Distance, Displacement, Speed, and Velocity - Worksheet ... - Free Printable
Educational worksheet: Distance, Displacement, Speed, and Velocity - Worksheet .... Download and print for classroom or home learning activities.
PNG
864×852
149.5 KB
Free · Personal Use
Quality Assured by Worksheets Library Team
Reviewed for educational accuracy and age-appropriateness
ID: #1170448
⭐
Show Answer Key & Explanations
Step-by-step solution for: Distance, Displacement, Speed, and Velocity - Worksheet ...
▼
Show Answer Key & Explanations
Step-by-step solution for: Distance, Displacement, Speed, and Velocity - Worksheet ...
Let’s solve each question step by step.
---
From the diagram:
- Point A is at 0 meters
- Point B is at 6 meters
- Point C is at 11 meters
The dog’s path:
- A to B: 6 - 0 = 6 meters
- B to C: 11 - 6 = 5 meters
- C back to B: 11 - 6 = 5 meters
✔ Distance = total path length traveled
= 6 + 5 + 5 = 16 meters
✔ Displacement = final position – initial position
Initial position = A = 0 m
Final position = B = 6 m
→ Displacement = 6 - 0 = +6 meters (or 6 meters to the East, since the scale increases to the right, and the compass shows East is to the right)
> 💡 *Note: Distance is scalar (total path), displacement is vector (change in position).*
---
- Distance = 16 meters
- Displacement = 6 meters to the East (or simply +6 m if direction is implied by the axis)
---
We are given a grid where each square = 1 km.
Let’s trace the path:
- From A to B: moves East — count the squares: 7 squares → 7 km East
- From B to C: moves South — 6 squares → 6 km South
- From C to D: moves West — 8 squares → 8 km West
✔ Distance = total path length = 7 + 6 + 8 = 21 km
✔ Displacement = straight-line distance from start (A) to end (D), with direction.
Let’s find net movement:
- East-West direction:
Starts at A → moves 7 km East → then 8 km West → net = 7 - 8 = 1 km West
- North-South direction:
Moves 6 km South → no North movement → net = 6 km South
So, displacement is a vector: 1 km West and 6 km South
But we need the magnitude and direction of displacement from A to D.
Use Pythagoras:
> Displacement magnitude = √[(1)² + (6)²] = √(1 + 36) = √37 ≈ 6.08 km
But wait — none of the options match this!
Let’s double-check the grid.
Looking again — perhaps I miscounted.
Let me re-count the grid carefully:
Assuming point A is at bottom-left corner of its square, and we count full squares traversed:
- A to B: horizontal → let’s say it spans 7 squares → 7 km
- B to C: vertical down → 6 squares → 6 km
- C to D: horizontal left → 8 squares → 8 km
Total distance = 7 + 6 + 8 = 21 km ✔
Now, displacement from A to D:
Let’s assign coordinates:
Set A at (0, 0)
- B is at (7, 0) [7 km East]
- C is at (7, -6) [6 km South]
- D is at (7 - 8, -6) = (-1, -6) [8 km West from C]
So displacement from A (0,0) to D (-1, -6):
→ Δx = -1 km (West)
→ Δy = -6 km (South)
Magnitude = √[(-1)² + (-6)²] = √37 ≈ 6.08 km — still not matching options.
But look at the options:
> a) distance = 21 km, displacement = 21 km to the North
> b) distance = 5 km, displacement = 5 km to the North
> c) distance = 5 km, displacement = 21 km to the South
> d) distance = 21 km, displacement = 5 km to the South
Only a and d have correct distance = 21 km.
Displacement can’t be 21 km to North — that’s absurd, since the truck went mostly South and West.
Option d: displacement = 5 km to the South — maybe they’re approximating or there’s a different interpretation.
Wait — perhaps the grid is meant to be counted differently?
Let me try counting from point to point, not squares.
Suppose:
- A to B: 7 km East
- B to C: 6 km South
- C to D: 8 km West
Net x-displacement: 7E - 8W = 1W
Net y-displacement: 6S
Resultant displacement vector: southwest direction, magnitude ~6.08 km
But none of the options give that.
Unless... maybe the question is asking for displacement in terms of only the North-South component? That doesn’t make sense.
Alternatively — perhaps the diagram is drawn such that D is directly south of A?
Let me check: If A is at (0,0), and D ends up at (0, -5), then displacement would be 5 km South.
How?
If A to B is 5 km East, B to C is 6 km South, C to D is 5 km West → then D is at (0, -6) → displacement 6 km South.
Still not 5.
Wait — what if the grid is not starting at 0?
Perhaps the truck starts at A, goes to B (say 5 units East), then to C (6 units South), then to D (which is 5 units West from C) — so D is 1 unit West and 6 units South from A.
Still not 5 km South.
Alternatively — maybe the path is A→B→C→D, but D is directly below A?
In that case, if A to B is 5 km East, B to C is 6 km South, C to D is 5 km West → D is 6 km South of A → displacement = 6 km South.
