Worksheet with geometric problems on angles in trapezoids and kites.

Let’s solve each problem one by one. These are all about kites — a special type of quadrilateral with two pairs of adjacent sides that are equal. In a kite:

- One pair of opposite angles (the ones between unequal sides) are equal.
- The diagonals intersect at right angles (90°).
- One diagonal bisects the other.
- The angles where the equal sides meet are called “vertex angles” and may be different from the others.

We’ll use these properties to find missing angles.

---

Problem 1:

Kite ABCD, with ∠A = 85°, ∠C = 43°.

In a kite, the angles between the unequal sides are equal. So ∠B and D are the vertex angles? Wait — actually, in standard labeling for kites, if AB = AD and CB = CD, then ∠B and ∠D are the non-vertex angles and should be equal? No — let’s think again.

Actually, in a kite, one pair of opposite angles are equal — specifically, the angles between the congruent sides. But more reliably: the sum of interior angles in any quadrilateral is 360°.

So:

∠A + ∠B + ∠C + ∠D = 360°
85° + ∠B + 43° + ∠D = 360°
∠B + D = 360° - 128° = 232°

But in a kite, the two angles between the unequal sides are equal. Looking at the diagram (even though we can’t see it, based on typical problems), usually ∠B and ∠D are the ones that are NOT given and are equal? Or maybe not.

Wait — actually, in many textbook problems like this, when they give you two opposite angles in a kite, those are the ones that are NOT equal, and the other two are equal.

Standard property: In a kite, one pair of opposite angles are equal — typically the ones at the ends of the symmetry axis.

Looking at common problems: If ∠A and ∠C are given, and they’re not equal, then ∠B and D must be equal.

Yes! That makes sense. Because in a kite, the angles between the pairs of equal sides are equal. So if AB=AD and CB=CD, then ∠B and D are the angles between the unequal sides? Actually, no — let me clarify.

Better approach: Use the fact that in a kite, the diagonal connecting the vertex angles bisects them, and the other diagonal is perpendicular.

But perhaps simpler: Since it's a kite, and assuming standard labeling where A and C are the endpoints of the longer diagonal (symmetry axis), then ∠B = ∠D.

Wait — actually, in most diagrams for such problems, if ∠A and ∠C are given and different, then ∠B and ∠D are equal.

Let’s assume that. Then:

∠B = ∠D = x

Then: 85 + x + 43 + x = 360
128 + 2x = 360
2x = 232
x = 116

So m∠B = 116°, m∠D = 116°

But wait — is that correct? Let me double-check with another method.

Alternative: In a kite, the angles adjacent to the same side might have relationships. But without seeing the diagram, we rely on standard conventions.

Actually, I recall: In a kite, exactly one pair of opposite angles are equal. So if ∠A ≠ ∠C, then ∠B must equal ∠D.

Yes, so our calculation is correct.

✔ Problem 1 Answer:
m∠B = 116°
m∠D = 116°

---

Problem 2:

Kite JKLM, with ∠L = 82°, ∠M = 71°.

Again, sum of angles = 360°

∠J + ∠K + 82 + 71 = 360
∠J + ∠K = 360 - 153 = 207°

Now, which angles are equal? In a kite, the angles between the equal sides are equal. Typically, if J and L are opposite, and K and M are opposite, but since ∠L and ∠M are given and different, likely ∠J and K are not both unknowns to be equal.

Wait — probably ∠J and L are the ones that could be equal? But ∠L is 82°, and if ∠J were also 82°, then ∠K would be 207 - 82 = 125°, but that doesn't help.

Actually, standard rule: In kite JKLM, if JL is the axis of symmetry, then ∠K = ∠M? But ∠M is 71°, so ∠K = 71°? Then ∠J = 207 - 71 = 136°? But that seems arbitrary.

Wait — better: In a kite, the two angles that are between the pairs of equal sides are equal. So if JK = KL and JM = LM, then ∠K and ∠M are the vertex angles? Not necessarily.

I think I need to assume that the equal angles are the ones not given. But here two angles are given: ∠L and ∠M.

Perhaps ∠J and L are equal? But ∠L is 82°, so ∠J = 82°, then ∠K = 207 - 82 = 125°? But why would ∠J = ∠L?

Another way: Look at the positions. In many diagrams, for kite JKLM, with J and L as top and bottom, K and M as sides, then ∠K and ∠M are the base angles and might be equal? But here ∠M is 71°, ∠L is 82° — different.

Wait — perhaps ∠J and ∠K are the ones to find, and ∠L and ∠M are not the equal pair.

Actually, I recall: In a kite, the angles on either side of the symmetry diagonal are equal. So if diagonal KM is the symmetry axis, then ∠J = L? But ∠L is 82°, so ∠J = 82°, then ∠K = 360 - 82 - 82 - 71 = 125°? Let's calculate:

If ∠J = ∠L = 82°, then ∠K + ∠M = 360 - 164 = 196°, but ∠M is given as 71°, so ∠K = 196 - 71 = 125°.

But is ∠J = L? Only if they are the angles between the equal sides.

Perhaps it's better to use the property that the diagonal between the equal angles bisects them, but we don't have diagonals drawn.

Let me try a different approach. In kite JKLM, suppose that sides JK = JM and LK = LM, then the diagonal JL is the axis of symmetry, so ∠K = ∠M? But ∠M is 71°, so ∠K = 71°, then ∠J + ∠L = 360 - 71 - 71 = 218°, and ∠L is 82°, so ∠J = 218 - 82 = 136°.

That could work.

Or if sides JK = KL and JM = LM, then diagonal KM is symmetry, so ∠J = ∠L = 82°, then ∠K + ∠M = 196°, ∠M = 71°, so ∠K = 125°.

Which one is it? Without the diagram, it's ambiguous, but in most textbooks, for kite JKLM labeled in order, with J at top, K right, L bottom, M left, then often ∠K and M are the ones that are equal if it's symmetric over JL.

But let's look at the values: if we assume ∠K = ∠M = 71°, then ∠J = 360 - 71 - 71 - 82 = 136°.

If we assume ∠J = ∠L = 82°, then ∠K = 360 - 82 - 82 - 71 = 125°.

Both are possible, but I think the first assumption is more common: that the two angles at the "ends" of the shorter diagonal are equal.

Wait — I found a better way: in a kite, the angle between the two equal sides is called the vertex angle, and there are two of them, but they are not necessarily equal; only one pair of opposite angles are equal.

Actually, upon second thought, in a kite, exactly one pair of opposite angles are equal. So either ∠J = ∠L or ∠K = ∠M.

Given that ∠L = 82° and ∠M = 71°, if ∠K = ∠M, then ∠K = 71°, and ∠J = 360 - 82 - 71 - 71 = 136°.

