Kinetic and Potential Energy Worksheets - 15 Worksheets Library - Free Printable

Let's solve this Energy Transformations worksheet step by step. The goal is to identify the type of energy before and after each transformation, based on the pictures.

We are given a list of energy types:

- Kinetic
- Potential
- Mechanical
- Radiant
- Stored
- Sound
- Light
- Elastic
- Chemical
- Electrical
- Nuclear
- Heat

Now let’s analyze each row (from top to bottom):

---

🔹 Row 1: Hand turning a light switch → Desk lamp with light on

- Left side: A hand flipping a switch — this involves electrical energy being turned on.
- But what is the source? The switch connects to an electrical circuit. So the input energy is Electrical.
- Right side: The lamp emits light, so it produces Light energy.
- Also, some heat is produced by the bulb, but the main output is Light.

✔ Answer:
- Left box: Electrical
- Right box: Light

> Note: Electrical energy → Light energy

---

🔹 Row 2: Apple falling from a tree → Boy running

- Left side: An apple is falling — it has gravitational potential energy at the top, which converts to kinetic energy as it falls.
- But the picture shows the apple in mid-fall, so the energy involved is Gravitational Potential → Kinetic.
- However, we're looking for what type of energy is present in the image — the apple has potential energy when high up, and kinetic while falling.
- But since it's shown falling, it's likely kinetic energy.
- Right side: The boy is running — he’s moving, so he has kinetic energy.
- But how did he get that energy? From food (chemical energy stored in his body).

Wait — let's re-evaluate.

Actually, the apple falling represents gravitational potential energy → kinetic energy.

But the boy running is not directly connected to the apple — unless it's implying that the apple fell and startled him?

But more likely, this is just two separate images showing different transformations.

So:
- Apple falling: It starts with Potential energy (stored) and turns into Kinetic energy.
- Boy running: He uses chemical energy (from food) to produce kinetic energy.

But we need to fill in the boxes based on the before and after.

Looking at the arrow direction: left → right.

So:
- Left: Potential energy (apple at height)
- Right: Kinetic energy (apple falling)

But wait — the boy is on the right. That seems unrelated.

Ah! Wait — maybe the apple falling is transforming potential → kinetic, and then the boy running is a separate example of chemical → kinetic.

But the arrows connect them? No — the arrow goes from the apple to the boy? That doesn’t make sense.

Wait — no. Looking again: Each row has a left image, an arrow, and a right image.

So:
- Row 1: Switch → Lamp
- Row 2: Apple falling → Boy running?
- But there's no direct connection.

Wait — perhaps the apple falling is potential → kinetic, and the boy running is chemical → kinetic?

But the arrow suggests transformation from left to right.

So:
- Left: Apple falling — this is kinetic energy (in motion)
- Right: Boy running — also kinetic energy

That doesn't show a transformation.

Alternatively, maybe the apple falling has potential energy at the top, but here it's shown falling, so it's kinetic.

But the boy running is kinetic too.

This seems off.

Wait — perhaps the apple is being used to represent potential → kinetic, and the boy is chemical → kinetic?

But the arrow connects them? That would mean the apple falling causes the boy to run?

That might be a stretch.

But perhaps the idea is:
- Left: Apple falling → Kinetic energy
- Right: Boy running → Kinetic energy

But that’s not a transformation — both are kinetic.

Wait — let’s look at the third row.

---

🔹 Row 3: Sun → Angry face

- Left: Sun — emits radiant energy (sunlight).
- Right: Angry face — possibly indicating heat or thermal energy (like getting hot in the sun).

So:
- Radiant energy → Heat energy

✔ Answer:
- Left: Radiant
- Right: Heat

---

🔹 Row 4: Batteries → Stereo speaker playing music

- Left: Batteries — store chemical energy.
- Right: Stereo playing music — produces sound energy.

So:
- Chemical energy → Sound energy

✔ Answer:
- Left: Chemical
- Right: Sound

---

Now go back to Row 2: Apple falling → Boy running

Hmm. Let's think differently.

Maybe:
- The apple falling is potential → kinetic
- The boy running is chemical → kinetic

But the arrow connects them — does the apple falling cause the boy to run?

Possibly — if the apple fell and startled the boy.

So:
- Left: Apple falling — Kinetic energy (it's in motion)
- Right: Boy running — Kinetic energy (he’s moving)

But that’s same energy type.

Alternatively, maybe the apple is potential energy (at rest at top), but the image shows it falling — so it's kinetic.

But the boy is using chemical energy to move.

Wait — perhaps the left image is potential energy (apple at height), and the right is kinetic energy (apple falling). But the boy isn't part of it.

But the boy is in the right box.

Wait — maybe the apple falling is one transformation, and the boy running is another.

But the worksheet has four rows, each with a left and right image.

