Find the Patterns worksheet for identifying multiplication sequences, featuring a fun math activity with children playing.

Let’s go step by step to find the missing numbers in each pattern.

---

A. 3, 6, 9, 12, ___, ___
This is adding 3 each time:
3 + 3 = 6
6 + 3 = 9
9 + 3 = 12
12 + 3 = 15
15 + 3 = 18
→ A: 15, 18

---

B. 4, 8, 12, 16, ___, ___
Adding 4 each time:
16 + 4 = 20
20 + 4 = 24
→ B: 20, 24

---

C. 1, 2, 3, 4, ___, ___
Just counting up by 1:
4 + 1 = 5
5 + 1 = 6
→ C: 5, 6

---

D. 7, 14, 21, ___, ___
Multiples of 7 (or add 7):
21 + 7 = 28
28 + 7 = 35
→ D: 28, 35

---

E. 10, 20, 30, ___, ___
Add 10 each time:
30 + 10 = 40
40 + 10 = 50
→ E: 40, 50

---

F. ___, 18, 27, ___, ___
Looks like multiples of 9:
Before 18 → 9
After 27 → 36, then 45
Check: 9, 18, 27, 36, 45 → yes, adds 9 each time.
→ F: 9, 36, 45

---

G. 6, 12, ___, 30, ___
Add 6 each time:
12 + 6 = 18
30 + 6 = 36
Check: 6, 12, 18, 30? Wait — that skips 24! Let’s check again.

Wait — maybe it’s not consistent? Let’s look:

6 → 12 (+6)
12 → ?
? → 30
Then 30 → ?

If we assume it’s adding 6:
6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36

But the blank after 12 is third number, and then 30 is fourth? The sequence is:

G. 6, 12, ___, 30, ___

So positions:
1st: 6
2nd: 12
3rd: ?
4th: 30
5th: ?

From 12 to 30 is two steps. If we add 6 each time:
12 → 18 → 24 → 30 → but that would make 30 the 4th term only if we have 18 and 24 in between. But here, 30 is the 4th term, so from 12 (2nd) to 30 (4th) is two jumps.

So jump size = (30 - 12) / 2 = 18 / 2 = 9? That doesn’t fit with first jump (6 to 12 is +6).

Alternative: Maybe it’s multiples of 6:
6×1=6, 6×2=12, 6×3=18, 6×4=24, 6×5=30, 6×6=36

But the sequence says: 6, 12, ___, 30, ___

So if 30 is the 4th term, then:

Term 1: 6
Term 2: 12
Term 3: ?
Term 4: 30
Term 5: ?

That suggests term 3 should be 18, term 4 should be 24 — but it says 30 is term 4. So contradiction?

Wait — let me re-read the problem.

Looking back at original:

G. 6, 12, ___, 30, ___

Perhaps it's a typo? Or maybe I miscounted.

Another idea: Maybe it’s 6, 12, 18, 24, 30 — but they wrote 30 as the 4th term? No, in the list it’s written as:

“G. 6, 12, ___, 30, ___”

So the blanks are 3rd and 5th terms.

If we assume the pattern is +6:

6 → 12 → 18 → 24 → 30 → 36

But here, 30 is given as the 4th term? Then 3rd term must be 18, and 5th term 36? But 18 to 30 is +12, which breaks the pattern.

Unless... perhaps it’s not arithmetic? Let’s try another approach.

Maybe it’s 6×1, 6×2, 6×3, 6×5, 6×6? Skipping 6×4? That seems odd.

Wait — let’s count the positions again.

The sequence is: position 1: 6, pos2:12, pos3:?, pos4:30, pos5:?

If pos4 is 30, and pos2 is 12, difference is 18 over 2 steps → average +9 per step.

But pos1 to pos2 is +6. Not consistent.

Alternative: Perhaps it’s 6, 12, 18, 24, 30 — and the “30” is actually the 5th term? But the way it’s written: “6, 12, ___, 30, ___” — that implies 30 is the 4th item.

