Printable Rebus Puzzles for Kids | Woo! Jr. Kids Activities ... - Free Printable

Let’s solve each rebus puzzle one by one. These are word games where you combine, remove, or change letters based on the clues given.

---

Puzzle 4: Bell Tower – Tower + Clone (B=C) & (Cl=Ph)

Step 1: Start with “Bell Tower”
Step 2: Subtract “Tower” → leaves “Bell”
Step 3: Add “Clone” → “Bell” + “Clone” = “Bellclone”? That doesn’t make sense yet.
But we have rules:
- B = C → so replace B with C → “Cellclone”? Still not right.
Wait — maybe it’s about sounds or parts of words.

Actually, let’s think differently:

“Bell Tower” minus “Tower” = “Bell”
Then add “Clone” → “Bell” + “Clone” = “Bellclone” — but that’s not a real word.

Now apply the letter substitutions:
(B = C) → so wherever there’s a B, use C → “Cell” instead of “Bell”
(Cl = Ph) → so “Cl” becomes “Ph” → “Clone” becomes “Phone”

So: “Cell” + “Phone” = Cellphone

✔ That makes sense!

---

Puzzle 5: Rude-off the NOSED rain + deer (a=e)

Step 1: “Rude-off” → probably means take “off” from “Rude” → “Rud”? Not helpful.

Wait — maybe “Rude - off” = remove “off” from “Rude”? But “Rude” doesn’t contain “off”.

Alternative: Maybe it’s “Rude” minus “off” as in sound? Or perhaps it’s “Rude” and then subtract something else.

Look again: “Rude-off the NOSED rain + deer (a=e)”

Maybe “Rude-off” is meant to be “Rude” with “off” removed — but that doesn’t work.

Another idea: Perhaps “Rude-off” is a clue for “Rude” without “off” — still stuck.

Wait — look at “the NOSED” — “NOSED” has “Nose” + “d”, but also, if we read it aloud… “no sed”? Not helpful.

Try this: “rain + deer” = “reindeer” — that’s a known combo!

And “(a=e)” — so replace ‘a’ with ‘e’ in some word.

Also, “Rude-off” — maybe “Rude” minus “off” isn’t literal. What if “Rude-off” means “Rude” with “off” taken away phonetically? Like “Rude” sounds like “Rood”, remove “ood”? No.

Wait — what if “Rude-off” is actually “Rude” and then “off” is separate? Like “Rude” and then “off the NOSED”?

This is tricky.

Let’s try combining “rain + deer” first → “reindeer”

Now, “the NOSED” — if we say “the nosed” out loud, it sounds like “the nose d” — but maybe it’s “the” + “nosed” = “thenosed”? No.

What if “NOSED” is an anagram? N-O-S-E-D → could be “soned”, “done s”, etc.

Wait — here’s a better approach:

“Rude-off” might mean “Rude” with “off” removed — but since “Rude” doesn’t have “off”, maybe it’s “Rude” minus the sound of “off”? Unlikely.

Alternative interpretation: In rebuses, sometimes “off” means remove a part. So “Rude-off” could mean remove “off” from a word that contains it — but which word?

Perhaps the whole phrase is: Take “Rude”, remove “off”, then do something with “the NOSED”, then add “rain + deer”.

Too messy.

Let’s look at the answer pattern. We know “rain + deer = reindeer”

And “(a=e)” — so maybe in “reindeer”, replace ‘a’ with ‘e’? But there’s no ‘a’ in “reindeer”.

Unless... “reindeer” spelled with an ‘a’? No.

Wait — what if “the NOSED” is meant to be “the” + “nosed” = “thenosed”, and then with (a=e), replace ‘a’ with ‘e’ — but no ‘a’.

Another idea: “NOSED” backwards is “DESON” — not helpful.

Let’s try sounding it out: “Rude-off the NOSED” — say it fast: “Rude off the nosed” → sounds like “Rude off the nose d” → maybe “Rude” + “off” + “the” + “nose” + “d” — too many pieces.

Wait — perhaps “Rude-off” is a misdirection. What if it’s “Rude” and “off” is indicating removal from another word?

Let’s consider: “the NOSED” — if we remove “the”, we get “NOSED”

“NOSED” with (a=e) — but no ‘a’. Unless we interpret “NOSED” as having an implied ‘a’? No.

Here’s a breakthrough: What if “NOSED” is “nose” + “d”, and “d” stands for something?

Or — “NOSED” pronounced is “nozed”, and if we replace ‘a’ with ‘e’, but still no ‘a’.

Let’s go back to “rain + deer = reindeer”

And “(a=e)” — maybe it applies to “reindeer” to make it “reindeer” with ‘a’ changed to ‘e’ — but it’s already all ‘e’s except ‘i’.

Unless the word is “rainder” or something — no.

Wait — what if “the NOSED” is “the” + “nosed” = “thenosed”, and then with (a=e), it becomes “thenesed”? Not a word.

I recall that in some rebuses, “off” can mean “remove the letters O-F-F” from a word.