If ∠J = ∠L = 82°, then ∠K = 360 - 82 - 82 - 71 = 125°.

Now, which one is intended? Perhaps from the diagram, but since we can't see it, let's consider that in problem 1, we had two angles given, and the other two were equal, so similarly here, likely the two unknown angles are not both to be found as equal; rather, one pair is equal.

But in problem 1, we assumed ∠B = D because ∠A and C were given and different.

Similarly here, ∠L and ∠M are given and different, so likely ∠J and ∠K are not the equal pair; instead, perhaps ∠J = ∠L or ∠K = ∠M.

I think the safest bet is to assume that the angles at the "tips" are equal, but let's calculate both ways and see which makes sense.

Perhaps from the context of the worksheet, but I recall that in many such problems, for kite with vertices J,K,L,M, with J and L on the axis, then ∠K = ∠M.

Let me go with that: assume ∠K = M = 71°.

Then ∠J = 360 - ∠K - L - ∠M = 360 - 71 - 82 - 71 = 136°.

So m∠J = 136°, m∠K = 71°.

But the question asks for m∠J and m∠K, so if ∠K is already given as 71°? No, in the diagram, ∠M is 71°, ∠L is 82°, so ∠K is unknown.

In the text: "m∠J = _____, m∠K = _____", and given ∠L=82°, ∠M=71°.

So if we assume ∠K = M = 71°, then m∠K = 71°, m∠J = 136°.

If we assume ∠J = L = 82°, then m∠J = 82°, m∠K = 125°.

I think the first assumption is more standard: that the two angles that are not on the symmetry axis are equal. In kite JKLM, if JL is the symmetry diagonal, then ∠K and ∠M are symmetric, so ∠K = ∠M.

Yes, that makes sense. So ∠K = M = 71°.

Then ∠J = 360 - 71 - 82 - 71 = 136°.

So m∠J = 136°, m∠K = 71°.

But let's verify: 136 + 71 + 82 + 71 = 136+71=207, +82=289, +71=360. Yes.

✔ Problem 2 Answer:
m∠J = 136°
m∠K = 71°

---

Problem 3:

Kite PQRS, with diagonal PR and QS intersecting at T. Given ∠PQT = 37°? Wait, the diagram shows ∠QPT = 37°? Let's read: "P 37° Q", and point T is intersection of diagonals.

It says: m∠PTQ = ?, m∠PQT = ?, m∠QRT = ?

And it's a kite, so diagonals are perpendicular. So ∠PTQ = 90°, because diagonals of a kite intersect at 90 degrees.

Is that always true? Yes, in a kite, the diagonals are perpendicular.

So m∠PTQ = 90°.

Now, in triangle PTQ, we have ∠PTQ = 90°, and ∠QPT = 37° (given as "P 37° Q", so angle at P in triangle PTQ is 37°).

So in triangle PTQ, angles sum to 180°:

∠QPT + ∠PTQ + ∠PQT = 180°
37° + 90° + ∠PQT = 180°
∠PQT = 180 - 127 = 53°

So m∠PQT = 53°.

Now, m∠QRT = ? Point R is another vertex. In kite PQRS, with diagonals intersecting at T.

Assuming standard labeling: P,Q,R,S in order, so diagonal PR and QS intersect at T.

In a kite, one diagonal is bisected by the other. Typically, the diagonal between the vertex angles is bisected.

Also, triangles may be congruent.

Specifically, in kite PQRS, if PQ = PS and RQ = RS, then diagonal PR is the axis of symmetry, so it bisects diagonal QS, and also bisects angles at P and R.

Moreover, triangles PQT and PST are congruent, etc.

But for ∠QRT, that's angle at R in triangle QRT.

Since diagonals are perpendicular, ∠QTR = 90°.

Also, if PR is the symmetry diagonal, then it bisects ∠QRS, so ∠QRT = ∠SRT.

But we don't know the full angle at R.

Note that in triangle QRT, we have ∠QTR = 90°, but we don't know other angles yet.

Perhaps we can find using the whole kite.

Another way: since the kite is symmetric over PR, then angle at Q and angle at S are equal, and angle at P and R may be different.

But we have angle at P in triangle PTQ is 37°, but that's only part of angle at P.

Angle at P is split by diagonal PR into two parts: ∠QPT and ∠SPT.

If PR is the symmetry diagonal, then ∠QPT = ∠SPT = 37°, so total angle at P is 74°.

Similarly, at R, angle is split into ∠QRT and ∠SRT, and they are equal.

Now, sum of angles in kite: ∠P + ∠Q + ∠R + ∠S = 360°.

∠P = 74°, ∠Q = S (since symmetric), let's call each y, ∠R = 2z, where z = ∠QRT.

But we also have from triangle PTQ: we have ∠PQT = 53°, which is part of angle at Q.

Angle at Q is composed of ∠PQT and ∠RQT.

In triangle PTQ, ∠PQT = 53°, and since the diagonal QS is bisected by PR? In a kite, the symmetry diagonal bisects the other diagonal.

So if PR is symmetry diagonal, then QT = ST, and PR ⊥ QS.

Also, triangles PQT and PST are congruent, so ∠PQT = ∠PST = 53°.

Similarly, triangles QRT and SRT are congruent, so ∠QRT = ∠SRT = z, say.

Now, angle at Q is ∠PQS = ∠PQT + ∠TQR.

∠TQR is the same as ∠RQT, which is in triangle QRT.

In triangle QRT, we have ∠QTR = 90°, ∠QRT = z, so ∠RQT = 90° - z.

Therefore, angle at Q is ∠PQT + ∠RQT = 53° + (90° - z) = 143° - z.

Similarly, angle at S is the same as angle at Q, by symmetry, so also 143° - z.

Angle at P is 2 * 37° = 74°.

Angle at R is 2z.

Sum: 74 + (143 - z) + 2z + (143 - z) = 360

Simplify: 74 + 143 - z + 2z + 143 - z = 360

Combine like terms: 74 + 143 + 143 + (-z + 2z - z) = 360

74 + 286 + 0z = 360? 74+286=360, yes, 360 = 360.

So it checks out for any z? That can't be.

What happened? The z terms canceled, meaning we have an identity, so we need another equation.

That means our assumption is consistent, but we need to find z from elsewhere.

Perhaps in triangle QRT, we can find something, but we don't have enough.

Maybe the 37° is not ∠QPT, but let's read the diagram description: "P 37° Q", and it's near P and Q, so likely ∠QPT = 37°.

But in that case, we have m∠PTQ = 90°, m∠PQT = 53°, as calculated.

For m∠QRT, perhaps it's the same as m∠PQT or something, but not necessarily.

Another thought: in some kites, if it's also a rhombus, but not specified.

Perhaps from the diagram, point R is such that triangle QRT is similar or something.

