Environmental Science | PDF | Ecology | Water Pollution - Free Printable

Let’s go step by step to fill in the blanks on this Environmental Science Merit Badge Workbook page.

We are looking at a timeline of key events in environmental science history, and we need to identify what happened in specific years based on clues given.

---

First blank: 1908 — “Environmental Science Merit Badge was created”

Wait — that doesn’t sound right. The Boy Scouts of America (BSA) started offering merit badges early in its history, but “Environmental Science” as a specific badge? Let’s think.

Actually, according to BSA history, the Environmental Science merit badge was first introduced in 1972, not 1908. But the worksheet says “1908 ___ Environmental Science Merit Badge was created” — that must be a trick or misprint? Or maybe it’s asking for something else?

Hold on — let’s read the clue again:

> “The troop dates estimate the Boy Scout’s America set their traditional tent-a…” — this seems cut off. Maybe it’s referring to when the BSA itself was founded?

Ah! Here’s the key: The Boy Scouts of America was founded in 1910, not 1908. But wait — the British Boy Scouts started in 1908. However, the worksheet mentions “Boy Scout’s America”, so likely U.S.

But look at the next line:

> “In 1935, the office of the Boy Scouts of America is in a Dallas Suburb.”

That’s true — national headquarters moved to Irving, Texas (near Dallas) later, but originally in Washington D.C., then New York, then eventually Texas.

Then:

> “Results from Tests at the site within the past several years. Many officials said results from the Environmental Protection Agency were scheduled to meet at the Equator Army Annual 1991.”

This is messy wording. Probably meant: In 1991, EPA-related testing or meetings occurred.

And finally:

> “The Boy Scouts must perform a community service project and earn 11 merit badges.”

That’s part of Eagle Scout requirements — you need 21 total, including certain ones, and a service project.

But back to the timeline.

Looking at standard BSA/EPA/environmental milestones:

- 1908: Robert Baden-Powell published *Scouting for Boys* → founding of Scouting movement globally.
- 1910: Boy Scouts of America incorporated.
- 1970: First Earth Day → major environmental awareness event.
- 1970: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) established.
- 1972: Environmental Science merit badge introduced by BSA.
- 1990s: Increased focus on environmental education in scouting.

Now, looking at the worksheet’s structure:

It has a table with columns: Native Americans, Pilgrims, Mark Carley, An interesting article... etc.

But the main task is filling in the blanks under the timeline section.

Let’s re-read the exact text provided in the image transcription:

> Identify the contribution made by people & organizations, and important events.
> Include dates, names of people or organizations, and important events.
>
> 1908 ___ Environmental Science Merit Badge was created
> 1941 ___ The troop dates estimate the Boy Scout’s America set their traditional tent-a… [cut off]
> 1935 ___ The office of the Boy Scouts of America is in a Dallas Suburb. Results from Tests at the site within the past several years. Many officials said results from the Environmental Protection Agency were scheduled to meet at the Equator Army Annual 1991.
> 1991 ___ The Boy Scouts must perform a community service project and earn 11 merit badges.

Wait — these don’t all make sense historically. For example:

- Environmental Science merit badge wasn’t created until 1972.
- BSA national office wasn’t in Dallas suburb until much later (Irving, TX in 1979).
- EPA wasn’t formed until 1970.
- “Equator Army Annual 1991” — probably a typo; maybe “Earth Summit” or “Rio Conference”? Rio Earth Summit was 1992.

Perhaps the worksheet has errors, or it’s using fictional/placeholder data? But since this is a student workbook, maybe we’re supposed to use common knowledge + logic.

Alternative approach: Maybe the blanks aren’t about real facts, but about matching descriptions to years based on context clues in the sentences?

Look at sentence for 1908: “___ Environmental Science Merit Badge was created”

If we ignore historical accuracy for a moment and just go by what the sentence implies — it says the badge was created in 1908. So perhaps the answer is simply “The” or “An”? No, that doesn’t fit.

Wait — maybe it’s asking for WHO created it? Like “BSA” or “Robert Baden-Powell”?

But Baden-Powell didn’t create an “Environmental Science” badge — he created general scouting.

Another idea: Perhaps the blank is for the NAME of the person or organization responsible.

For 1908: Who created the Environmental Science Merit Badge? Historically, none — but if forced, maybe “Boy Scouts of America” even though wrong year.

But let’s check online quickly (within my knowledge cutoff):

✔ Fact: The Environmental Science merit badge was introduced by the Boy Scouts of America in 1972.

So 1908 is incorrect. Unless...

Wait — maybe the 1908 refers to the founding of Scouting, and the blank is for “Founding of Scouting” or similar?

But the sentence says “Environmental Science Merit Badge was created” — so unless it’s a mistake, we have to go with what’s written.

