Pin page - Free Printable

This is a Numbrix puzzle (also known as Hidato or Number Snake). The goal is to fill the grid with numbers from 1 to 256 so that they form a continuous path. Each number must be adjacent (horizontally or vertically) to the next number. Diagonal moves are not allowed.

Let's solve this step-by-step by looking for "forced" moves—places where a number has only one possible neighbor for the next or previous number in the sequence.

Step 1: Analyze the Bottom-Right Corner (Numbers 1–20)

Let's start at 1 in the bottom-left area (Row 13, Column 2).
- 1 is at R13C2. Its neighbors are R12C2 (empty), R13C1 (11), R13C3 (15), R14C2 (empty). Wait, looking at the grid:
- Row 13: `11 1 15 9 | ...`
- So 1 is surrounded by 11, 15, and empty cells. Since 1 is the start, it must connect to 2.
- The only empty neighbor of 1 is R14C2? No, let's look closer.
- R13C2 is `1`. Neighbors: R12C2 (7), R13C1 (11), R13C3 (15), R14C2 (empty).
- Wait, R12C2 is `7`. That's not adjacent to 1.
- Let's re-read the grid carefully around 1.
- Row 12: `... 7 ...` (R12C2 is 7).
- Row 13: `11 1 15 9 ...`
- Row 14: `14 ...` (R14C1 is 14).
- So 1 is at R13C2.
- Neighbors of R13C2:
- Up: R12C2 = 7 (Not 2)
- Left: R13C1 = 11 (Not 2)
- Right: R13C3 = 15 (Not 2)
- Down: R14C2 = Empty.
- Therefore, 2 MUST be at R14C2.

Now we have 2 at R14C2.
- Neighbors of 2:
- Up: 1 (Used)
- Left: R14C1 = 14 (Not 3)
- Right: R14C3 = Empty
- Down: Out of bounds.
- Therefore, 3 MUST be at R14C3.

Now we have 3 at R14C3.
- Neighbors of 3:
- Left: 2 (Used)
- Up: R13C3 = 15 (Not 4)
- Right: R14C4 = Empty
- Down: Out of bounds.
- Therefore, 4 MUST be at R14C4? Wait, let's check R14C4.
- Row 14 starts: `14 [2] [3] ...`
- Let's check the given numbers in Row 14: `14 . . . | 11 . 2 . | . 13 3 5 . . 12`
- Actually, let's look at the cluster around 1, 2, 3 again.
- If 3 is at R14C3, where is 4?
- Neighbors of R14C3: R14C2(2), R13C3(15), R14C4(empty).
- So 4 is at R14C4.

Now 4 at R14C4.
- Neighbors: R14C3(3), R13C4(9), R14C5(empty).
- R13C4 is 9. So 4 cannot go up.
- Therefore, 5 MUST be at R14C5.

Now 5 at R14C5.
- Neighbors: R14C4(4), R13C5(empty), R14C6(empty).
- We need to place 6.
- Let's look ahead. Where is 7? R12C2 is 7. That's far away.
- Let's look at 8. R12C1 is 5? No, R12C1 is 5? Let's check Row 12: `5 8 . . | 1 . . 2 ...`
- Ah, R12C1 is 5? No, the image shows:
- Row 12: `5 8 . . | 1 . . 2 ...` -> Wait, looking at the left block of rows 9-12.
- Row 9: `. 2 . . | . . 13 | . 12 5 8 | . . 3`
- Row 10: `. 13 . . | 15 . 3 . | 14 8 . . | 16 . . .`
- Row 11: `5 8 . . | 1 . . 2 | . . . . | 13 9 15 .`
- Row 12: `. . 12 4 | . 6 16 . | 13 . . 7 | . . . 5`

Okay, let's restart the numbering trace carefully using the fixed numbers provided in the grid.

Given Numbers Check:
- 1 is at R13C2.
- 2 is at R9C2? No, R9C2 is 2. But we just deduced 2 is at R14C2. Contradiction?
- Let's re-examine the grid coordinates.
- The grid is 16x16.
- Top-left is (1,1). Bottom-right is (16,16).

Let's locate 1:
- It is in the 4th block row, 1st block column.
- Specifically, Row 13, Column 2 contains `1`.

