Place Value: 2-Digit Numbers Worksheets for Grade 1 - Kidpid - Free Printable

Let’s go row by row and fill in the missing parts. We’ll use what we know about tens and ones, part-whole models, numerals, and words.

---

Row 1 (already done as example):

- Picture: 2 full rows of 10 dots + 7 single dots → 2 tens, 7 ones
- Part whole model: top circle = total (27), bottom two = 20 and 7
- Numeral: 27
- Words: twenty-seven ✔

---

Row 2:

Picture shows:
- 4 long sticks (each is 10) → that’s 4 tens
- 6 small cubes (each is 1) → that’s 6 ones

So:
→ 4 tens
→ 6 ones

Part whole model:
Top circle = total number → 40 + 6 = 46
Bottom circles = 40 and 6

Numeral: 46

Words: forty-six

---

Row 3:

Picture shows:
- 3 boxes labeled “Crayons 10” → 3 tens = 30
- 6 single crayons → 6 ones

But wait — the part whole model already has 36 on top! So that matches: 30 + 6 = 36.

So:
→ 3 tens
→ 6 ones

Numeral: 36

Words: thirty-six

---

Row 4:

Given:
- 5 tens → 50
- 9 ones → 9
Total = 59 (already given in numeral column)

Part whole model:
Top circle = 59
Bottom circles = 50 and 9

Words: fifty-nine

---

Row 5:

Picture shows:
- 8 gray circles with “10” → 8 tens = 80
- 2 white circles with “1” → 2 ones = 2

BUT — look at the part whole model: one bottom circle says 70, and the other is blank.

That means the total must be 70 + ? = ?

Wait — if there are 8 tens (80) and 2 ones (2), total should be 82.

But the part whole model shows 70 in one bottom circle. That suggests maybe only 7 tens are being used? Let’s check again.

Actually — looking closely at the picture:

There are 8 circles with “10”, but one of them might not be counted? No — let’s count:

Top row: 3 circles (two 10s, one 10) → actually all say “10”

Middle row: 3 circles (all “10”)

Bottom row: 2 circles (“10”) and 2 circles (“1”)

Wait — total “10” circles: 8 → 80
Total “1” circles: 2 → 2
Total = 82

But part whole model has 70 in one bottom circle. That doesn’t match unless...

Ah! Maybe the part whole model is showing a different breakdown? Or perhaps it’s a trick?

Wait — no, let’s read the part whole model again.

It says: top circle is blank, bottom left is 70, bottom right is blank.

If the total is 82, then 70 + 12 = 82? But 12 isn’t “ones” — ones should be less than 10.

This suggests maybe I miscounted.

Let me recount the picture carefully:

Row 1: three circles — all labeled “10” → 30
Row 2: three circles — all labeled “10” → 30
Row 3: two circles labeled “10”, two labeled “1” → 20 + 2 = 22

Wait — that can’t be right because row 3 has four circles total.

Actually, looking again:

The image has:

First row: 3 circles → all “10” → 30
Second row: 3 circles → all “10” → 30
Third row: 2 circles “10”, 2 circles “1” → 20 + 2 = 22

Total = 30 + 30 + 22 = 82? But that’s not how place value works — we group into tens and ones.

Actually, each “10” circle is one ten. Each “1” circle is one one.

So:

Number of “10” circles: let’s count:

Top row: 3
Middle row: 3
Bottom row: 2
Total “10” circles = 8 → 8 tens = 80

“1” circles: bottom row, last two → 2 ones = 2

Total = 82

Now, part whole model: bottom left is 70. That would mean 7 tens. But we have 8 tens.

Unless... the part whole model is not matching the picture? That can’t be.

Wait — perhaps the part whole model is for a different interpretation? Or maybe I need to see what the total is based on the model.

Another idea: maybe the 70 in the part whole model is a hint that the total is 70 + something.

But the picture clearly has 8 tens and 2 ones.

Perhaps there’s a mistake in my counting.

Let me list them:

Circle positions:

(1,1): 10
(1,2): 10
(1,3): 10
(2,1): 10
(2,2): 10
(2,3): 10
(3,1): 10
(3,2): 10
(3,3): 1
(3,4): 1

Wait — that’s 8 tens and 2 ones? But (3,3) and (3,4) are ones, so yes.

But 8 tens is 80, plus 2 is 82.

Now, part whole model has 70 in one bottom circle. That suggests the total might be 70 + 12, but 12 is not valid for "ones" place.

Unless the part whole model is showing 70 and 12, but that breaks place value rules.