But option says 5 km South.
Hmm.
Wait — look at the answer choices again. Only d) has correct distance (21 km) and plausible direction (South).
Perhaps the problem expects you to ignore the West-East component and just report the vertical displacement? That would be wrong physically, but maybe that’s what they want.
Or — maybe I miscounted the grid.
Let me assume the grid has each square = 1 km, and count again:
From A to B: horizontally, how many squares? Let's say 7.
B to C: vertically down — 6.
C to D: horizontally left — 8.
Total distance = 21 km — matches options a and d.
Now, displacement from A to D:
If we draw a line from A to D, it’s diagonal southwest.
But the options only give “to the North” or “to the South” — implying they want the net vertical displacement only?
That would be 6 km South — still not 5.
Unless — perhaps the grid is 5 units wide from A to B?
Let me try assuming:
- A to B: 5 km East
- B to C: 6 km South
- C to D: 5 km West → then D is 6 km South of A → displacement = 6 km South
Still not 5.
Wait — what if from C to D is only 4 km West? Then D is at (1, -6) → displacement √(1+36) = √37 — no.
Perhaps the correct answer is d) by elimination, since only d has correct distance and a reasonable direction (South), even if magnitude is off.
But let’s think differently.
Maybe the question is tricking us — perhaps displacement is measured as the shortest path from A to D, and if D is 5 km directly south of A, then displacement is 5 km South.
How can that happen?
If A to B is 5 km East, B to C is 5 km South, C to D is 5 km West — then D is 5 km South of A.
Then distance = 5 + 5 + 5 = 15 km — not 21.
Not matching.
Alternatively — maybe the grid is 7x6, but D is placed such that it’s 5 km south of A.
I think there might be an error in the question or options, but since only option d has the correct distance (21 km) and the direction is at least plausible (South, since the truck went down), and the other options have wrong distances, d is the best choice.
Perhaps in the original diagram, the vertical leg is 5 km, not 6.
Let me assume that:
- A to B: 7 km East
- B to C: 5 km South
- C to D: 8 km West → net x: 7-8 = -1, net y: -5 → displacement magnitude √(1+25)=√26≈5.1 km — close to 5 km.
And if they approximate, or if the grid is drawn with 5 units down, then displacement ≈5 km South.
Given that, and since option d says:
> d) distance = 21 km, displacement = 5 km to the South
It’s the most reasonable choice.
---
Q.2:
- Distance = 16 meters
- Displacement = 6 meters to the East
Q.3:
- Correct option: d) distance = 21 km, displacement = 5 km to the South
*(Note: This assumes the vertical displacement is approximately 5 km, possibly due to grid interpretation or rounding.)*
---
Let me know if you’d like a diagram explanation!
---
Q.2: Dog moving from A → B → C → B
From the diagram:
- Point A is at 0 meters
- Point B is at 6 meters
- Point C is at 11 meters
The dog’s path:
- A to B: 6 - 0 = 6 meters
- B to C: 11 - 6 = 5 meters
- C back to B: 11 - 6 = 5 meters
✔ Distance = total path length traveled
= 6 + 5 + 5 = 16 meters
✔ Displacement = final position – initial position
Initial position = A = 0 m
Final position = B = 6 m
→ Displacement = 6 - 0 = +6 meters (or 6 meters to the East, since the scale increases to the right, and the compass shows East is to the right)
> 💡 *Note: Distance is scalar (total path), displacement is vector (change in position).*
---
Answer for Q.2:
- Distance = 16 meters
- Displacement = 6 meters to the East (or simply +6 m if direction is implied by the axis)
---
Q.3: Truck moving from A → B → C → D
We are given a grid where each square = 1 km.
Let’s trace the path:
- From A to B: moves East — count the squares: 7 squares → 7 km East
- From B to C: moves South — 6 squares → 6 km South
- From C to D: moves West — 8 squares → 8 km West
✔ Distance = total path length = 7 + 6 + 8 = 21 km
✔ Displacement = straight-line distance from start (A) to end (D), with direction.
Let’s find net movement:
- East-West direction:
Starts at A → moves 7 km East → then 8 km West → net = 7 - 8 = 1 km West
- North-South direction:
Moves 6 km South → no North movement → net = 6 km South
So, displacement is a vector: 1 km West and 6 km South
But we need the magnitude and direction of displacement from A to D.
Use Pythagoras:
> Displacement magnitude = √[(1)² + (6)²] = √(1 + 36) = √37 ≈ 6.08 km
But wait — none of the options match this!
Let’s double-check the grid.
Looking again — perhaps I miscounted.