Let's locate 2:
- There is a `2` at Row 9, Column 2.
- There is a `2` at Row 11, Column 8.
- There is a `2` at Row 14, Column 13? No, Row 14 Col 13 is `3`? No, Row 14 ends with `... 13 3 5 . . 12`.
- Let's look at Row 14: `14 . . . | 11 . 2 . | . 13 3 5 . . 12`?
- Actually, let's look at the bottom right corner numbers: `13 3 5 . . 12`.
- And Row 13: `11 1 15 9 | . . 13 . | 2 . . 14 . . . .`

Wait, if there is a pre-filled `2` at R9C2, then my previous deduction that "2 must be at R14C2" was wrong because I assumed 1 connects to an empty cell. But 1 is at R13C2. The cell above it is R12C2.
Let's check R12C2. Row 12 is `. . 12 4 ...`. So R12C2 is empty.
Row 13 is `11 1 15 9 ...`. So R13C1=11, R13C2=1, R13C3=15, R13C4=9.
Row 14 is `14 . . . ...`. So R14C1=14.

So, neighbors of 1 (R13C2):
- Up: R12C2 (Empty)
- Down: R14C2 (Empty)
- Left: R13C1 (11)
- Right: R13C3 (15)

So 2 is either at R12C2 or R14C2.

Let's look at 3.
- Pre-filled `3`s are at: R1C5, R10C7, R14C13, R16C11.
- Also R9C16 is 3.

Let's look at 11.
- R13C1 is 11.
- Neighbors of 11 (R13C1):
- Up: R12C1 (5? No, R12C1 is empty in my reading? Let's check Row 12 again: `. . 12 4`. So R12C1 is empty.)
- Down: R14C1 (14)
- Right: R13C2 (1)
- So 11 is connected to 1? No, 1 and 11 are not consecutive.
- 11 must connect to 10 and 12.
- Neighbor R14C1 is 14. Not 10 or 12.
- Neighbor R13C2 is 1. Not 10 or 12.
- So 11 MUST connect to 10 and 12 via its only other neighbor: R12C1.
- This implies R12C1 contains BOTH 10 and 12? Impossible.
- Therefore, one of 10 or 12 is at R12C1, and the other is... where?
- 11 has only 4 neighbors. Two are occupied by non-consecutive numbers (1 and 14). One is empty (R12C1). The fourth is out of bounds (Left).
- So 11 has ONLY ONE empty neighbor: R12C1.
- This means 11 must be an endpoint? No, 11 is in the middle of 1-256.
- Wait, did I misidentify R14C1?
- Row 14 starts with `14`. Yes.
- Did I misidentify R13C2?
- Row 13 starts `11 1`. Yes.
- So 11 is at R13C1.
- Neighbors:
- R12C1 (Up)
- R14C1 (Down) -> Value 14.
- R13C2 (Right) -> Value 1.
- 11 needs neighbors 10 and 12.
- Neither 1 nor 14 is 10 or 12.
- So 10 and 12 must both be accessible from 11.
- But 11 only has ONE empty neighbor (R12C1).
- This is a contradiction unless... I am misreading the grid structure or values.

Let's re-read the bottom-left 4x4 block (Rows 13-16, Cols 1-4).
Row 13: `11 1 15 9`
Row 14: `14 . . .`
Row 15: `. . . .` (Wait, Row 15 is `11 1 15 9`? No, that was Row 13).

Let's look at the image again very carefully.

Block 4 (Bottom Left):
Row 13: `11 1 15 9` | `...`
Row 14: `14 . . .` | `...`
Row 15: `. . . .` | `...` ?? No.

Let's look at the labels on the left.
The grid is divided into 4x4 blocks.

Row 13: `11 1 15 9` | ` . . 13 . ` | ` 2 . . 14 ` | ` . . . . `
Row 14: `14 . . .` | ` 11 . 2 . ` | ` . 13 3 5 ` | ` . . 12 . ` ??

Let's check the very last row (Row 16).
Row 16: `14 . . .` | ` 11 . 2 . ` | ` . 13 3 5 ` | ` . . 12 . `

Ah! I was shifting rows. Let's count rows from the top.
There are 16 rows.

Rows 1-4: Top band.
Rows 5-8: Second band.
Rows 9-12: Third band.
Rows 13-16: Bottom band.

Let's read the Bottom Band (Rows 13-16) specifically from the image.

Row 13:
Cells 1-4: ` . 3 . . ` ? No.
Let's look at the third horizontal line separator. Below it is Row 13.
Row 13 starts with: ` . 3 . . `?
No, let's look at the numbers `11 1 15 9`. They are in the second to last row?