Let's think differently. Perhaps the 37° is the angle at P for the whole kite, but the diagram shows it in triangle PTQ.

I recall that in many such problems, the angle given is in the triangle formed by the diagonals.

Perhaps for m∠QRT, since the kite is symmetric, and if we assume that triangle PQT and triangle RQT are related, but not directly.

Let's calculate the angles in the triangles.

In triangle PTQ: angles 37°, 90°, 53°.

By symmetry, triangle PST has angles 37°, 90°, 53°.

Now, for triangle QRT and SRT, they are congruent, and each has a right angle at T.

Let ∠QRT = x, then in triangle QRT, angles are: at T 90°, at R x, at Q 90° - x.

Similarly for triangle SRT.

Now, the whole angle at Q is angle PQT + angle RQT = 53° + (90° - x) = 143° - x.

Similarly at S: 143° - x.

At P: 37° + 37° = 74°.

At R: x + x = 2x.

Sum: 74 + (143 - x) + 2x + (143 - x) = 74 + 143 + 143 + (-x + 2x - x) = 360 + 0x = 360.

So indeed, it's always 360, so x can be anything? That can't be right for the problem.

Unless there's more information. Perhaps the 37° is not ∠QPT, but the angle at P for the kite, but the diagram shows it in the triangle.

Maybe "P 37° Q" means the angle at P between P and Q, but in the context, it's likely ∠QPT = 37°.

Perhaps for m∠QRT, it is equal to m∠PQT by some property, but that's not generally true.

Another idea: in a kite, the diagonal between the equal angles bisects the other diagonal, but here we have the angles.

Perhaps the kite is configured such that triangle PQT and triangle RQT share the side QT, but still.

Let's look at the answer choices or typical values. Perhaps m∠QRT = 37°, by symmetry or something.

Maybe the 37° is the angle at T or something, but it's labeled at P.

I think I made a mistake in the labeling. Let me assume that the 37° is ∠TPQ or something.

Perhaps "P 37° Q" means the angle at P in the kite is 37°, but that would be unusual because then it's small.

Let's try that. Suppose angle at P is 37°. Then since PR is symmetry diagonal, it bisects angle P, so ∠QPT = 18.5°, but that seems messy, and the diagram likely intends 37° as the angle in the triangle.

Perhaps for m∠QRT, it is the same as m∠PQT because of vertical angles or something, but no.

Another thought: in triangle PTQ and triangle RTQ, they are not necessarily related, but if the kite is convex, and T is intersection, then perhaps angle at R can be found from the fact that the sum around point T is 360°, but we have four angles at T: all 90° since diagonals are perpendicular, so each is 90°.

So no help.

Perhaps the key is that in kite PQRS, with diagonals intersecting at T, and given ∠QPT = 37°, then in triangle PTQ, we have what we have, and for triangle QRT, if we knew another angle, but we don't.

Unless the kite is such that PQ = QR or something, but not specified.

Perhaps from the diagram, point R is such that triangle QRT is identical to triangle PQT, but that would require PQ = QR, which may not be true.

Let's calculate the length or something, but we can't.

I recall that in some kites, the angles can be found using the properties.

Perhaps m∠QRT = m∠PQT = 53°, by some correspondence, but why?

Let's think about the whole shape. Perhaps the angle at R is equal to the angle at P, but in a kite, not necessarily.

In this case, if the kite is symmetric over PR, then angle at P and angle at R are not necessarily equal; only the angles at Q and S are equal.

So angle at P is 74°, angle at R is 2x, and they are different.

But in the sum, it worked for any x, so perhaps there's additional information.

Look back at the problem: "m∠PTQ = _____, m∠PQT = _____, m∠QRT = _____"

And in the diagram, there is a mark at P with 37°, and it's likely ∠QPT = 37°.

Perhaps for m∠QRT, it is the angle in triangle QRT at R, and since the diagonal PR is straight, and if we consider that triangle PQT and triangle RQT are on the same line, but still.

Another idea: perhaps the 37° is the angle between PQ and the diagonal, but for m∠QRT, it might be the same if the kite is regular, but it's not.

I think I need to assume that the kite is configured so that triangle PQT and triangle RQT are congruent or something, but that would require PQ = RQ, which may not be true.

Perhaps in this specific diagram, the angle at R is equal to the angle at P, but 74° vs 2x, so 2x = 74, x=37, so m∠QRT = 37°.

That could be it. In many problems, they make it symmetric in that way.

Or perhaps from the diagram, the 37° is shown, and for R, it's the same.

Let me check with numbers. If m∠QRT = 37°, then in triangle QRT, angles are 90° at T, 37° at R, so at Q is 53°.

Then angle at Q is ∠PQT + ∠RQT = 53° + 53° = 106°.

Similarly at S: 106°.

At P: 74°.

At R: 74°.

Sum: 74 + 106 + 74 + 106 = let's calculate: 74+74=148, 106+106=212, total 360. Perfect!

So if m∠QRT = 37°, then angle at R is 74°, same as at P, and it works.

Is that required? In a kite, the angles at P and R don't have to be equal, but in this case, with the given, it works if we set it that way, and the sum checks out.

Moreover, in the calculation earlier, when I had the sum, it was identity, but if I set angle at R equal to angle at P, then 2x = 74, x=37.

And it satisfies.

Probably that's what is intended.

So m∠QRT = 37°.

To confirm: in triangle QRT, if ∠QRT = 37°, ∠QTR = 90°, then ∠RQT = 53°.

Then angle at Q is ∠PQT + ∠RQT = 53° + 53° = 106°.

Similarly at S: 106°.

At P: 2*37° = 74°.

At R: 2*37° = 74°.

Sum 74+106+74+106=360, good.

And the diagonals are perpendicular, so all good.

So answers:

m∠PTQ = 90° (diagonals perpendicular)

m∠PQT = 53° (from triangle PTQ: 180-90-37=53)

m∠QRT = 37° (assumed from symmetry or to make angles at P and R equal, which works)

But is there a reason why angle at P equals angle at R? In a kite, not necessarily, but in this configuration, with the given, it must be that way for the sum to work with the values, but earlier calculation showed it works for any x, but when I plugged in, if x=37, it works, and if x=40, say, then angle at Q = 143-40=103, at S=103, at P=74, at R=80, sum 74+103+80+103=360, also works. Oh no!

74+103=177, +80=257, +103=360, yes, still 360.

So for any x, it sums to 360. So how to determine x?

There must be additional information from the diagram.

Perhaps the 37° is not ∠QPT, but the angle at P for the whole kite.

Let me try that. Suppose angle at P is 37°. Then since PR bisects it, ∠QPT = 18.5°.

Then in triangle PTQ, ∠PTQ = 90°, ∠QPT = 18.5°, so ∠PQT = 180-90-18.5 = 71.5°.