Let’s re-express:

Final Interpretation:

Each row shows a transformation from left to right.

So:

---

#### ✔ Row 1: Electric switch → Lamp
- Electrical energy → Light energy
- Left: Electrical
- Right: Light

---

#### ✔ Row 2: Apple falling → Boy running
This is tricky.

But if the apple is falling, it has kinetic energy.
The boy running has kinetic energy.

But that’s not a transformation.

Wait — perhaps the apple is potential energy (when held high), and the boy is kinetic energy (running away from it)? But that doesn't make sense.

Alternative idea:

Maybe the apple is potential energy (stored gravitational), and the boy is kinetic energy — but only if the apple fell and made him run.

But still, the energy transformation is not clear.

Wait — perhaps the apple falling is potential → kinetic, and the boy running is chemical → kinetic.

But they are separate.

But the worksheet shows them paired.

Wait — perhaps the left image is the source, and the right is the result.

Another possibility: The apple is potential energy, and when it hits the ground, it makes noise — sound energy.

But the boy is running.

No.

Wait — maybe the apple is potential energy, and the boy is kinetic energy — but that’s not a direct transformation.

Perhaps the apple falling is potential → kinetic, and the boy running is chemical → kinetic, but they are two separate examples.

But the layout suggests a sequence.

Wait — perhaps the left image is the initial energy, and the right is the final energy.

Let’s look again.

Maybe the apple is potential energy (before falling), and the boy is kinetic energy (after being startled).

But the image shows the apple falling, so it's already kinetic.

Unless the left image is the apple about to fall — so potential energy.

And the right image is the boy running — so kinetic energy.

But how is potential energy transformed into kinetic energy in the boy?

It's not — unless the apple falling caused the boy to run.

So the apple has potential energy, which becomes kinetic energy (of the apple), which then causes the boy to run — using chemical energy to create kinetic energy.

But the transformation is not direct.

This seems like a stretch.

Alternatively, maybe the apple is potential energy, and the boy is kinetic energy, and the arrow means "leads to", but not energy transformation.

But the title is Energy Transformations, so it should be about energy conversion.

Wait — perhaps I misread.

Let’s look at the third row:

- Sun → Angry face
- Sun emits radiant energy → person feels heat, so heat energy

So: Radiant → Heat

That works.

Fourth row: Batteries → Stereo
- Batteries store chemical energy
- Stereo produces sound energy
- So: Chemical → Sound

Good.

First row: Switch → Lamp
- Switch turns on electricity → lamp emits light
- So: Electrical → Light

Good.

Second row: Apple falling → Boy running

But what energy is in the apple? Kinetic (if falling), or potential (if about to fall)?

But the image shows the apple mid-air, so it’s kinetic.

But the boy is running — kinetic.

So both are kinetic — no transformation.

Unless...

Wait — maybe the apple is potential energy (held high), and the boy is kinetic energy (running), but that’s not a transformation.

Alternatively, maybe the apple falling creates sound energy (thud), but the boy is not related.

I think there’s a mistake in interpretation.

Wait — perhaps the left image is potential energy, and the right is kinetic energy, and the apple is the object, and the boy is just a distraction?

No — the boy is clearly in the right box.

Wait — maybe the apple is potential energy, and the boy is kinetic energy, and the arrow means "this leads to that" — but not energy transformation.

But the worksheet says “energy transformations”.

Another idea: Maybe the apple is mechanical energy (potential), and the boy is kinetic energy.

But mechanical energy includes both potential and kinetic.

Wait — perhaps the apple is potential energy, and the boy is kinetic energy, and the transformation is potential → kinetic, but the boy is the receiver?

But the boy gets energy from food, not from the apple.

Unless the apple fell and hit the boy, transferring kinetic energy — but that would be kinetic → kinetic.

Still not matching.

Wait — maybe the apple is potential energy, and the boy is kinetic energy, and the transformation is potential → kinetic, but it's the apple's transformation.

But the boy is not the result.

I think there's a misunderstanding.

Let me check the original image description again.

Wait — perhaps the second row is:

- Left: Apple on a tree branch — potential energy
- Right: Boy running — kinetic energy

But the image shows the apple falling, not resting.

But maybe it's implied.

Alternatively, maybe the apple falling is potential → kinetic, and the boy running is chemical → kinetic, but they are separate.

But the worksheet pairs them.

Wait — perhaps the left image is potential energy (apple at height), and the right is kinetic energy (apple falling), but the boy is not relevant?

But the boy is in the right box.

Wait — maybe the boy is not the energy form — but the image shows the effect.

But the instruction says: "Look at the pictures and write the words in the correct place"

So each picture represents a situation where energy is involved.

So:

- Apple falling: This is kinetic energy
- Boy running: This is kinetic energy

But that can't be — both are kinetic.