Perhaps the picture is meant to be interpreted as 7 tens and 12 ones? But that’s not standard.

Wait — let's look back at the problem. The part whole model has 70 in one bottom circle, and the other is blank. The top is blank.

In place value, the part whole model usually splits the number into tens and ones, where ones are less than 10.

So if one part is 70, the other part should be the ones, which must be less than 10.

But in the picture, we have 8 tens and 2 ones, which is 82.

82 split as 70 and 12? But 12 is not "ones".

This is confusing.

Perhaps I miscounted the tens.

Let me count the "10" circles again:

From the image description:

"IO IO IO" — first row: three 10s
"IO IO IO" — second row: three 10s
"IO IO I I" — third row: two 10s and two 1s

So total 10s: 3+3+2 = 8
Total 1s: 2

So 82.

But the part whole model has 70 in one bottom circle. That doesn't match.

Unless the 70 is a typo or I'm misunderstanding.

Another possibility: perhaps the part whole model is not for this row? No, it's aligned.

Let's read the row again:

"__ tens"
"__ ones"
Part whole model: top blank, bottom left 70, bottom right blank
Numeral blank
Words blank

And the picture has 8 tens and 2 ones.

But 8 tens is 80, not 70.

Unless one of the "10" circles is not counted? That doesn't make sense.

Perhaps the "70" in the part whole model is a red herring, or it's for a different purpose.

Wait — in some curricula, the part whole model can show any decomposition, not necessarily tens and ones.

For example, 82 can be 70 + 12, even though 12 is not "ones" in place value terms.

But the column is "Tens and ones", so it should be standard place value.

Let's check the first row: 2 tens and 7 ones, part whole model has 20 and 7, total 27.

Similarly, row 4: 5 tens and 9 ones, part whole model should have 50 and 9, total 59.

So for row 5, if we have 8 tens and 2 ones, part whole model should have 80 and 2, total 82.

But it has 70 in one bottom circle. That suggests that perhaps the total is 70 + x, and x is the ones.

But 70 + x = total, and from picture, total is 82, so x=12.

Then "tens and ones" would be 7 tens and 12 ones? But that's not standard; usually we regroup.

In standard place value, 82 is 8 tens and 2 ones, not 7 tens and 12 ones.

However, sometimes in part whole models, they allow non-standard decompositions.

But the column is "Tens and ones", which implies standard place value.

Perhaps there's a mistake in the image or my interpretation.

Let's look at the picture again as described:

"IO IO IO" — 3 tens
"IO IO IO" — 3 tens
"IO IO I I" — 2 tens and 2 ones

Total tens: 8, ones: 2.

But the part whole model has 70, which is 7 tens.

Unless the last "IO" in the third row is not a ten? But it says "IO", which is 10.

Perhaps "IO" means something else, but in context, it's likely 10.

Another idea: perhaps the "70" in the part whole model is for the tens part, but we have 8 tens, so it should be 80.

I think there might be an error in my reasoning or in the problem.

Let's calculate the total from the picture: 8*10 + 2*1 = 82.

Part whole model: if bottom left is 70, then bottom right must be 12 to make 82.

Then "tens and ones" could be written as 7 tens and 12 ones, but that's unusual.

In some educational contexts, they teach that you can have more than 9 ones, and then regroup.

But here, the column is "Tens and ones", and in the first row, it's 2 tens and 7 ones, which is standard.

For consistency, perhaps for this row, it's 8 tens and 2 ones, and the 70 in the part whole model is a mistake, or perhaps it's 80.

But it's written as 70.

Let's read the user's image description again:

" (3,1): 10
(3,2): 10
(3,3): 1
(3,4): 1 "

So (3,1) and (3,2) are 10, (3,3) and (3,4) are 1.

So 8 tens, 2 ones.

Perhaps the part whole model is showing 70 and 12, and we need to write 7 tens and 12 ones, but that's not typical.

Maybe the "70" is for the total of the tens, but we have 8 tens.

I recall that in some worksheets, they might have a different decomposition.

Let's look at the answer choices or think differently.

Another approach: perhaps the part whole model is given, and we need to find the number from that.

Part whole model: bottom left 70, bottom right blank, top blank.

But we don't know the bottom right.

From the picture, we have 8 tens and 2 ones, so total 82.

So if part whole model has 70 in one part, the other part must be 12.

Then for "tens and ones", it could be 7 tens and 12 ones, but that's not standard.

Perhaps "tens and ones" means the standard form, so 8 tens and 2 ones, and the part whole model is separate.

But the part whole model is in the same row, so it should correspond.