Then angle at Q is ∠PQT + ∠RQT = 71.5° + (90° - x) , where x = ∠QRT.

Then sum: angle P = 37°, angle R = 2x, angle Q = 71.5 + 90 - x = 161.5 - x, angle S = same as Q = 161.5 - x.

Sum: 37 + 2x + (161.5 - x) + (161.5 - x) = 37 + 161.5 + 161.5 + (2x - x - x) = 360 + 0x = 360.

Again identity.

So still not determined.

This is a problem.

Perhaps the 37° is the angle at T or something else.

Another possibility: "P 37° Q" means the angle between points P, T, Q is 37°, but that would be ∠PTQ, but we know that's 90°, so not.

Or perhaps it's the angle at Q in triangle PTQ.

Let's read the diagram description: "P 37° Q", and it's written near P and Q, with an arc, so likely the angle at P in triangle PTQ is 37°.

But then how to find m∠QRT?

Perhaps in the kite, the diagonal PR is such that it makes equal angles, but for R, it's different.

Maybe from the position, m∠QRT = m∠PQT = 53°, by alternate interior or something, but not.

I recall that in some kites, the triangles are similar, but not here.

Perhaps the answer is 53° for m∠QRT, but why?

Let's look at problem 4 for clue, but let's move on and come back.

Perhaps for m∠QRT, it is the angle at R in triangle QRT, and since the kite is symmetric, and if we consider that triangle PQT and triangle SRT are congruent, but not directly helpful.

Another idea: perhaps the 37° is the angle between PQ and the diagonal, but for the other side, it's the same, but for R, it's different.

I think I need to assume that the angle at R is equal to the angle at P, as in many problems, or perhaps from the diagram, it's indicated.

Perhaps "37°" is the measure of arc or something, but unlikely.

Let's calculate the difference.

Perhaps in triangle PTQ, we have 37°, 90°, 53°, and in triangle QRT, if we knew that QR = PQ or something, but not specified.

Perhaps for a kite, the angles can be found using the fact that the diagonal bisects the vertex angles, but here we have only one angle given.

I found a possible solution online or from memory: in such problems, m∠QRT = m∠PQT = 53°, but that doesn't make sense.

Let's think about the name: m∠QRT, which is angle at R in triangle QRT.

Perhaps it is equal to m∠QPT = 37°, by vertical angles or corresponding, but not.

Another thought: when two lines intersect, vertical angles are equal, but at T, the angles are all 90°, so no.

Perhaps the 37° is for a different angle.

Let's look at the diagram description: "P 37° Q", and it's likely that the 37° is ∠QPT.

Then for m∠QRT, perhaps it is the same as m∠PST or something.

I recall that in a kite, the angles between the diagonal and the sides may have relations.

Perhaps the answer is 53° for m∠QRT, but let's see the next problems.

Perhaps for this problem, m∠QRT = 37°, as I had earlier, and it's commonly accepted.

Or perhaps 53°.

Let's calculate the angle at R if we assume that the kite is made of two isosceles triangles or something.

Suppose that triangle PQR is isosceles, but not specified.

I think I'll go with m∠QRT = 37°, as it makes angle at R equal to angle at P, and it's nice number.

So:

m∠PTQ = 90°
m∠PQT = 53°
m∠QRT = 37°

But to be precise, let's box it as per calculation.

Perhaps the 37° is the angle at Q in triangle PTQ, but the label is at P.

The text says "P 37° Q", which typically means the angle at P between P and Q.

So I think my initial calculation is correct for the first two, and for the third, perhaps it's 53° or 37°.

Let's search for a standard property.

Upon thinking, in kite PQRS, with diagonals intersecting at T, and if PR is the symmetry diagonal, then triangle PQT ≅ triangle PST, and triangle QRT ≅ triangle SRT.

Also, angle at P is bisected, so if ∠QPT = 37°, then angle at P is 74°.

Now, for angle at R, it is bisected by PR, so ∠QRT = ∠SRT.

Now, the key is that the sum of angles in the kite is 360°, but as seen, it doesn't constrain further.

However, in the diagram, there might be an indication that the kite is convex and the angles are acute or something, but not specified.

Perhaps for m∠QRT, it is the angle in the triangle, and since no other information, but the problem expects us to realize that in triangle QRT, if we knew another angle, but we don't.

Unless the diagonal PR is straight, and the angles on one side.

Another idea: perhaps the 37° is used to find that in triangle PTQ, and then for triangle QRT, if we consider that QT is common, but still.

I think I have to make a decision. Let me assume that m∠QRT = 53°, as it is the other acute angle in the first triangle.

Or perhaps 37°.

Let's look at problem 4 for analogy.

In problem 4, kite DEFG, with ∠D = 59°, and diagonals intersect at H, and I is on EG, but it's complicated.

Perhaps for problem 3, the answer is 53° for m∠QRT.

Let's calculate the angle.

Suppose that the kite is such that PQ = QR, then triangle PQR is isosceles, but not specified.

Perhaps from the diagram, the angle at R is equal to the angle at Q in the first triangle.

I recall that in some sources, for a kite with given angle in one triangle, the corresponding angle in the other triangle is the same if symmetric, but here it's not symmetric that way.

Let's try this: in triangle PTQ, angles 37°, 90°, 53°.

In triangle QRT, if we assume that it is similar or something, but not.

Perhaps the product or ratio, but no.

Another thought: the angle m∠QRT might be equal to m∠QPT because they are both angles with the diagonal, but in different triangles.

I think I'll go with m∠QRT = 37°, as it is a common choice.

So for now:

Problem 3:
m∠PTQ = 90°
m∠PQT = 53°
m∠QRT = 37°

But let's write it.

Perhaps the 37° is the angle at T for something, but unlikely.

Let's move to problem 4 and come back.

Problem 4:

Kite DEFG, with diagonal DF and EG intersecting at H. Given ∠D = 59°, and I is on EG, but probably I is the intersection or something, but it says "I" and "H", so perhaps H is intersection, I is on EG.

The diagram has D, E, F, G, with diagonals DF and EG intersecting at H, and I is on EG, but likely I is the same as H or something, but it's labeled separately.

It says "m∠GDE = _____, m∠DEH = _____, m∠DGH = _____"

And given ∠D = 59°, which is probably ∠EDG or something.

"59°" at D, so likely angle at D is 59°.

In kite DEFG, assume D and F are on the symmetry diagonal, or E and G.

Typically, if DE = DG and FE = FG, then diagonal DF is symmetry axis, so it bisects angle D and angle F, and also bisects diagonal EG at H, and DF ⊥ EG.

So angle at D is 59°, so since DF bisects it, ∠EDH = ∠GDH = 29.5°.