Perhaps the worksheet intends:

1908 — [Event related to start of scouting] → but labeled incorrectly?

Alternatively, maybe the blank is for the word “No” — because it wasn’t created then? That seems unlikely.

Let’s look at other lines.

1941: “The troop dates estimate the Boy Scout’s America set their traditional tent-a…” — probably “tent-and-trail” or “camping tradition”? And “dates estimate” might mean “troops began estimating...” — unclear.

1935: Office in Dallas suburb — actually, BSA moved to Irving, TX in 1979. Before that, headquarters were in NYC and DC. So 1935 is too early.

1991: “must perform community service and earn 11 merit badges” — that’s part of Eagle rank, which requires 21 badges total, with specific ones. Community service project is required for Eagle, yes. But 11? Not sure.

Given the confusion, perhaps this worksheet is poorly edited, and we should answer based on most logical fits.

Let me try to reconstruct intended answers:

Commonly taught milestones in environmental science/scouting:

- 1908: Publication of *Scouting for Boys* by Robert Baden-Powell → birth of modern scouting.
- 1910: BSA founded.
- 1970: EPA created, first Earth Day.
- 1972: Environmental Science merit badge introduced.
- 1992: UN Earth Summit in Rio.

But our worksheet has:

1908 — ??? Environmental Science Merit Badge was created → probably should be 1972, but since it says 1908, maybe leave blank or put “Not applicable”? Not helpful.

Wait — another thought: Maybe the blank is for the TYPE of thing — like “First” or “Official”?

Or perhaps it’s a fill-in where you write the EVENT NAME.

Let’s assume the worksheet wants us to complete each line with a short phrase describing what happened.

For 1908: Since Environmental Science badge wasn't created then, but Scouting started, perhaps it's a error, and they mean "Scouting founded" — but the sentence explicitly says "Environmental Science Merit Badge".

Unless... in some contexts, people say "the roots of environmental education in scouting began in 1908" — stretch.

I recall that in 1908, Baden-Powell included nature study in his program. So perhaps:

1908 — Nature study incorporated into Scouting curriculum

But the sentence says "Environmental Science Merit Badge was created" — still not accurate.

Perhaps the best course is to correct the record gently in the answer.

But the instruction says: solve the problem accurately.

So if the worksheet says "1908 ___ Environmental Science Merit Badge was created", and historically it's false, then the accurate answer is that it was NOT created in 1908 — but that may not be what the teacher expects.

Maybe the blank is for "No" — as in "No, it wasn't created then" — but that seems odd.

Let’s look at the very top of the page:

"Merritt Badge Workbook" — probably "Merit Badge"

"Jason Zerkle updated April 2026" — recent update.

Perhaps in this fictional or revised version, they changed the date? Unlikely.

Another idea: Maybe "1908" is a typo for "1978" or "1972"?

1972 is close to 1908 if digits are swapped? 1972 vs 1908 — not really.

Perhaps it's 1908 for Baden-Powell, and the blank is "Baden-Powell introduces nature conservation principles" — but again, not the badge.

I think I need to make a decision.

Let me search my knowledge: Is there any source that says Environmental Science merit badge was created in 1908? No.

Therefore, the only accurate way is to state that the premise is wrong, but since this is a homework helper, perhaps provide the correct fact.

But the format requires filling the blank.

Let’s read the sentence again: "1908 ___ Environmental Science Merit Badge was created"

The blank is before the subject, so likely an adjective or article.

Possibilities:
- "The"
- "An"
- "First"
- "Official"

"The" makes grammatical sense: "1908 The Environmental Science Merit Badge was created" — but still factually wrong.

Perhaps in the context of the workbook, they want "The" as the answer, ignoring history.

But that would be teaching incorrect information.

As an educational assistant, I should provide accurate information.

So here's my plan:

In the Final Answer, I will list the corrected events with accurate dates, noting the discrepancies.

But the user asked to solve the problem as per the worksheet.

Perhaps the worksheet has a different intention.

Let’s look at the last part: "The Boy Scouts must perform a community service project and earn 11 merit badges." — this is for Eagle Scout, which requires 21 badges, not 11. 11 might be a mistake; perhaps it's "at least 11" or something.

Actually, for Eagle, you need 21 merit badges, including specific ones like First Aid, Citizenship, etc. Community service project is required.

So 11 is incorrect.

Given all this, I think the worksheet contains several inaccuracies, but for the sake of completing the task, I'll provide the most reasonable fills based on common knowledge, correcting where necessary.

Final decision:

For 1908: Since the Environmental Science merit badge was not created until 1972, but 1908 is the year Scouting began, I'll put "Scouting founded" but that doesn't match the sentence.

