Measurement scales displaying values of 30, 400, and 3.2.
Three measurement scales showing values at 30, 400, and 3.2 respectively.
JPG
1012×488
94 KB
Free · Personal Use
Quality Assured by Worksheets Library Team
Reviewed for educational accuracy and age-appropriateness
ID: #301764
⭐
Show Answer Key & Explanations
Step-by-step solution for: Reading a Triple Beam Balance | Baamboozle - Baamboozle | The Most ...
▼
Show Answer Key & Explanations
Step-by-step solution for: Reading a Triple Beam Balance | Baamboozle - Baamboozle | The Most ...
The image shows a vernier caliper with three scales: the main scale, the vernier scale, and the depth gauge (or auxiliary scale). We need to determine the measurement shown by the caliper. Let's break it down step by step.
---
There are three scales:
1. Top Scale (Main Scale): Ranges from 0 to 100 in increments of 10.
2. Middle Scale (Vernier Scale): Ranges from 0 to 500 in increments of 100.
3. Bottom Scale (Main Scale with finer divisions): Ranges from 0 to 10 with smaller subdivisions.
But wait — this looks like a combination of scales, possibly representing different units or a compound measuring device. However, more likely, this is a vernier caliper where:
- The top scale is the main scale (in mm or cm).
- The middle scale might be for depth or thrust.
- The bottom scale is the vernier scale, used for fine measurement.
Let’s interpret it as a standard vernier caliper with:
- Main scale: Top scale (0–100)
- Vernier scale: Bottom scale (0–10), which has 10 divisions
- Reading: Main scale + Vernier scale correction
But there's also a middle scale, which appears to go from 0 to 500 — possibly indicating a different unit, like millimeters or even a scale multiplier.
Wait — let’s re-analyze.
Actually, this seems to be a triple-scale reading device, perhaps a slide rule-style or compound scale, but given the layout, it's most likely a vernier caliper with multiple readings.
But looking at the alignment:
- On the top scale: The pointer is between 20 and 30, pointing at 30.
- But the black bar (the sliding jaw) is aligned with 30 on the top scale.
- On the middle scale: The black bar is aligned with 400.
- On the bottom scale: The black bar is aligned with 3.
But the bottom scale has smaller divisions — each division is 0.1 units.
Let’s assume this is a vernier caliper where:
- The main scale is the top one (0–100), in cm or mm?
- The bottom scale is the vernier scale, with 10 divisions = 1 unit on the main scale.
But that doesn’t match typical vernier calipers.
Alternatively, consider this: It's a diagram showing three different scales being read simultaneously, perhaps for length, depth, and precision.
But let's look closely:
---
This is not a standard vernier caliper. Instead, it appears to be a measuring device with three scales, possibly representing a dial gauge or a multi-scale instrument.
But here's a better idea: This is a vernier caliper with:
- Main scale: Top scale (0–100), in millimeters
- Vernier scale: Bottom scale (0–10), with 10 divisions → each division = 0.1 mm
- Depth scale: Middle scale (0–500), possibly in millimeters
But the pointer on the top scale is at 30, and the sliding jaw aligns with 30.
On the bottom scale, the vernier scale has a black mark at 3, and the main scale has a tick just before 3.
Wait — actually, the vernier scale is the bottom one, and we must find which line on the vernier aligns with the main scale.
But the bottom scale has 10 divisions between 0 and 10 — so each small division is 0.1 unit.
Let’s suppose the main scale is in centimeters (0–100 cm), but that’s too large.
More likely: the top scale is in millimeters (0–100 mm), the middle scale is in tenths of a millimeter or something else.
But the middle scale goes up to 500 — perhaps it's in micrometers?
Alternatively, this could be a calibration chart or test of reading multiple scales.
Let’s try a simpler interpretation.
---
This is a vernier caliper with:
- Main scale: Top scale (0–100), in millimeters
- Vernier scale: Bottom scale (0–10), with 10 divisions → each division = 0.1 mm
- The reading is obtained by:
- Reading the main scale (to the nearest mm)
- Then finding which vernier division lines up with the main scale
- Adding the vernier correction
Now, observe:
- On the top scale, the zero of the vernier scale is between 20 and 30, closer to 30.
- The vernier zero is past 20, and the main scale shows 20 mm as the last full mark before the vernier zero.
- Wait — no: the black block on the top scale is over 30, and the vernier scale is below.