Let's check row 3: part whole model has 36 on top, and we have 3 tens and 6 ones, so it matches.

Row 1: 2 tens, 7 ones, part whole model has 20 and 7, total 27.

Row 4: 5 tens, 9 ones, numeral 59, so part whole model should have 50 and 9.

For row 5, if we have 8 tens and 2 ones, numeral 82, part whole model should have 80 and 2.

But it has 70 in one bottom circle. That suggests that perhaps the total is 70 + 12 = 82, and they want us to write 7 tens and 12 ones for "tens and ones", but that's unconventional.

Perhaps "tens and ones" is for the standard representation, so 8 tens and 2 ones, and the part whole model is showing a different split.

But the instruction is to complete the table based on the picture.

Let's assume that the part whole model is correct, and the picture is to be interpreted accordingly.

If part whole model has 70 in one bottom circle, and the other is blank, and from the picture we have additional information.

Perhaps the 70 is the tens part, but we have 8 tens, so it's inconsistent.

I think there might be a mistake in the problem or my understanding.

Let's count the "10" circles again from the text:

"IO IO IO" — 3
"IO IO IO" — 3
"IO IO I I" — 2 tens and 2 ones

So 8 tens.

But perhaps the last "IO" in the third row is not a ten? But it says "IO", same as others.

Another idea: perhaps "IO" means 1 and 0, but that doesn't make sense.

Or perhaps it's a font issue, but in context, it's likely 10.

Let's look at the very first row: it has dots, and it's 2 tens and 7 ones.

Second row: sticks and cubes, 4 tens and 6 ones.

Third row: crayon boxes and single crayons, 3 tens and 6 ones.

Fourth row: bundles of sticks, 5 tens and 9 ones.

Fifth row: circles with 10 and 1.

So for fifth row, 8 circles with 10, 2 with 1.

So 82.

Now, for the part whole model, it has 70 in one bottom circle. Perhaps it's a typo, and it should be 80.

Maybe in this context, they want us to use the part whole model to find the number.

But the directions say: "Look at the picture to find the number"

So we should use the picture.

Perhaps the 70 is for the sum of some groups.

Let's calculate the total from the picture: 8*10 + 2*1 = 82.

So numeral is 82.

Words: eighty-two.

For "tens and ones": 8 tens and 2 ones.

For part whole model: top should be 82, bottom left 80, bottom right 2.

But it has 70 in bottom left. That doesn't match.

Unless the 70 is a distractor, or perhaps it's for a different row.

I think I need to go with the picture.

So for row 5:

- Tens and ones: 8 tens, 2 ones
- Part whole model: top 82, bottom left 80, bottom right 2 — but since bottom left is given as 70, perhaps it's a mistake, or perhaps we leave it as is.

But in the table, for part whole model, the bottom left is filled with 70, so for this row, it's given as 70, so we must use that.

Perhaps the picture is to be interpreted as 7 tens and 12 ones.

How? If we consider that the 8 tens are there, but one ten is broken into 10 ones, so 7 tens and 12 ones.

That makes sense for part whole model: 70 and 12.

And "tens and ones" could be 7 tens and 12 ones, although it's not standard, but in some curricula, they teach that before regrouping.

In the first row, it's standard, but perhaps for this row, it's different.

Let's see the part whole model: it has 70 in one bottom circle, so likely the other is 12, total 82.

So for "tens and ones", it might be 7 tens and 12 ones.

Then numeral 82, words eighty-two.

And in the "tens and ones" column, we write 7 tens and 12 ones.

That could be it.

In some educational approaches, they show that 82 can be 7 tens and 12 ones, and then regroup to 8 tens and 2 ones.

So for this worksheet, they might be teaching that.

So let's go with that.

So for row 5:

- Tens and ones: 7 tens, 12 ones (since part whole model has 70, implying 7 tens)
- Part whole model: top 82, bottom left 70, bottom right 12
- Numeral: 82
- Words: eighty-two

But is 12 ones acceptable? In the context, perhaps.

Otherwise, it doesn't match the given 70.

So I'll assume that.

To confirm, in row 3, part whole model has 36 on top, and we have 3 tens and 6 ones, so it's standard.

In row 5, if they put 70, it might be to show a non-standard decomposition.

So for the sake of completing the table, we'll use:

Tens and ones: 7 tens, 12 ones

But let's see the column header: "Tens and ones" — in row 1, it's "2 tens" "7 ones", which is standard.

Perhaps for this row, it's different.

Another way: perhaps the "70" in the part whole model is for the tens part, but we have 8 tens, so it's 80, but it's written as 70 by mistake.

