Find the missing number in the sequence puzzle.
A logic puzzle with numbers in shapes (circles, squares, hexagons) arranged in a grid, featuring a question mark in the center and three options below.
GIF
463×454
10.5 KB
Free · Personal Use
Quality Assured by Worksheets Library Team
Reviewed for educational accuracy and age-appropriateness
ID: #674888
⭐
Show Answer Key & Explanations
Step-by-step solution for: Printable printable Logic puzzle with shapes and numbers in pdf ...
▼
Show Answer Key & Explanations
Step-by-step solution for: Printable printable Logic puzzle with shapes and numbers in pdf ...
Let me carefully analyze the pattern in the grid.
The grid has 3 rows and 4 columns:
Row 1: circle(5), circle(9), square(6), hexagon(8)
Row 2: square(10), circle(12), circle(9), hexagon(11)
Row 3: circle(9), hexagon(3), ?, circle(9)
I need to find what number goes in the "?" position (row 3, column 3).
Let me look for patterns by shape type:
Circles: positions (1,1)=5, (1,2)=9, (2,2)=12, (2,3)=9, (3,1)=9, (3,4)=9
That's six circles with values: 5, 9, 12, 9, 9, 9
Squares: (1,3)=6, (2,1)=10, and option A=12, B=15
So squares: 6, 10, ?
Hexagons: (1,4)=8, (2,4)=11, (3,2)=3, and option C=4
Hexons: 8, 11, 3, ?
Maybe look at rows or columns.
Let me check columns:
Column 1: circle(5), square(10), circle(9) → 5, 10, 9
Column 2: circle(9), circle(12), hexagon(3) → 9, 12, 3
Column 3: square(6), circle(9), ?
Column 4: hexagon(8), hexagon(11), circle(9) → 8, 11, 9
Look at column 2: 9, 12, 3 — 9+3=12? No, 9+3=12 yes! That works.
Column 1: 5, 10, 9 — 5+9=14 ≠ 10. Not that.
What about sum of each row?
Row 1: 5+9+6+8 = 28
Row 2: 10+12+9+11 = 42
Row 3: 9+3+?+9 = 21 + ?
28 to 42 is +14. If row 3 is +14 again: 42+14=56, so 21+?=56 → ?=35. Too big, not among options.
Maybe look at shapes per column.
Another idea: maybe the number relates to the number of sides of the shape?
- Circle: 0 sides (or infinite, but usually treated as 0 for such puzzles)
- Square: 4 sides
- Hexagon: 6 sides
Let me test:
If circle = 0, then value might be something like: number = base + sides?
Check (1,1): circle, 5 → if base=5, sides=0 → 5+0=5 ✓
(1,2): circle, 9 → 9+0=9 ✓
(1,3): square, 6 → if base=2, 2+4=6 ✓
(1,4): hexagon, 8 → 2+6=8 ✓ → so base=2 for row 1?
Row 2:
(2,1): square, 10 → if base=6, 6+4=10 ✓
(2,2): circle, 12 → 12+0=12 ✓
(2,3): circle, 9 → 9+0=9 ✓
(2,4): hexagon, 11 → 5+6=11? Then base=5? Inconsistent.
Alternative: maybe each column has a constant "value per side" or something.
Let me list all cells with (shape, sides, value):
- Circle (0 sides): 5, 9, 12, 9, 9, 9
- Square (4 sides): 6, 10, ?
- Hexagon (6 sides): 8, 11, 3, ?
Look at square values: 6 and 10. Difference = 4. If pattern +4, next would be 14 — not an option. Options are 12, 15, 4.
Wait — maybe it's about position: row index and column index.
Let me assign coordinates (r,c), r=1..3, c=1..4.
(1,1): circle, 5
(1,2): circle, 9
(1,3): square, 6
(1,4): hexagon, 8
(2,1): square, 10
(2,2): circle, 12
(2,3): circle, 9
(2,4): hexagon, 11
(3,1): circle, 9
(3,2): hexagon, 3
(3,3): ?, ?
(3,4): circle, 9
Now look at diagonals?
Main diagonal: (1,1)=5, (2,2)=12, (3,3)=? → 5, 12, ? — difference +7, so ?=19? Not in options.
Other diagonal: (1,4)=8, (2,3)=9, (3,2)=3 — 8,9,3 — no clear pattern.