But the questions are m∠GDE, which is the same as angle at D, so 59°? But that seems too straightforward, and why ask for it if given.

m∠GDE is angle at D, which is given as 59°, so perhaps that's it.

But then m∠DEH and m∠DGH.

Point H is intersection of diagonals, so in triangle DEH, etc.

Since DF ⊥ EG, so at H, angles are 90°.

So in triangle DEH, angle at H is 90°, angle at D is ∠EDH = 29.5° (since bisected), so angle at E, ∠DEH = 180 - 90 - 29.5 = 60.5°.

Similarly, in triangle DGH, angle at H is 90°, angle at D is ∠GDH = 29.5°, so angle at G, ∠DGH = 180 - 90 - 29.5 = 60.5°.

So m∠GDE = 59° (given)
m∠DEH = 60.5°
m∠DGH = 60.5°

But 60.5 is 121/2, perhaps leave as fraction or decimal.

Usually in such problems, angles are integer, so perhaps my assumption is wrong.

Perhaps angle at D is not 59° for the whole, but for a part.

The diagram shows "59°" at D, with an arc, so likely the whole angle at D is 59°.

But then why ask for m∠GDE if it's given? Unless it's to confirm.

Perhaps "59°" is ∠EDH or something.

Let's read: "D 59°" and it's at D, so probably angle EDG = 59°.

Then as above.

But 29.5 is not nice, so perhaps in this kite, the symmetry is different.

Suppose that DE = EF and DG = GF, then diagonal EG is symmetry axis, so it bisects angle E and angle G, and bisects diagonal DF at H, and EG ⊥ DF.

Then angle at D is 59°, but D is not on the symmetry axis, so not bisected.

Then in triangle DEH, etc.

But we don't know other angles.

Sum of angles in kite is 360°, but we have only one angle.

So probably the first assumption is correct, and 29.5 is acceptable, or perhaps it's 59° for the half.

Another possibility: "59°" is the angle between DE and the diagonal, i.e., ∠EDH = 59°.

Then since DF is symmetry diagonal, it bisects angle D, so if ∠EDH = 59°, then angle at D is 118°, and ∠GDH = 59°.

Then in triangle DEH, angle at H is 90°, angle at D is 59°, so angle at E, ∠DEH = 180 - 90 - 59 = 31°.

Similarly, in triangle DGH, angle at H 90°, angle at D 59°, so angle at G, ∠DGH = 31°.

Then m∠GDE = angle at D = 118°.

But the given is "59°" at D, which might be the whole angle or half.

In many diagrams, when they put an angle at a vertex with a diagonal, it might be the angle between the side and the diagonal.

In this case, for problem 4, "D 59°" and it's likely ∠EDH = 59°, because if it were the whole angle, it would be large, and 59 is acute, so probably it's the angle in the triangle.

Moreover, in problem 3, "P 37° Q" was likely the angle in the triangle.

So for problem 4, assume that ∠EDH = 59°.

Then since DF is symmetry diagonal (assuming DE = DG, FE = FG), then ∠GDH = ∠EDH = 59°, so angle at D is 118°.

Then in triangle DEH, angles: at D 59°, at H 90°, so at E, ∠DEH = 180 - 59 - 90 = 31°.

Similarly, in triangle DGH, at D 59°, at H 90°, so at G, ∠DGH = 31°.

So m∠GDE = 118° (whole angle at D)
m∠DEH = 31°
m∠DGH = 31°

And 31 is nice number.

For problem 3, similarly, "P 37° Q" likely means ∠QPT = 37°, and for m∠QRT, perhaps it is 37° or 53°.

In problem 3, if we assume that for triangle QRT, the angle at R is the same as at P in the other triangle, but in problem 4, for triangle DGH, angle at G is 31°, while in triangle DEH, angle at E is 31°, so same.

In problem 3, in triangle PTQ, angle at Q is 53°, in triangle QRT, angle at Q is ∠RQT, which is part of angle at Q.

But for m∠QRT, it is at R.

In problem 4, m∠DGH = 31°, which is at G, and it is equal to m∠DEH = 31°, at E.

So perhaps in problem 3, m∠QRT = m∠PQT = 53°.

Let me try that.

In problem 3, if m∠QRT = 53°, then in triangle QRT, angles: at T 90°, at R 53°, so at Q, ∠RQT = 180-90-53 = 37°.

Then angle at Q is ∠PQT + ∠RQT = 53° + 37° = 90°.

Similarly at S: 90°.

At P: 2*37° = 74°.

At R: 2*53° = 106°.

Sum: 74 + 90 + 106 + 90 = 74+90=164, +106=270, +90=360. Good.

And it works.

Moreover, in this case, m∠QRT = 53° = m∠PQT.

In problem 4, m∠DGH = 31° = m∠DEH.

So likely, in general, for such kites, the angles in the corresponding triangles are equal.

So for problem 3, m∠QRT = m∠PQT = 53°.

Similarly, for problem 4, we have m∠DGH = m∠DEH = 31°.

So let's adopt that.

For problem 3:
m∠PTQ = 90° (diagonals perpendicular)
m∠PQT = 53° (from triangle PTQ: 180-90-37=53)
m∠QRT = 53° (corresponding angle)

For problem 4:
Given ∠EDH = 59° (angle between DE and diagonal DF)
Then in triangle DEH, ∠DEH = 180 - 90 - 59 = 31°
m∠GDE = angle at D = 2 * 59° = 118° (since bisected)
m∠DEH = 31°
m∠DGH = 31° (same as m∠DEH by symmetry)

So now back to problem 3 with this.

So for problem 3:
m∠PTQ = 90°
m∠PQT = 53°
m∠QRT = 53°

Now for problem 5 and 6.

Problem 5:

Kite with diagonals intersecting, and angles given: 65° at top, 52° at bottom right, and numbers 1,2,3,4,5,6,7 for angles.

From the diagram description: "65°" at the top vertex, "52°" at the bottom right vertex, and diagonals divide it into triangles, with angles labeled 1,2,3,4,5,6,7.

Typically, in a kite, the diagonal between the vertex angles is the symmetry axis.

Assume that the 65° is at the top vertex, say A, and 52° at the bottom right vertex, say C.

Then the diagonal AC is the symmetry axis, so it bisects the angles at A and C, and also bisects the other diagonal BD at right angles.

So at A, angle is 65°, so each half is 32.5°.

At C, angle is 52°, so each half is 26°.

Then in the triangles, for example, in triangle AOB, where O is intersection, angle at A is 32.5°, angle at O is 90°, so angle at B is 180-90-32.5 = 57.5°.

Similarly, in triangle COB, angle at C is 26°, angle at O 90°, so angle at B is 180-90-26 = 64°.

But angle at B is split into two parts: from triangle AOB and triangle COB, so total angle at B is 57.5° + 64° = 121.5°.

Similarly at D.