Let's count from the bottom up.
Last Row (Row 16): `14 . . . | 11 . 2 . | . 13 3 5 | . . 12 .`
Row 15: `11 1 15 9 | . . 13 . | 2 . . 14 | . . . .`
Row 14: `. 7 . . | 16 . 5 . | 14 . . 1 | . . 2 .`
Row 13: `. . 3 . | 12 . . . | 6 . . 4 | 11 . . 16`

Let's verify this alignment with the top.
Top Row (Row 1): `1 . . 2 | 3 4 . . | 12 . 6 . | . . 7 .`

Okay, let's re-evaluate the position of 1.
In my new reading, 1 is at Row 15, Column 2.

Let's check the neighbors of 1 at R15C2.
- Up: R14C2. Row 14 is `. 7 . .`. So R14C2 is 7.
- Down: R16C2. Row 16 is `14 . . .`. So R16C2 is Empty.
- Left: R15C1. Row 15 is `11 1 ...`. So R15C1 is 11.
- Right: R15C3. Row 15 is `... 1 15 ...`. So R15C3 is 15.

So, neighbors of 1 are: 7, 11, 15, and Empty (R16C2).
Since 1 must connect to 2, and 7, 11, 15 are not 2, 2 MUST be at R16C2.

Step 1: Place 2 at R16C2.

Now find 3.
Neighbors of 2 (R16C2):
- Up: R15C2 = 1 (Used)
- Left: R16C1 = 14 (Not 3)
- Right: R16C3 = Empty
- Down: Out of bounds.

So 3 MUST be at R16C3.

Now find 4.
Neighbors of 3 (R16C3):
- Left: R16C2 = 2 (Used)
- Up: R15C3 = 15 (Not 4)
- Right: R16C4 = Empty
- Down: Out of bounds.

So 4 MUST be at R16C4.

Now find 5.
Neighbors of 4 (R16C4):
- Left: R16C3 = 3 (Used)
- Up: R15C4. Row 15 is `11 1 15 9`. So R15C4 is 9. (Not 5)
- Right: R16C5. Row 16 continues `... 4 | 11 ...`. So R16C5 is 11. (Not 5)
- Down: Out of bounds.

Wait. R16C4 is 4. Its neighbors are 3, 9, 11. None are 5.
Where can 5 go?
Did I misread R16C5?
Row 16: `14 . . . | 11 . 2 . | ...`
The vertical bar separates columns 4 and 5.
So R16C1=14, R16C2=., R16C3=., R16C4=.
R16C5=11.

If 4 is at R16C4, it is blocked from reaching 5.
This implies my placement of 4 is wrong, or my reading of the grid is wrong.

Let's re-read Row 16 carefully.
Image bottom row:
`14` `blank` `blank` `blank` | `11` `blank` `2` `blank` | `blank` `13` `3` `5` | `blank` `blank` `12` `blank`

So:
R16C1 = 14
R16C2 = Empty
R16C3 = Empty
R16C4 = Empty
R16C5 = 11
R16C6 = Empty
R16C7 = 2
R16C8 = Empty
R16C9 = Empty
R16C10 = 13
R16C11 = 3
R16C12 = 5
R16C13 = Empty
R16C14 = Empty
R16C15 = 12
R16C16 = Empty

Okay, let's re-trace 1->2->3->4->5 with this correct map.

1 is at R15C2.
Neighbors:
- Up: R14C2 = 7 (from Row 14: `. 7 . .`)
- Left: R15C1 = 11
- Right: R15C3 = 15
- Down: R16C2 = Empty

So 2 is at R16C2.

2 is at R16C2.
Neighbors:
- Up: 1
- Left: R16C1 = 14
- Right: R16C3 = Empty
- Down: Wall

So 3 is at R16C3.

3 is at R16C3.
Neighbors:
- Left: 2
- Up: R15C3 = 15
- Right: R16C4 = Empty
- Down: Wall

So 4 is at R16C4.

4 is at R16C4.
Neighbors:
- Left: 3
- Up: R15C4 = 9 (Row 15: `11 1 15 9`)
- Right: R16C5 = 11
- Down: Wall

Problem: 4 is surrounded by 3, 9, 11. No spot for 5.

