English grammar practice worksheet for children, including exercises on "can" and "can't," sentence matching, word identification from pictures, and sentence rewriting.

Let's go through each section of the worksheet step by step and solve the problems with explanations.

---

I. Complete the following sentences using *can* or *can't*.

We need to use "can" for things that are possible, and "can't" for things that are not possible based on real-world knowledge.

1. A cat can run.
✔ Cats can run — this is true.

2. A mouse can't talk.
✔ Mice don’t speak human language; they make sounds but can't talk.

3. A tree can't move.
✔ Trees are rooted and cannot move from place to place.

4. A peacock can dance.
✔ Peacocks perform a display (often called "dancing") during courtship.

5. A fox can sing.
✘ Foxes don’t sing like birds. They make calls, but "sing" is not accurate.
So: A fox can't sing.

6. A dog can bark.
✔ Dogs bark — this is a well-known fact.

✔ Final Answers:
1. can
2. can't
3. can't
4. can
5. can't
6. can

---

II. Match and make correct sentences.

We have two columns: one with subjects and verbs, and another with actions. We need to match them correctly.

Sentences:
1. I can't ________ play football. → This should be "I can't play football."
But wait — there’s a list of options:
- play football
- bark loudly
- drive a car
- run fast

Now we match each sentence to the correct action:

1. I can't play football → [ ]
→ This is grammatically correct as-is. So it matches "play football"

2. My friend can bark loudly → [ ]
→ Wait! People don't bark. This is funny, but incorrect.
Actually, "bark loudly" would go with an animal, not a friend.

But let's think: maybe we're matching the subject to the correct action?

Wait — the instruction says: "Match and make correct sentences."
So likely, we have to pair each subject-verb combo with the correct action.

Let’s analyze:

1. I can't ________ → which action makes sense?
→ "I can't drive a car" or "I can't run fast"?
But "I can't play football" is also possible.

But here's the issue: the options are listed separately. Probably, we need to choose the correct action for each sentence.

Let’s assume the four options are:
- play football
- bark loudly
- drive a car
- run fast

Now match:

1. I can't ________ → run fast? Or drive a car?
But “I can’t play football” is valid too.
However, “I can’t bark loudly” doesn’t make sense for a person.

So likely, the correct matching is:

1. I can't run fast → Possible if someone is injured
2. My friend can bark loudly → No, people don’t bark
→ Wait, this seems odd.

Alternatively, perhaps the actions are meant to be matched to the subjects.

Let’s try again.

Maybe the structure is:

Each sentence has a blank, and we pick the correct action from the list.

But the list is in brackets: [ ], so we’re to fill in the correct action.

Let’s re-read:

> II. Match and make correct sentences.
>
> 1. I can't ________ play football. → This seems miswritten.

Wait — look carefully:

It says:
1. I can't ________ play football. → That doesn’t make sense.

Ah! It might be a typo. Likely, it's meant to be:

1. I can't ________
2. My friend can ________
3. My cat can't ________
4. My dog can ________

And then the list of options:
- play football
- bark loudly
- drive a car
- run fast

Now we match each sentence with the correct verb phrase.

So:

1. I can't drive a car → plausible (if you're underage or unlicensed)
2. My friend can play football → yes
3. My cat can't run fast → no, cats can run fast — so this is wrong
→ My cat can't bark loudly → yes! Cats don’t bark.
4. My dog can bark loudly → yes!

So better:

1. I can't drive a car
2. My friend can play football
3. My cat can't bark loudly
4. My dog can run fast

But wait — dogs can bark loudly, but "run fast" is also true.

But "bark loudly" fits best with dog.

Let’s assign logically:

- "I can't drive a car" – reasonable
- "My friend can play football" – good
- "My cat can't bark loudly" – correct (cats don't bark)
- "My dog can run fast" – correct (dogs can run fast)

So the matching is:

1. I can't drive a car → [ ]
2. My friend can play football → [ ]
3. My cat can't bark loudly → [ ]
4. My dog can run fast → [ ]

But the options are listed as:
- play football
- bark loudly
- drive a car
- run fast

So we assign:

1. I can't → drive a car
2. My friend can → play football
3. My cat can't → bark loudly
4. My dog can → run fast

✔ Final Matching:
1. drive a car
2. play football
3. bark loudly
4. run fast

(We write the answer in the brackets.)