Let me check the original image description — but I can’t see it. However, based on standard patterns, this is likely meant to be multiples of 6.

Perhaps there’s a mistake in my reading. Let me think differently.

What if the pattern is: 6, 12, 18, 24, 30 — but they skipped writing 24? No, the blank is after 12 and before 30, so one blank between 12 and 30.

So: 6, 12, X, 30, Y

From 12 to 30 is two steps: 12 → X → 30

If linear, X = (12 + 30)/2 = 21? But 6 to 12 is +6, 12 to 21 is +9, 21 to 30 is +9 — not consistent.

Another idea: Maybe it’s 6*1, 6*2, 6*3, 6*5, 6*6 — skipping 4? Unlikely.

Perhaps it’s a different pattern. Let’s look at other problems for clue.

H. ___, 22, ___, 44, ___, 77

That looks like multiples of 11: 11, 22, 33, 44, 55, 66, 77

So H: 11, 33, 55, 66

Back to G.

Perhaps G is also multiples of 6, and "30" is the 5th term? But the way it's written: "6, 12, ___, 30, ___" — that's five items total, with blanks at 3 and 5.

List: item1=6, item2=12, item3=?, item4=30, item5=?

If item4=30, and it's multiples of 6, then item4 should be 24 (6*4), but it's 30, which is 6*5. So perhaps the indexing is off.

Maybe it's 6, 12, 18, 24, 30 — and they meant to write 24 instead of 30? But that's speculation.

Another possibility: The pattern is +6, but they have a typo, or I need to accept that 30 is the 4th term, so the common difference changes.

Let's calculate the difference between known points.

From item1 to item2: +6

From item2 to item4: +18 over 2 steps, so +9 per step.

Not consistent.

Perhaps it's not arithmetic. Let's try geometric? 6 to 12 is *2, 12 to ? , ? to 30.

12 * x = y, y * z = 30. Too many variables.

I recall that in some worksheets, they might have sequences where the increment changes, but that's advanced.

Let's look at the answer choices or context — but there are none.

Perhaps for G, it's 6, 12, 18, 24, 30 — and the "30" is misplaced in my understanding. Let me read the user's text again.

User wrote: "G. 6, 12, ___, 30, ___"

And in the initial problem, it's listed as such.

Another idea: Maybe it's 6, 12, 18, 30, 36 — but 18 to 30 is +12, while others are +6.

Or perhaps it's 6*1, 6*2, 6*3, 6*5, 6*6 — skipping 4, but why?

Let's skip and come back.

Look at I: 5, 10, 15, ___, ___ — clearly +5, so 20, 25

J: 8, ___, 24, ___, 40, ___ — multiples of 8: 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48

K: 10, 12, 14, ___, ___, 22, ___ — +2 each time: 16, 18, 20, 24

L: ___, 24, ___, 48, 60, ___ — multiples of 12: 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72

Now back to G. With L being multiples of 12, G might be multiples of 6.

In G, if it's multiples of 6: 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36

But the sequence is given as 6, 12, ___, 30, ___

So if 30 is the 4th term, then it should be 24, but it's 30. Unless the blank is for the 3rd and 5th, and 30 is the 4th, so perhaps it's 6, 12, 18, 30, 36 — but 18 to 30 is +12, not +6.

Perhaps it's a different pattern. Let's consider that "30" might be a typo, and it's supposed to be 24. In many worksheets, that happens.

Maybe it's 6, 12, 18, 24, 30 — and the "30" is the 5th term, but the way it's written has only one blank before it.

Let's count the commas.

"G. 6, 12, ___, 30, ___" — that's five elements: 1.6, 2.12, 3.blank, 4.30, 5.blank

So for it to be multiples of 6, element 4 should be 24, but it's 30. So perhaps the pattern is not starting from 6*1.

Another idea: Perhaps it's 6*1, 6*2, 6*3, 6*5, 6*6 — but that's irregular.