I think for accuracy, I'll go with the picture: 8 tens and 2 ones.

And for part whole model, even though it shows 70, perhaps it's a error, or perhaps we ignore it.

But that's not good.

Let's look online or think of standard practice.

Upon second thought, in the part whole model for row 5, the bottom left is 70, and bottom right is blank, so we need to fill bottom right.

From the picture, total is 82, so bottom right = 82 - 70 = 12.

Then for "tens and ones", it could be 7 tens and 12 ones.

And in some worksheets, they do that to teach regrouping.

So I'll go with that.

So summary for row 5:

- Tens and ones: 7 tens, 12 ones
- Part whole model: top 82, bottom left 70, bottom right 12
- Numeral: 82
- Words: eighty-two

Now, let's compile all rows.

Row 2:
- Tens and ones: 4 tens, 6 ones
- Part whole model: top 46, bottom 40 and 6
- Numeral: 46
- Words: forty-six

Row 3:
- Tens and ones: 3 tens, 6 ones
- Part whole model: top 36, bottom 30 and 6 (but top is given as 36, so bottom should be 30 and 6)
- Numeral: 36
- Words: thirty-six

Row 4:
- Tens and ones: 5 tens, 9 ones (given)
- Part whole model: top 59, bottom 50 and 9
- Numeral: 59 (given)
- Words: fifty-nine

Row 5:
- Tens and ones: 7 tens, 12 ones
- Part whole model: top 82, bottom left 70, bottom right 12
- Numeral: 82
- Words: eighty-two

For row 5, "12 ones" might be written as "12 ones", even though it's not standard.

Perhaps "tens and ones" is for the standard form, so 8 tens and 2 ones, and the part whole model is separate.

But to match the given 70, I think 7 tens and 12 ones is intended.

So I'll proceed.

Final answers for each row:

Row 2:
- Tens and ones: 4 tens, 6 ones
- Part whole model: 46 on top, 40 and 6 on bottom
- Numeral: 46
- Words: forty-six

Row 3:
- Tens and ones: 3 tens, 6 ones
- Part whole model: 36 on top (given), 30 and 6 on bottom
- Numeral: 36
- Words: thirty-six

Row 4:
- Tens and ones: 5 tens, 9 ones (given)
- Part whole model: 59 on top, 50 and 9 on bottom
- Numeral: 59 (given)
- Words: fifty-nine

Row 5:
- Tens and ones: 7 tens, 12 ones
- Part whole model: 82 on top, 70 and 12 on bottom
- Numeral: 82
- Words: eighty-two

For the part whole model in row 5, the bottom right is blank, so we fill 12.

In the table, for part whole model, it's a diagram, so we don't write numbers, but in the context, when we say "complete the table", for part whole model, if it's blank, we might need to describe, but in this case, for row 2,3,4,5, the part whole model has blanks, so we need to fill the numbers in the circles.

In the image, for row 1, part whole model has empty circles, but in the table, it's shown as diagrams, so probably for the answer, we don't need to draw, but for the other columns, we fill.

In the user's request, we need to provide the completed table values.

So for each row, fill the missing cells.

Let's list what to fill:

Row 2:
- Tens and ones: 4 tens, 6 ones
- Part whole model: (not numerical, but if needed, top=46, bottom left=40, bottom right=6)
- Numeral: 46
- Words: forty-six

Row 3:
- Tens and ones: 3 tens, 6 ones
- Part whole model: top=36 (given), bottom left=30, bottom right=6
- Numeral: 36
- Words: thirty-six

Row 4:
- Tens and ones: given as 5 tens, 9 ones
- Part whole model: top=59, bottom left=50, bottom right=9
- Numeral: given as 59
- Words: fifty-nine

Row 5:
- Tens and ones: 7 tens, 12 ones
- Part whole model: top=82, bottom left=70 (given), bottom right=12
- Numeral: 82
- Words: eighty-two

For row 5, "12 ones" might be controversial, but I think it's correct for this context.

Perhaps "tens and ones" should be 8 tens and 2 ones, and the 70 is a mistake, but to match the given, I'll stick with 7 tens and 12 ones.

So now, for the final answer, since the user wants the completed table, but in the response, we need to provide the answers for the missing parts.

Since the question is to solve the problem, and the problem is to complete the table, we can list the missing values.

But in the format, we need to provide the final answer.

Perhaps for each row, state the missing entries.

Since it's a table, and we need to output the completed version, but in text, we can describe.

For the sake of the response, I'll provide the filled values for each row's missing cells.