---

III. Look at these pictures to make doing words.

We have pictures and word parts:

Pictures:
1. A boy jumping on bed → leaps → "leaps" is already given
2. A woman dancing → dance → but we see "ancde" → letters: a,n,c,d,e → rearrange → dance
3. A boy kicking a ball → lapy → l,a,p,y → play
4. A dragon breathing fire → ings → i,n,g,s → ? → "sings"? But picture is dragon → maybe "sings"?
But "ings" alone — likely part of "sings" or "rings"?
Wait, the word is split: "ing" + "s"?
But the picture shows a dragon — could be "roars"? But no 'r' in "ings".

Wait — look at the image: it says "ings" — maybe it's "sings", but missing 's'?
No — it says "ings", and the picture is a dragon — possibly "sings"? But dragons don't sing.

Wait — perhaps the word is "flying"? But we have "ings" — maybe it's "wings"? But picture is dragon with wings.

Ah! The picture is a dragon with wings → the word is "wings" → but we have "ings".
So missing 'w'? But the word fragment is "ings" — maybe it's "wings" and "w" is implied?

But the word parts are:
- leaps → already complete
- ancde → letters: a,n,c,d,e → dance
- lapy → l,a,p,y → play
- ings → i,n,g,s → sings or rings or wings?

But the picture is a dragon — likely "wings" — but "wings" starts with 'w', not in "ings".

Wait — perhaps the word is "flies"? But we have "ings".

Alternatively, maybe the word is "drags"? No.

Wait — the last one says "radw" — oh! There's a typo.

Look: the last picture shows a man cooking → "radw" → r,a,d,w → rearrange → "draw"? But he's cooking.

Wait — the label under the last picture is "radw" → r,a,d,w → could be "draw"? But the picture shows someone cooking.

Wait — maybe it's "reads"? But "radw" has 'w'.

Perhaps it's "cooks"? But not in letters.

Wait — let's look carefully.

The pictures are labeled:
1. leaps → boy jumping → leaps → correct
2. ancde → dancing woman → dance → rearrange: a,n,c,d,e → dance
3. lapy → boy playing soccer → play → l,a,p,y → play
4. ings → dragon → wings? But "ings" lacks 'w'. Maybe it's "sings"? Dragon sings? Unlikely.

Wait — the last one is labeled "radw" → r,a,d,w → could be "draw"? But the picture is cooking.

Wait — perhaps the labels are scrambled.

Let me read again:

> III. Look at these pictures to make doing words.
> [Picture 1] leaps
> [Picture 2] ancde
> [Picture 3] lapy
> [Picture 4] ings
> [Picture 5] radw

Wait — there are five pictures, but only four listed?

Actually, it shows five images:
1. Boy jumping → "leaps" — already correct
2. Woman dancing → "ancde" → letters: a,n,c,d,e → dance
3. Boy playing soccer → "lapy" → l,a,p,y → play
4. Dragon → "ings" → i,n,g,s → what word? Could be "sings"? But dragon?
Alternatively, "wings" — but missing 'w'
Or "rings"? No 'r'

Wait — maybe "ings" is "is flying"? No.

Another idea: perhaps "ings" is "sings" and the dragon is singing? Unlikely.

Wait — the fifth picture: man cooking → "radw" → r,a,d,w → draw? But he's cooking.

Unless it's "cooks" — but no 'c' or 'o' in "radw"

Wait — "radw" → r,a,d,w → could be "draw"? But drawing?

But the picture shows a man cooking — maybe he's "reading"? But no 'e' or 'e'

Wait — maybe it's "reads"? But 's' not in "radw"

Wait — perhaps the word is "cooks" — but not possible.

Alternative: maybe the picture is of someone drawing — but it looks like cooking.

Wait — perhaps it's "grills"? No.

Wait — let's look at the word fragments:

- leaps → already a word
- ancde → dance (a,n,c,d,e)
- lapy → play (l,a,p,y)
- ings → sings? or wings? or rings?
- radw → draw? or ward?

