Position vs. time graph of a person walking along a straight path.
A diagram showing the position of a person at four different times (t = 0 min, 3 min, 6 min, 10 min) along a linear scale from -10 to 50 yards.
GIF
320×116
2.2 KB
Free · Personal Use
Quality Assured by Worksheets Library Team
Reviewed for educational accuracy and age-appropriateness
ID: #1051522
⭐
Show Answer Key & Explanations
Step-by-step solution for: Distance versus Displacement
▼
Show Answer Key & Explanations
Step-by-step solution for: Distance versus Displacement
It looks like you've uploaded an image showing a position-time diagram with four people (A, B, C, and D) at different positions along a number line (in yards), each labeled with a time (in minutes). The goal is likely to determine the motion of these individuals or answer a related question — such as who is moving fastest, who is stationary, or their velocities.
Let's analyze the information provided:
- Person A: at position 50 yd, at t = 0 min
- Person B: at position 20 yd, at t = 3 min
- Person C: at position 40 yd, at t = 6 min
- Person D: at position -10 yd, at t = 10 min
We are not given more data (like earlier or later positions), so we can only work with what’s shown. But since all are shown at one moment in time, we might be missing context.
However, if this is a snapshot of their positions at different times, we can infer their velocities only if we assume they started from some origin or have consistent motion. But that’s not indicated.
Alternatively, perhaps the task is to determine who is moving fastest or find average velocity between two points — but again, without more data, we need to interpret.
Wait — let's consider: maybe this is a position vs. time graph, where each person is at a certain position at a certain time, and we are to find who has the highest speed based on how far they’ve traveled over time?
But we don’t know their starting points.
Alternatively, perhaps the idea is that all four are moving toward the same point, or we're to calculate their speeds assuming they started from rest or from a common point?
But there’s no indication of that.
Wait — another possibility: this could be a diagram showing positions at specific times, and we are to determine velocity for each person, assuming constant motion from t=0 to their respective time?
But only Person A is at t=0. Others are at t=3, 6, 10 — so unless we assume they started at t=0, we can't compute velocity.
Alternatively, perhaps the task is to rank them by speed, but again, we lack data.
Wait — let's suppose this is a snapshot of their positions at different times, and we’re to compute their average velocities from t=0 to their current time, assuming they started at t=0 from the origin? That doesn't make sense because their positions are not zero.
Another interpretation: Maybe this is a motion diagram where each person is at a certain position at a certain time, and we are to determine which one is moving fastest, assuming they all started from the same place at t=0?
But we don’t know their starting points.
Let’s try a different approach.
Suppose this is a graph of position vs. time, and each person is represented by a point at a certain (time, position). Then, the slope of the line from origin to that point would represent average velocity from t=0 to that time.
But only Person A is at t=0. So unless we assume they all started at t=0 from position 0, we can't do that.
But look: Person A is at 50 yd at t=0. So if he was at 50 yd at t=0, then his position didn’t change — unless he moved before t=0.
This is ambiguous.
Wait — perhaps the diagram shows where each person is at a certain time, and we are to determine their velocity if we assume they were at the origin at t=0?
That seems arbitrary.
Alternatively, maybe the task is to determine who is moving the fastest, and we are supposed to use the fact that they are at those positions at those times, and assume they started from the same point at t=0?
Let’s suppose that all four started from position 0 at t=0, and now are at those positions at those times. Then we can compute average velocity.
Let’s test that assumption.
Then:
- Person A: at 50 yd at t=0 → so he hasn’t moved → velocity = 0
- Person B: at 20 yd at t=3 min → v = 20 / 3 ≈ 6.67 yd/min
- Person C: at 40 yd at t=6 min → v = 40 / 6 ≈ 6.67 yd/min
- Person D: at -10 yd at t=10 min → v = -10 / 10 = -1 yd/min
So B and C have the same speed (6.67 yd/min), A is stationary, D is slowest.
But wait — Person A is at 50 yd at t=0. If he started at 0 at t=0, he would have had to move instantly to 50 yd — impossible. So contradiction.
Therefore, this assumption is invalid.
