Students complete a chart by writing the same number in numerical, word, and expanded forms.

Let’s go row by row and fill in the missing forms for each number.

We are given three columns:
- Numeral (the digits, like 401)
- Number Name (how we say it, like “four hundred one”)
- Expanded Form (breaking it into hundreds + tens + ones, like 400 + 0 + 1)

---

Row 1:
Given: Number Name = “seven hundred ninety-three”

→ Numeral: 793
→ Expanded Form: 700 + 90 + 3

*(Check: 700 + 90 = 790; 790 + 3 = 793 → correct)*

---

Row 2:
Given: Expanded Form = 900 + 40 + 5

→ Numeral: 945
→ Number Name: nine hundred forty-five

*(Check: 900 + 40 = 940; 940 + 5 = 945 → correct)*

---

Row 3:
Given: Numeral = 401

→ Number Name: four hundred one
→ Expanded Form: 400 + 0 + 1 *(or just 400 + 1 — but since the chart shows all places, we’ll write 400 + 0 + 1 to match style)*

*(Note: Some teachers accept 400 + 1, but looking at other rows like 600 + 60 + 1, they include zero tens if needed. So we’ll follow that pattern.)*

Actually, let’s check Row 6: “one hundred twenty-one” → expanded is not given, but Row 7 has 700 + 30 + 8 → which skips the zero? Wait no — 700 + 30 + 8 is fine because there’s no zero place missing. But in 401, the tens place is 0. Looking at Row 4: 600 + 60 + 1 → that’s 661, so they don’t skip zeros unless the digit is non-zero. Actually, in standard expanded form, you can omit the zero terms. Let me check the example in Row 2: 900 + 40 + 5 — that’s full. Row 4: 600 + 60 + 1 — also full. Row 7: 700 + 30 + 8 — that’s 738, which has no zero. So for 401, should we write 400 + 0 + 1 or 400 + 1?

Looking at the worksheet’s own examples:

- Row 2: 900 + 40 + 5 → includes all places even though none are zero.
- Row 4: 600 + 60 + 1 → same.
- Row 7: 700 + 30 + 8 → this is 738, which has no zero, so it’s natural.

But for 401, the tens digit is 0. In many curricula, especially at this level, they expect you to show all places, including zero. However, sometimes they allow omitting zero terms. To be safe, let’s look at what’s consistent.

Wait — Row 6: “one hundred twenty-one” → that’s 121 → expanded would be 100 + 20 + 1 — no zero.

Row 3: 401 → if we follow the pattern of showing every place value, it should be 400 + 0 + 1.

But let’s see if any row omits a zero. None do — all given expanded forms have three terms. So yes, we should write 400 + 0 + 1.

However, I recall that in some systems, they don’t require writing +0. But since the worksheet didn’t give an example with a zero, and to match the format of always having three addends, I’ll go with 400 + 0 + 1.

Actually, let me double-check with logic: The problem says “Same Number - Different Forms”, and expanded form means breaking down by place value. For 401, it’s 4 hundreds, 0 tens, 1 one → so 400 + 0 + 1 is technically correct. But often in elementary math, they might accept 400 + 1. However, looking at the provided answers in the sheet:

- Row 2: 900 + 40 + 5 → all non-zero
- Row 4: 600 + 60 + 1 → all non-zero
- Row 7: 700 + 30 + 8 → all non-zero

None have a zero. So perhaps they don’t expect us to write +0. Maybe for 401, it’s acceptable to write 400 + 1.

But wait — let’s think about consistency. If we look at the instruction: “Complete the chart by writing the same number in each form.” And the forms are numeral, name, expanded.

In expanded form, if a place is zero, it’s optional to include it. Since none of the given expanded forms include a zero term, I think it’s safer to omit the zero. So for 401, expanded form = 400 + 1.

But let’s verify with another approach. What does “expanded form” mean here? It’s adding the values of each digit based on its place.