Or maybe it's 6, 12, 18, 30, 48 — Fibonacci-like? 6+12=18, 12+18=30, 18+30=48 — oh! That could be it.

Let's test: Start with 6, 12

Then next = 6+12 = 18

Then next = 12+18 = 30 — matches the given 30

Then next = 18+30 = 48

So G: 6, 12, 18, 30, 48

Yes! That makes sense. It's a Fibonacci-style sequence where each term is sum of previous two.

Confirm:
Term1: 6
Term2: 12
Term3: 6+12=18
Term4: 12+18=30 — given
Term5: 18+30=48

Perfect.

So G: 18, 48

---

H. ___, 22, ___, 44, ___, 77

Multiples of 11: 11, 22, 33, 44, 55, 66, 77

So blanks: 11, 33, 55, 66

Sequence: pos1:?, pos2:22, pos3:?, pos4:44, pos5:?, pos6:77

So pos1: 11 (since 11*1)
pos3: 33 (11*3)
pos5: 55 (11*5)
and pos6 is 77, which is 11*7, so pos5 should be 66? No.

Positions:
1: ?
2: 22 = 11*2
3: ?
4: 44 = 11*4
5: ?
6: 77 = 11*7

So likely: 11*1=11, 11*2=22, 11*3=33, 11*4=44, 11*5=55, 11*6=66, 11*7=77

But the sequence has only six terms mentioned: blanks at 1,3,5, and given 2,4,6.

Given: pos2=22, pos4=44, pos6=77

So pos1=11, pos3=33, pos5=55? But pos6 is 77, which is 11*7, so if pos5 is 55=11*5, then pos6 should be 66=11*6, but it's 77=11*7. Inconsistency.

Unless the last is pos6=77, so the multipliers are 1,2,3,4,5,7? Missing 6.

Perhaps it's 11,22,33,44,55,66,77 but they have only six slots.

The sequence is: ___, 22, ___, 44, ___, 77 — that's six items.

So item1: ?, item2:22, item3:?, item4:44, item5:?, item6:77

If multiples of 11, item2=22=11*2, item4=44=11*4, item6=77=11*7 — not consistent multiplier.

11*2, 11*4, 11*7 — differences in multipliers: 2,4,7 — not arithmetic.

Perhaps it's not multiples, but something else.

Another idea: From 22 to 44 is +22, 44 to 77 is +33, not consistent.

Or perhaps it's 11 times odd numbers or something.

Let's list what we know:

Assume it's arithmetic sequence.

From item2 to item4: 22 to 44, difference 22 over 2 steps, so +11 per step.

From item4 to item6: 44 to 77, difference 33 over 2 steps, so +16.5 per step — not integer.

Not good.

Perhaps the pattern is +11 each time, but item6 is 77, which is 11*7, so if item2 is 22=11*2, then item1 should be 11*1=11, item3=11*3=33, item4=11*4=44, item5=11*5=55, item6=11*6=66 — but it's given as 77, not 66.

Unless there's a mistake, or perhaps it's 11,22,33,44,55,66,77 and they have seven items, but the sequence shows only six with three blanks.

The user wrote: "H. ___, 22, ___, 44, ___, 77" — that's six positions.

Perhaps the last is 66, but it's written as 77? Or maybe it's correct, and the pattern is different.

Another thought: 22, 44, 77 — 22=2*11, 44=4*11, 77=7*11, and 2,4,7 are triangular numbers or something? 2,4,7 — differences 2,3, not clear.

Perhaps it's 11*2, 11*4, 11*7, and the multipliers are increasing by 2, then 3, so next would be +4, but we have only up to 77.

For the blanks, if item2=22=11*2, item4=44=11*4, item6=77=11*7, then item1 might be 11*1=11, item3=11*3=33, item5=11*5=55 or 11*6=66? But 5 is between 4 and 7.

Multipliers: pos1:?, pos2:2, pos3:?, pos4:4, pos5:?, pos6:7

If the multipliers are 1,2,3,4,5,7 — missing 6, or perhaps 1,2,3,4,6,7 — not clear.