Is it possible that 1 is NOT at R15C2?
Let's look at the number `1` in the grid again.
There is a `1` at R1C1.
There is a `1` at R3C6? (Row 3: `. 12 . . | 10 . . 1 ...`) -> R3C8 is 1?
There is a `1` at R8C9? (Row 8: `16 . . 5 | 9 12 . . | 1 . . . | . . 8 .`) -> R8C9 is 1.
There is a `1` at R11C5? (Row 11: `5 8 . . | 1 . . 2 ...`) -> R11C5 is 1.
There is a `1` at R13C12? (Row 13: `... 6 . . 4 | 11 . . 16`) -> No.
There is a `1` at R14C12? (Row 14: `... 14 . . 1 | ...`) -> R14C12 is 1.
There is a `1` at R15C2? (Row 15: `11 1 15 9 ...`) -> Yes.

Wait, look at R16C11 = 3 and R16C12 = 5.
If 3 is at R16C11 and 5 is at R16C12, where is 4?
4 must be adjacent to both 3 and 5.
Neighbors of R16C11 (3): R16C10(13), R16C12(5), R15C11(.).
Neighbors of R16C12 (5): R16C11(3), R16C13(.), R15C12(.).

Common neighbors of 3 and 5?
- R16C11 and R16C12 are adjacent.
- 4 must be adjacent to 3 AND 5.
- Possible spots for 4:
- R15C11 (Above 3)? If 4 is at R15C11, is it adjacent to 5 (R16C12)? No, diagonal.
- R15C12 (Above 5)? If 4 is at R15C12, is it adjacent to 3 (R16C11)? No, diagonal.
- R16C10? No, that's 13.
- R16C13? Adjacent to 5, but not 3.

Wait, in Numbrix, the path is linear. 3 -> 4 -> 5.
So 4 must be adjacent to 3, and 5 must be adjacent to 4.
3 is at R16C11.
5 is at R16C12.
They are next to each other.
This implies the order is ... 3, 4, 5 ... OR ... 5, 4, 3 ...
But 3 and 5 are fixed.
If the path goes 3 -> 4 -> 5, then 4 must be between them? No, they are adjacent cells.
If 3 is at C11 and 5 is at C12, they are neighbors.
Can 4 be somewhere else?
If 4 is at R15C11, it touches 3. Does it touch 5? No.
If 4 is at R15C12, it touches 5. Does it touch 3? No.
If 4 is at R16C10? Touches 3? Yes. Touches 5? No.
If 4 is at R16C13? Touches 5? Yes. Touches 3? No.

This suggests that 3 and 5 are NOT consecutive in the path via a single intermediate cell 4 located elsewhere.
UNLESS... 4 is at R15C11 AND 5 is at R15C12? No, 5 is fixed at R16C12.

Let's look at the fixed numbers again.
R16C11 = 3.
R16C12 = 5.

Is it possible that 4 is at R15C11 or R15C12?
If 4 is at R15C11:
- Path: 3(R16C11) -> 4(R15C11).
- Next is 5. 5 is at R16C12.
- Is R15C11 adjacent to R16C12? No.

If 4 is at R15C12:
- Path: 5(R16C12) -> 4(R15C12).
- Prev is 3. 3 is at R16C11.
- Is R15C12 adjacent to R16C11? No.

This implies that my reading of the fixed numbers is incorrect or the puzzle allows diagonal moves (standard Numbrix does not) or I have identified the wrong '3' and '5'.

Let's check other 3s and 5s.
Maybe the path doesn't go through R16C11/12?
But those are fixed numbers. The path MUST go through all numbers 1-256.

Let's re-read Row 16 from the image.
`14 . . . | 11 . 2 . | . 13 3 5 | . . 12 .`

Is it possible that R16C11 is NOT 3?
Looking at the third block in the bottom row.
Cells: `.` `13` `3` `5`.
Yes, it looks like 3 and 5.

Is it possible that 4 is at R15C11 and 5 is actually at R15C12?
Let's check Row 15.
`11 1 15 9 | . . 13 . | 2 . . 14 | . . . .`
R15C11 is empty. R15C12 is empty.

Let's check Row 14.
`. 7 . . | 16 . 5 . | 14 . . 1 | . . 2 .`
R14C7 is 5.

Let's check Row 13.
`. . 3 . | 12 . . . | 6 . . 4 | 11 . . 16`
R13C3 is 3.
R13C12 is 4.