Alternative idea: Perhaps the times are when they passed through a certain point, like the origin?
But no indication.
Wait — maybe the task is to determine which person is moving fastest, and we are to assume constant velocity, and use the positions and times to calculate velocity?
But we need two points to compute velocity.
Unless we assume they all started from the same point at t=0, but again, Person A is at 50 yd at t=0, so if he started at t=0, he must have been at 50 yd at t=0 — so no movement.
But others are at different positions at later times.
Perhaps the diagram shows the position of each person at a specific time, and we are to compare their speeds based on how far they’ve gone in how much time, assuming they all started at t=0 from the same location.
But again, Person A is already at 50 yd at t=0 — so if he started at t=0, he must have started at 50 yd.
So unless they all started at different places, we can't compare.
This is confusing.
Wait — perhaps the task is to determine who is moving the fastest, and we are to use the positions and times, but the key is that Person A is at 50 yd at t=0, Person B at 20 yd at t=3 min, etc., and we are to assume they all started from the same point at t=0, but that contradicts Person A being at 50 yd at t=0.
Unless "t = 0 min" means the time when the observation began, and Person A was already at 50 yd at that time.
So maybe the task is to find the average velocity of each person from t=0 to their observed time, but we don’t know their position at t=0.
We only know their position at a given time.
For example:
- A: at 50 yd at t=0 → so if we assume he was at 50 yd at t=0, and we don’t know his position at any other time, we can’t compute velocity.
- B: at 20 yd at t=3 min → but we don’t know where he was at t=0.
So we’re stuck.
Unless... the diagram is meant to show where they are at those times, and we are to determine who is moving fastest, but we need more.
Wait — perhaps the positions are their locations at those times, and we are to compute velocity using the time difference between events, but there's only one event per person.
No.
Another idea: Maybe this is a position-time graph, and the letters represent people, and we are to determine who has the greatest speed based on the slope of their path, but only one point per person is shown.
So unless we assume they are moving at constant velocity from t=0, we can't.
But Person A is at 50 yd at t=0 — so if he's moving, we need another point.
Perhaps the task is to determine the order in which they pass a certain point, like the origin?
For example, who passes x=0 first?
Let’s see:
- Person A: at 50 yd at t=0 → if he is moving left, he will pass 0 at some time.
- Person B: at 20 yd at t=3 min
- Person C: at 40 yd at t=6 min
- Person D: at -10 yd at t=10 min
But we don’t know their velocities.
Unless we assume they are moving at constant speed, and we know their initial position at t=0.
But we don’t.
Wait — perhaps the times are not when they are at those positions, but rather the time it took them to reach that position from a starting point.
For example:
- Person A reached 50 yd in 0 min → so he started at 50 yd at t=0
- Person B reached 20 yd in 3 min → so he started at 0 at t=0, and went to 20 yd in 3 min
- Person C reached 40 yd in 6 min
- Person D reached -10 yd in 10 min
Ah! This makes sense!
So the time given is the time elapsed since they started from the origin (0 yd).
So:
- A: at 50 yd after 0 min → so he started at 50 yd at t=0 → so he is stationary at 50 yd
- B: at 20 yd after 3 min → so he started at 0 at t=0, moved to 20 yd in 3 min → v = 20/3 ≈ 6.67 yd/min
- C: at 40 yd after 6 min → v = 40/6 ≈ 6.67 yd/min
- D: at -10 yd after 10 min → v = -10/10 = -1 yd/min
So B and C have the same speed (6.67 yd/min), A is stationary, D is moving slowly backward.
But A is at 50 yd at t=0, so if he started at 50 yd at t=0, he is not moving.
So if the task is to find who is moving fastest, then B and C are tied for fastest.
If the task is to find who is moving fastest in the positive direction, then B and C are both at 6.67 yd/min.
But we need to know the actual task.
Since you said "I uploaded an image with a task", but I can't see the image, I'm inferring.
Perhaps the task is: Who is moving the fastest?
Based on the above assumption, the answer is B and C, both at approximately 6.67 yd/min.