For 401:
- 4 is in hundreds place → 400
- 0 is in tens place → 0
- 1 is in ones place → 1

So 400 + 0 + 1.

But in practice, many textbooks and worksheets at this level will accept 400 + 1 as simplified expanded form.

Given that the worksheet itself doesn't show any example with a zero, and to avoid overcomplicating, I'll use 400 + 1 for 401. However, I want to be precise.

Let me check online or standard practice... but since I can't, I'll rely on context.

Look at Row 5: Numeral = 680

→ Number Name: six hundred eighty
→ Expanded Form: 600 + 80 + 0? Or 600 + 80?

Again, similar issue.

Row 8: Numeral = 595 → expanded not given, but we'll calculate.

Perhaps the best way is to follow the pattern of the given expanded forms: they only include non-zero components. For example, 900 + 40 + 5 — all non-zero. 600 + 60 + 1 — all non-zero. 700 + 30 + 8 — all non-zero.

So for numbers with zero in a place, they probably omit that term.

Therefore:

For 401: expanded form = 400 + 1
For 680: expanded form = 600 + 80

That makes sense and matches the style.

I think that's the intended approach.

So let's proceed with that.

---

Row 3: Numeral = 401

→ Number Name: four hundred one
→ Expanded Form: 400 + 1

*(Some might argue for 400 + 0 + 1, but given the worksheet's examples, omitting zero is likely expected.)*

---

Row 4:
Given: Expanded Form = 600 + 60 + 1

→ Numeral: 661
→ Number Name: six hundred sixty-one

*(Check: 600 + 60 = 660; 660 + 1 = 661 → correct)*

---

Row 5:
Given: Numeral = 680

→ Number Name: six hundred eighty
→ Expanded Form: 600 + 80

*(Since 0 ones, we omit it, following the pattern)*

---

Row 6:
Given: Number Name = “two hundred forty”

→ Numeral: 240
→ Expanded Form: 200 + 40

*(Omit the 0 ones)*

---

Row 7:
Given: Number Name = “one hundred twenty-one”

→ Numeral: 121
→ Expanded Form: 100 + 20 + 1

*(All non-zero, so full form)*

---

Row 8:
Given: Expanded Form = 700 + 30 + 8

→ Numeral: 738
→ Number Name: seven hundred thirty-eight

*(Check: 700 + 30 = 730; 730 + 8 = 738 → correct)*

---

Row 9:
Given: Numeral = 595

→ Number Name: five hundred ninety-five
→ Expanded Form: 500 + 90 + 5

*(Check: 500 + 90 = 590; 590 + 5 = 595 → correct)*

---

Now, let’s compile the full table:

| Numeral | Number Name | Expanded Form |
|---------|--------------------------|-------------------|
| 793 | seven hundred ninety-three | 700 + 90 + 3 |
| 945 | nine hundred forty-five | 900 + 40 + 5 |
| 401 | four hundred one | 400 + 1 |
| 661 | six hundred sixty-one | 600 + 60 + 1 |
| 680 | six hundred eighty | 600 + 80 |
| 240 | two hundred forty | 200 + 40 |
| 121 | one hundred twenty-one | 100 + 20 + 1 |
| 738 | seven hundred thirty-eight | 700 + 30 + 8 |
| 595 | five hundred ninety-five | 500 + 90 + 5 |

Wait — I think I made a mistake in Row 3 and Row 5 and Row 6 regarding expanded form.

Let me reconsider.

In Row 4, expanded form is given as 600 + 60 + 1 — which is for 661. That includes all three places, even though the ones digit is 1, not zero.

In Row 2, 900 + 40 + 5 — all non-zero.

In Row 7, 700 + 30 + 8 — all non-zero.

But for a number like 401, if we write 400 + 1, that’s two terms, while others have three. Is that inconsistent?

Perhaps the worksheet expects three terms always, including +0.

Let me look back at the user's image description — but I can't see the image, only the text.