Okay, there are multiple 3s, 4s, 5s.
The puzzle uses numbers 1-256. Each number appears ONCE.
So if I see a `3` at R16C11, that is THE number 3.
If I see a `3` at R13C3, that is a DIFFERENT number?
NO. In Numbrix/Hidato, the numbers 1 to N are placed in the grid. Each number appears exactly once.

CRITICAL REALIZATION:
The numbers printed in the grid are CLUES. They are the actual values for those cells.
So, `3` at R16C11 means Cell(16,11) contains the value 3.
`3` at R13C3 means Cell(13,3) contains the value 3.

THIS IS IMPOSSIBLE. You cannot have two 3s in a standard Numbrix puzzle.

Therefore, this is NOT a standard Numbrix puzzle where you fill 1-256.

What kind of puzzle is this?
- Sudoku? No, numbers go up to 16. And there are 16x16 cells. Standard Sudoku is 9x9. 16x16 Sudoku exists (Hexadoku), using digits 0-9 and A-F, or 1-16.
- If it is a 16x16 Sudoku, the rules are:
1. Each row contains 1-16 exactly once.
2. Each column contains 1-16 exactly once.
3. Each 4x4 block contains 1-16 exactly once.

Let's test this hypothesis.
Look at Block 1 (Top Left, Rows 1-4, Cols 1-4).
Values present:
R1: 1, 2
R2: 8
R3: 12
R4: 3, 15
Missing: 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14, 16.

Look at Row 1: `1 . . 2 | 3 4 . . | 12 . 6 . | . . 7 .`
Numbers in Row 1: 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 12.
This fits the Sudoku hypothesis (numbers 1-16).

Look at the "3" and "5" issue earlier.
R16C11 = 3.
R13C3 = 3.
Are they in the same row? No.
Same column? No (Col 11 vs Col 3).
Same 4x4 block?
R16C11 is in Block 16 (Bottom Right).
R13C3 is in Block 13 (Bottom Left-Middle? No, Block 13 is Rows 13-16, Cols 1-4? No.
Blocks are 4x4.
Block 1: R1-4, C1-4.
Block 2: R1-4, C5-8.
Block 3: R1-4, C9-12.
Block 4: R1-4, C13-16.
...
Block 13: R13-16, C1-4.
Block 14: R13-16, C5-8.
Block 15: R13-16, C9-12.
Block 16: R13-16, C13-16.

R16C11 is in Block 15 (Cols 9-12).
R13C3 is in Block 13 (Cols 1-4).
So having two 3s is allowed in Sudoku as long as they don't share row, col, or block.

Conclusion: This is a 16x16 Sudoku Puzzle.

### Solving the 16x16 Sudoku

I need to fill in the missing numbers so that every row, column, and 4x4 block contains the digits 1 through 16 exactly once.

Since solving the entire 16x16 grid manually in text is extremely lengthy and prone to error without a visual interactive tool, I will solve for a specific cell or provide the full grid if I can deduce it logically. However, usually, these requests expect the full completed grid.

Given the constraints of this format, I will perform a logical deduction for key cells to ensure accuracy, but providing the full 256-cell solution requires a systematic solver approach. I will simulate the solver steps.

Strategy:
1. Identify rows/columns/blocks with few missing numbers.
2. Use cross-hatching.

Let's try to fill Row 1.
Current: `1 . . 2 | 3 4 . . | 12 . 6 . | . . 7 .`
Missing: 5, 8, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14, 15, 16.

Let's look at Cell R1C2.
Col 2 has: 8(R2), 12(R3), 15(R4)...
Block 1 (R1-4, C1-4) has: 1, 2, 8, 12, 3, 15.
Missing in Block 1: 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14, 16.

This is too complex to do purely by mental scratchpad for all 256 cells.
However, I can generate the solution by running a backtracking algorithm mentally or by recognizing patterns.

Actually, looking at the prompt "Solve the problem accurately", and the nature of Sudoku, the "Answer" is the filled grid.

Let's try to solve a few specific easy ones to demonstrate, then provide the full grid.

Focus on Block 1 (Top-Left):
Cells:
R1: 1, ?, ?, 2
R2: ?, 8, ?, ?
R3: ?, 12, ?, ?
R4: 3, ?, 15, ?

Missing in Block 1: 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14, 16.

Let's look at R1C2.
Row 1 needs: 5,8,9,10,11,13,14,15,16.
Col 2 has: 8, 12, 15, 7(R6), 11(R6? No R6C2 is 11? Let's check R6: `. 11 7 6`). Yes, R6C2=11.
So R1C2 cannot be 8, 12, 15, 11.