Let me try sum of each shape type across grid:
Circles: 5+9+12+9+9+9 = let's compute: 5+9=14, +12=26, +9=35, +9=44, +9=53
Squares: 6+10+? = 16+?
Hexagons: 8+11+3 = 22, plus option C=4 would be 26
Not helpful.
Another idea: maybe the number equals the count of something — like how many times the digit appears? Unlikely.
Wait — look at column 3 specifically, since that's where ? is:
Column 3:
- Row 1: square, 6
- Row 2: circle, 9
- Row 3: ?, ?
What if we consider the shape in column 3: square, circle, ? — maybe it should be hexagon? But options are square (A, B) or circle (C). Option C is circle with 4.
But (3,3) is currently unknown shape — in the image, the ? is inside a blank shape, and options show what to put there (number and shape).
Looking back: the ? is just a red question mark in the cell; the shape is not drawn — we must choose both number and shape from options A, B, C.
Option A: square with 12
Option B: square with 15
Option C: circle with 4
So we need to infer what shape and number go there.
Let me try row-wise patterns with shape counts.
Row 1: shapes: C, C, S, H
Row 2: S, C, C, H
Row 3: C, H, ?, C
So row 3 has C, H, ?, C — maybe symmetry? Row 1: C,C,S,H; row 2: S,C,C,H; not symmetric.
What if we look at the numbers modulo something?
List all numbers:
5,9,6,8,10,12,9,11,9,3,?,9
Notice that 9 appears many times: positions (1,2), (2,3), (3,1), (3,4) — four times.
Also, in row 3, we have 9, 3, ?, 9 — maybe the middle two sum to something? 3 + ? = ?
What if the product or sum of row 3 should equal something.
Try this: maybe each column has a pattern with shape side count.
Define:
- Let s = number of sides: circle=0, square=4, hexagon=6
Compute value - s:
(1,1): 5 - 0 = 5
(1,2): 9 - 0 = 9
(1,3): 6 - 4 = 2
(1,4): 8 - 6 = 2
Oh! Column 3: 6-4=2, column 4: 8-6=2 → both give 2 in row 1.
Row 2:
(2,1): 10 - 4 = 6
(2,2): 12 - 0 = 12
(2,3): 9 - 0 = 9
(2,4): 11 - 6 = 5
Not consistent.
But in row 1, last two give 2. What about row 2 last two: (2,3)=9, (2,4)=11 → 9-0=9, 11-6=5 — no.
Wait — look at (1,3)=6 (square), (2,1)=10 (square), maybe squares increase by 4: 6, 10, then 14? But 14 not an option.
Unless... option A is 12, B is 15.
Let me consider the possibility that the missing cell is a square, and we need to find number.
Another angle: maybe the grid represents a magic-like property where each 2x2 subgrid has constant sum.
Top-left 2x2: (1,1)=5, (1,2)=9, (2,1)=10, (2,2)=12 → sum = 5+9+10+12 = 36
Top-right 2x2: (1,2)=9, (1,3)=6, (2,2)=12, (2,3)=9 → 9+6+12+9 = 36 ✓
Bottom-left 2x2: (2,1)=10, (2,2)=12, (3,1)=9, (3,2)=3 → 10+12+9+3 = 34 ≠ 36
Bottom-right 2x2: (2,2)=12, (2,3)=9, (3,2)=3, (3,3)=? → 12+9+3+? = 24+?
If it should be 36, then ? = 12.
And 12 is option A: square with 12.
Check if bottom-left should also be 36: currently 34, off by 2. But maybe only the overlapping 2x2 blocks that are fully defined follow the rule.
We have two 2x2 blocks in row 1-2 that sum to 36:
- cols 1-2: 5+9+10+12 = 36
- cols 2-3: 9+6+12+9 = 36
So pattern: each consecutive 2x2 block in rows 1-2 sums to 36.
Then the next 2x2 block would be cols 3-4, rows 1-2: (1,3)=6, (1,4)=8, (2,3)=9, (2,4)=11 → 6+8+9+11 = 34 — not 36. So that breaks.
Unless I miscalculated: 6+8=14, 9+11=20, total 34. Yes.
But the first two 2x2 blocks (cols 1-2) and (cols 2-3) both sum to 36. That suggests a sliding window: positions (r,c), (r,c+1), (r+1,c), (r+1,c+1) for r=1, c=1 and c=2 both sum to 36.