Actually, the top scale has a black rectangle centered at 30, and the bottom scale has a black rectangle at 3.
But the bottom scale is the vernier scale, and it has 10 divisions between 0 and 10, so each division is 0.1 mm.
Let’s suppose:
- The main scale (top) reads 30 mm
- The vernier scale (bottom) has a line that aligns with the main scale.
But the bottom scale has 10 divisions from 0 to 10, so if the vernier zero is at 30 mm on the main scale, then the vernier reading is the number of divisions that align.
But in the image, the vernier scale is below, and its zero is aligned with 30 on the top scale.
Then, we look for which vernier division lines up with a main scale division.
But the main scale is not visible below — only the bottom scale is shown.
Wait — the bottom scale is the vernier scale, and the top scale is the main scale.
So:
- The main scale (top): The vernier zero is between 20 and 30, but the black block is over 30, suggesting the zero of the vernier is at 30 mm.
- So the main scale reading is 30 mm
- Now, look at the vernier scale (bottom): It has 10 divisions from 0 to 10, each 0.1 mm
But the vernier scale is marked from 0 to 10, and the black block is at 3, meaning the vernier zero is at 30 mm, and the vernier scale is shifted.
Wait — the vernier scale has a black block at 3, and the main scale has a tick at 30.
But the vernier scale is not aligned with the main scale — we need to see which vernier line aligns with a main scale line.
But in this image, the vernier scale (bottom) has fine markings, and the main scale (top) has coarse markings.
Let’s count:
- On the bottom scale, the black block is at 3, and the main scale has a tick at 30.
- But the vernier scale is calibrated such that 10 divisions = 9 divisions of the main scale, so the vernier gives 0.1 mm precision.
But without seeing the alignment of individual ticks, we can't proceed.
Wait — perhaps this is a test of reading three scales.
Let’s look again:
- Top scale: Black block at 30
- Middle scale: Black block at 400
- Bottom scale: Black block at 3
And the bottom scale has 10 divisions from 0 to 10, so each division is 1 unit, and the black block is at 3, so 3 units.
But what are the units?
Possibility: This is a compound scale for length, depth, and micrometer.
But another possibility: This is a dial indicator or digital readout.
But the most plausible explanation is that this is a vernier caliper with:
- Main scale: Top (0–100 mm)
- Vernier scale: Bottom (0–10, each division = 0.1 mm)
- Depth scale: Middle (0–500 mm)
But the depth scale is not typically on a caliper.
Alternatively, this is a ruler with three different scales for different units.
Let’s try this:
- Top scale: 0–100 → could be centimeters
- Middle scale: 0–500 → could be millimeters (since 500 mm = 50 cm)
- Bottom scale: 0–10 → could be tenths of a centimeter or millimeters
But the black blocks are aligned:
- Top: at 30
- Middle: at 400
- Bottom: at 3
So perhaps the total reading is:
- From top scale: 30 cm
- From middle scale: 400 mm = 40 cm
- From bottom scale: 3 mm
But that doesn't make sense.
Wait — maybe the top scale is in cm, middle in mm, and bottom in 0.1 mm.
Then:
- Top: 30 cm
- Middle: 400 mm = 40 cm
- Bottom: 3 mm
But 30 cm ≠ 40 cm.
Unless it's a compound measurement.
Another idea: This is a vernier caliper where:
- The main scale is the top (0–100 mm)
- The vernier scale is the bottom (0–10), with 10 divisions
- The reading is: main scale + vernier correction
From the image:
- The zero of the vernier scale is at 30 mm on the main scale
- So main scale reading = 30 mm
- Now, on the vernier scale, the 3rd division is aligned with a main scale line
- But the vernier scale has 10 divisions for 9 mm, so each division is 0.1 mm
But in the image, the vernier scale is marked 0 to 10, and the black block is at 3, meaning the 3rd division of the vernier scale is aligned with a main scale line.
So vernier reading = 3 × 0.1 mm = 0.3 mm
Total reading = 30 + 0.3 = 30.3 mm
But wait — the middle scale shows 400, which is not used.
Perhaps the middle scale is for depth or thickness, and the top and bottom are for length.
But the middle scale has a black block at 400, and the top at 30, bottom at 3.
Maybe the total measurement is:
- Length: 30.3 mm (from top and bottom)
- Depth: 400 mm (from middle)
But that seems unlikely.
