor"?

But “nor” is used with “neither”:
"They neither ate nor drank."

So unless the sentence is “The builders had not nor started…” — that’s not valid.

So this sentence may have a flaw.

Let’s assume it’s meant to be:
"The builders had not yet started laying the bricks."
→ But “yet” is not a conjunction.

Maybe the blank is for "yet" anyway.

Or perhaps the sentence is:
"The builders had not started laying the bricks yet." — but the blank is before “started”.

So the only logical word is "yet", even though it’s not a conjunction.

But wait — maybe the sentence is:
"The builders had not only started laying the bricks." — that doesn’t work.

Alternatively, perhaps it’s:
"The builders had not begun to lay the bricks." — but again, not helpful.

I think this sentence might be flawed.

Let’s skip and come back.

---

6. Tim neither likes apples ____ pears.
→ "Tim neither likes apples nor pears."
✘ "Neither... nor" is a correlative conjunction pair.
✔️ Answer: nor

7. The family went out ____ breakfast.
→ "The family went out for breakfast."
✘ "For" is a preposition, not a conjunction.
But the sentence needs a word connecting "went out" and "breakfast".

Wait — perhaps it's:
"The family went out to have breakfast." — but that’s not what’s given.

Or: "The family went out and had breakfast." — but that’s not matching.

Alternatively, maybe it's:
"The family went out for breakfast." — but "for" is not a conjunction.

But the instruction says "add conjunctions", so maybe it’s not this.

Wait — perhaps it's:
"The family went out to eat breakfast." — again, not helping.

But looking at the blank: "went out ____ breakfast"

Only possible conjunction-like word is "for", but it's not a conjunction.

Unless it's:
"The family went out and had breakfast." — but that’s not what’s written.

Wait — maybe it’s a typo, and it should be:
"The family went out and had breakfast." — but the blank is between "out" and "breakfast".

That doesn’t work.

Alternatively, maybe it's:
"The family went out to get breakfast." — but again, not a conjunction.

This sentence is problematic.

But perhaps it’s meant to be:
"The family went out for breakfast." — and "for" is accepted as a preposition, not a conjunction.

So maybe this one is off too.

But let’s see — perhaps it’s:
"The family went out and had breakfast." — but the sentence says “____ breakfast”, not “____ had breakfast”.

So unless it’s “for”, it’s not working.

Wait — maybe the sentence is:
"The family went out ____ breakfast."
And the answer is "for" — but again, not a conjunction.

So this may be a mistake.

Alternatively, perhaps it's:
"The family went out to have breakfast." — but that’s not a conjunction.

I think both 5 and 7 are possibly flawed.

But let’s keep going.

---

8. After school they ate their snack fast ___ they could go play.
→ "After school they ate their snack fast so they could go play."
✘ "So" shows purpose or result.
✔️ Answer: so

9. It was a warm ____ sunny day so they went for a swim.
→ "It was a warm and sunny day..."
✘ "And" connects two adjectives describing the day.
✔️ Answer: and

10. Lilly helped her mum ____ dad paint the shed.
→ "Lilly helped her mum and dad paint the shed."
✘ "And" connects two people.
✔️ Answer: and

---

Now, back to the problematic ones.

---

🔍 Re-evaluating Problematic Sentences

#### Sentence 5:
"The builders had not ____ started laying the bricks."

This is tricky.
If we say: "The builders had not yet started..." — "yet" is an adverb, not a conjunction.

But is there a conjunction that fits?

What about "nor"?
"Nor" is used in negative constructions:
"Neither did they start, nor did they plan."

But here, it's not paired with "neither".

Alternatively, maybe the sentence is:
"The builders had not only started laying the bricks." — but that doesn’t make sense.

Or: "The builders had not even started..." — again, not a conjunction.

Wait — perhaps the intended answer is "yet", even though it's not a conjunction.

But the instruction says “add conjunctions”.

Alternatively, maybe the sentence is:
"The builders had not begun to lay the bricks yet." — but again, no conjunction.

I think this sentence might be incorrectly designed.

But let’s consider:
Could it be "yet"? Yes, but it's not a conjunction.

Maybe it's a typo, and it should be:
"The builders had not only started..." — no.

Another idea:
Perhaps it’s meant to be:
"The builders had not started laying the bricks yet." — but the blank is before “started”.

So the only logical word is "yet", even if it's not a conjunction.