Perhaps it's not multiples of 11, but the numbers are related.

22 to 44 is double, 44 to 77 is not double.

77 - 44 = 33, 44 - 22 = 22, so differences 22,33, which are 11*2, 11*3, so perhaps the increments are increasing by 11 each time.

From item2 to item4: +22 over 2 steps, so per step +11.

From item4 to item6: +33 over 2 steps, so per step +16.5 — not good.

Let's assume the common difference is constant.

Suppose from item1 to item2: d
item2 to item3: d
etc.

Item2 = 22
Item4 = 44
Item6 = 77

From item2 to item4: 2 steps, difference 22, so d = 11
From item4 to item6: 2 steps, difference 33, so d = 16.5 — conflict.

Unless the sequence is not arithmetic.

Perhaps it's 11, 22, 33, 44, 55, 66, and 77 is a typo, or vice versa.

In many such worksheets, H is likely 11, 22, 33, 44, 55, 66, but they have 77 at the end, which is unusual.

Another idea: Perhaps "77" is for a different part, but no.

Let's look at the word problem at the bottom: Sam ran 3 miles Sunday, 6 Monday, 12 Wednesday — doubling each time? 3,6,12, so Tuesday would be 24? But that's separate.

For H, let's force it to be multiples of 11 with the given.

Perhaps the sequence is: 11, 22, 33, 44, 55, 66, and the "77" is a mistake, or perhaps it's 66.

But the user wrote "77", so I'll assume it's correct.

Perhaps it's 0, 22, 22, 44, 44, 77 — not likely.

Let's calculate the average or something.

Another approach: The numbers 22, 44, 77 are all divisible by 11, and 22/11=2, 44/11=4, 77/11=7, and 2,4,7 are 2, 2+2=4, 4+3=7, so increments of 2, then 3, so for the blanks, if pos2=2, pos4=4, pos6=7, then pos1 might be 1 (2-1), pos3=3 (between 2 and 4), pos5=5 or 6 (between 4 and 7).

If pos5=5, then 11*5=55, pos6=77=11*7, so from 5 to 7 is +2, while from 4 to 5 is +1, not consistent.

If pos5=6, then 11*6=66, pos6=77=11*7, so +1, good, but from pos4=4 to pos5=6 is +2, while from pos2=2 to pos4=4 is +2 over 2 steps, so per step +1, so from pos4 to pos5 should be +1, so pos5=5, but then pos6 should be 6, not 7.

I think there might be a typo in the problem, or in my reasoning.

Perhaps "77" is for the next one, but the sequence has only six items.

Let's count the blanks: "___, 22, ___, 44, ___, 77" — so three blanks, three given, total six.

Perhaps the pattern is that each number is 11 times the position number, but pos2=22=11*2, pos4=44=11*4, pos6=77=11*7, not matching.

Pos6 should be 66 if consistent.

I recall that in some patterns, they use 11,22,33,44,55,66, and 77 is extra, but here it's included.

Another idea: Perhaps it's 11*1, 11*2, 11*3, 11*4, 11*5, 11*7 — skipping 6, but why.

Or perhaps the last is 66, and "77" is a miswrite.

Given that in most educational contexts, this is likely intended to be multiples of 11: 11, 22, 33, 44, 55, 66

And "77" might be a typo, or perhaps for a different purpose.

But to match the given, let's assume that the sequence is 11, 22, 33, 44, 55, 66, and ignore the 77, but that's not honest.

Perhaps "77" is correct, and the pattern is different.

Let's try: from 22 to 44 is +22, from 44 to 77 is +33, so the increment is increasing by 11 each time: +22, then +33, so before that, from item1 to item2 should be +11, so item1 = 22 - 11 = 11

From item2 to item3: +11, so item3 = 22 + 11 = 33

From item3 to item4: +11, item4 = 33 + 11 = 44 — good

From item4 to item5: +11, item5 = 44 + 11 = 55

From item5 to item6: +11, item6 = 55 + 11 = 66 — but given as 77, not 66.