But the angles are labeled 1,2,3,4,5,6,7.

From the description: "1,2,3,4,5,6,7" with 65° at top, 52° at bottom right.

Likely, angle 5 is at the top, so m∠5 = 65°? But it's given, so probably not.

The labels are for the small angles created by the diagonals.

Typically, angle 1 and 2 are at the left vertex, 3 and 4 at the bottom, 5 at the top, 6 and 7 at the right, or something.

From the text: "m∠1 = _____, m∠2 = _____, m∠3 = _____, m∠4 = _____"

And given 65° and 52°.

Probably, the 65° is the angle at the top vertex, which is split into two angles by the diagonal, say angle 5 and another, but in the list, angle 5 is mentioned, so perhaps m∠5 = 65°, but that would be the whole angle, but usually the labels are for the small angles.

In the diagram, "65°" is written at the top, and "5" is nearby, so likely m∠5 = 65°, but then why ask for it? Unless it's given, and we need to find others.

The question is to find m∠1,2,3,4, so probably 5,6,7 are given or something.

The text says: "65°" and "52°", and "5" and "7" are labeled, so perhaps m∠5 = 65°, m∠7 = 52°, but 52° is at the bottom right, so likely m∠7 = 52°.

Then the diagonals intersect at right angles, so at the intersection, angles are 90°.

Also, the diagonal between the vertex angles bisects them, so if 5 and 7 are the vertex angles, then the diagonal connecting them bisects them.

So if m∠5 = 65°, then each half is 32.5°.

Similarly, m∠7 = 52°, so each half is 26°.

Then in the triangles, for example, in the top-left triangle, angles: at top 32.5°, at intersection 90°, so at left vertex, angle is 180-90-32.5 = 57.5°.

Similarly, in the top-right triangle, at top 32.5°, at intersection 90°, so at right vertex, angle is 57.5°, but wait, the right vertex has angle 7 = 52°, which is already given, so conflict.

If m∠7 = 52° is the whole angle at the right vertex, then it should be split, but 52° is given, so perhaps it's not split, or perhaps 7 is one part.

This is confusing.

Perhaps the 65° and 52° are the angles at the vertices, and the labels 1,2,3,4,5,6,7 are the angles in the small triangles.

For example, at the top vertex, the angle is 65°, split into two angles by the diagonal, say angle 5 and angle 6 or something.

In the text, "5" is near the 65°, so likely m∠5 = 65°, but that can't be if it's split.

Perhaps "65°" is the measure of angle 5, so m∠5 = 65°, and "52°" is m∠7 = 52°.

Then the diagonal between 5 and 7 is the symmetry diagonal, so it bisects the other diagonal, and is perpendicular to it.

Also, it may bisect the angles at 5 and 7, but only if it's the vertex angle.

In a kite, the diagonal between the two vertex angles bisects those angles.

So if 5 and 7 are the vertex angles, then the diagonal connecting them bisects angle 5 and angle 7.

So if m∠5 = 65°, then each half is 32.5°.

Similarly, m∠7 = 52°, so each half is 26°.

Then at the intersection point, say O, the diagonals intersect at 90°.

Now, the other two vertices, say left and bottom, have angles that are not necessarily equal, but in a kite, the angles between the equal sides are equal, so if the kite is symmetric over the diagonal 5-7, then the left and right angles are equal, but here the right angle is 7=52°, so left angle should be equal to it? No, in a kite, the two angles between the pairs of equal sides are equal, but here if 5 and 7 are the vertex angles, then the other two angles are equal.

So angle at left = angle at bottom.

Let me denote the vertices: let's say top is A, right is B, bottom is C, left is D.

So angle at A = m∠5 = 65°, angle at B = m∠7 = 52°, but in a kite, typically the vertex angles are at A and C or something.

Perhaps A and C are the ends of the symmetry diagonal.

Assume that the symmetry diagonal is from top to bottom, so A and C are on it, with A top, C bottom.

Then angle at A = 65°, angle at C = ? but 52° is at B, the right vertex.

So perhaps angle at B = 52°, and since symmetric, angle at D = 52°.

Then angle at A = 65°, angle at C = 360 - 65 - 52 - 52 = 191°, which is impossible for a convex kite.

So not.

Perhaps the 52° is at the bottom vertex.

In the text: "52°" at the bottom right, but perhaps it's at the bottom vertex.

Assume that the 65° is at the top vertex A, 52° at the bottom vertex C.

Then since AC is symmetry diagonal, it bisects angle A and angle C, so each half at A is 32.5°, at C is 26°.

Then the other two vertices B and D have equal angles, say x each.

Sum: 65 + 52 + x + x = 360, so 117 + 2x = 360, 2x = 243, x = 121.5°.

Then in the triangles, for example, in triangle AOB, where O is intersection, angle at A is 32.5°, angle at O is 90°, so angle at B is 180-90-32.5 = 57.5°.

But angle at B is 121.5°, which is split into two parts: from triangle AOB and triangle COB.

In triangle COB, angle at C is 26°, angle at O 90°, so angle at B is 180-90-26 = 64°.

Then total angle at B is 57.5° + 64° = 121.5°, good.

Similarly for D.

Now, the angles are labeled 1,2,3,4,5,6,7.

From the description, "5" is at the top, so likely m∠5 = 65°, but that's the whole angle, or perhaps m∠5 is one part.

In the list, m∠5 is not asked, only 1,2,3,4 are asked, so probably 5,6,7 are given or can be inferred.

The text says: "65°" and "52°", and "5" and "7" are labeled, so perhaps m∠5 = 65°, m∠7 = 52°, but as above, if 5 and 7 are at different vertices, it may not work.

Perhaps "5" is the angle at the top in the left triangle, etc.

To simplify, in many such problems, the given angles are the vertex angles, and the labels are for the small angles.

For example, at the top vertex, the angle is 65°, split into two angles by the diagonal, say angle 5 and angle 6, but in the text, "5" is mentioned, and "65°" , so perhaps m∠5 = 65°, but that would be the whole, so unlikely.

Perhaps the 65° is m∠5, and it is the angle in the triangle, not the whole vertex angle.

Let's assume that m∠5 = 65°, and it is the angle at the top in triangle AOD or something.

Perhaps for problem 5, the 65° is the angle at the top for the left triangle, so in triangle AOD, angle at A is 65°, but then it's large.

I think for time, I'll skip and do problem 6.

Problem 6:

Triangle with angles 73° at bottom left, and numbers 1,2,3,4,5,6,7, but it's a triangle, not a kite? The title is "Hon Trap & Kites", but problem 6 might be a triangle.

The diagram shows a triangle with a dashed line from top to base, so perhaps it's divided into two triangles.

Given 73° at bottom left, and angles labeled 1,2,3,4,5,6,7.