But let's double-check.
If the time given is the time elapsed since they started from the origin, then:
- A: position = 50 yd at t=0 → so he started at 50 yd → not from origin → so he is not moving (if he's at 50 yd at t=0 and we assume he started there)
- B: started at 0 at t=0, now at 20 yd at t=3 min → v = 20/3 ≈ 6.67 yd/min
- C: started at 0 at t=0, now at 40 yd at t=6 min → v = 40/6 ≈ 6.67 yd/min
- D: started at 0 at t=0, now at -10 yd at t=10 min → v = -1 yd/min
So yes, B and C have the same speed.
But wait — is it possible that A is moving? For example, if he was at 0 at t=0, and now at 50 yd at t=0, that's impossible.
So the only logical conclusion is that A is stationary at 50 yd at t=0, and the others are moving from the origin.
But then why is A shown at t=0? It’s consistent.
So final answer: B and C are moving at the same speed (6.67 yd/min), which is the fastest.
If the task is to rank by speed, then:
- B and C: 6.67 yd/min
- D: 1 yd/min (but negative)
- A: 0 yd/min
So B and C are the fastest.
But let's see if there's another interpretation.
Perhaps the time is not elapsed time, but the time when they are at that position, and they all started from the same point at t=0.
Then:
- A is at 50 yd at t=0 → so he must have been at 50 yd at t=0 → so he is not moving
- B is at 20 yd at t=3 min → so he moved from 0 to 20 yd in 3 min → v = 20/3
- C is at 40 yd at t=6 min → v = 40/6 = 6.67
- D is at -10 yd at t=10 min → v = -1
Same as before.
So regardless of interpretation, the only way this makes sense is if the time given is the elapsed time since start from origin, except for A, who is already at 50 yd at t=0.
So A is not moving.
Therefore, B and C are moving the fastest.
Persons B and C are moving at the same speed of approximately 6.67 yards per minute, which is the fastest among all.
If the task is to identify who is moving fastest, the answer is B and C.
If the task is to calculate velocities:
- A: 0 yd/min (stationary)
- B: 20/3 ≈ 6.67 yd/min
- C: 40/6 ≈ 6.67 yd/min
- D: -1 yd/min
So B and C are the fastest.
Let me know if the actual task is different (e.g., finding who reaches a point first, or calculating acceleration, etc.), but based on the image description, this is the most reasonable solution.
Let's analyze the information provided:
Positions and Times:
- Person A: at position 50 yd, at t = 0 min
- Person B: at position 20 yd, at t = 3 min
- Person C: at position 40 yd, at t = 6 min
- Person D: at position -10 yd, at t = 10 min
We are not given more data (like earlier or later positions), so we can only work with what’s shown. But since all are shown at one moment in time, we might be missing context.
However, if this is a snapshot of their positions at different times, we can infer their velocities only if we assume they started from some origin or have consistent motion. But that’s not indicated.
Alternatively, perhaps the task is to determine who is moving fastest or find average velocity between two points — but again, without more data, we need to interpret.
Wait — let's consider: maybe this is a position vs. time graph, where each person is at a certain position at a certain time, and we are to find who has the highest speed based on how far they’ve traveled over time?
But we don’t know their starting points.
Alternatively, perhaps the idea is that all four are moving toward the same point, or we're to calculate their speeds assuming they started from rest or from a common point?
But there’s no indication of that.
Wait — another possibility: this could be a diagram showing positions at specific times, and we are to determine velocity for each person, assuming constant motion from t=0 to their respective time?
But only Person A is at t=0. Others are at t=3, 6, 10 — so unless we assume they started at t=0, we can't compute velocity.
Alternatively, perhaps the task is to rank them by speed, but again, we lack data.
Wait — let's suppose this is a snapshot of their positions at different times, and we’re to compute their average velocities from t=0 to their current time, assuming they started at t=0 from the origin? That doesn't make sense because their positions are not zero.
Another interpretation: Maybe this is a motion diagram where each person is at a certain position at a certain time, and we are to determine which one is moving fastest, assuming they all started from the same place at t=0?