Another possibility: This is a micrometer or caliper with digital readout, but it's analog.
Let’s look at the bottom scale carefully:
- It has 10 divisions from 0 to 10
- Each division is 1 unit, but the scale is labeled 0 to 10, and there are 10 major divisions, so each major division is 1 unit
- But between 0 and 1, there are 10 small divisions, so each small division is 0.1 unit
Ah! That’s important.
The bottom scale has 10 small divisions between 0 and 1, so it's divided into 0.1 units.
So the scale is from 0 to 10, with 100 divisions? No — it says 0 to 10, and there are 10 major marks, each separated by 1 unit, and within each unit, there are 10 small divisions, so yes, 0.1 unit per small division.
But the black block is at 3, so it's at 3.0 units.
But what is the unit?
Perhaps the top scale is in cm, the bottom scale in mm, and the middle scale in microns.
But that's messy.
Let’s try this:
Suppose the top scale is in cm (0–100 cm), the middle scale in mm (0–500 mm), and the bottom scale in 0.1 mm.
Then:
- Top: 30 cm = 300 mm
- Middle: 400 mm
- Bottom: 3 mm
But they don't match.
Unless it's a single measurement with multiple scales.
Wait — perhaps the top scale is the main scale, the bottom scale is the vernier, and the middle scale is for depth.
But the black blocks are aligned vertically.
So:
- Top: 30
- Middle: 400
- Bottom: 3
Perhaps the reading is 30.3, but the middle scale is 400, which is confusing.
Another idea: This is a test of reading a vernier caliper where:
- The main scale is the top (0–100 mm)
- The vernier scale is the bottom (0–10), with 10 divisions = 1 mm, so each division is 0.1 mm
- The vernier zero is at 30 mm on the main scale
- The vernier scale has a division that aligns with the main scale
In the image, the vernier scale has a black block at 3, and the main scale has a tick at 30.
But we need to see which vernier line aligns with a main scale line.
But the vernier scale is below, and it has 10 divisions from 0 to 10, with smaller ticks.
Assuming that the vernier scale is designed so that its 0 is at 30 mm on the main scale, and the 3rd division of the vernier aligns with a main scale line, then the reading is:
- Main scale: 30 mm
- Vernier scale: 3 × 0.1 = 0.3 mm
- Total: 30.3 mm
But why is the middle scale at 400?
Perhaps the middle scale is for depth, and it's independent.
So the length is 30.3 mm, and the depth is 400 mm.
But that seems odd.
Alternatively, the middle scale is in tenths of a millimeter, so 400 means 400/10 = 40 mm, but that doesn't help.
Wait — perhaps the top scale is in cm, so 30 cm = 300 mm
- Middle scale is in mm, so 400 mm
- Bottom scale is in 0.1 mm, so 3 mm
But 300 mm vs 400 mm — conflict.
Unless it's a compound scale where the total is 30 + 400 + 3 = 433, but that doesn't make sense.
Perhaps the top scale is in units, the middle scale in tenths, and the bottom scale in hundredths.
But the values are 30, 400, 3.
No.
Another possibility: This is a ruler with three different scales for different units, and the reading is 30.3 from the top and bottom, and the middle is 400 for something else.
But the problem is to "solve the task" — likely to read the measurement.
Given the common use of such diagrams, the intended answer is probably:
- Main scale: 30 mm
- Vernier scale: 0.3 mm
- Total: 30.3 mm
And the middle scale is for depth or additional measurement, but since the question is to solve the task, and only one value is expected, likely the length is 30.3 mm.
But let’s double-check.
In many vernier caliper diagrams, the main scale is read first, then the vernier scale.
Here, the main scale (top) shows 30 mm.
The vernier scale (bottom) has a division that aligns with the main scale. The vernier scale is marked from 0 to 10, and the black block is at 3, so the 3rd division of the vernier scale aligns with a main scale line.
Since the vernier scale has 10 divisions for 1 mm, each division is 0.1 mm.
So vernier reading = 3 × 0.1 = 0.3 mm
Total = 30 + 0.3 = 30.3 mm
The middle scale at 400 may be a distractor or for a different measurement.
Therefore, the solution is:
> 30.3 mm
But to be thorough, let's consider the middle scale.
If the middle scale is for depth, and it reads 400, that could be 400 mm or 40 cm.
But without context, it's hard to say.
