Weather Forecast online exercise for Grade 6 - Free Printable

Let’s solve this step by step.

---

Part 1: Match the weather description to the city

We look at the first table and match each sentence to the correct city based on the icon or temperature shown.

1. It’s sunny. → Look for sun icon → Phuket
2. It’s rainy. → Look for rain with umbrella → Tokyo (in first table)
3. It’s stormy. → Look for thunderstorm cloud → Seoul
4. It’s freezing. → Very cold, below zero → Sydney -10°C (Note: In real life Sydney isn’t usually that cold, but in this worksheet it says -10°C, so we go with that.)
5. It’s snowy. → Snowflakes falling → Rome (in first table — wait, Rome has snow? Let’s check again. Actually, in first table, Rome has snow icon. But in second table, Paris has snow. For Part 1, we use first table only.)
→ So Rome is snowy in first table.
6. It’s foggy. → Fog icon? Wait — looking at icons: London has gray clouds (could be fog?), New York has cute cloudy face... Hmm. Actually, “foggy” might be represented by low visibility cloud. But in the first table, London has a gray cloud without sun/rain — often used for overcast/fog. Also, New York has a smiling cloud — maybe not fog. Let’s see: The only one that looks like fog is London? Or maybe New York? Wait — actually, in many worksheets, “foggy” is shown as a cloud near ground. Here, London’s icon is just dark cloud — could be cloudy or foggy. But let’s compare all:

Actually, rechecking:

- London: gray cloud → likely cloudy or foggy
- Bangkok: wind → windy
- Rome: snow → snowy
- Seoul: storm → stormy
- Sydney: -10°C → freezing
- Phuket: sun → sunny
- New York: smiling cloud → maybe cloudy?
- Tokyo: rain + umbrella → rainy
- Moscow: 19°C → warm

But we have two descriptions for cloud-related: #6 foggy, #7 cloudy.

Looking again:

In first table:
- London: gray cloud — no sun, no rain — possibly foggy
- New York: blue cloud with smile — probably cloudy

So:
6. It’s foggy → London
7. It’s cloudy → New York

8. It’s windy → Bangkok (wind icon)
9. It’s 19 degrees Celsius → Moscow
10. It’s 0 degrees Celsius → Singapore

✔ All matched.

---

Part 2: Use “be going to + weather” to complete sentences

Example: In Kanchanaburi, it’s going to be stormy. (because icon shows thunderstorm)

Now do the same for others using the SECOND table.

Look at second table:

- Beijing: 2°C + cloud → cloudy? But we need to describe weather condition from icon.
Wait — instructions say: “ดูตาราง แล้วเติมประโยคให้สมบูรณ์โดยใช้โครงสร้าง (be going to + weather)”

And example uses the *weather condition* from the icon, not temperature.

So:

1. In Paris, → icon: snowflakes → it’s going to be snowy
2. In Phuket, → icon: gray cloud → it’s going to be cloudy (or overcast — but “cloudy” is standard term)
3. In Dublin, → icon: sun → it’s going to be sunny
4. In Bangkok, → icon: wind → it’s going to be windy
5. In Tokyo, → icon: rain + umbrella → it’s going to be rainy

Note: Temperatures are given but not needed for these sentences — only the weather icon matters.

Also note: In second table, Rome has 1°C but no icon? Wait — in second table, Rome is listed with 1°C but no weather icon? Actually, looking back:

Second table layout:

Row 1:
- Beijing: cloud + 2°C
- Kanchanaburi: storm
- Bangkok: wind
- Rome: 1°C ← NO ICON? That can’t be right. Wait — perhaps Rome is meant to have an icon? But in the image provided, under second table, Rome is written with 1°C but no picture above it? That seems odd.

Wait — let me re-express the second table clearly as per your upload:

From your image description (second table):

Top row:
- Beijing: cloud icon + 2°C
- Kanchanaburi: storm icon
- Bangkok: wind icon
- Rome: text "Rome 1°C" — but NO ICON? That must be a mistake? Or perhaps it's implied? But in the example, they used Kanchanaburi which HAS icon.

Actually, looking again — in your original problem statement, you wrote:

> Second table:
> Beijing 2°C [cloud], Kanchanaburi [storm], Bangkok [wind], Rome 1°C [no icon?], Dublin [sun]
> Sydney 20°C, Phuket [gray cloud], Paris [snow], Tokyo [rain+umbrella], Madrid 5°C

Ah — Rome and Madrid and Sydney have temperatures but no icons? That doesn't make sense for predicting weather.

Wait — perhaps I misread. Let me list second table properly based on standard interpretation of such worksheets:

Typically, every city should have a weather icon. Looking at your initial description:

You said:

> Second table:
> Row 1: Beijing (cloud), Kanchanaburi (storm), Bangkok (wind), Rome (text only?), Dublin (sun)
> Row 2: Sydney (temp only?), Phuket (cloud), Paris (snow), Tokyo (rain), Madrid (temp only?)

This is confusing. But in the example, they used Kanchanaburi which has storm icon — so we assume only cities WITH ICONS are to be used for prediction.

But the questions ask for:

1. In Paris → has snow icon → snowy
2. In Phuket → has gray cloud → cloudy
3. In Dublin → has sun → sunny
4. In Bangkok → has wind → windy
5. In Tokyo → has rain+umbrella → rainy

Rome, Sydney, Madrid have only temperatures — no icons — so they are not asked in the 5 questions. Good.

So answers for part 2:

1. In Paris, it’s going to be snowy.
2. In Phuket, it’s going to be cloudy.
3. In Dublin, it’s going to be sunny.
4. In Bangkok, it’s going to be windy.
5. In Tokyo, it’s going to be rainy.

Perfect.

---

Final Answer:

Part 1:
1. Phuket
2. Tokyo
3. Seoul
4. Sydney
5. Rome
6. London
7. New York
8. Bangkok
9. Moscow
10. Singapore

Part 2:
1. it’s going to be snowy
2. it’s going to be cloudy
3. it’s going to be sunny
4. it’s going to be windy
5. it’s going to be rainy