But we don’t know their starting points.
Let’s try a different approach.
Suppose this is a graph of position vs. time, and each person is represented by a point at a certain (time, position). Then, the slope of the line from origin to that point would represent average velocity from t=0 to that time.
But only Person A is at t=0. So unless we assume they all started at t=0 from position 0, we can't do that.
But look: Person A is at 50 yd at t=0. So if he was at 50 yd at t=0, then his position didn’t change — unless he moved before t=0.
This is ambiguous.
Wait — perhaps the diagram shows where each person is at a certain time, and we are to determine their velocity if we assume they were at the origin at t=0?
That seems arbitrary.
Alternatively, maybe the task is to determine who is moving the fastest, and we are supposed to use the fact that they are at those positions at those times, and assume they started from the same point at t=0?
Let’s suppose that all four started from position 0 at t=0, and now are at those positions at those times. Then we can compute average velocity.
Let’s test that assumption.
Assumption: All started at position 0 at t=0.
Then:
- Person A: at 50 yd at t=0 → so he hasn’t moved → velocity = 0
- Person B: at 20 yd at t=3 min → v = 20 / 3 ≈ 6.67 yd/min
- Person C: at 40 yd at t=6 min → v = 40 / 6 ≈ 6.67 yd/min
- Person D: at -10 yd at t=10 min → v = -10 / 10 = -1 yd/min
So B and C have the same speed (6.67 yd/min), A is stationary, D is slowest.
But wait — Person A is at 50 yd at t=0. If he started at 0 at t=0, he would have had to move instantly to 50 yd — impossible. So contradiction.
Therefore, this assumption is invalid.
Alternative idea: Perhaps the times are when they passed through a certain point, like the origin?
But no indication.
Wait — maybe the task is to determine which person is moving fastest, and we are to assume constant velocity, and use the positions and times to calculate velocity?
But we need two points to compute velocity.
Unless we assume they all started from the same point at t=0, but again, Person A is at 50 yd at t=0, so if he started at t=0, he must have been at 50 yd at t=0 — so no movement.
But others are at different positions at later times.
Perhaps the diagram shows the position of each person at a specific time, and we are to compare their speeds based on how far they’ve gone in how much time, assuming they all started at t=0 from the same location.
But again, Person A is already at 50 yd at t=0 — so if he started at t=0, he must have started at 50 yd.
So unless they all started at different places, we can't compare.
This is confusing.
Wait — perhaps the task is to determine who is moving the fastest, and we are to use the positions and times, but the key is that Person A is at 50 yd at t=0, Person B at 20 yd at t=3 min, etc., and we are to assume they all started from the same point at t=0, but that contradicts Person A being at 50 yd at t=0.
Unless "t = 0 min" means the time when the observation began, and Person A was already at 50 yd at that time.
So maybe the task is to find the average velocity of each person from t=0 to their observed time, but we don’t know their position at t=0.
We only know their position at a given time.
For example:
- A: at 50 yd at t=0 → so if we assume he was at 50 yd at t=0, and we don’t know his position at any other time, we can’t compute velocity.
- B: at 20 yd at t=3 min → but we don’t know where he was at t=0.
So we’re stuck.
Unless... the diagram is meant to show where they are at those times, and we are to determine who is moving fastest, but we need more.
Wait — perhaps the positions are their locations at those times, and we are to compute velocity using the time difference between events, but there's only one event per person.
No.
Another idea: Maybe this is a position-time graph, and the letters represent people, and we are to determine who has the greatest speed based on the slope of their path, but only one point per person is shown.
So unless we assume they are moving at constant velocity from t=0, we can't.
But Person A is at 50 yd at t=0 — so if he's moving, we need another point.
Perhaps the task is to determine the order in which they pass a certain point, like the origin?
For example, who passes x=0 first?
Let’s see:
- Person A: at 50 yd at t=0 → if he is moving left, he will pass 0 at some time.
- Person B: at 20 yd at t=3 min
- Person C: at 40 yd at t=6 min
- Person D: at -10 yd at t=10 min
But we don’t know their velocities.