So “Rude-off” — if we assume “Rude” is the word, and remove “off”, but “Rude” doesn’t contain “o,f,f”.

Unless it’s “Rude” as in the word, and “off” is separate instruction.

Perhaps the puzzle is: Start with “Rude”, remove “off” (but how?), then take “the NOSED”, then add “rain + deer”, then apply (a=e).

This is taking too long. Let me search for common rebus patterns.

Another thought: “Rude-off” might be “Rude” with “off” meaning the opposite or something — not likely.

Let’s look at the answer. I think I’ve seen this before.

“Rude-off” — if you take “Rude” and remove “off”, but since it’s not there, maybe it’s “Rude” minus the sound “oo” or something.

Wait — here’s a different angle: “Rude-off” could be “Rude” and “off” is indicating to remove the last two letters or something.

“Rude” has 4 letters. Remove “off” — not possible.

Perhaps “Rude-off” is a single unit meaning “rude behavior” but that doesn’t help.

Let’s try this: Ignore “Rude-off” for a moment. Focus on “the NOSED rain + deer (a=e)”

“rain + deer” = “reindeer”

“the NOSED” — if we say “the nosed” quickly, it sounds like “thenosed”, but if we replace ‘a’ with ‘e’, and if “nosed” had an ‘a’, it would be “nesed”, but it doesn’t.

Unless “NOSED” is meant to be “nos ed” and “ed” is past tense, but not helping.

Another idea: “NOSED” backwards is “DESON”, and “deson” with (a=e) — still no.

Perhaps “the NOSED” is “the” + “nose” + “d”, and “d” is for “deer”, but we already have “deer”.

I think I found it: In some rebuses, “off” means to remove the letters that spell “off” from the word.

But “Rude” doesn’t have those letters.

Unless the word is “Rudeoff” or something — not standard.

Let’s consider that “Rude-off” might be “Rude” with “off” removed phonetically — “Rude” sounds like “rood”, remove “ood” leaves “r” — not good.

Perhaps it’s “Rude” and “off” is a separate word, and “the NOSED” is another.

Let’s count the words: “Rude-off the NOSED rain + deer”

Maybe it’s “Rude” minus “off” = ? , then “the” plus “NOSED” = “thenosed”, then “rain + deer” = “reindeer”, then (a=e).

Still messy.

Wait — what if “Rude-off” is “Rude” and “off” means to take away the “u” or something? “Rde” — not good.

I recall that “reindeer” is often used in rebuses, and “nosed” might be related to “nose”.

Another thought: “the NOSED” — if we remove “the”, we have “NOSED”, and “NOSED” with (a=e) — but no ‘a’. Unless we interpret “NOSED” as “no sed” and “sed” is Latin for “but”, not helpful.

Perhaps “NOSED” is an anagram for “soned” or “done s”, but with (a=e), it becomes “sone d” or “done e”.

Not working.

Let’s try a different strategy. Look at the other puzzles for context.

Puzzle 6: lightbulb + y + rom + ce + (p) & (o=a)

That might be easier.

Puzzle 7: Bided names (b=v), (ed=eo), & (n=g)

For now, let's skip 5 and come back.

---

Puzzle 6: [lightbulb] + y + rom + ce + (p) & (o=a)

The lightbulb usually represents "idea" or "light", but in rebuses, it often stands for "bulb" or "light".

But here, it's combined with letters.

It says: lightbulb + y + rom + ce

So, if lightbulb = "bulb", then "bulb" + "y" + "rom" + "ce" = "bulbyromce" — nonsense.

Perhaps lightbulb represents "idea", so "idea" + "y" + "rom" + "ce" = "ideayromce" — no.

Another common representation: lightbulb = "lit" or "light".

Let's assume lightbulb = "light".

Then "light" + "y" + "rom" + "ce" = "lightyromce" — still bad.

Perhaps it's syllables or sounds.

"rom" + "ce" = "romance"

Then "y" + "romance" = "yromance" — not good.

With the rules: (p) & (o=a)

(p) might mean add 'p' or replace with 'p'

(o=a) means replace 'o' with 'a'

So, let's build the word.

Start with "rom" + "ce" = "romance"

Add "y" — where? At the beginning? "yromance" — not a word.

At the end? "romancy" — close to "romance", but "romancy" is not standard; it's "romance".

"Romance" with 'y' added — perhaps "romantic" but that's not it.

Another idea: lightbulb might represent "bulb", and "bulb" + "y" = "bulby", then + "rom" = "bulbyrom", + "ce" = "bulbyromce" — no.

Perhaps the lightbulb is "idea", and "idea" + "y" = "ideay", then + "rom" = "ideayrom", + "ce" = "ideayromce" — no.

Let's think of common words. What word has "rom", "ce", "y", and involves a lightbulb?

Perhaps "lyric" or something.

Another thought: in some rebuses, lightbulb = "on" as in "light on", but not sure.

Let's look at the rules: (p) & (o=a)

So after forming the word, we apply these substitutions.

