Educational worksheet teaching students the components of an argument with a basketball-themed example.
A worksheet titled "4 Writing: Parts of an Argument #2" with sections for Claim, Evidence, Counter-Argument, Rebuttal, and Conclusion, including a sample argument about basketball and instructions to write an original argument.
JPG
298×396
32.4 KB
Free · Personal Use
Quality Assured by Worksheets Library Team
Reviewed for educational accuracy and age-appropriateness
ID: #716712
⭐
Show Answer Key & Explanations
Step-by-step solution for: Argument Writing Parts of An Argument 2 PDF | PDF
▼
Show Answer Key & Explanations
Step-by-step solution for: Argument Writing Parts of An Argument 2 PDF | PDF
It looks like you've uploaded a document titled "Writing: Parts of an Argument #2" from Education.com. The document is designed to help students understand and identify the key components of an argument: Claim, Evidence, Counter-Argument, Rebuttal, and Conclusion.
Let’s go through the task step by step and solve it.
---
You are given a sample argument about whether students should play basketball instead of baseball after school. Your job is to:
1. Underline each part of the argument using specific colors (as indicated in the color-coded chart).
2. Then, write your own argument on a separate sheet, following the same structure.
---
Here is the argument provided:
> "Hey Kenya! We should play basketball instead of baseball after school today. Basketball is better because we can play with more than two people at once. If we're the only ones playing, we can play one-on-one or we can play 'Horse.' When you play baseball, you need at least six people to play with us. A lot of people, like Jake and Penelope, think that baseball is more fun because they like hitting the ball over the fence and stealing bases. But the truth is that we always end up having more fun when we play basketball because we don't have to wait for people to go get the ball from the street. So, let's meet at the basketball courts at 4:00 pm."
Now, let’s break this down into the five parts of an argument:
---
| Part of Argument | Text from the Argument | Explanation |
|------------------|------------------------|-----------|
| Claim | "We should play basketball instead of baseball after school today." | This is the main point the speaker wants to convince the reader of. |
| Evidence | "Basketball is better because we can play with more than two people at once. If we're the only ones playing, we can play one-on-one or we can play 'Horse.'" | These are reasons supporting the claim. They show why basketball is more flexible and accessible. |
| Counter-Argument | "A lot of people, like Jake and Penelope, think that baseball is more fun because they like hitting the ball over the fence and stealing bases." | This presents the opposing viewpoint—why some might prefer baseball. |
| Rebuttal | "But the truth is that we always end up having more fun when we play basketball because we don't have to wait for people to go get the ball from the street." | This directly responds to the counter-argument by showing why basketball is still better in practice. |
| Conclusion | "So, let's meet at the basketball courts at 4:00 pm." | This is a call to action based on the argument. It summarizes the reasoning and encourages agreement. |
---
Even though I can’t actually color the text here, here’s how you would apply the colors:
- Claim → Use red
- Evidence → Use blue
- Counter-Argument → Use green
- Rebuttal → Use purple
- Conclusion → Use orange
So, when you underline the parts in your printed copy:
- Underline *"We should play basketball instead of baseball after school today."* in red
- Underline the sentences about flexibility and games like “Horse” in blue
- Underline the sentence about Jake and Penelope liking baseball in green
- Underline the rebuttal about not waiting for the ball in purple
- Underline *"So, let's meet at the basketball courts at 4:00 pm."* in orange
---
Now, create your own argument using the same structure. Here’s an example:
> Claim: School should start later in the morning.
> Evidence: Studies show that teenagers need more sleep, and starting school later helps improve focus and grades.
> Counter-Argument: Some parents say that later start times make it harder to manage work schedules and after-school activities.
> Rebuttal: Schools could adjust bus routes and extracurricular schedules to accommodate later start times, and the benefits to student health and learning outweigh the inconvenience.
> Conclusion: Therefore, schools should consider moving start times to 9:00 AM to support student well-being.