So still conflict.

Unless the increment changes.

From item4 to item6: +33 over 2 steps, so if linear, +16.5 per step, not integer.

Perhaps it's not arithmetic.

Let's consider that 77 is 7*11, and 44 is 4*11, 22 is 2*11, so the multipliers are 2,4,7 for positions 2,4,6.

2,4,7 — differences 2,3, so perhaps the multiplier for position n is something.

For position 2: 2
Position 4: 4
Position 6: 7

2 to 4 is +2, 4 to 7 is +3, so for position 1: 2 -1 =1 (since from 1 to 2 is +1 in position, but multiplier increase may be different).

Assume the multiplier increases by 1 each step in position, but from pos2 to pos4 is 2 steps, multiplier from 2 to 4, +2, so +1 per position step.

From pos4 to pos6: 2 steps, multiplier from 4 to 7, +3, so +1.5 per step — not integer.

I think for the sake of this, I'll assume that "77" is a typo and it's 66, as it's more reasonable for a grade school worksheet.

Perhaps in the original image, it's 66, but user typed 77.

Or perhaps it's 55 for the last, but no.

Another possibility: The sequence is 0, 22, 22, 44, 44, 77 — not likely.

Let's look online or recall standard patterns.

Upon second thought, in some patterns, they have 11, 22, 33, 44, 55, 66, and then 77 is for the next, but here it's included as the sixth.

Perhaps the blanks are for 11, 33, 55, and 77 is given, so item6=77, which is 11*7, so item5 should be 11*6=66, but it's blank, so we can put 66, but then item6=77, so from 66 to 77 is +11, good, but from item4=44 to item5=66 is +22, while from item2=22 to item4=44 is +22 over 2 steps, so per step +11, so from item4 to item5 should be +11, so 55, not 66.

I'm stuck.

Let's calculate the required values.

Suppose the common difference is d.

Then item2 = item1 + d = 22
item4 = item1 + 3d = 44 (since from 1 to 4 is 3 steps)
item6 = item1 + 5d = 77

From item2 and item4: (item1 + 3d) - (item1 + d) = 2d = 44 - 22 = 22, so d = 11

Then item1 = 22 - d = 22 - 11 = 11

item4 = 11 + 3*11 = 11+33=44 — good

item6 = 11 + 5*11 = 11+55=66 — but given as 77, not 66.

So unless d is not constant, or the given is wrong.

Perhaps "77" is for item7, but the sequence has only six items.

I think for practical purposes, I'll assume that the last number is 66, and "77" is a typo, or perhaps in the context, it's accepted as 66.

Maybe it's 11, 22, 33, 44, 55, 66, and the "77" is a distractor, but unlikely.

Another idea: Perhaps "77" is the answer to the word problem, but no, it's part of H.

Let's move on and come back.

For now, I'll set H as 11, 33, 55, and assume item6 is 66, but since it's given as 77, perhaps the pattern is different.

Let's try a different pattern for H.

Suppose it's 11*1, 11*2, 11*3, 11*4, 11*5, 11*7 — so blanks are 11, 33, 55, and last is 77, so item5=55, item6=77, so from 55 to 77 is +22, while from 44 to 55 is +11, not consistent.

Perhaps the sequence is not based on position.

Let's list the numbers: a, 22, b, 44, c, 77

Assume a,22,b,44,c,77

Suppose 22 to 44 is *2, 44 to 77 is *1.75, not good.

22 + 22 = 44, 44 + 33 = 77, and 22,33 are 11*2, 11*3, so perhaps the added amount is 11*2, then 11*3, so before that, from a to 22 should be +11*1 =11, so a=11

From 22 to b: +11*2 =22, so b=44 — but b is before 44, and 44 is already there.

From item2=22 to item3=b: if +22, b=44, but item4 is 44, so b=44, then item4=44, duplicate.

Not good.

From item1=a to item2=22: +x
item2 to item3=b: +y
item3 to item4=44: +z
etc.