Suppose we have a word that has 'o' and we replace with 'a', and add 'p' or replace with 'p'.

For example, if we have "romance", replace 'o' with 'a' -> "ramance", then add 'p' -> "pramance" or "ramancep" — not good.

"Romance" with 'o' replaced by 'a' is "ramance", which is not a word, but "romance" is correct spelling.

Perhaps the base word is "lyric" or "lyrics".

Let's try: lightbulb = "lit" (as in light), then "lit" + "y" = "lity", + "rom" = "lityrom", + "ce" = "lityromce" — no.

Perhaps "lightbulb" represents "bulb", and "bulb" is B-U-L-B, but we need to use the letters given.

Another idea: the lightbulb might be ignored, and we start with "y + rom + ce" = "yromce", then with (p) and (o=a).

"yromce" with 'o' replaced by 'a' -> "yramce", then add 'p' -> "pyramce" or "yramcep" — not good.

"Pyramid" comes to mind. P-Y-R-A-M-I-D.

How to get that?

If we have "rom" + "ce" = "romance", but that's not helping.

"rom" could be "room" without 'o', but not.

Let's consider that "rom" + "ce" = "romance", and "y" is for "why" or something.

Perhaps the lightbulb is "idea", and "idea" + "y" = "ideay", but "ideay" isn't a word.

I recall that in some puzzles, lightbulb = "bright" or "smart", but not fitting.

Let's look for the word "lyric". L-Y-R-I-C.

How to get that from the components?

"y" is there, "rom" has 'r','o','m', "ce" has 'c','e'.

If we take 'y' from "y", 'r' from "rom", 'i' from somewhere, 'c' from "ce", but missing 'l'.

Lightbulb might provide 'l' for "light".

So "light" provides 'l', then "y" , then "rom" provides 'r','o','m', "ce" provides 'c','e'.

So letters: l,y,r,o,m,c,e

Now, form a word: perhaps "lyric" but missing 'i', have 'o','m','e' extra.

"Lyric" is L-Y-R-I-C, so we have L,Y,R,C, but need I, and have O,M,E extra.

Not matching.

Another word: "comely" or something.

Perhaps "mercy" but not.

Let's use the rules early.

Suppose we form "romance" from "rom" + "ce", then add "y" at the beginning: "yromance"

Then apply (o=a): replace 'o' with 'a' -> "yramance"

Then (p): add 'p' or replace with 'p'. If we add 'p' at the beginning, "pyramance" — close to "pyramid" but not quite.

"Pyramid" is P-Y-R-A-M-I-D.

We have P,Y,R,A,M from "pyramance", but "ance" vs "id".

Not matching.

Perhaps "rom" is "room" without 'o', but "room" has 'o'.

Another idea: "lightbulb" might represent "bulb", and "bulb" + "y" = "bulby", then "bulby" + "rom" = "bulbyrom", then + "ce" = "bulbyromce", then with (p) and (o=a).

Replace 'o' with 'a' in "bulbyromce" -> "bulbyramce", then add 'p' -> "pbulbyramce" — no.

This is frustrating.

Let's think of the word "lyric" again. How can we get "lyric"?

L from lightbulb (light), Y from "y", R from "rom", I from where? C from "ce".

But "rom" has 'o' and 'm', not 'i'.

Unless "rom" is meant to be "rim" or something.

Perhaps "rom" is "from" without 'f', but not.

Another common rebus: lightbulb = "on", so "on" + "y" + "rom" + "ce" = "onyromce" — not good.

Perhaps the lightbulb is "idea", and "idea" is I-D-E-A, then + "y" = "ideay", + "rom" = "ideayrom", + "ce" = "ideayromce", then with (p) and (o=a).

Replace 'o' with 'a' -> "ideayramce", then add 'p' -> "pideayramce" — no.

I recall that "lyric" can be formed from "ly" + "ric", but not matching.

Let's consider that "rom" + "ce" = "romance", and "y" is for "why", but "why romance" not a word.

Perhaps the word is "romantic", but that's longer.

Another thought: in some puzzles, "lightbulb" means "bright", so "bright" + "y" = "brighty", + "rom" = "brightyrom", + "ce" = "brightyromce" — no.

Perhaps it's "lyric" and the lightbulb provides the 'l', "y" is 'y', "rom" provides 'r' and 'o' and 'm', but we need 'i' and 'c', and "ce" provides 'c' and 'e', so we have extra 'o','m','e'.

Unless we use only some letters.

Perhaps "rom" is to be read as "rum" or "ram", but it's written as "rom".

Let's look at the rule (o=a), so perhaps in "rom", 'o' is replaced with 'a', so "ram", then "ram" + "ce" = "ramce", then + "y" = "yramce", then lightbulb adds 'l' at beginning: "lyramce", then (p) add 'p' -> "plyramce" — not good.

"Pyramid" is close. P-Y-R-A-M-I-D.

If we have "y" , "ram" (from rom with o=a), "ce" has 'c','e', not 'i','d'.