So for c=3: cells (1,3)=6, (1,4)=8, (2,3)=9, (2,4)=11 → sum 34. Not 36.
Unless the pattern is different.
Let me try differences between rows.
Row 2 - Row 1:
col1: 10 - 5 = 5
col2: 12 - 9 = 3
col3: 9 - 6 = 3
col4: 11 - 8 = 3
Interesting! Columns 2,3,4 all have difference 3. Only col1 is 5.
Now Row 3 - Row 2:
col1: 9 - 10 = -1
col2: 3 - 12 = -9
col3: ? - 9 = ?
col4: 9 - 11 = -2
No clear pattern.
But notice: in row 2, columns 2,3,4 are all circles or hexagon, and differences from row 1 are 3,3,3.
What if the rule is: for columns 2-4, each entry in row 2 is row1 + 3.
Check:
col2: 9+3=12 ✓
col3: 6+3=9 ✓
col4: 8+3=11 ✓
Yes! Perfect.
So rule: For columns 2, 3, and 4, row 2 = row 1 + 3.
Now apply same rule to get row 3 from row 2? Maybe row 3 = row 2 - 3? Let's test:
col2: row2=12, minus 3 = 9, but row3 col2 is 3 (hexagon) — not 9. So no.
Unless the operation changes.
Row 3 col2 is 3, while row2 col2 is 12. 12 to 3 is -9.
Row 3 col1: 9 vs row2 col1:10 → -1
Row 3 col4: 9 vs 11 → -2
Not consistent.
Wait — look at column 3 specifically, since that's our target:
col3:
row1: 6 (square)
row2: 9 (circle)
row3: ?
If the pattern is +3 from row1 to row2, maybe +3 again to row3: 9+3=12.
And 12 is option A (square with 12). Also, shape: row1 square, row2 circle, row3 maybe square again? Alternating?
Square → circle → square is plausible.
Also, check if any other column does that:
col1: row1 circle, row2 square, row3 circle — yes! C, S, C
col2: row1 circle, row2 circle, row3 hexagon — not alternating.
col4: row1 hexagon, row2 hexagon, row3 circle
But col1 is C, S, C — alternating starting with circle.
col3: row1 square, row2 circle, so row3 should be square to alternate: S, C, S.
Yes! So shape should be square.
Number: if row1=6, row2=9 (+3), then row3=12 (+3 again).
So ? = 12 in a square → option A.
Let me verify with another view: the increments are +3 down column 3, and shape alternates square-circle-square.
Thus the answer is A: 12 in a square.
Final Answer:
A
The grid has 3 rows and 4 columns:
Row 1: circle(5), circle(9), square(6), hexagon(8)
Row 2: square(10), circle(12), circle(9), hexagon(11)
Row 3: circle(9), hexagon(3), ?, circle(9)
I need to find what number goes in the "?" position (row 3, column 3).
Let me look for patterns by shape type:
Circles: positions (1,1)=5, (1,2)=9, (2,2)=12, (2,3)=9, (3,1)=9, (3,4)=9
That's six circles with values: 5, 9, 12, 9, 9, 9
Squares: (1,3)=6, (2,1)=10, and option A=12, B=15
So squares: 6, 10, ?
Hexagons: (1,4)=8, (2,4)=11, (3,2)=3, and option C=4
Hexons: 8, 11, 3, ?
Maybe look at rows or columns.
Let me check columns:
Column 1: circle(5), square(10), circle(9) → 5, 10, 9
Column 2: circle(9), circle(12), hexagon(3) → 9, 12, 3
Column 3: square(6), circle(9), ?
Column 4: hexagon(8), hexagon(11), circle(9) → 8, 11, 9
Look at column 2: 9, 12, 3 — 9+3=12? No, 9+3=12 yes! That works.
Column 1: 5, 10, 9 — 5+9=14 ≠ 10. Not that.
What about sum of each row?
Row 1: 5+9+6+8 = 28
Row 2: 10+12+9+11 = 42
Row 3: 9+3+?+9 = 21 + ?
28 to 42 is +14. If row 3 is +14 again: 42+14=56, so 21+?=56 → ?=35. Too big, not among options.
Maybe look at shapes per column.
Another idea: maybe the number relates to the number of sides of the shape?
- Circle: 0 sides (or infinite, but usually treated as 0 for such puzzles)
- Square: 4 sides
- Hexagon: 6 sides
Let me test:
If circle = 0, then value might be something like: number = base + sides?