Then, underline each part with the correct color as instructed.
---
- You’ve now identified all five parts of the argument.
- You know how to use evidence, address counterarguments, and conclude effectively.
- The goal is to build strong, logical arguments that persuade others.
Let me know if you'd like help writing your own argument or practicing with another example!
Let’s go through the task step by step and solve it.
---
🔍 Task Overview
You are given a sample argument about whether students should play basketball instead of baseball after school. Your job is to:
1. Underline each part of the argument using specific colors (as indicated in the color-coded chart).
2. Then, write your own argument on a separate sheet, following the same structure.
---
🧩 Step 1: Analyze the Sample Argument
Here is the argument provided:
> "Hey Kenya! We should play basketball instead of baseball after school today. Basketball is better because we can play with more than two people at once. If we're the only ones playing, we can play one-on-one or we can play 'Horse.' When you play baseball, you need at least six people to play with us. A lot of people, like Jake and Penelope, think that baseball is more fun because they like hitting the ball over the fence and stealing bases. But the truth is that we always end up having more fun when we play basketball because we don't have to wait for people to go get the ball from the street. So, let's meet at the basketball courts at 4:00 pm."
Now, let’s break this down into the five parts of an argument:
---
✔ Step-by-Step Breakdown
| Part of Argument | Text from the Argument | Explanation |
|------------------|------------------------|-----------|
| Claim | "We should play basketball instead of baseball after school today." | This is the main point the speaker wants to convince the reader of. |
| Evidence | "Basketball is better because we can play with more than two people at once. If we're the only ones playing, we can play one-on-one or we can play 'Horse.'" | These are reasons supporting the claim. They show why basketball is more flexible and accessible. |
| Counter-Argument | "A lot of people, like Jake and Penelope, think that baseball is more fun because they like hitting the ball over the fence and stealing bases." | This presents the opposing viewpoint—why some might prefer baseball. |
| Rebuttal | "But the truth is that we always end up having more fun when we play basketball because we don't have to wait for people to go get the ball from the street." | This directly responds to the counter-argument by showing why basketball is still better in practice. |
| Conclusion | "So, let's meet at the basketball courts at 4:00 pm." | This is a call to action based on the argument. It summarizes the reasoning and encourages agreement. |
---
🎨 Color-Coding Guide (as per instructions)
Even though I can’t actually color the text here, here’s how you would apply the colors:
- Claim → Use red
- Evidence → Use blue
- Counter-Argument → Use green
- Rebuttal → Use purple
- Conclusion → Use orange
So, when you underline the parts in your printed copy:
- Underline *"We should play basketball instead of baseball after school today."* in red
- Underline the sentences about flexibility and games like “Horse” in blue
- Underline the sentence about Jake and Penelope liking baseball in green
- Underline the rebuttal about not waiting for the ball in purple
- Underline *"So, let's meet at the basketball courts at 4:00 pm."* in orange
---
✍️ Step 2: Write Your Own Argument
Now, create your own argument using the same structure. Here’s an example:
> Claim: School should start later in the morning.
> Evidence: Studies show that teenagers need more sleep, and starting school later helps improve focus and grades.
> Counter-Argument: Some parents say that later start times make it harder to manage work schedules and after-school activities.
> Rebuttal: Schools could adjust bus routes and extracurricular schedules to accommodate later start times, and the benefits to student health and learning outweigh the inconvenience.
> Conclusion: Therefore, schools should consider moving start times to 9:00 AM to support student well-being.
Then, underline each part with the correct color as instructed.
---
✔ Summary
- You’ve now identified all five parts of the argument.
- You know how to use evidence, address counterarguments, and conclude effectively.
- The goal is to build strong, logical arguments that persuade others.
Let me know if you'd like help writing your own argument or practicing with another example!
Parent Tip: Review the logic above to help your child master the concept of parts of an argument worksheet.