Not matching.

Perhaps "ce" is "see" or "sea", but not.

Another idea: "lightbulb" might represent "bulb", and "bulb" is B-U-L-B, but we have to use the letters given in the puzzle.

Perhaps the lightbulb is not adding letters, but indicating a word like "idea" or "thought", but then how to combine.

Let's try to search for common rebus solutions.

I recall that for "lightbulb + y + rom + ce", it might be "lyric" but how.

Perhaps "rom" is "from" without 'f', but "from" has 'f','r','o','m', so without 'f' is "rom", same thing.

Let's consider that "rom" + "ce" = "romance", and "y" is for "why", but "why romance" isn't a word.

Perhaps the word is "romance" with 'y' added to make "romancy", which is an archaic spelling of "romance", but usually not used.

Then with (o=a), "ramancy", then (p) add 'p' -> "pramancy" — not a word.

"Prance" is a word, but not matching.

Let's move to Puzzle 7 and come back.

---

Puzzle 7: Bided names (b=v), (ed=eo), & (n=g)

"Bided names" — "bided" is past tense of "bide", but in rebuses, it might be "bide" + "d" or something.

Rules: (b=v) , (ed=eo), & (n=g)

So, start with "bided names"

First, "bided" — if we apply (b=v), so 'b' becomes 'v' -> "vided"

Then (ed=eo) — "ed" becomes "eo", so "vided" has "ed" at the end, so "vided" -> "vieo" ? "vied" is a word, but "vided" with "ed" replaced by "eo" -> "vieo" — not good.

"Bided" is B-I-D-E-D, so if we replace 'b' with 'v' -> "vided", then replace "ed" with "eo" — but "ed" is at the end, so "vided" -> "vieo" — not a word.

Perhaps "bided" is to be split as "bi" + "ded" or something.

Another idea: "bided names" might be "bide" + "d" + "names", but complicated.

Perhaps "bided" is a clue for "bid" with "ed", but "bid" is B-I-D, "ed" is E-D, so "bided" is B-I-D-E-D.

Apply (b=v): so B->V, so "vided"

Then (ed=eo): so the "ed" at the end becomes "eo", so "vided" -> "vieo" — still not.

Unless "ed" refers to the suffix, so in "bided", the "ed" is replaced with "eo", so "bide" + "eo" = "bideo" — not a word.

Then (n=g): in "names", 'n' becomes 'g', so "games"

So "bideo games" — "video games"!

Yes! "Bided" with (b=v) -> "vided", but "vided" is not "video".

"Bided" with (b=v) -> "vided", then if we have "names" with (n=g) -> "games", so "vided games" — not "video games".

But "video" is V-I-D-E-O.

How to get "video" from "bided"?

"Bided" is B-I-D-E-D.

Apply (b=v): B->V, so V-I-D-E-D

Then (ed=eo): the "ed" at the end is replaced with "eo", so V-I-D-E-D -> V-I-D-E-O? But "ed" is two letters, "eo" is two letters, so replacing the last two letters "ed" with "eo" gives V-I-D-E-O — "video"!

Yes! Because "bided" ends with "ed", so replace "ed" with "eo" -> "bideo", but after (b=v), it's "vided", then replace "ed" with "eo" -> "vieo" — wait, "vided" is V-I-D-E-D, so positions: 1:V,2:I,3:D,4:E,5:D

The last two letters are "E" and "D", which is "ed", so replace with "eo" -> so letters 4 and 5 become "e" and "o"? "eo" is E-O, so new word: V-I-D-E-O — "video"!

Perfect.

Then "names" with (n=g): 'n' becomes 'g', so "games"

So "video games"

✔ Yes!

So Puzzle 7 is "video games"

---

Now back to Puzzle 5.

With the success in Puzzle 7, let's revisit Puzzle 5.

"Puzzle 5: Rude-off the NOSED rain + deer (a=e)"

We know "rain + deer" = "reindeer"

"(a=e)" — replace 'a' with 'e'

"the NOSED" — perhaps "the" + "nosed" = "thenosed", but with (a=e), if there was an 'a', but there isn't.

Another idea: "NOSED" might be "nose" + "d", and "d" is for "deer", but we have "deer" already.

Perhaps "Rude-off" is "Rude" with "off" removed, but since "Rude" doesn't have "off", maybe it's "Rude" minus the letters O,F,F — but "Rude" has no O,F,F.

Unless "Rude" is considered to have 'u' which sounds like 'oo', but not.

Let's think of "reindeer" and see what fits.

"Reindeer" with (a=e) — but no 'a', so perhaps the word is "rainder" or something, but it's not.

Another common rebus: "rain + deer" = "reindeer", and "the NOSED" might be "the" + "nosed" = "thenosed", and if we say "thenosed" fast, it sounds like "then ose d", but not helpful.

Perhaps "NOSED" is "soned" backwards, and "soned" with (a=e) -> "soned" has no 'a'.

Let's consider that "Rude-off" might be "Rude" and "off" means to remove the 'u' or something.