Check (1,1): circle, 5 → if base=5, sides=0 → 5+0=5 ✓
(1,2): circle, 9 → 9+0=9 ✓
(1,3): square, 6 → if base=2, 2+4=6 ✓
(1,4): hexagon, 8 → 2+6=8 ✓ → so base=2 for row 1?
Row 2:
(2,1): square, 10 → if base=6, 6+4=10 ✓
(2,2): circle, 12 → 12+0=12 ✓
(2,3): circle, 9 → 9+0=9 ✓
(2,4): hexagon, 11 → 5+6=11? Then base=5? Inconsistent.
Alternative: maybe each column has a constant "value per side" or something.
Let me list all cells with (shape, sides, value):
- Circle (0 sides): 5, 9, 12, 9, 9, 9
- Square (4 sides): 6, 10, ?
- Hexagon (6 sides): 8, 11, 3, ?
Look at square values: 6 and 10. Difference = 4. If pattern +4, next would be 14 — not an option. Options are 12, 15, 4.
Wait — maybe it's about position: row index and column index.
Let me assign coordinates (r,c), r=1..3, c=1..4.
(1,1): circle, 5
(1,2): circle, 9
(1,3): square, 6
(1,4): hexagon, 8
(2,1): square, 10
(2,2): circle, 12
(2,3): circle, 9
(2,4): hexagon, 11
(3,1): circle, 9
(3,2): hexagon, 3
(3,3): ?, ?
(3,4): circle, 9
Now look at diagonals?
Main diagonal: (1,1)=5, (2,2)=12, (3,3)=? → 5, 12, ? — difference +7, so ?=19? Not in options.
Other diagonal: (1,4)=8, (2,3)=9, (3,2)=3 — 8,9,3 — no clear pattern.
Let me try sum of each shape type across grid:
Circles: 5+9+12+9+9+9 = let's compute: 5+9=14, +12=26, +9=35, +9=44, +9=53
Squares: 6+10+? = 16+?
Hexagons: 8+11+3 = 22, plus option C=4 would be 26
Not helpful.
Another idea: maybe the number equals the count of something — like how many times the digit appears? Unlikely.
Wait — look at column 3 specifically, since that's where ? is:
Column 3:
- Row 1: square, 6
- Row 2: circle, 9
- Row 3: ?, ?
What if we consider the shape in column 3: square, circle, ? — maybe it should be hexagon? But options are square (A, B) or circle (C). Option C is circle with 4.
But (3,3) is currently unknown shape — in the image, the ? is inside a blank shape, and options show what to put there (number and shape).
Looking back: the ? is just a red question mark in the cell; the shape is not drawn — we must choose both number and shape from options A, B, C.
Option A: square with 12
Option B: square with 15
Option C: circle with 4
So we need to infer what shape and number go there.
Let me try row-wise patterns with shape counts.
Row 1: shapes: C, C, S, H
Row 2: S, C, C, H
Row 3: C, H, ?, C
So row 3 has C, H, ?, C — maybe symmetry? Row 1: C,C,S,H; row 2: S,C,C,H; not symmetric.
What if we look at the numbers modulo something?
List all numbers:
5,9,6,8,10,12,9,11,9,3,?,9
Notice that 9 appears many times: positions (1,2), (2,3), (3,1), (3,4) — four times.
Also, in row 3, we have 9, 3, ?, 9 — maybe the middle two sum to something? 3 + ? = ?
What if the product or sum of row 3 should equal something.
Try this: maybe each column has a pattern with shape side count.
Define:
- Let s = number of sides: circle=0, square=4, hexagon=6
Compute value - s:
(1,1): 5 - 0 = 5
(1,2): 9 - 0 = 9
(1,3): 6 - 4 = 2
(1,4): 8 - 6 = 2
Oh! Column 3: 6-4=2, column 4: 8-6=2 → both give 2 in row 1.
Row 2:
(2,1): 10 - 4 = 6
(2,2): 12 - 0 = 12
(2,3): 9 - 0 = 9
(2,4): 11 - 6 = 5
Not consistent.
But in row 1, last two give 2. What about row 2 last two: (2,3)=9, (2,4)=11 → 9-0=9, 11-6=5 — no.
Wait — look at (1,3)=6 (square), (2,1)=10 (square), maybe squares increase by 4: 6, 10, then 14? But 14 not an option.
Unless... option A is 12, B is 15.