The text says: "Expanded Form" column has entries like "900 + 40 + 5", "600 + 60 + 1", "700 + 30 + 8" — all have three addends.

For 401, if we write 400 + 0 + 1, that's three addends.

For 680, 600 + 80 + 0.

For 240, 200 + 40 + 0.

That would be consistent with the format.

Moreover, in educational standards, when teaching place value, they often emphasize including all places, even if zero.

For example, Common Core or similar might expect 400 + 0 + 1 for 401.

Given that, and to match the three-term format of the given expanded forms, I think we should include the zero.

Let me adjust:

Row 3: 401
→ Expanded Form: 400 + 0 + 1

Row 5: 680
→ Expanded Form: 600 + 80 + 0

Row 6: 240
→ Expanded Form: 200 + 40 + 0

This way, every expanded form has exactly three terms, matching the given examples' structure (even though the given ones don't have zero, it's because those numbers don't have zero digits).

The given expanded forms are for numbers without zero digits, so they naturally have three non-zero terms. For numbers with zero digits, we still show three terms, with +0 where appropriate.

I think this is more accurate pedagogically.

So final decision: include +0 for missing places to maintain three-term expanded form.

Thus:

Row 3: 401 → 400 + 0 + 1
Row 5: 680 → 600 + 80 + 0
Row 6: 240 → 200 + 40 + 0

Yes.

Now, let's list all rows correctly:

1. Given: "seven hundred ninety-three"
→ Numeral: 793
→ Expanded: 700 + 90 + 3

2. Given: 900 + 40 + 5
→ Numeral: 945
→ Name: nine hundred forty-five

3. Given: 401
→ Name: four hundred one
→ Expanded: 400 + 0 + 1

4. Given: 600 + 60 + 1
→ Numeral: 661
→ Name: six hundred sixty-one

5. Given: 680
→ Name: six hundred eighty
→ Expanded: 600 + 80 + 0

6. Given: "two hundred forty"
→ Numeral: 240
→ Expanded: 200 + 40 + 0

7. Given: "one hundred twenty-one"
→ Numeral: 121
→ Expanded: 100 + 20 + 1

8. Given: 700 + 30 + 8
→ Numeral: 738
→ Name: seven hundred thirty-eight

9. Given: 595
→ Name: five hundred ninety-five
→ Expanded: 500 + 90 + 5

Perfect.

Now, for the Final Answer, since the task is to complete the chart, I need to provide the filled-in values for each blank cell.

The chart has 9 rows, and some cells are blank. I'll list the answers row by row, specifying what goes in each blank.

But the user didn't specify how to output the answer. Since it's a chart, perhaps I should present the completed table or list the missing parts.

Given the response format, I think providing the completed table is best.

But let's see the instruction: "Final Answer: [Provide only the final correct answer]"

And since it's a chart, I'll write the full completed chart.

Alternatively, since the original had blanks, I can list the answers for each blank in order.

To be clear, I'll present the entire completed table.

Final Answer:

| Numeral | Number Name | Expanded Form |
|---------|--------------------------|-------------------|
| 793 | seven hundred ninety-three | 700 + 90 + 3 |
| 945 | nine hundred forty-five | 900 + 40 + 5 |
| 401 | four hundred one | 400 + 0 + 1 |
| 661 | six hundred sixty-one | 600 + 60 + 1 |
| 680 | six hundred eighty | 600 + 80 + 0 |
| 240 | two hundred forty | 200 + 40 + 0 |
| 121 | one hundred twenty-one | 100 + 20 + 1 |
| 738 | seven hundred thirty-eight | 700 + 30 + 8 |
| 595 | five hundred ninety-five | 500 + 90 + 5 |

I think this is correct.

Just to double-check a few:

- Row 3: 401 = 400 + 0 + 1 → yes
- Row 5: 680 = 600 + 80 + 0 → yes
- Row 6: 240 = 200 + 40 + 0 → yes
- Row 9: 595 = 500 + 90 + 5 → yes

All good.