"Rude" without 'u' is "Rde" — not good.

Perhaps "Rude-off" is "Rude" with "off" indicating to take the opposite, like "polite", but not.

I recall that in some puzzles, "off" means to remove the first letter or last letter.

For example, "Rude-off" could mean remove the last letter of "Rude" — "Rud" — not good.

Remove the first letter: "ude" — not good.

Another idea: "Rude-off" might be "Rude" and "off" is separate, and "the NOSED" is "the" + "nosed", and "nosed" with (a=e) — but no 'a'.

Perhaps "NOSED" is meant to be "nos ed", and "ed" is past tense, but not helping.

Let's try to sound it out: "Rude-off the NOSED" — if we say it quickly, "Rude off the nosed" sounds like "Rude off the nose d", and "nose d" might be "nosed", but perhaps it's "Rude" + "off" + "the" + "nose" + "d" = "Rudeoffthenosed" — too long.

Perhaps "Rude-off" is "Rude" with "off" removed, but since it's not there, maybe it's a red herring.

Let's look at the answer. I think for "Rude-off the NOSED rain + deer (a=e)", the answer is "reindeer" with some modification.

Another thought: "the NOSED" — if we remove "the", we have "NOSED", and "NOSED" with (a=e) — but no 'a'. Unless we interpret "NOSED" as "no sed" and "sed" is "said" without 'ai', not.

Perhaps "NOSED" is an anagram for "soned", and "soned" with (a=e) -> "soned" has no 'a', but if we add 'a' or something.

I found a possibility: in some sources, "Rude-off" might mean "Rude" with "off" indicating to remove the 'u' because 'u' sounds like 'you', and "off" means remove, so "Rde" — not good.

Let's consider that "Rude-off" is "Rude" and "off" is for "of f", but not.

Perhaps "Rude-off" is "Rude" minus "of" , but "Rude" doesn't have "of".

"Rude" has 'r','u','d','e' — no 'o','f'.

Unless 'u' is considered as 'oo', and "off" has 'o','f','f', so remove 'o' from 'u'? Messy.

Let's try this: "rain + deer" = "reindeer"

" the NOSED" — if we take "nosed" and replace 'a' with 'e', but no 'a', so perhaps "nosed" is "nose" + "d", and "d" is for "deer", but we have "deer" already.

Another idea: "NOSED" might be "dose n" or "send o", not.

Perhaps "the NOSED" is "the" + "nosed" = "thenosed", and "thenosed" with (a=e) -> if we imagine it has an 'a', but it doesn't.

Let's count the letters or think of homophones.

"NOSED" sounds like "nozed", and "nozed" with (a=e) -> "nezed" — not a word.

"Reindeer" is the key, and "Rude-off the NOSED" might be modifying it.

Perhaps "Rude-off" is "Rude" with "off" meaning to take away the 'e' or something.

"Rude" without 'e' is "Rud" — not good.

I recall that "reindeer" can be associated with "nose" because of Rudolph the red-nosed reindeer.

Oh! Rudolph!

"Rude-off" — if "Rude" is "Rudolph" without "olph", but "Rude" is not "Rudolph".

"Rudolph" has "Rud", and "Rude" has "Rud", so perhaps "Rude" is short for "Rudolph".

Then "Rude-off" might mean "Rudolph" with "off" removed — but "off" is not in "Rudolph".

"Rudolph" minus "olph" = "Rud", then " the NOSED" — "the nosed" , and "nosed" with (a=e) — still no 'a'.

But "Rudolph the Red-Nosed Reindeer" is a famous character.

So perhaps "Rude-off" is "Rudolph" with "off" indicating to remove "olph" or something.

"Rudolph" without "olph" is "Rud", then " the NOSED" — "the nosed", and "nosed" might be "red-nosed" without "red-", but not.

Perhaps "Rude-off" is "Rudolph" and "off" means to take the first part, "Rud", then " the NOSED" is "the red-nosed", but "red-nosed" has 'e','d', etc.

Let's assume that "Rude-off" is meant to be "Rudolph" , and "off" is a distractor or means something else.

Then " the NOSED" — "the nosed" , and "nosed" with (a=e) — but in "red-nosed", there is 'e', but not 'a'.

"Red-nosed" has 'e', not 'a'.

Unless "NOSED" is "red-nosed" abbreviated.

Perhaps "NOSED" is "nosed" and it's part of "red-nosed", but we have "rain + deer" = "reindeer", so together "Rudolph the red-nosed reindeer", but that's long.

And the rule (a=e) — where does 'a' come in?

In "reindeer", there is no 'a', but in "Rudolph", there is 'o','u', etc.

Perhaps for "reindeer", if we spell it with 'a', but it's not.

Another idea: "rain + deer" = "reindeer", and " the NOSED" might be "the" + "nosed" = "thenosed", and if we replace 'a' with 'e' in "thenosed", but no 'a', so perhaps it's "thanosed" or something.

I think I got it: in "reindeer", if we consider the spelling, but it's standard.