However, given the layout, the top and bottom scales are clearly for length, and the middle scale might be for depth or thickness.
But the task is likely to read the length.
Thus, the final answer is:
> 30.3 mm
Or in centimeters: 3.03 cm
But since the top scale goes to 100, likely in mm.
So the measurement is 30.3 mm.
---
Step 1: Understand the Scales
There are three scales:
1. Top Scale (Main Scale): Ranges from 0 to 100 in increments of 10.
2. Middle Scale (Vernier Scale): Ranges from 0 to 500 in increments of 100.
3. Bottom Scale (Main Scale with finer divisions): Ranges from 0 to 10 with smaller subdivisions.
But wait — this looks like a combination of scales, possibly representing different units or a compound measuring device. However, more likely, this is a vernier caliper where:
- The top scale is the main scale (in mm or cm).
- The middle scale might be for depth or thrust.
- The bottom scale is the vernier scale, used for fine measurement.
Let’s interpret it as a standard vernier caliper with:
- Main scale: Top scale (0–100)
- Vernier scale: Bottom scale (0–10), which has 10 divisions
- Reading: Main scale + Vernier scale correction
But there's also a middle scale, which appears to go from 0 to 500 — possibly indicating a different unit, like millimeters or even a scale multiplier.
Wait — let’s re-analyze.
Actually, this seems to be a triple-scale reading device, perhaps a slide rule-style or compound scale, but given the layout, it's most likely a vernier caliper with multiple readings.
But looking at the alignment:
- On the top scale: The pointer is between 20 and 30, pointing at 30.
- But the black bar (the sliding jaw) is aligned with 30 on the top scale.
- On the middle scale: The black bar is aligned with 400.
- On the bottom scale: The black bar is aligned with 3.
But the bottom scale has smaller divisions — each division is 0.1 units.
Let’s assume this is a vernier caliper where:
- The main scale is the top one (0–100), in cm or mm?
- The bottom scale is the vernier scale, with 10 divisions = 1 unit on the main scale.
But that doesn’t match typical vernier calipers.
Alternatively, consider this: It's a diagram showing three different scales being read simultaneously, perhaps for length, depth, and precision.
But let's look closely:
---
Interpretation:
This is not a standard vernier caliper. Instead, it appears to be a measuring device with three scales, possibly representing a dial gauge or a multi-scale instrument.
But here's a better idea: This is a vernier caliper with:
- Main scale: Top scale (0–100), in millimeters
- Vernier scale: Bottom scale (0–10), with 10 divisions → each division = 0.1 mm
- Depth scale: Middle scale (0–500), possibly in millimeters
But the pointer on the top scale is at 30, and the sliding jaw aligns with 30.
On the bottom scale, the vernier scale has a black mark at 3, and the main scale has a tick just before 3.
Wait — actually, the vernier scale is the bottom one, and we must find which line on the vernier aligns with the main scale.
But the bottom scale has 10 divisions between 0 and 10 — so each small division is 0.1 unit.
Let’s suppose the main scale is in centimeters (0–100 cm), but that’s too large.
More likely: the top scale is in millimeters (0–100 mm), the middle scale is in tenths of a millimeter or something else.
But the middle scale goes up to 500 — perhaps it's in micrometers?
Alternatively, this could be a calibration chart or test of reading multiple scales.
Let’s try a simpler interpretation.
---
Most Likely Interpretation:
This is a vernier caliper with:
- Main scale: Top scale (0–100), in millimeters
- Vernier scale: Bottom scale (0–10), with 10 divisions → each division = 0.1 mm
- The reading is obtained by:
- Reading the main scale (to the nearest mm)
- Then finding which vernier division lines up with the main scale
- Adding the vernier correction
Now, observe:
- On the top scale, the zero of the vernier scale is between 20 and 30, closer to 30.
- The vernier zero is past 20, and the main scale shows 20 mm as the last full mark before the vernier zero.
- Wait — no: the black block on the top scale is over 30, and the vernier scale is below.
Actually, the top scale has a black rectangle centered at 30, and the bottom scale has a black rectangle at 3.
But the bottom scale is the vernier scale, and it has 10 divisions between 0 and 10, so each division is 0.1 mm.
Let’s suppose:
- The main scale (top) reads 30 mm
- The vernier scale (bottom) has a line that aligns with the main scale.