Too many unknowns.

Perhaps it's 11, 22, 33, 44, 55, 66, and for the sake of this exercise, I'll use that, and note that 77 might be a mistake.

Or perhaps in the original, it's 66.

I recall that in some versions, it's 66.

So I'll go with H: 11, 33, 55, and for the last blank, since item6=77, but if we must fill, perhaps 66, but let's see the format.

The sequence is: ___, 22, ___, 44, ___, 77

So three blanks: first, third, fifth.

If we put 11, 33, 55, then the sequence is 11, 22, 33, 44, 55, 77 — which has 55 to 77 as +22, while others are +11, so not consistent, but perhaps it's accepted.

Maybe the last is 66, and "77" is for the word problem.

Let's look at the word problem: Sam ran 3 miles Sunday, 6 Monday, 12 Wednesday — so Tuesday should be 24, as doubling.

But for H, I think I'll assume the pattern is +11 each time, so item1=11, item3=33, item5=55, and item6 should be 66, but since it's given as 77, perhaps there's a different interpretation.

Another idea: Perhaps "77" is 7*11, and the multipliers are 1,2,3,4,5,7 for the positions, so item5=5*11=55, item6=7*11=77, so the multiplier for item5 is 5, for item6 is 7, so from 5 to 7 is +2, while from item4=4 to item5=5 is +1, not consistent, but perhaps it's ok for the blank.

So for H, blanks are 11, 33, 55

And we leave item6 as 77, even though it breaks the pattern.

Perhaps the pattern is that the multiplier is the position number for even positions, but for odd, different.

I think for the purpose of this, I'll put H: 11, 33, 55

And assume that the last number is given as 77, so we don't change it.

So H: 11, 33, 55

---

I. 5, 10, 15, ___, ___
+5 each time: 20, 25
→ I: 20, 25

---

J. 8, ___, 24, ___, 40, ___
Multiples of 8: 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48
→ J: 16, 32, 48

---

K. 10, 12, 14, ___, ___, 22, ___
+2 each time: 16, 18, 20, 24
Check: 10,12,14,16,18,20,22,24 — yes, 22 is given, so after 22 is 24
Blanks are 4th,5th,7th: so 16,18,24
→ K: 16, 18, 24

---

L. ___, 24, ___, 48, 60, ___
Multiples of 12: 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72
→ L: 12, 36, 72

---

Now back to G and H.

For G, we have: 6, 12, 18, 30, 48 (Fibonacci-style)

For H, let's decide.

Perhaps in H, the pattern is 11, 22, 33, 44, 55, 66, and "77" is a typo, or perhaps it's 66.

Maybe "77" is for the next, but the sequence ends with it.

Another thought: In the user's text, it's "H. ___, 22, ___, 44, ___, 77" and perhaps the last blank is for the seventh, but it's written as sixth.

I think I'll go with H: 11, 33, 55, and assume item6=77 is given, so the sequence is 11,22,33,44,55,77 — and accept that the last jump is larger, or perhaps it's 11*1,2,3,4,5,7.

So for the answer, I'll put 11, 33, 55 for the blanks.

Similarly for G, 18, 48

Now for the word problem: Sam ran 3 miles Sunday, 6 Monday, 12 Wednesday. How many on Tuesday?

From Sunday to Monday: 3 to 6, doubled.

Monday to Tuesday: should double to 12, but Wednesday is 12, so perhaps Tuesday is 12, but then Wednesday is also 12, not doubled.

Sunday: 3
Monday: 6 (double)
Tuesday: ?
Wednesday: 12

If it doubles each day, then Tuesday should be 12, Wednesday 24, but Wednesday is 12, so not.

Perhaps it's every other day or something.

From Sunday to Monday: +3
Monday to Tuesday: +6? Then Tuesday to Wednesday: +6, so 6+6=12, good.

So Monday 6, Tuesday 12, Wednesday 12 — but 12 to 12 is +0, not consistent.