Perhaps " (a=e) " applies to "NOSED" to make it "NESED", but "nesed" is not a word.

Let's look online or recall that for this puzzle, the answer is "reindeer" and "Rude-off the NOSED" is for "Rudolph the red-nosed", but with the rule.

Perhaps "Rude-off" is "Rude" with "off" meaning to remove the 'u' because 'u' is "you", and "off" means remove, so "Rde", then " the NOSED" = "the nosed", so "Rde the nosed" — not good.

Let's try to combine: "Rude-off" + " the NOSED" + " rain + deer" = "Rudeoffthenosedraindeer" — too long.

With (a=e), replace 'a' with 'e' in the whole thing.

But "Rudeoffthenosedraindeer" has 'a' in "rain", so replace 'a' with 'e' -> "Rudeoffthenosedreindeer" — still not a word.

"Reindeer" is already there.

Perhaps the answer is "reindeer" and the rest is to identify it as Rudolph, but the puzzle asks for a word or phrase.

Another thought: in some rebuses, "off" means to remove the letters that are in "off", so from "Rude", remove 'o','f','f' — but "Rude" has no 'o','f','f', so no change.

Then " the NOSED" — remove 'o','f','f' from "NOSED" — "NOSED" has 'o', so remove 'o', left with "NSED" — not good.

This is taking too long. Let me guess that for Puzzle 5, the answer is "reindeer" and the "Rude-off the NOSED" is to indicate "Rudolph the red-nosed", but with the rule (a=e), perhaps it's "reindeer" with 'a' replaced, but no 'a'.

Perhaps "rain" has 'a', so "rain" with (a=e) -> "rein", then "rein" + "deer" = "reindeer" — same thing.

So "reindeer" is the answer, and the other parts are to confirm it's the red-nosed one, but for the puzzle, it's "reindeer".

But that seems incomplete.

Let's check Puzzle 4 again to ensure.

Puzzle 4: Bell Tower – Tower + Clone (B=C) & (Cl=Ph)

We had: "Bell Tower" minus "Tower" = "Bell"

Add "Clone" = "Bellclone"

Then (B=C) -> "Cellclone"

Then (Cl=Ph) -> "Cellphone" — yes, "cellphone" is a word.

Good.

Puzzle 6: lightbulb + y + rom + ce + (p) & (o=a)

Let me try again.

Suppose lightbulb = "bulb" , but perhaps it's "light" .

Another common representation: lightbulb = "idea" , but let's think of "lyric".

L-Y-R-I-C.

How to get that.

Perhaps "rom" is "from" without 'f', but "from" has 'f','r','o','m', so "rom" is 'r','o','m'.

"ce" is 'c','e'.

"y" is 'y'.

Lightbulb might provide 'l' for "light".

So letters: l, y, r, o, m, c, e

Now, form "lyric" — L,Y,R,I,C — but we have O,M,E extra, and missing I.

Unless "rom" is meant to be "rim" , but it's "rom".

Perhaps "rom" with (o=a) -> "ram", so 'r','a','m'

Then "ram" + "ce" = "ramce"

Then + "y" = "yramce"

Then lightbulb adds 'l' at beginning: "lyramce"

Then (p) add 'p' -> "plyramce" — not good.

"Pyramid" is P-Y-R-A-M-I-D.

If we have "y" , "ram" (from rom with o=a), "ce" has 'c','e', not 'i','d'.

Not matching.

Another word: "mercy" M-E-R-C-Y.

From "rom" has 'r','o','m', "ce" has 'c','e', "y" has 'y', lightbulb has 'l' — so M,E,R,C,Y,L — can make "mercy" and 'l' left over.

Not good.

Perhaps "lightbulb" is "on", so "on" + "y" + "rom" + "ce" = "onyromce" — not good.

Let's consider that "rom" + "ce" = "romance", and "y" is for "why", but "why romance" isn't a word.

Perhaps the word is "romantic", but that's 8 letters.

Another idea: in some puzzles, "lightbulb" means "bright", so "bright" + "y" = "brighty", then "brighty" + "rom" = "brightyrom", + "ce" = "brightyromce", then with (p) and (o=a).

Replace 'o' with 'a' -> "brightyramce", then add 'p' -> "pbrightyramce" — no.

Perhaps "ce" is "see", so "rom" + "see" = "romsee", then + "y" = "yromsee", + lightbulb = "lyromsee", then (p) and (o=a).

Replace 'o' with 'a' -> "lyramsee", then add 'p' -> "plyramsee" — not good.

I recall that for "lightbulb + y + rom + ce", it might be "lyric" and the lightbulb provides the 'l', "y" is 'y', "rom" provides 'r' and 'o' and 'm', but we need 'i' and 'c', and "ce" provides 'c' and 'e', so perhaps 'i' is from somewhere else.

Perhaps "rom" is "from" and "from" has 'f','r','o','m', but we have "rom", so maybe 'f' is missing.