This is tedious. I will provide the final solved grid based on standard Sudoku solving logic.

Final Answer Construction:
I will output the 16x16 grid.

*(Self-Correction during generation)*: Since I cannot run code, I must rely on logical deduction of the most constrained areas.

Let's look at Row 16: `14 . . . | 11 . 2 . | . 13 3 5 | . . 12 .`
Missing: 1, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 15, 16.

Let's look at Col 16:
R1: .
R2: 11
R3: 14
R4: 12
R5: .
R6: 13
R7: 11? No R7C16 is 13? R7: `. . . 10 | . 5 15 . | . 4 . 8 | . . 11 .` -> R7C16 is empty? No, R7 ends with `11 .`. Wait.

Okay, to ensure 100% accuracy, I will solve the grid using a constraint satisfaction approach in the final output generation.

Here is the step-by-step logic for a few cells to verify the method:

1. R1C1 is 1.
2. R1C4 is 2.
3. R1C5 is 3.
4. R1C6 is 4.
5. R1C9 is 12.
6. R1C11 is 6.
7. R1C15 is 7.

Row 1 Missing: 5, 8, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14, 15, 16.

Let's look at R1C2.
Col 2 contains: 8(R2), 12(R3), 15(R4), 7(R6C2? No R6C2 is 11), 11(R6C2), 2(R9C2), 13(R10C2), 8(R11C2), 7(R14C2), 1(R15C2).
Wait, R11C2 is 8. R2C2 is 8. Duplicate 8 in Col 2?
Let's re-read R2: `. 8 . .`. R2C2=8.
Let's re-read R11: `5 8 . .`. R11C2=8.
Contradiction!

If R2C2=8 and R11C2=8, this is NOT a standard Sudoku where columns must have unique 1-16.

Let's re-read the puzzle type.
Is it possible the image is four separate 4x4 Sudokus? No, the lines are thick every 4 cells, implying 16x16.

Let's re-read R11.
Row 11: `5 8 . . | 1 . . 2 | . . . . | 13 9 15 .`
Row 2: `. 8 . . | . 7 . . | 3 . . . | 9 10 6 11`

If Col 2 has two 8s, it's not a standard Sudoku.

Could it be Killer Sudoku? No cages.
Could it be Samurai Sudoku? No overlapping.

Let's look at the numbers again.
Maybe R11C2 is NOT 8?
Image: Row 11 starts `5 8`.
Image: Row 2 starts `. 8`.

Is it possible that the grid is not 1-16 Sudoku?

Let's look at the first option again: Numbrix.
In Numbrix, numbers can repeat? NO. 1 to 256 unique.

If it's not Sudoku (unique 1-16 per row/col) and not Numbrix (path 1-256), what is it?

Let's look at Block 1 again.
1, 2, 8, 12, 3, 15.

Let's look at Block 2 (R1-4, C5-8).
R1: 3, 4, ., .
R2: ., 7, ., .
R3: 10, ., ., 1
R4: 2, ., ., 14

If this were Sudoku, Block 2 would need 1-16.

Let's check if Row 1 has duplicates.
1, 2, 3, 4, 12, 6, 7. No duplicates.

Let's check if Col 2 has duplicates in the visible numbers.
R2C2=8.
R11C2=8.

If Col 2 has two 8s, it violates Sudoku rules.

Is it possible I am misidentifying the rows?
Maybe the grid is 9x9? No, 16x16.

Maybe the numbers are not 8 and 8?
R2C2: Looks like 8.
R11C2: Looks like 8.

Let's check Col 1.
R1: 1
R4: 3
R5: 13
R8: 16
R11: 5
R12: .
R13: .
R14: .
R15: 11
R16: 14

No obvious duplicates in Col 1.

Let's check Col 3.
R1: .
R2: .
R3: .
R4: 15
R6: 7
R9: .
R10: .
R11: .
R12: 12
R13: 3
R14: .
R15: 15

Duplicate 15 in Col 3! (R4C3=15, R15C3=15).

So it is NOT a standard Sudoku.

Then what is it?

Let's go back to Numbrix.
In Numbrix, numbers do NOT repeat. 1 to 256.
So having two 15s in the grid is impossible for Numbrix.

Is it possible the image contains MULTIPLE puzzles?
No, it's one grid.

Is it possible the numbers are not 1-16 or 1-256?

Let