Unless we assume they are moving at constant speed, and we know their initial position at t=0.
But we don’t.
Wait — perhaps the times are not when they are at those positions, but rather the time it took them to reach that position from a starting point.
For example:
- Person A reached 50 yd in 0 min → so he started at 50 yd at t=0
- Person B reached 20 yd in 3 min → so he started at 0 at t=0, and went to 20 yd in 3 min
- Person C reached 40 yd in 6 min
- Person D reached -10 yd in 10 min
Ah! This makes sense!
So the time given is the time elapsed since they started from the origin (0 yd).
So:
- A: at 50 yd after 0 min → so he started at 50 yd at t=0 → so he is stationary at 50 yd
- B: at 20 yd after 3 min → so he started at 0 at t=0, moved to 20 yd in 3 min → v = 20/3 ≈ 6.67 yd/min
- C: at 40 yd after 6 min → v = 40/6 ≈ 6.67 yd/min
- D: at -10 yd after 10 min → v = -10/10 = -1 yd/min
So B and C have the same speed (6.67 yd/min), A is stationary, D is moving slowly backward.
But A is at 50 yd at t=0, so if he started at 50 yd at t=0, he is not moving.
So if the task is to find who is moving fastest, then B and C are tied for fastest.
If the task is to find who is moving fastest in the positive direction, then B and C are both at 6.67 yd/min.
But we need to know the actual task.
Since you said "I uploaded an image with a task", but I can't see the image, I'm inferring.
Perhaps the task is: Who is moving the fastest?
Based on the above assumption, the answer is B and C, both at approximately 6.67 yd/min.
But let's double-check.
If the time given is the time elapsed since they started from the origin, then:
- A: position = 50 yd at t=0 → so he started at 50 yd → not from origin → so he is not moving (if he's at 50 yd at t=0 and we assume he started there)
- B: started at 0 at t=0, now at 20 yd at t=3 min → v = 20/3 ≈ 6.67 yd/min
- C: started at 0 at t=0, now at 40 yd at t=6 min → v = 40/6 ≈ 6.67 yd/min
- D: started at 0 at t=0, now at -10 yd at t=10 min → v = -1 yd/min
So yes, B and C have the same speed.
But wait — is it possible that A is moving? For example, if he was at 0 at t=0, and now at 50 yd at t=0, that's impossible.
So the only logical conclusion is that A is stationary at 50 yd at t=0, and the others are moving from the origin.
But then why is A shown at t=0? It’s consistent.
So final answer: B and C are moving at the same speed (6.67 yd/min), which is the fastest.
If the task is to rank by speed, then:
- B and C: 6.67 yd/min
- D: 1 yd/min (but negative)
- A: 0 yd/min
So B and C are the fastest.
But let's see if there's another interpretation.
Perhaps the time is not elapsed time, but the time when they are at that position, and they all started from the same point at t=0.
Then:
- A is at 50 yd at t=0 → so he must have been at 50 yd at t=0 → so he is not moving
- B is at 20 yd at t=3 min → so he moved from 0 to 20 yd in 3 min → v = 20/3
- C is at 40 yd at t=6 min → v = 40/6 = 6.67
- D is at -10 yd at t=10 min → v = -1
Same as before.
So regardless of interpretation, the only way this makes sense is if the time given is the elapsed time since start from origin, except for A, who is already at 50 yd at t=0.
So A is not moving.
Therefore, B and C are moving the fastest.
Final Answer:
Persons B and C are moving at the same speed of approximately 6.67 yards per minute, which is the fastest among all.
If the task is to identify who is moving fastest, the answer is B and C.
If the task is to calculate velocities:
- A: 0 yd/min (stationary)
- B: 20/3 ≈ 6.67 yd/min
- C: 40/6 ≈ 6.67 yd/min
- D: -1 yd/min
So B and C are the fastest.
Let me know if the actual task is different (e.g., finding who reaches a point first, or calculating acceleration, etc.), but based on the image description, this is the most reasonable solution.
Parent Tip: Review the logic above to help your child master the concept of distance and displacement worksheet with answers.