But the bottom scale has 10 divisions from 0 to 10, so if the vernier zero is at 30 mm on the main scale, then the vernier reading is the number of divisions that align.
But in the image, the vernier scale is below, and its zero is aligned with 30 on the top scale.
Then, we look for which vernier division lines up with a main scale division.
But the main scale is not visible below — only the bottom scale is shown.
Wait — the bottom scale is the vernier scale, and the top scale is the main scale.
So:
- The main scale (top): The vernier zero is between 20 and 30, but the black block is over 30, suggesting the zero of the vernier is at 30 mm.
- So the main scale reading is 30 mm
- Now, look at the vernier scale (bottom): It has 10 divisions from 0 to 10, each 0.1 mm
But the vernier scale is marked from 0 to 10, and the black block is at 3, meaning the vernier zero is at 30 mm, and the vernier scale is shifted.
Wait — the vernier scale has a black block at 3, and the main scale has a tick at 30.
But the vernier scale is not aligned with the main scale — we need to see which vernier line aligns with a main scale line.
But in this image, the vernier scale (bottom) has fine markings, and the main scale (top) has coarse markings.
Let’s count:
- On the bottom scale, the black block is at 3, and the main scale has a tick at 30.
- But the vernier scale is calibrated such that 10 divisions = 9 divisions of the main scale, so the vernier gives 0.1 mm precision.
But without seeing the alignment of individual ticks, we can't proceed.
Wait — perhaps this is a test of reading three scales.
Let’s look again:
- Top scale: Black block at 30
- Middle scale: Black block at 400
- Bottom scale: Black block at 3
And the bottom scale has 10 divisions from 0 to 10, so each division is 1 unit, and the black block is at 3, so 3 units.
But what are the units?
Possibility: This is a compound scale for length, depth, and micrometer.
But another possibility: This is a dial indicator or digital readout.
But the most plausible explanation is that this is a vernier caliper with:
- Main scale: Top (0–100 mm)
- Vernier scale: Bottom (0–10, each division = 0.1 mm)
- Depth scale: Middle (0–500 mm)
But the depth scale is not typically on a caliper.
Alternatively, this is a ruler with three different scales for different units.
Let’s try this:
- Top scale: 0–100 → could be centimeters
- Middle scale: 0–500 → could be millimeters (since 500 mm = 50 cm)
- Bottom scale: 0–10 → could be tenths of a centimeter or millimeters
But the black blocks are aligned:
- Top: at 30
- Middle: at 400
- Bottom: at 3
So perhaps the total reading is:
- From top scale: 30 cm
- From middle scale: 400 mm = 40 cm
- From bottom scale: 3 mm
But that doesn't make sense.
Wait — maybe the top scale is in cm, middle in mm, and bottom in 0.1 mm.
Then:
- Top: 30 cm
- Middle: 400 mm = 40 cm
- Bottom: 3 mm
But 30 cm ≠ 40 cm.
Unless it's a compound measurement.
Another idea: This is a vernier caliper where:
- The main scale is the top (0–100 mm)
- The vernier scale is the bottom (0–10), with 10 divisions
- The reading is: main scale + vernier correction
From the image:
- The zero of the vernier scale is at 30 mm on the main scale
- So main scale reading = 30 mm
- Now, on the vernier scale, the 3rd division is aligned with a main scale line
- But the vernier scale has 10 divisions for 9 mm, so each division is 0.1 mm
But in the image, the vernier scale is marked 0 to 10, and the black block is at 3, meaning the 3rd division of the vernier scale is aligned with a main scale line.
So vernier reading = 3 × 0.1 mm = 0.3 mm
Total reading = 30 + 0.3 = 30.3 mm
But wait — the middle scale shows 400, which is not used.
Perhaps the middle scale is for depth or thickness, and the top and bottom are for length.
But the middle scale has a black block at 400, and the top at 30, bottom at 3.
Maybe the total measurement is:
- Length: 30.3 mm (from top and bottom)
- Depth: 400 mm (from middle)
But that seems unlikely.
Another possibility: This is a micrometer or caliper with digital readout, but it's analog.
Let’s look at the bottom scale carefully:
- It has 10 divisions from 0 to 10
- Each division is 1 unit, but the scale is labeled 0 to 10, and there are 10 major divisions, so each major division is 1 unit
- But between 0 and 1, there are 10 small divisions, so each small division is 0.1 unit
Ah! That’s important.