Let's do it row by row for the missing parts.

Row 2:
- Tens and ones: 4 tens, 6 ones
- Numeral: 46
- Words: forty-six
- Part whole model: not numerical, but if required, the top is 46, bottom are 40 and 6

Row 3:
- Tens and ones: 3 tens, 6 ones
- Numeral: 36
- Words: thirty-six
- Part whole model: bottom left 30, bottom right 6 (top is given as 36)

Row 4:
- Words: fifty-nine
- Part whole model: top 59, bottom left 50, bottom right 9 (tens and ones and numeral given)

Row 5:
- Tens and ones: 7 tens, 12 ones
- Numeral: 82
- Words: eighty-two
- Part whole model: top 82, bottom right 12 (bottom left given as 70)

For the final answer, since the user may expect the completed table, but in the response format, we can box the key answers.

Perhaps list the missing values.

I think for clarity, I'll provide the completed table in text form.

But to save space, since the first row is given, we can start from row 2.

Final Answer:

For Row 2:
- Tens and ones: 4 tens, 6 ones
- Numeral: 46
- Words: forty-six

For Row 3:
- Tens and ones: 3 tens, 6 ones
- Numeral: 36
- Words: thirty-six

For Row 4:
- Words: fifty-nine

For Row 5:
- Tens and ones: 7 tens, 12 ones
- Numeral: 82
- Words: eighty-two

And for part whole model, it's implied by the numbers.

To be precise, let's include all.

Since the part whole model is a diagram, and in the table it's shown as circles, for the answer, we don't need to specify the numbers in the circles, as long as the other columns are filled.

In the first row, part whole model is not filled with numbers, so probably for the answer, we only fill the text columns.

So for each row, fill the blank cells in "Tens and ones", "Numeral", "Words", and for "Part whole model", if there are blanks, but in this case, for row 2,3,5, the part whole model has empty circles, but we don't write numbers there in the table; it's a visual.

In the user's image, the part whole model is drawn with circles, so for the answer, we might not need to fill numbers in those circles; the table is to be completed with text in the other columns.

Looking back at the first row: "Tens and ones" has "2 tens" "7 ones", "Part whole Model" has a diagram with empty circles, "Numeral" is blank but in the example it's 27, "Words" is "twenty-seven".

In the table, for "Part whole Model", it's a drawing, so when completing, we don't add numbers to the drawing; the other columns are for text.

For row 2, "Tens and ones" has blanks for tens and ones, so we fill "4 tens" and "6 ones".

"Part whole Model" is a diagram, so no text to fill.

"Numeral" is blank, so fill "46".

"Words" is blank, so fill "forty-six".

Similarly for others.

For row 3, "Tens and ones" has blanks, fill "3 tens" "6 ones".

"Part whole Model" has top circle with "36" already, so no change.

"Numeral" blank, fill "36".

"Words" blank, fill "thirty-six".

For row 4, "Tens and ones" given as "5 tens" "9 ones", so no change.

"Part whole Model" diagram, no text.

"Numeral" given as "59", so no change.

"Words" blank, fill "fifty-nine".

For row 5, "Tens and ones" has blanks, fill "7 tens" "12 ones" (based on our decision).

"Part whole Model" has bottom left "70" given, so no change for that, but the top and bottom right are blank, but since it's a diagram, perhaps we don't fill numbers, or if we do, but in the table, it's not specified.

To simplify, for the answer, we only fill the text columns that have blanks.

So for row 5, "Tens and ones": 7 tens, 12 ones

"Numeral": 82

"Words": eighty-two

And for part whole model, it's already partially filled, so no action.

So final answer is the filled values for the blank cells.

So let's list them.

For Row 2:
- Tens and ones: 4 tens, 6 ones
- Numeral: 46
- Words: forty-six

For Row 3:
- Tens and ones: 3 tens, 6 ones
- Numeral: 36
- Words: thirty-six

For Row 4:
- Words: fifty-nine

For Row 5:
- Tens and ones: 7 tens, 12 ones
- Numeral: 82
- Words: eighty-two

I think that's it.

So in the Final Answer section, we can box this.

Since it's multiple parts, perhaps write it clearly.

Final Answer:

Row 2:
- Tens and ones: 4 tens, 6 ones
- Numeral: 46
- Words: forty-six

Row 3:
- Tens and ones: 3 tens, 6 ones
- Numeral: 36
- Words: thirty-six

Row 4:
- Words: fifty-nine

Row 5:
- Tens and ones: 7 tens, 12 ones
- Numeral: 82
- Words: eighty-two