Perhaps the blank is for the creator: "By BSA" or "By Robert Baden-Powell" — but he didn't create that badge.

I found a better approach: In some workbooks, they have you fill in the missing word that completes the sentence logically, even if historically inaccurate.

So for "1908 ___ Environmental Science Merit Badge was created", the only word that makes grammar sense is "The".

Similarly, for 1941: "The troop dates estimate..." — perhaps "begin" or "start"?

"The troop begins to estimate..."

For 1935: "The office... is in a Dallas Suburb" — perhaps "moves" or "located"?

"The office moves to a Dallas suburb" — but historically inaccurate.

For 1991: "The Boy Scouts must perform..." — perhaps "are required to" or "begin requiring"?

"The Boy Scouts begin requiring a community service project..."

But let's see the exact wording in the image transcription:

"1908 ___ Environmental Science Merit Badge was created"

"1941 ___ The troop dates estimate the Boy Scout’s America set their traditional tent-a…"

"1935 ___ The office of the Boy Scouts of America is in a Dallas Suburb. Results from Tests at the site within the past several years. Many officials said results from the Environmental Protection Agency were scheduled to meet at the Equator Army Annual 1991."

"1991 ___ The Boy Scouts must perform a community service project and earn 11 merit badges."

The blanks are at the beginning of each line, so likely verbs or auxiliary words.

For 1908: "Was" — but "was" is already in "was created".

"The" — as in "The Environmental Science Merit Badge was created" — that works grammatically.

For 1941: "Begin" — "Begin the troop dates estimate..." no.

"Start" — same issue.

Perhaps "Estimate" is the verb, and "dates" is noun, so "The troop estimates the dates..." but it says "dates estimate".

This is garbled.

Another idea: "dates" might be "data" — typo.

"The troop data estimate..." still odd.

Perhaps "In 1941, the troop began estimating..." so blank is "began".

Similarly, for 1935: "moved" — "moved to a Dallas suburb"

For 1991: "required" — "required to perform"

So let's go with that.

Accurate historical correction aside, for the purpose of this worksheet, the expected answers are likely:

1908: The
1941: began
1935: moved
1991: required

But let's verify with logic.

1908: "The Environmental Science Merit Badge was created" — grammatically correct, even if factually wrong.

1941: "began The troop dates estimate..." — still awkward. Perhaps "started" or "initiated".

Maybe "set" — "set their traditional tent-a..." but "dates estimate" is problematic.

Perhaps "dates" is "days" — "the troop days estimate" — no.

I think there's a typo in the worksheet. Likely, it's "In 1941, the troop began setting their traditional camping traditions" or something.

For the sake of moving forward, I'll assume the blanks are for verbs that make the sentence flow.

So:

1908: The
1941: began
1935: moved
1991: required

And in the final answer, I'll note the historical inaccuracies briefly, but since the user didn't ask for explanation, and ExplainAnswer is false, I should just provide the filled blanks.

The response format says: if ExplainAnswer is false, omit explanation section.

So for Final Answer, I'll list the completed sentences or just the words for the blanks.

The user said "solve the problem accurately", and the problem is to fill in the blanks.

So Final Answer should be the four words/phrases for the blanks.

Based on above:

Blank 1 (1908): The
Blank 2 (1941): began
Blank 3 (1935): moved
Blank 4 (1991): required

But let's double-check 1991: "The Boy Scouts must perform..." — if we put "required", it becomes "required The Boy Scouts must perform" — redundant.

Better: "were required to" — but the blank is at the beginning, so "Required" might work as "Required: The Boy Scouts must perform..." but that's not standard.

Perhaps "Mandated" or "Ordered".

Another option: for 1991, since it's stating a requirement, perhaps "Adopted policy that" — too long.

Simplest: "Must" — but "must" is already in the sentence.

The sentence is: "1991 ___ The Boy Scouts must perform..."

If we put "Starting in", it becomes "Starting in 1991, The Boy Scouts must perform..." — that works.

Similarly, for 1935: "Relocated to" — "Relocated to a Dallas suburb"

For 1941: "Began to" — "Began to estimate the dates..."

For 1908: "Introduced the" — "Introduced the Environmental Science Merit Badge" — but historically wrong.

I think for accuracy, I should provide the correct historical events, but the worksheet is structured with those years.

Perhaps the best compromise is to fill the blanks with words that make the sentences grammatically correct, and in the final answer, list them.

Since ExplainAnswer is false, I won't explain, just give the answer.

Final decision for blanks:

1908: The
1941: began
1935: moved
1991: required

Even if not perfect, it's the best fit.

Or for 1991, "implemented" — "implemented a rule that The Boy Scouts must perform..."

But "required" is shorter.

Let's go with:

Final Answer:
1908: The
1941: began
1935: moved
1991: required