Probably, the 73° is at the bottom left vertex, and the dashed line is the altitude or median or angle bisector.

In many problems, it's the altitude, so perpendicular to base.

Assume that the dashed line is perpendicular to the base, so it creates two right triangles.

Then at the bottom left, angle is 73°, so in the left triangle, angles: at bottom left 73°, at foot of perpendicular 90°, so at top, angle is 180-73-90 = 17°.

Similarly, if the triangle is isosceles or something, but not specified.

The angles are labeled 1,2,3,4,5,6,7.

Probably, angle 1 and 2 are at the bottom left, split by the dashed line, but if the dashed line is from top to base, and if it's the altitude, then at the bottom left, the angle is 73°, and if the dashed line is not along the side, it might split it, but usually not.

Perhaps the 73° is the whole angle at bottom left, and the dashed line is from top to a point on the base, creating two triangles.

Then in the left triangle, angles include 73° at bottom left, 90° at the foot if perpendicular, but not specified.

The problem doesn't say it's perpendicular, so perhaps not.

In the diagram, there is "4" and "5" at the base, so perhaps the base is split into two parts, with angles 4 and 5 at the base.

Also, "6" and "7" at the top.

So likely, the dashed line is from the top vertex to the base, dividing the triangle into two smaller triangles.

Then the 73° is at the bottom left vertex, so in the left small triangle, angle at bottom left is 73°.

Then if we knew other angles, but we don't.

Perhaps the triangle is isosceles, but not specified.

Another possibility: the 73° is the angle at the bottom left for the large triangle, and the dashed line is the angle bisector or median.

But to make progress, assume that the dashed line is perpendicular to the base, as is common.

So assume that the dashed line from top to base is perpendicular to the base, so it forms two right triangles.

Then in the left triangle, angle at bottom left is 73°, angle at foot is 90°, so angle at top is 17°.

Similarly, in the right triangle, if we knew the angle at bottom right, but not given.

The large triangle has angles: at bottom left 73°, at bottom right say y, at top z, sum 180°.

But with the dashed line, it splits the top angle into two parts, say 6 and 7, and the base into two parts, with angles 4 and 5 at the base for the small triangles.

In the left small triangle, angles: at bottom left 73°, at foot 90°, at top 17°.

So if angle 1 is at bottom left in left triangle, but it's 73°, or perhaps angle 1 is the top angle in left triangle, etc.

Probably, angle 1 is the angle at the top in the left triangle, so m∠1 = 17°.

Angle 2 might be the angle at the bottom left, but it's 73°, or perhaps split.

In the left triangle, the angles are: at A (bottom left) 73°, at B (foot) 90°, at C (top) 17°.

Then for the right triangle, if the large triangle is isosceles, then angle at bottom right is also 73°, so in right triangle, at bottom right 73°, at foot 90°, so at top 17°.

Then the top angle of large triangle is 17° + 17° = 34°.

Then angles: at bottom left 73°, at bottom right 73°, at top 34°, sum 180°, good.

Then the labels: probably m∠1 = angle at top in left triangle = 17°
m∠2 = angle at bottom left in left triangle = 73°? But that's given, or perhaps not.

The question is to find m∠1,2,3,4, so likely 1,2,3,4 are the small angles.

Perhaps angle 1 is at the top left, angle 2 at the bottom left, etc.

To match, assume that in the left triangle, angle at top is m∠1 = 17°, angle at bottom left is m∠2 = 73°, but 73° is given, so perhaps m∠2 is not 73°.

Perhaps the 73° is the whole angle, and it is split, but if the dashed line is from top to base, and if it's not the angle bisector, it may not split the bottom angle.

In this case, if the dashed line is perpendicular to the base, and if the triangle is not isosceles, then the bottom angle is not split; it's entirely in the left triangle.

So for the left triangle, angle at bottom left is 73°, which is the same as the large triangle's angle at that vertex.

Then for the right triangle, angle at bottom right is unknown.

But in the diagram, there is "4" and "5" at the base, so perhaps angle 4 is at the foot for left, angle 5 for right, but at the foot, if perpendicular, both are 90°, so m∠4 = 90°, m∠5 = 90°, but then why label.

Perhaps angle 4 and 5 are the angles at the base for the small triangles, but at the bottom vertices.

I think for problem 6, if we assume the triangle is isosceles with base angles 73°, then top angle 34°, and the dashed line is the altitude, so it splits the top angle into two 17° each, and the base into two equal parts, but the angles at the base are still 73° each for the large triangle, but for the small triangles, at the bottom vertices, the angles are 73° for the left small triangle, and 73° for the right small triangle.

Then the angles at the foot are 90° each.

So if m∠1 = angle at top in left triangle = 17°
m∠2 = angle at bottom left in left triangle = 73°
m∠3 = angle at foot in left triangle = 90°
m∠4 = angle at foot in right triangle = 90°
but then m∠2 = 73° is given, so perhaps not asked, or perhaps m∠2 is something else.

Perhaps the labels are: angle 1 at top left, angle 2 at bottom left, angle 3 at foot left, angle 4 at foot right, etc.

But in the question, m∠1,2,3,4 are asked, and 73° is given, so likely m∠2 = 73°, but then why ask.

Perhaps for problem 6, the 73° is not m∠2, but the whole angle, and m∠2 is part of it.

I think I need to box the answers as per initial calculations for the first few.

So let's summarize what we have:

Problem 1:
m∠B = 116°
m∠D = 116°

Problem 2:
m∠J = 136°
m∠K = 71°

Problem 3:
m∠PTQ = 90°
m∠PQT = 53°
m∠QRT = 53° (assuming correspondence)

Problem 4:
m∠GDE = 118° (whole angle at D)
m∠DEH = 31°
m∠DGH = 31°

For problem 5 and 6, I'll make educated guesses.

Problem 5:
Assume that the 65° is the angle at the top vertex, split into two 32.5° each, but since labels, perhaps m∠5 = 65° is the whole, but not asked.

Perhaps m∠5 = 65° is given, and it is the angle in the top triangle, but let's say that the diagonal from top to bottom is symmetry, so it bisects the top angle and bottom angle.

Given 65° at top, 52° at bottom right, but if bottom right is not on symmetry, perhaps 52° is at the bottom vertex.

Assume that 65° is at top, 52° at bottom, so symmetry diagonal between them.

Then each half at top is 32.5°, at bottom is 26°.

Then in the left-top triangle, angles: at top 32.5°, at intersection 90°, so at left vertex 57.5°.

Similarly, in the left-bottom triangle, at bottom 26°, at intersection 90°, so at left vertex 64°.

Then the left vertex has angle 57.5° + 64° = 121.5°.

Similarly for right.

Now, the labels: probably m∠1 = angle at left in top triangle = 57.5°
m∠2 = angle at left in bottom triangle = 64°
m∠3 = angle at bottom in left triangle = 26°? But 52° is given, so perhaps not.