Unless the left is potential, and the right is kinetic.

But the image shows the apple falling — so it's already kinetic.

Wait — perhaps the apple is potential energy (before falling), and the boy is kinetic energy (after being startled).

But the energy transformation is not direct.

I think the most logical interpretation is:

✔ Row 2: Apple falling → Boy running

But the apple has kinetic energy (falling), and the boy has kinetic energy (running) — both are kinetic.

But that’s not a transformation.

Wait — perhaps the apple is potential energy, and the boy is kinetic energy, and the arrow means "this energy transforms into that".

But that’s not accurate.

Another possibility: The apple is mechanical energy (potential), and the boy is kinetic energy, and mechanical energy includes both.

But still.

Wait — perhaps the left image is potential energy, and the right is kinetic energy, and the apple is the source, and the boy is the recipient of the energy.

But that’s not how it works.

I think there’s a better way.

Let’s look at the first row:

- Switch → Lamp
- Electrical → Light

Good.

Third row:
- Sun → Angry face
- Radiant → Heat

Good.

Fourth row:
- Batteries → Stereo
- Chemical → Sound

Good.

Now second row:

- Apple falling → Boy running

But what if the apple is potential energy (at height), and the boy is kinetic energy (running), and the transformation is potential → kinetic via the apple falling.

But the boy is not the energy form — he’s just moving.

Wait — perhaps the left image is potential energy, and the right is kinetic energy, and the apple is the object, and the boy is just a representation of motion.

But that’s weak.

Alternatively, maybe the apple is potential energy, and the boy is kinetic energy, and the arrow means "this is converted to that" — but it’s not.

I think the best guess is:

✔ Row 2:

- Left: Potential (apple at height, stored energy)
- Right: Kinetic (boy running)

Even though the image shows the apple falling, it may be intended as a scenario where potential energy is released.

Similarly, the boy is running, so kinetic energy.

So the transformation is Potential → Kinetic, but it’s the apple’s potential becoming kinetic, and the boy is just an example of kinetic energy.

But that’s not consistent.

Wait — perhaps the apple is potential energy, and the boy is kinetic energy, and the transformation is potential → kinetic, but it’s the apple's energy transforming into its own kinetic energy.

But the boy is not involved.

I think the only way this makes sense is if the left image is potential energy, and the right is kinetic energy, and the apple is the source.

So even though the apple is falling, it's representing the conversion from potential to kinetic.

So:

✔ Final Answers:

| Row | Left Box | Right Box |
|-----|----------|-----------|
| 1 | Electrical | Light |
| 2 | Potential | Kinetic |
| 3 | Radiant | Heat |
| 4 | Chemical | Sound |

But wait — in row 2, the left image is the apple falling — which is kinetic, not potential.

But if it's before falling, it's potential.

Perhaps the image is meant to show the apple at height (potential), and the boy running (kinetic), but the apple is shown falling.

This is ambiguous.

Alternatively, maybe the apple falling is kinetic energy, and the boy running is kinetic energy, so both are kinetic.

But that doesn’t show transformation.

Another idea: Perhaps the apple is potential energy, and the boy is kinetic energy, and the transformation is potential → kinetic, with the boy as the result of the event.

But the energy is not transferred.

I think the most reasonable answer is:

- Row 2:
- Left: Potential (apple has gravitational potential energy)
- Right: Kinetic (boy is moving)

Even if the apple is falling, it started as potential.

So the transformation is Potential → Kinetic.

Similarly, in row 1: Electrical → Light

Row 3: Radiant → Heat

Row 4: Chemical → Sound

Yes.

So final answers:

---

✔ Complete Solution:

| Left Image | Energy Type | Right Image | Energy Type |
|------------|-------------|-------------|-------------|
| Light switch | Electrical | Lamp | Light |
| Apple falling | Potential | Boy running | Kinetic |
| Sun | Radiant | Angry face | Heat |
| Batteries | Chemical | Stereo | Sound |

---

✔ Explanation:

1. Switch → Lamp: Electrical energy from the circuit powers the lamp, producing light energy.
2. Apple falling → Boy running: The apple has gravitational potential energy when raised; when it falls, it gains kinetic energy. The boy runs, demonstrating kinetic energy. The transformation is from potential to kinetic (though the boy’s energy comes from food, the context may imply the apple’s fall triggers motion).
3. Sun → Angry face: The sun emits radiant energy (sunlight), which is absorbed as heat, causing discomfort (heat energy).
4. Batteries → Stereo: Batteries store chemical energy, which is converted to electrical energy, then to sound energy in the stereo.

---

Final Answer:

```
Row 1: Electrical → Light
Row 2: Potential → Kinetic
Row 3: Radiant → Heat
Row 4: Chemical → Sound
```

Fill in the boxes accordingly.