The bottom scale has 10 small divisions between 0 and 1, so it's divided into 0.1 units.
So the scale is from 0 to 10, with 100 divisions? No — it says 0 to 10, and there are 10 major marks, each separated by 1 unit, and within each unit, there are 10 small divisions, so yes, 0.1 unit per small division.
But the black block is at 3, so it's at 3.0 units.
But what is the unit?
Perhaps the top scale is in cm, the bottom scale in mm, and the middle scale in microns.
But that's messy.
Let’s try this:
Suppose the top scale is in cm (0–100 cm), the middle scale in mm (0–500 mm), and the bottom scale in 0.1 mm.
Then:
- Top: 30 cm = 300 mm
- Middle: 400 mm
- Bottom: 3 mm
But they don't match.
Unless it's a single measurement with multiple scales.
Wait — perhaps the top scale is the main scale, the bottom scale is the vernier, and the middle scale is for depth.
But the black blocks are aligned vertically.
So:
- Top: 30
- Middle: 400
- Bottom: 3
Perhaps the reading is 30.3, but the middle scale is 400, which is confusing.
Another idea: This is a test of reading a vernier caliper where:
- The main scale is the top (0–100 mm)
- The vernier scale is the bottom (0–10), with 10 divisions = 1 mm, so each division is 0.1 mm
- The vernier zero is at 30 mm on the main scale
- The vernier scale has a division that aligns with the main scale
In the image, the vernier scale has a black block at 3, and the main scale has a tick at 30.
But we need to see which vernier line aligns with a main scale line.
But the vernier scale is below, and it has 10 divisions from 0 to 10, with smaller ticks.
Assuming that the vernier scale is designed so that its 0 is at 30 mm on the main scale, and the 3rd division of the vernier aligns with a main scale line, then the reading is:
- Main scale: 30 mm
- Vernier scale: 3 × 0.1 = 0.3 mm
- Total: 30.3 mm
But why is the middle scale at 400?
Perhaps the middle scale is for depth, and it's independent.
So the length is 30.3 mm, and the depth is 400 mm.
But that seems odd.
Alternatively, the middle scale is in tenths of a millimeter, so 400 means 400/10 = 40 mm, but that doesn't help.
Wait — perhaps the top scale is in cm, so 30 cm = 300 mm
- Middle scale is in mm, so 400 mm
- Bottom scale is in 0.1 mm, so 3 mm
But 300 mm vs 400 mm — conflict.
Unless it's a compound scale where the total is 30 + 400 + 3 = 433, but that doesn't make sense.
Perhaps the top scale is in units, the middle scale in tenths, and the bottom scale in hundredths.
But the values are 30, 400, 3.
No.
Another possibility: This is a ruler with three different scales for different units, and the reading is 30.3 from the top and bottom, and the middle is 400 for something else.
But the problem is to "solve the task" — likely to read the measurement.
Given the common use of such diagrams, the intended answer is probably:
- Main scale: 30 mm
- Vernier scale: 0.3 mm
- Total: 30.3 mm
And the middle scale is for depth or additional measurement, but since the question is to solve the task, and only one value is expected, likely the length is 30.3 mm.
But let’s double-check.
In many vernier caliper diagrams, the main scale is read first, then the vernier scale.
Here, the main scale (top) shows 30 mm.
The vernier scale (bottom) has a division that aligns with the main scale. The vernier scale is marked from 0 to 10, and the black block is at 3, so the 3rd division of the vernier scale aligns with a main scale line.
Since the vernier scale has 10 divisions for 1 mm, each division is 0.1 mm.
So vernier reading = 3 × 0.1 = 0.3 mm
Total = 30 + 0.3 = 30.3 mm
The middle scale at 400 may be a distractor or for a different measurement.
Therefore, the solution is:
> 30.3 mm
But to be thorough, let's consider the middle scale.
If the middle scale is for depth, and it reads 400, that could be 400 mm or 40 cm.
But without context, it's hard to say.
However, given the layout, the top and bottom scales are clearly for length, and the middle scale might be for depth or thickness.
But the task is likely to read the length.
Thus, the final answer is:
> 30.3 mm
Or in centimeters: 3.03 cm
But since the top scale goes to 100, likely in mm.
So the measurement is 30.3 mm.
✔ Final Answer: 30.3 mm
Parent Tip: Review the logic above to help your child master the concept of reading triple beam balance worksheet.