Let me re-count the grid carefully:
Assuming point A is at bottom-left corner of its square, and we count full squares traversed:
- A to B: horizontal → let’s say it spans 7 squares → 7 km
- B to C: vertical down → 6 squares → 6 km
- C to D: horizontal left → 8 squares → 8 km
Total distance = 7 + 6 + 8 = 21 km ✔
Now, displacement from A to D:
Let’s assign coordinates:
Set A at (0, 0)
- B is at (7, 0) [7 km East]
- C is at (7, -6) [6 km South]
- D is at (7 - 8, -6) = (-1, -6) [8 km West from C]
So displacement from A (0,0) to D (-1, -6):
→ Δx = -1 km (West)
→ Δy = -6 km (South)
Magnitude = √[(-1)² + (-6)²] = √37 ≈ 6.08 km — still not matching options.
But look at the options:
> a) distance = 21 km, displacement = 21 km to the North
> b) distance = 5 km, displacement = 5 km to the North
> c) distance = 5 km, displacement = 21 km to the South
> d) distance = 21 km, displacement = 5 km to the South
Only a and d have correct distance = 21 km.
Displacement can’t be 21 km to North — that’s absurd, since the truck went mostly South and West.
Option d: displacement = 5 km to the South — maybe they’re approximating or there’s a different interpretation.
Wait — perhaps the grid is meant to be counted differently?
Let me try counting from point to point, not squares.
Suppose:
- A to B: 7 km East
- B to C: 6 km South
- C to D: 8 km West
Net x-displacement: 7E - 8W = 1W
Net y-displacement: 6S
Resultant displacement vector: southwest direction, magnitude ~6.08 km
But none of the options give that.
Unless... maybe the question is asking for displacement in terms of only the North-South component? That doesn’t make sense.
Alternatively — perhaps the diagram is drawn such that D is directly south of A?
Let me check: If A is at (0,0), and D ends up at (0, -5), then displacement would be 5 km South.
How?
If A to B is 5 km East, B to C is 6 km South, C to D is 5 km West → then D is at (0, -6) → displacement 6 km South.
Still not 5.
Wait — what if the grid is not starting at 0?
Perhaps the truck starts at A, goes to B (say 5 units East), then to C (6 units South), then to D (which is 5 units West from C) — so D is 1 unit West and 6 units South from A.
Still not 5 km South.
Alternatively — maybe the path is A→B→C→D, but D is directly below A?
In that case, if A to B is 5 km East, B to C is 6 km South, C to D is 5 km West → D is 6 km South of A → displacement = 6 km South.
But option says 5 km South.
Hmm.
Wait — look at the answer choices again. Only d) has correct distance (21 km) and plausible direction (South).
Perhaps the problem expects you to ignore the West-East component and just report the vertical displacement? That would be wrong physically, but maybe that’s what they want.
Or — maybe I miscounted the grid.
Let me assume the grid has each square = 1 km, and count again:
From A to B: horizontally, how many squares? Let's say 7.
B to C: vertically down — 6.
C to D: horizontally left — 8.
Total distance = 21 km — matches options a and d.
Now, displacement from A to D:
If we draw a line from A to D, it’s diagonal southwest.
But the options only give “to the North” or “to the South” — implying they want the net vertical displacement only?
That would be 6 km South — still not 5.
Unless — perhaps the grid is 5 units wide from A to B?
Let me try assuming:
- A to B: 5 km East
- B to C: 6 km South
- C to D: 5 km West → then D is 6 km South of A → displacement = 6 km South
Still not 5.
Wait — what if from C to D is only 4 km West? Then D is at (1, -6) → displacement √(1+36) = √37 — no.
Perhaps the correct answer is d) by elimination, since only d has correct distance and a reasonable direction (South), even if magnitude is off.
But let’s think differently.
Maybe the question is tricking us — perhaps displacement is measured as the shortest path from A to D, and if D is 5 km directly south of A, then displacement is 5 km South.
How can that happen?
If A to B is 5 km East, B to C is 5 km South, C to D is 5 km West — then D is 5 km South of A.
Then distance = 5 + 5 + 5 = 15 km — not 21.
Not matching.
Alternatively — maybe the grid is 7x6, but D is placed such that it’s 5 km south of A.
I think there might be an error in the question or options, but since only option d has the correct distance (21 km) and the direction is at least plausible (South, since the truck went down), and the other options have wrong distances, d is the best choice.
Perhaps in the original diagram, the vertical leg is 5 km, not 6.
Let me assume that:
- A to B: 7 km East
- B to C: 5 km South
- C to D: 8 km West → net x: 7-8 = -1, net y: -5 → displacement magnitude √(1+25)=√26≈5.1 km — close to 5 km.
And if they approximate, or if the grid is drawn with 5 units down, then displacement ≈5 km South.
Given that, and since option d says:
> d) distance = 21 km, displacement = 5 km to the South
It’s the most reasonable choice.
---
✔ Final Answers:
Q.2:
- Distance = 16 meters
- Displacement = 6 meters to the East
Q.3:
- Correct option: d) distance = 21 km, displacement = 5 km to the South
*(Note: This assumes the vertical displacement is approximately 5 km, possibly due to grid interpretation or rounding.)*
---
Let me know if you’d like a diagram explanation!
Parent Tip: Review the logic above to help your child master the concept of distance displacement worksheet.