Perhaps the pattern is that he runs twice as much as the previous day, but from Monday 6 to Tuesday 12, then Wednesday should be 24, but it's 12, so not.

Another idea: Perhaps "on Wednesday, he ran 12 miles" is given, and we need to find Tuesday.

From Sunday 3, Monday 6, so perhaps Tuesday is 9, Wednesday 12, adding 3 each day.

3,6,9,12 — yes, +3 each day.

So Tuesday: 9 miles.

But the problem says "how many more miles do you think he ran on Tuesday?" implying compared to what? Or just how many.

The question: "How many more miles do you think he ran on Tuesday?"

"More" than what? Than Monday? Or than Sunday?

Typically, "how many more" means additional, but here it might mean how many miles.

Read: "On Sunday he ran 3 miles. On Monday he ran 6 miles. On Wednesday, he ran 12 miles. How many more miles do you think he ran on Tuesday?"

"More" might imply compared to the previous day or something.

Perhaps it's poorly worded, and it's "how many miles".

In context, likely they want the number for Tuesday.

With the pattern +3: Sun 3, Mon 6, Tue 9, Wed 12 — so Tuesday 9 miles.

If doubling, it doesn't work.

Perhaps from Sun to Mon: *2, Mon to Tue: *2, so Tue 12, but Wed is 12, not 24.

Unless Wednesday is a different day.

Another possibility: The days are not consecutive in the pattern.

But likely, it's arithmetic sequence with common difference 3.

So Tuesday: 9 miles.

" How many more" — perhaps compared to Sunday or Monday.

Compared to Monday: 9 - 6 = 3 more than Monday.

Compared to Sunday: 9 - 3 = 6 more.

But the question is "how many more miles do you think he ran on Tuesday?" without specification, so probably they want the number for Tuesday, or the increment.

In many such problems, "how many more" means the additional amount, but here it's ambiguous.

Perhaps "more" is a red herring, and it's "how many miles".

Given that, and the pattern, I'll say 9 miles for Tuesday.

But let's see the answer format.

First, let's compile all answers.

Final Answer section should have all the filled sequences.

Also for the word problem.

So let's list:

A: 15, 18

B: 20, 24

C: 5, 6

D: 28, 35

E: 40, 50

F: 9, 36, 45

G: 18, 48 (from Fibonacci: 6,12,18,30,48)

H: 11, 33, 55 (assuming multiples of 11, and 77 is given, so we have 11,22,33,44,55,77)

I: 20, 25

J: 16, 32, 48

K: 16, 18, 24

L: 12, 36, 72

Word problem: Tuesday: 9 miles (if +3 each day)

" How many more" — perhaps they want the number, or the difference.

Since it says "how many more miles", and in context, likely they want the number for Tuesday, or perhaps the increment from Monday.

But to be safe, let's assume they want the number of miles on Tuesday.

So 9.

Perhaps "more" means additional to the previous, so from Monday 6 to Tuesday 9, so 3 more miles.

But the question is "how many more miles do you think he ran on Tuesday?" which might mean how many miles did he run on Tuesday that are additional, but it's vague.

In educational contexts, often "how many more" means the difference, but here it might be misphrased.

Looking at the sentence: "How many more miles do you think he ran on Tuesday?"

Probably, it's "how many miles", and "more" is a mistake, or it's "how many miles in total".

I think 9 is the intended answer for Tuesday's miles.

So for the final answer, I'll provide the sequences and the word problem answer.

Now for H, to resolve, let's assume that the sequence is 11, 22, 33, 44, 55, 66, and "77" is a typo, so item6=66, but since it's given as 77, perhaps in the answer, we put the blanks as 11, 33, 55, and ignore the inconsistency.

Perhaps for H, the pattern is different.

Another idea: 22, 44, 77 are given, and 22=2*11, 44=4*11, 77=7*11, and 2,4,7 are 2, 2+2=4, 4+3=7, so the increments are 2,3, so for the beginning, from start to 22: if first number is 11*1=11, then