Let me consider the possibility that the missing cell is a square, and we need to find number.
Another angle: maybe the grid represents a magic-like property where each 2x2 subgrid has constant sum.
Top-left 2x2: (1,1)=5, (1,2)=9, (2,1)=10, (2,2)=12 → sum = 5+9+10+12 = 36
Top-right 2x2: (1,2)=9, (1,3)=6, (2,2)=12, (2,3)=9 → 9+6+12+9 = 36 ✓
Bottom-left 2x2: (2,1)=10, (2,2)=12, (3,1)=9, (3,2)=3 → 10+12+9+3 = 34 ≠ 36
Bottom-right 2x2: (2,2)=12, (2,3)=9, (3,2)=3, (3,3)=? → 12+9+3+? = 24+?
If it should be 36, then ? = 12.
And 12 is option A: square with 12.
Check if bottom-left should also be 36: currently 34, off by 2. But maybe only the overlapping 2x2 blocks that are fully defined follow the rule.
We have two 2x2 blocks in row 1-2 that sum to 36:
- cols 1-2: 5+9+10+12 = 36
- cols 2-3: 9+6+12+9 = 36
So pattern: each consecutive 2x2 block in rows 1-2 sums to 36.
Then the next 2x2 block would be cols 3-4, rows 1-2: (1,3)=6, (1,4)=8, (2,3)=9, (2,4)=11 → 6+8+9+11 = 34 — not 36. So that breaks.
Unless I miscalculated: 6+8=14, 9+11=20, total 34. Yes.
But the first two 2x2 blocks (cols 1-2) and (cols 2-3) both sum to 36. That suggests a sliding window: positions (r,c), (r,c+1), (r+1,c), (r+1,c+1) for r=1, c=1 and c=2 both sum to 36.
So for c=3: cells (1,3)=6, (1,4)=8, (2,3)=9, (2,4)=11 → sum 34. Not 36.
Unless the pattern is different.
Let me try differences between rows.
Row 2 - Row 1:
col1: 10 - 5 = 5
col2: 12 - 9 = 3
col3: 9 - 6 = 3
col4: 11 - 8 = 3
Interesting! Columns 2,3,4 all have difference 3. Only col1 is 5.
Now Row 3 - Row 2:
col1: 9 - 10 = -1
col2: 3 - 12 = -9
col3: ? - 9 = ?
col4: 9 - 11 = -2
No clear pattern.
But notice: in row 2, columns 2,3,4 are all circles or hexagon, and differences from row 1 are 3,3,3.
What if the rule is: for columns 2-4, each entry in row 2 is row1 + 3.
Check:
col2: 9+3=12 ✓
col3: 6+3=9 ✓
col4: 8+3=11 ✓
Yes! Perfect.
So rule: For columns 2, 3, and 4, row 2 = row 1 + 3.
Now apply same rule to get row 3 from row 2? Maybe row 3 = row 2 - 3? Let's test:
col2: row2=12, minus 3 = 9, but row3 col2 is 3 (hexagon) — not 9. So no.
Unless the operation changes.
Row 3 col2 is 3, while row2 col2 is 12. 12 to 3 is -9.
Row 3 col1: 9 vs row2 col1:10 → -1
Row 3 col4: 9 vs 11 → -2
Not consistent.
Wait — look at column 3 specifically, since that's our target:
col3:
row1: 6 (square)
row2: 9 (circle)
row3: ?
If the pattern is +3 from row1 to row2, maybe +3 again to row3: 9+3=12.
And 12 is option A (square with 12). Also, shape: row1 square, row2 circle, row3 maybe square again? Alternating?
Square → circle → square is plausible.
Also, check if any other column does that:
col1: row1 circle, row2 square, row3 circle — yes! C, S, C
col2: row1 circle, row2 circle, row3 hexagon — not alternating.
col4: row1 hexagon, row2 hexagon, row3 circle
But col1 is C, S, C — alternating starting with circle.
col3: row1 square, row2 circle, so row3 should be square to alternate: S, C, S.
Yes! So shape should be square.
Number: if row1=6, row2=9 (+3), then row3=12 (+3 again).
So ? = 12 in a square → option A.
Let me verify with another view: the increments are +3 down column 3, and shape alternates square-circle-square.
Thus the answer is A: 12 in a square.
Final Answer:
A
Parent Tip: Review the logic above to help your child master the concept of printable logic puzzles brain teasers.