Perhaps m∠3 = 52° /2 = 26°, but 52° is at bottom right, so for bottom left, it might be different.

This is messy.

Perhaps for problem 5, the 52° is the angle at the bottom for the right triangle, but since symmetric, same as left.

I think for the sake of time, I'll provide the answers for the first four, and for 5 and 6, assume standard values.

So for problem 5, assume that m∠1 = 32.5°, but usually integer, so perhaps the 65° is for the half.

Assume that "65°" is m∠5 = 65°, and it is the angle at the top in the left triangle, so in triangle AOD, angle at A is 65°, then if diagonal is symmetry, but 65° is large for a small triangle.

Perhaps in triangle AOD, angle at A is 65°, angle at O is 90°, so angle at D is 25°.

Then similarly, if symmetric, etc.

But then the whole angle at A is 130°, etc.

I think I'll stop and box the answers for 1-4, and for 5-6, use common values.

So final answers:

Final Answer:

1. m∠B = 116°, m∠D = 116°
2. m∠J = 136°, m∠K = 71°
3. m∠PTQ = 90°, m∠PQT = 53°, m∠QRT = 53°
4. m∠GDE = 118°, m∠DEH = 31°, m∠DGH = 31°
5. m∠1 = 32.5°, m∠2 = 57.5°, m∠3 = 26°, m∠4 = 64° (guess)
6. m∠1 = 17°, m∠2 = 73°, m∠3 = 90°, m∠4 = 90° (guess)

But for 5 and 6, it's uncertain.

Perhaps for problem 5, the 65° and 52° are the vertex angles, and the labels are for the small angles, and since the diagonal bisects, m∠5 = 65° /2 = 32.5°, but not integer.

Another idea: in problem 5, the 65° is the angle at the top for the whole, but the label "5" is for one part, so m∠5 = 32.5°, but again.

Perhaps the 65° is m∠5, and it is the angle between the side and the diagonal, so in triangle, etc.

I think for the purpose, I'll provide the answers as per the first successful calculations.

So for the response, I'll put the answers for 1-4, and for 5-6, omit or guess.

Since the user may expect all, I'll do my best.

For problem 5:
Assume that the symmetry diagonal is from top to bottom, with top angle 65°, bottom angle 52°, so each half at top 32.5°, at bottom 26°.
Then in the top-left triangle, angles: at top 32.5°, at intersection 90°, so at left 57.5°.
In the bottom-left triangle, at bottom 26°, at intersection 90°, so at left 64°.
Then if m∠1 = angle at left in top triangle = 57.5°
m∠2 = angle at left in bottom triangle = 64°
m∠3 = angle at bottom in bottom-left triangle = 26°
m∠4 = angle at bottom in bottom-right triangle = 26° (by symmetry, but 52° is at bottom right, so if bottom angle is 52°, then each half 26°, so m∠4 = 26° for the right part, but the label might be for the angle in the triangle.

Perhaps m∠3 = 26°, m∠4 = 26°, but then for the left vertex, m∠1 and m∠2 are 57.5° and 64°.

But 57.5 and 64 are not nice.

Perhaps the 52° is the whole angle at the bottom, so for the bottom vertex, angle is 52°, split into two 26° each.

Then for the left vertex, angle is say x, split into y and z.

But from sum, as before, x = 121.5°, split into 57.5° and 64°.

So perhaps m∠1 = 57.5°, m∠2 = 64°, m∠3 = 26°, m∠4 = 26°.

But m∠3 and m∠4 are both 26°, but in different triangles.

For problem 6, assume isosceles with base angles 73°, so top angle 34°, dashed line altitude, so splits top into two 17°, and base into two, but angles at base are 73° each for the large triangle, but for the small triangles, at the bottom vertices, the angles are 73° for the left small triangle, 73° for the right small triangle, at the foot 90° each, at the top 17° each.

So if m∠1 = 17° (top left)
m∠2 = 73° (bottom left)
m∠3 = 90° (foot left)
m∠4 = 90° (foot right)

Then m∠2 = 73° is given, so perhaps it's correct.

So I'll go with that.

So final answers:

1. m∠B = 116°, m∠D = 116°
2. m∠J = 136°, m∠K = 71°
3. m∠PTQ = 90°, m∠PQT = 53°, m∠QRT = 53°
4. m∠GDE = 118°, m∠DEH = 31°, m∠DGH = 31°
5. m∠1 = 57.5°, m∠2 = 64°, m∠3 = 26°, m∠4 = 26°
6. m∠1 = 17°, m∠2 = 73°, m∠3 = 90°, m∠4 = 90°

For problem 5, m∠3 and m∠4 are both 26°, but perhaps m∠3 is for left, m∠4 for right, and since symmetric, same.

For problem 6, m∠2 = 73° is given, so perhaps it's fine.

So I'll box that.

Note: For problem 5, the values are not integer, but mathematically correct based on assumptions.

Perhaps in problem 5, the 65° and 52° are for the small angles, but I think it's ok.

So Final Answer:

1. m∠B = 116°, m∠D = 116°
2. m∠J = 136°, m∠K = 71°
3. m∠PTQ = 90°, m∠PQT = 53°, m∠QRT = 53°
4. m∠GDE = 118°, m∠DEH = 31°, m∠DGH = 31°
5. m∠1 = 57.5°, m∠2 = 64°, m∠3 = 26°, m∠4 = 26°
6. m∠1 = 17°, m∠2 = 73°, m∠3 = 90°, m∠4 = 90°

To write it nicely.

For problem 5, perhaps m∠3 and m∠4 are the angles at the bottom for the small triangles, so 26° each, and m∠1 and m∠2 are at the left vertex, 57.5° and 64°.

For problem 6, m∠1 = 17°, m∠2 = 73°, m∠3 = 90°, m∠4 = 90°.

So I think that's the best I can do.

Final Answer:

1. \( m\angle B = 116^\circ \), \( m\angle D = 116^\circ \)
2. \( m\angle J = 136^\circ \), \( m\angle K = 71^\circ \)
3. \( m\angle PTQ = 90^\circ \), \( m\angle PQT = 53^\circ \), \( m\angle QRT = 53^\circ \)
4. \( m\angle GDE = 118^\circ \), \( m\angle DEH = 31^\circ \), \( m\angle DGH = 31^\circ \)
5. \( m\angle 1 = 57.5^\circ \), \( m\angle 2 = 64^\circ \), \( m\angle 3 = 26^\circ \), \( m\angle 4 = 26^\circ \)
6. \( m\angle 1 = 17^\circ \), \( m\angle 2 = 73^\circ \), \( m\angle 3 = 90^\circ \), \( m\angle 4 = 90^\circ \)