But let’s check standard grammar.

Actually, in some contexts, “yet” is used in negative sentences with “not”, but it's not a conjunction.

So perhaps the worksheet has an error.

Alternatively, maybe it’s:
"The builders had not even started..." — but again, not a conjunction.

So I think the best we can do is accept "yet" as the intended answer, even if it's not a conjunction.

But let’s look at sentence 7.

#### Sentence 7:
"The family went out ____ breakfast."

This is clearly missing a preposition: "for".

But "for" is not a conjunction.

Unless it's:
"The family went out and had breakfast." — but the sentence says “____ breakfast”, not “____ had breakfast”.

So unless it’s a typo, this is flawed.

But perhaps the intended answer is "for", even though it's not a conjunction.

Alternatively, maybe it's:
"The family went out to eat breakfast." — but again, not a conjunction.

So both 5 and 7 seem to be issues.

But let’s check online or standard worksheets.

Wait — perhaps sentence 5 is meant to be:
"The builders had not yet started laying the bricks." — and “yet” is accepted as a filler, even if not a conjunction.

Similarly, sentence 7: “The family went out for breakfast.” — “for” is a preposition.

But the worksheet says “Add conjunctions”, so maybe it's a mistake.

Alternatively, perhaps sentence 5 is:
"The builders had not only started laying the bricks." — no.

Wait — another possibility:
Maybe it’s:
"The builders had not begun to lay the bricks yet." — but again, no conjunction.

I think we must conclude that:

- Sentence 5: yet (adverb, not conjunction) — but likely intended.
- Sentence 7: for (preposition) — but not a conjunction.

But let’s double-check the original.

Wait — perhaps sentence 7 is:
"The family went out and had breakfast." — but it says “____ breakfast”.

No.

Alternatively, maybe it’s:
"The family went out to have breakfast." — but again, not a conjunction.

So perhaps the worksheet has errors.

But let’s assume the following:

✔ Final Answers (with explanations):

1. so – cause and effect: rain caused them to go inside.
2. and – joining two actions.
3. but – contrast: tired, yet continued.
4. and – joining two tasks.
5. yet – although not a conjunction, it’s the only logical fit (adverb).
6. nor – part of "neither... nor" pair.
7. for – preposition, but commonly used; however, not a conjunction.
8. so – purpose: they ate fast so they could play.
9. and – joining two adjectives.
10. and – joining two people.

But since the instruction says “conjunctions”, let’s reconsider:

Wait — perhaps sentence 5 is:
"The builders had not only started laying the bricks." — no.

Another idea:
Maybe sentence 5 is:
"The builders had not yet started laying the bricks." — and “yet” is accepted in many educational contexts even if not technically a conjunction.

Similarly, sentence 7: “The family went out for breakfast.” — “for” is not a conjunction.

But let’s check if any of these could be fixed.

Wait — perhaps sentence 7 is:
"The family went out to have breakfast." — but again, not a conjunction.

Alternatively, maybe it’s:
"The family went out and had breakfast." — but the blank is between “out” and “breakfast”.

So unless it’s “for”, it doesn’t work.

I think the most plausible answers are:

---

✔ Final Answer Key:

1. so
2. and
3. but
4. and
5. yet *(Note: "yet" is an adverb, not a conjunction; possibly a mistake in the worksheet)*
6. nor
7. for *(Note: "for" is a preposition; not a conjunction)*
8. so
9. and
10. and

---

🟡 Explanation of Why These Work:

- so: shows result (rain → went inside)
- and: adds actions
- but: shows contrast
- and: lists tasks
- yet: indicates time (not started until now) — though not a conjunction
- nor: pairs with "neither"
- for: indicates purpose — but not a conjunction
- so: shows reason (ate fast to play)
- and: joins adjectives
- and: joins people

---

⚠️ Note:

Sentences 5 and 7 may contain errors in the worksheet. They require adverbs ("yet") or prepositions ("for"), not conjunctions. The rest are correctly designed.

---

✔ Corrected Version (if possible):

- 5. "The builders had not yet started laying the bricks." → Acceptable in context.
- 7. "The family went out for breakfast." → Acceptable, but "for" is not a conjunction.

---

Final Answer:

1. so
2. and
3. but
4. and
5. yet
6. nor
7. for
8. so
9. and
10. and

✔ These are the most logical completions, even if some are not strictly conjunctions.