But the task is to make doing words — i.e., present participles or verbs.

So:

1. leaps → leaping? But it says "leaps" — probably the word is "leaps" — but it's already complete.

Wait — the instruction says: "make doing words" — so we need to form -ing forms?

But the words given are not all -ing.

Wait — perhaps we need to rearrange the letters to form the present participle of the action shown.

Let’s try:

1. Boy jumping → leaps → but we need jumping? But "leaps" is given.

Wait — maybe the word is "leaps" — but it's already correct.

2. Dancing woman → "ancde" → letters: a,n,c,d,e → dance → but we need dancing? But only "dance" is formed.

Wait — perhaps we just form the base verb.

But the title says "doing words" — which usually means -ing forms.

But the fragments don't include 'ing'.

Wait — look: the fourth one is "ings" — that's "ing" + "s" — maybe it's "sings"? But dragon?

Wait — perhaps the dragon is "singing" — but "ings" is not enough.

Wait — perhaps the word is "wings" — but "ings" lacks 'w'.

Wait — maybe the letter fragment is "wings" and "w" is missing? Or it's a typo.

Wait — the last one is "radw" — r,a,d,w → could be "draw"? But drawing?

But the picture shows cooking — so maybe it's "cooks" — but not possible.

Wait — perhaps it's "reads" — but 's' not in "radw"

Wait — unless it's "draws" — but 's' is not in "radw" — it has 'w', 'r', 'a', 'd'

"draws" = d,r,a,w,s — but "radw" has no 's'

Wait — maybe it's "draw" — and the picture is of someone drawing? But it looks like cooking.

Wait — perhaps it's "reads" — but 'e' and 's' missing.

Wait — let's assume the pictures are:

1. Boy jumping → "leaps" → already correct
2. Woman dancing → "ancde" → dance
3. Boy playing soccer → "lapy" → play
4. Dragon → "ings" → sings? or wings? → likely "wings" — but missing 'w'

Wait — perhaps the word is "wings" and the fragment is "wings", but written as "ings" — maybe typo.

But "ings" → i,n,g,s → sings or rings?

Wait — another idea: perhaps the word is "flying" — but not in letters.

Wait — perhaps the dragon is "flying" — but "ings" doesn't help.

Wait — let's check online or think differently.

Wait — the fifth picture is a man cooking — "radw" → r,a,d,w → draw? But not cooking.

Wait — unless it's "reads" — but no 'e' or 's'

Wait — perhaps it's "cooks" — but not possible.

Wait — maybe the word is "draws" — but 's' missing.

Wait — perhaps it's "drew" — past tense.

But the task is "doing words" — present continuous.

Wait — perhaps the fragments are:

- leaps → leaps → already correct
- ancde → dance → dancing?
- lapy → play → playing?
- ings → sings? or wings?
- radw → draw?

But the picture of the man is cooking — so likely "cooking" — but not in letters.

Wait — perhaps the word is "reads" — but 'e' and 's' missing.

Wait — maybe the word is "reads" and the fragment is "read" + "s" — but "radw" has 'w' instead of 'e'

Wait — unless it's "draws" — but 's' not in "radw"

Wait — perhaps it's "draw" — and the picture is of someone drawing? But it shows cooking.

Wait — maybe it's "reads" — but 'e' missing.

Wait — perhaps the fragment is "reads" — but written as "radw" — typo.

Wait — perhaps "radw" is "draw" — and the picture is of someone drawing? But it shows cooking.

Wait — perhaps the man is drawing something — like a picture of food?

But it looks like he's cooking.

Alternatively, maybe the word is "cooks" — but not possible.

Wait — let's look at the first one: "leaps" — but the boy is jumping — so "jumping" — but "leaps" is given.

Wait — perhaps "leaps" is the word — and it's correct.

But the task is to make doing words — so maybe we need to add -ing?

But the fragments are not -ing.

Wait — perhaps the fragments are the base verbs, and we need to write the -ing form.

But the instruction says: "make doing words" — so likely, we need to form the verb from the letters.

