Preposition Worksheet 1 | Answers - Free Printable

Let’s go through each question carefully and fill in the blanks with the correct prepositions.

---

Q1. Choose the correct prepositions from brackets and fill in the blanks.

1. Are you going to the party ______ (at/in/on) Friday?
→ We use “on” for days of the week.
✔ Answer: on

2. I will be busy ______ (at/in/on) the morning, but I can join you ______ (at/in/on) the evening.
→ We say “in the morning” and “in the evening”.
✔ Answers: in, in

3. She has been living in that house ______ (for/since) two years.
→ “For” is used with a period of time (like 2 years). “Since” is used with a starting point (like since 2020).
✔ Answer: for

4. Let’s meet ______ (at/in/on) the corner of the street.
→ We use “at” for specific points or locations like corners.
✔ Answer: at

5. The concert is scheduled ______ (at/in/on) the weekend.
→ In American English, we often say “on the weekend”. In British English, it’s sometimes “at the weekend”, but since this worksheet uses “on Friday” earlier, let’s stick with “on” for consistency.
✔ Answer: on

---

Q2. Fill in the blanks with suitable prepositions:

1. The lollies were shared ______ Ella and Molly.
→ When something is divided between two people, we use “between”.
✔ Answer: between

2. The dog growled ______ the two strangers.
→ The dog is showing anger toward them → use “at”.
✔ Answer: at

3. Jordan is standing ______ Peter.
→ If Jordan is next to Peter, we say “beside” or “next to”. But if no direction is given, “beside” is safe. However, common usage here might be “behind”, “in front of”, etc. But since no context, most neutral is “beside”. Wait — actually, looking at typical worksheets, they often expect “beside” or “next to”. But let’s think — maybe “near”? Hmm. Actually, in many such exercises, if someone is standing close by, “beside” is expected. But wait — perhaps it’s “behind”? No clue. Let me check standard answers for similar questions. Actually, without more info, “beside” is safest. BUT — hold on! Maybe it’s “next to”? Same thing. Alternatively, could it be “with”? Not quite. Let’s go with beside.

Wait — rethinking: In many school worksheets, when two people are standing together, they use “beside”. So:

✔ Answer: beside

But let me double-check — another possibility: “near”? Too vague. “Behind”? No info. So yes, beside.

Actually — wait! Looking at Q2 #3 again: “Jordan is standing ______ Peter.” — if it’s about position relative to Peter, and no other info, the most common answer in such cases is beside.

BUT — I recall some worksheets use “next to” — same meaning. Since we need one word, “beside” is fine.

Alternatively — could it be “behind”? No, not specified. Let’s stick with beside.

Wait — actually, let me look at all answers together. Maybe there’s a pattern? No. Let’s just go with logic.

Another thought: Sometimes “standing with” means accompanying, but that’s not positional. The sentence says “standing ___ Peter” — likely positional. So “beside”.

✔ Final decision: beside

4. The children ran ______ the playground.
→ They ran inside the area → “into” or “around”? But “ran into” means entered. “Ran around” means moved within. But simplest is “into” if they entered, or “in” if already there. But verb is “ran” — so movement. Common phrase: “ran into the playground” (entered) or “ran around the playground”. But without context, “into” is possible. Wait — actually, in many worksheets, they use “into” for entering a place. But let’s see — if they were outside and ran inside, “into”. If they were already inside and running, “around” or “in”. But the sentence doesn’t specify. Hmm.

Actually, looking at common usage: “The children ran into the playground” implies they entered it. That makes sense. Alternatively, “ran in the playground” is also correct if they’re already there. But since it’s “ran ___ the playground”, and no prior context, “into” is better for movement toward/entering.

But wait — let’s check online or standard answers. Actually, in many similar exercises, they use “into” for entering. For example: “He ran into the room.” So:

✔ Answer: into

But another possibility: “around”? Like playing? But “ran around” is phrasal. Here it’s “ran ___ the playground” — so preposition needed. “Into” fits.

Alternatively, “through”? No. “Across”? No. So “into” is best.

Wait — actually, I think “in” is also acceptable. But “into” shows direction. Let’s go with into.

But let me confirm with Q2 #9: “The rabbit ran ______ the burrow.” — that would be “into” too. So maybe consistent.

Actually, for #4, if it’s “the playground” as an area, “in” is also fine. But “ran in the playground” sounds like they were already there and running. “Ran into” suggests entry. Since no context, both could work, but in worksheets, they often prefer “into” for movement into a place.

I’ll go with into.

Wait — correction: Upon second thought, “ran into” can mean collided with, which is not intended. Oh no! That’s a problem.

Example: “He ran into a tree” = hit it.

So “ran into the playground” could be misinterpreted? Not really — “playground” is a place, not an object. So “ran into the playground” = entered it. It’s acceptable.

To avoid confusion, maybe “in” is safer? But “ran in the playground” is grammatically correct too.

Actually, let’s look at standard curriculum. In many Grade 3-5 worksheets, for “children ran ___ the playground”, they accept “in” or “into”. But since we must choose one, and to show movement, I’ll pick into.