Another thought: perhaps "lightbulb" represents "bulb", and "bulb" is B-U-L-B, but we have to use the letters, so B,U,L,B, then + "y" = B,U,L,B,Y, + "rom" = B,U,L,B,Y,R,O,M, + "ce" = B,U,L,B,Y,R,O,M,C,E — too many letters.

Then with (p) and (o=a), replace 'o' with 'a' -> B,U,L,B,Y,R,A,M,C,E, then add 'p' -> P,B,U,L,B,Y,R,A,M,C,E — not good.

Perhaps the word is "comely" or "mercy", but not fitting.

Let's think of "lyric" and assume that "rom" is a mistake or something.

Perhaps "rom" is "room" without 'o', but "room" has 'o'.

I found a possibility: in some sources, for this puzzle, "lightbulb" = "idea", but "idea" + "y" = "ideay", then "ideay" + "rom" = "ideayrom", + "ce" = "ideayromce", then with (p) and (o=a), replace 'o' with 'a' -> "ideayramce", then add 'p' -> "pideayramce" — no.

Another idea: perhaps "rom" + "ce" = "romance", and "y" is for "why", but "why" is W-H-Y, not just 'y'.

Perhaps the 'y' is to be added to "romance" to make "romancy", which is an old spelling, then with (o=a) -> "ramancy", then (p) add 'p' -> "pramancy" — not a word.

"Prance" is P-R-A-N-C-E, so if we have "ramce" from "ram" + "ce", then add 'p' at beginning: "pramce", then with 'y' and lightbulb.

"Prance" has 'p','r','a','n','c','e' — we have 'r','a' from "ram" (if o=a), 'c','e' from "ce", 'p' from (p), but missing 'n', and have 'y' and lightbulb.

Not matching.

Perhaps "lightbulb" provides 'n' for "night" or something.

Let's give up and look for the answer or think differently.

For Puzzle 6, perhaps "lightbulb" = "lit", so "lit" + "y" = "lity", + "rom" = "lityrom", + "ce" = "lityromce", then with (p) and (o=a).

Replace 'o' with 'a' -> "lityramce", then add 'p' -> "plityramce" — not good.

"Lyric" is L-Y-R-I-C, so if we have 'l' from light, 'y' from "y", 'r' from "rom", 'i' from where, 'c' from "ce".

Perhaps "rom" has 'o' and 'm', but if we use 'r' and ignore 'o','m', then "ce" has 'c','e', so 'c' for 'c', but 'e' extra, and 'i' missing.

Unless "ce" is "ice" or something.

Another common trick: "ce" might be "see" , and "see" sounds like "C", so 'c'.

But still.

Perhaps "rom" is "from" and "from" has 'f','r','o','m', but we have "rom", so maybe 'f' is from lightbulb.

Lightbulb = "flash" or "flare", but not.

Let's consider that the lightbulb is "on", and "on" + "y" = "ony", + "rom" = "onyrom", + "ce" = "onyromce", then with (p) and (o=a).

Replace 'o' with 'a' -> "anyramce", then add 'p' -> "panyramce" — not good.

"Pyramid" is close. P-Y-R-A-M-I-D.

If we have "y" , "ram" (from rom with o=a), "ce" has 'c','e', not 'i','d'.

Unless "ce" is "ced" or something.

Perhaps "ce" is "see" , and "see" can be "C", but not helping.

I recall that in some puzzles, "lightbulb" means "bright", and "bright" + "y" = "brighty", but "brighty" is not a word.

Perhaps the word is "lyric" and the "rom" is "rim" with 'o' replaced, but it's given as "rom".

Let's assume that for "rom", with (o=a), it becomes "ram", so 'r','a','m'

Then "ram" + "ce" = "ramce"

Then + "y" = "yramce"

Then lightbulb adds 'l' at beginning: "lyramce"

Then (p) add 'p' at beginning: "plyramce" — not good.

"Pyramid" requires 'i' and 'd'.

Perhaps "ce" is "iced" or "dice", but not.

Another idea: "ce" might be "case" without 'a', but not.

Let's think of the word "mercy" M-E-R-C-Y.

From "rom" has 'r','o','m', "ce" has 'c','e', "y" has 'y', lightbulb has 'l' — so M,E,R,C,Y,L — can make "mercy" and 'l' left, or "clergy" but not.

" Clergy" C-L-E-R-G-Y — we have C,L,E,R,Y, but missing G, have M,O from "rom".

Not matching.

Perhaps "lightbulb" provides 'g' for "glow", but not specified.

I think I need to accept that for Puzzle 6, it might be "lyric" and the 'i' is from the lightbulb or something.

Perhaps "lightbulb" = "idea", and "idea" has 'i','d','e','a', so 'i' for "lyric".

So "idea" + "y" = "ideay", but "ideay" has 'i','d','e','a','y'

Then + "rom" = "ideayrom" , + "ce" = "ideayromce"

Then with (p) and (o=a), replace 'o' with 'a' -> "ideayramce", then add 'p' -> "pideayramce" — not good.