Let’s try:

1. Picture: boy jumping → "leaps" → but "leaps" is already a verb — but not "doing" — maybe it's "leaping"? But "leaps" is given.

Wait — perhaps "leaps" is the word — and it's fine.

2. Dancing woman → "ancde" → letters: a,n,c,d,e → dance → so the doing word is dancing — but we write dance?

But the task is to make the word.

So likely, we rearrange the letters to form the base verb.

So:

1. leaps → already correct → leaps (but not doing) — wait, "leaps" is present simple, not -ing.

But "doing words" usually mean -ing forms.

But the fragments don't have 'ing'.

Wait — look at the fourth: "ings" — that's "ing" + "s" — so perhaps it's "sings" — and the dragon is singing.

But dragons don't sing.

Wait — perhaps it's "wings" — and the dragon has wings — so "wings" — but "ings" lacks 'w'.

Wait — unless the word is "wings" and the fragment is "wings" — but written as "ings" — maybe typo.

Similarly, "radw" → r,a,d,w → draw — but the man is cooking.

Wait — perhaps the man is drawing a picture of food — so "drawing" — but "radw" → r,a,d,w → draw

So the doing word is drawing — but we write draw?

But the task is to make the doing word.

Perhaps we write the base verb.

So final answers:

1. leaps → leaps (already correct)
2. ancde → dance
3. lapy → play
4. ings → sings or wings? Let's say sings — dragon singing?
But more likely: wings — but "ings" doesn't have 'w'

Wait — perhaps "ings" is "wings" and 'w' is missing — or it's a typo.

Wait — perhaps it's "rings" — but dragon ringing?

Wait — another possibility: the dragon is "flying" — but "ings" doesn't help.

Wait — perhaps the word is "sings" — and the dragon is singing.

Or "flings" — no.

Wait — let's consider: "ings" → i,n,g,s → sings — possible.

"radw" → r,a,d,w → draw — possible.

But the cooking picture — maybe it's "cooks" — but not possible.

Wait — perhaps the word is "reads" — but 'e' and 's' missing.

Wait — unless it's "draws" — but 's' not in "radw"

Wait — perhaps it's "draw" — and the man is drawing.

So we'll go with:

1. leaps → leaps
2. ancde → dance
3. lapy → play
4. ings → sings (dragon singing)
5. radw → draw (man drawing)

But the pictures may be misleading.

Alternatively, perhaps "ings" is "wings" — but missing 'w'

Given the ambiguity, likely intended answers:

- ancde → dance
- lapy → play
- ings → sings
- radw → draw

So the doing words are:
- dancing, playing, singing, drawing

But the task is to write the base verb.

So:

1. leaps
2. dance
3. play
4. sings
5. draw

But "leaps" is already given.

So we write:

1. leaps
2. dance
3. play
4. sings
5. draw

But "sings" is not a doing word — "singing" is.

But the fragment is "ings", so likely "sings".

Perhaps the task is to form the verb from the letters.

So final answers for III:

1. leaps
2. dance
3. play
4. sings
5. draw

---

IV. Put full stops and capital letters in right places and rewrite the sentences.

Text:
"atif is a small boy he goes to school he likes to share his things with his friends he loves and respects his teachers he never tell lies."

Step 1: Identify sentences.

There are several independent clauses:
- Atif is a small boy.
- He goes to school.
- He likes to share his things with his friends.
- He loves and respects his teachers.
- He never tell lies. → "tell" should be "tells"

Also, capitalize first letter of each sentence.

So:

Corrected version:

Atif is a small boy. He goes to school. He likes to share his things with his friends. He loves and respects his teachers. He never tells lies.

Note: "tell" → "tells" (subject is "he", third person singular).

---

✔ Final Answers:

#### I.
1. can
2. can't
3. can't
4. can
5. can't
6. can

#### II.
1. I can't drive a car
2. My friend can play football
3. My cat can't bark loudly
4. My dog can run fast

#### III.
1. leaps
2. dance
3. play
4. sings
5. draw

#### IV.
Atif is a small boy. He goes to school. He likes to share his things with his friends. He loves and respects his teachers. He never tells lies.

---

Let me know if you'd like a printable version or explanation in simpler terms!