But wait — let’s see answer key patterns. Actually, I recall that for places like park, playground, school, we often use “in” for being inside, and “into” for entering. Since the verb is “ran”, which implies motion, “into” is better.

✔ Answer: into

5. I disagree ______ him.
→ We disagree *with* a person.
✔ Answer: with

6. The blind man relies ______ his stick.
→ Rely *on* something.
✔ Answer: on

7. She was satisfied ______ the agreement.
→ Satisfied *with* something.
✔ Answer: with

8. The farmer left the shovel ______ the wall.
→ Left it near or against the wall? Common phrase: “left the shovel against the wall” or “by the wall”. But what’s expected? Probably “against” if leaning, or “near”. But in worksheets, often “against” for objects placed touching a wall.
✔ Answer: against

9. The rabbit ran ______ the burrow.
→ Ran into its home → “into”
✔ Answer: into

10. She distributed sweets ______ .
→ Distributed to whom? The blank is at the end. Probably “to the children” or something, but it’s cut off? Wait, in the image, it says “She distributed sweets ______ .” — and then page ends. But in the original, it might be incomplete. Looking back at user input: “10. She distributed sweets ______ .” — and then “Page | 1” and banner. So probably it’s meant to be “to the children” or similar, but since it’s blank, we need a preposition.

Actually, “distributed sweets to someone” — so the preposition is “to”. But the blank is after “sweets”, so likely “to [someone]”, but since no object given, perhaps it’s “among” or “to”. But in context, if it’s “she distributed sweets ___”, and no recipient mentioned, it might be “among the class” or something. But the blank is just for preposition.

Wait — looking at the structure: “She distributed sweets ______ .” — the blank is where the preposition goes, and presumably the object is implied or missing. But in standard grammar, “distribute” takes “to” for recipients or “among” for groups.

Since it’s a worksheet, and previous questions have clear answers, likely they expect “to” — but to whom? Perhaps it’s a typo, and it should be “to the children” but only preposition is asked.

Actually, re-examining the user’s text: “10. She distributed sweets ______ .” — and then the page ends. But in the image description, it might be cut off. However, based on common usage, if we assume she gave them to people, “to” is the preposition. But the blank is after “sweets”, so if it’s “distributed sweets to [someone]”, then “to” is the answer.

Perhaps it’s “among” if sharing among a group. But without context, “to” is more general.

Wait — let’s think: In many such exercises, “distribute sweets to the children” is common. So preposition is “to”.

But the blank is only for the preposition, so even if the object is missing, we put “to”.

Alternatively, could it be “out”? As in “distributed sweets out” — no, that’s not right.

Or “around”? Not standard.

Best answer: to

But let’s confirm: “She distributed sweets to her friends.” — yes.

So ✔ Answer: to

However, in some contexts, “among” is used for dividing among a group. But “to” is safer.

Actually, upon checking, “distribute” is usually followed by “to” for individuals or “among” for groups. Since no group specified, “to” is fine.

But wait — the sentence ends with the blank, so perhaps it’s “She distributed sweets among.” — but that’s incomplete. I think it’s a formatting issue, and we should provide the preposition that typically follows.

Given that, I’ll go with to.

But let me see if there’s a better fit. Another possibility: “She distributed sweets freely.” — but that’s adverb, not preposition.

No, must be preposition. So “to” is correct.

Final decision for #10: to

---

Now, compiling all answers:

Q1:
1. on
2. in, in
3. for
4. at
5. on

Q2:
1. between
2. at
3. beside
4. into
5. with
6. on
7. with
8. against
9. into
10. to

Wait — for Q2 #3, I said “beside”, but let me double-check. Is there a more common answer? In some worksheets, they might expect “next to”, but since it’s one word, “beside” is fine. Alternatively, “near”? But “beside” is more precise for standing next to someone.

For Q2 #4, I said “into”, but let’s consider: if the children were already in the playground and ran around, it could be “around”. But the sentence is “ran ___ the playground” — if it’s “ran in the playground”, that’s also correct. But “into” emphasizes entering. To be safe, perhaps “in” is better because “ran into” can mean collision, though unlikely with “playground”.

Actually, let’s change Q2 #4 to in to avoid ambiguity. Because “children ran in the playground” is very common and clear.

Similarly, for #9, “rabbit ran into the burrow” is perfect — no ambiguity.

So revise Q2 #4 to in.

Also, for Q2 #8, “left the shovel against the wall” — yes, that’s standard.

For Q2 #10, still to.

And Q2 #3: let’s keep beside.

But wait — another thought for Q2 #3: if Jordan is standing directly next to Peter, “beside” is good. But in some contexts, “with” could mean accompanying, but “standing with Peter” might imply they are together, not necessarily positionally adjacent. But the sentence is “standing ___ Peter”, which suggests location relative to Peter. So “beside” is best.

Okay, final answers:

Q1:
1. on
2. in, in
3. for
4. at
5. on

Q2:
1. between
2. at
3. beside
4. in
5. with
6. on
7. with
8. against
9. into
10. to

I think that’s solid.

Final Answer:
Q1:
1. on
2. in, in
3. for
4. at
5. on

Q2:
1. between
2. at
3. beside
4. in
5. with
6. on
7. with
8. against
9. into
10. to