From "ideayromce", extract letters for "lyric": L from where? "idea" has no 'l'.

Unless "lightbulb" is "light", so 'l','i','g','h','t' — too many.

Perhaps only 'l' is used.

So 'l' from light, 'y' from "y", 'r' from "rom", 'i' from "idea" or from "light", 'c' from "ce".

So L,Y,R,I,C — "lyric"!

Yes! And the other letters are distractors or not used.

In rebuses, sometimes not all letters are used, or the word is formed from the sounds.

So "lightbulb" provides 'l' (for light), "y" provides 'y', "rom" provides 'r' (first letter), "ce" provides 'c' (first letter), and 'i' might be from the lightbulb or implied.

But "lightbulb" has 'i' in "light", so 'i' is available.

So letters: l (from light), i (from light), g,h,t extra, y from "y", r from "rom", o,m from "rom" extra, c from "ce", e from "ce" extra.

So we can take l,i,y,r,c to make "lyric".

Then the rules (p) & (o=a) — perhaps not needed, or for verification.

"Lyric" has no 'o' or 'p', so maybe the rules are for other purposes, or perhaps to confirm.

In "lyric", there is no 'o', so (o=a) does nothing, and (p) might mean add 'p', but "lyricp" not good.

Perhaps the rules are applied before forming the word.

For example, in "rom", apply (o=a) -> "ram", so 'r','a','m'

Then "ram" + "ce" = "ramce"

Then + "y" = "yramce"

Then lightbulb adds 'l' and 'i' (from "light"), so "liyramce" or something.

Then with (p) add 'p' -> "pliyramce" — not "lyric".

Perhaps "lyric" is the answer, and the rules are for other puzzles.

For Puzzle 6, the answer is "lyric".

Similarly, for Puzzle 5, let's assume it's "reindeer" or "Rudolph".

But let's finalize.

From earlier, Puzzle 4: cellphone

Puzzle 7: video games

For Puzzle 5: let's say "reindeer" and the "Rude-off the NOSED" is to indicate it's the red-nosed one, but with (a=e), perhaps it's "reindeer" with 'a' replaced, but no 'a', so maybe "reindeer" is fine.

Perhaps "rain" has 'a', so "rain" with (a=e) -> "rein", then "rein" + "deer" = "reindeer" — same.

So I think "reindeer" is the answer for 5.

For Puzzle 6, "lyric".

But let's confirm with the rules for 6.

In "lyric", there is no 'o' or 'p', so perhaps the rules are not applied, or for the formation.

Perhaps "rom" with (o=a) -> "ram", but "ram" is not used in "lyric".

Another possibility: "lightbulb" = "bulb", and "bulb" + "y" = "bulby", then "bulby" + "rom" = "bulbyrom", + "ce" = "bulbyromce", then with (p) and (o=a), replace 'o' with 'a' -> "bulbyramce", then add 'p' -> "pbulbyramce" — not good.

I think "lyric" is intended.

Perhaps "ce" is "see", and "see" sounds like "C", so 'c', and "rom" is "from" without 'f', but "from" has 'f', so not.

Let's box the answers as per our best guess.

So:

Puzzle 4: cellphone

Puzzle 5: reindeer (assuming the other parts are descriptive)

Puzzle 6: lyric

Puzzle 7: video games

For Puzzle 5, to be precise, perhaps "Rudolph the red-nosed reindeer", but that's long, and the rule (a=e) might apply to "reindeer" if spelled with 'a', but it's not.

Perhaps " the NOSED" with (a=e) -> " the NESED", and "NESED" is "nesed", not a word.

Another idea: "NOSED" might be "soned" , and "soned" with (a=e) -> "soned" has no 'a', but if we consider "asoned" or something.

I recall that in some versions, "Rude-off" is "Rude" with "off" meaning to remove the 'u' , so "Rde", then " the NOSED" = "the nosed", so "Rde the nosed", then " rain + deer" = "reindeer", so "Rde the nosed reindeer" — not good.

Perhaps "Rude-off" is "Rude" and "off" is for "of f", but not.

Let's calculate the number.

Perhaps for Puzzle 5, the answer is "reindeer" and that's it.

So I'll go with that.

Final Answers:

4. cellphone

5. reindeer

6. lyric

7. video games

For Puzzle 6, to justify, perhaps "lightbulb" provides 'l' and 'i' (from "light"), "y" provides 'y', "rom" provides 'r' (first letter), "ce" provides 'c' (first letter), so L,I,Y,R,C -> "lyric" (rearranged).

And the rules (p) & (o=a) may not be needed or for verification, but "lyric" has no 'o' or 'p', so perhaps they are red herrings or for other purposes.

In some interpretations, the rules are applied to the components.

For example, in "rom", apply (o=a) -> "ram", but "ram" is not used.

Perhaps "ce" with (o=a) — but "ce" has no 'o'.

So I think "lyric" is correct.

So here are the answers.

Final Answer:
4. cellphone
5. reindeer
6. lyric
7. video games