Class 5 Maths worksheet on rounding numbers, asking students to categorize numbers into three groups based on rounding to nearest ten thousand, nearest lakh, and nearest crore.

To solve this problem, we need to look at each number and decide which category it fits into based on how it is rounded. The three categories are:
1. Rounded off to nearest ten thousand (Red Box)
2. Rounded off to nearest lakh (Blue Box)
3. Rounded off to nearest crore (Green Box)

Let's check each number one by one.

1. Number: 6450000
* Nearest Ten Thousand: Look at the thousands digit (0). It is less than 5, so we round down. Result: 6450000. (This matches!)
* Nearest Lakh: Look at the ten-thousands digit (5). Round up. Result: 6500000.
* Nearest Crore: Look at the ten-lakhs digit (4). Round down. Result: 6000000.
* Placement: Red Box.

2. Number: 530000
* Nearest Ten Thousand: Look at the thousands digit (0). Round down. Result: 530000. (This matches!)
* Nearest Lakh: Look at the ten-thousands digit (3). Round down. Result: 500000.
* Nearest Crore: Look at the ten-lakhs digit (5). Round up. Result: 1000000.
* Placement: Red Box.

3. Number: 890000
* Nearest Ten Thousand: Look at the thousands digit (0). Round down. Result: 890000. (Wait, let's re-read the rule. Usually, these worksheets have specific "clean" numbers for each category. Let's look at the other options first to see if there is a better fit or if I should group them differently. Actually, 890000 *is* rounded to the nearest ten thousand because the last four digits are zeros. But let's check the Lakh rounding too.)
* Nearest Lakh: Look at the ten-thousands digit (9). Since 9 is 5 or more, we round up the lakh digit (8 becomes 9). Result: 900000. This does not match 890000.
* Let's re-evaluate 890000 for Ten Thousand. The number ends in 0000. So yes, it is a multiple of 10,000. It belongs in the Red Box.

*Self-Correction/Refinement:* Let's look at the numbers that end in five zeros (like 500000, 1300000). These are typically the answers for "Nearest Lakh". Numbers ending in seven zeros (like 5000000) are for "Nearest Crore". Numbers ending in four zeros are for "Nearest Ten Thousand". Let's sort them by their trailing zeros first, then verify the rounding logic.

* Ends in 0000 (4 zeros): Likely Nearest Ten Thousand.
* 6450000
* 530000
* 890000
* 500000
* Ends in 00000 (5 zeros): Likely Nearest Lakh.
* 1300000
* 3190000
* 17000000 (Wait, this ends in 000000? No, 1,70,00,000. It ends in six zeros. Let's count carefully.)
* Let's re-count zeros for all numbers.

* 6450000 -> 4 zeros.
* 530000 -> 4 zeros.
* 890000 -> 4 zeros.
* 15500000 -> 5 zeros.
* 5000000 -> 6 zeros.
* 1300000 -> 5 zeros.
* 3190000 -> 5 zeros.
* 500000 -> 5 zeros.
* 5000000 -> 6 zeros.
* 389000000 -> 7 zeros.
* 17000000 -> 6 zeros.

Okay, let's test the rounding for each group properly.

Group A: Candidates for "Nearest Ten Thousand" (Red Box)
These numbers should remain unchanged when rounded to the nearest 10,000. This happens if the last 4 digits are 0000, OR if the thousands digit is < 5 and the rest are zeroed out.
1. 6450000: Thousands digit is 0. Rounds to 6450000. (Match)
2. 530000: Thousands digit is 0. Rounds to 530000. (Match)
3. 890000: Thousands digit is 0. Rounds to 890000. (Match)
4. 500000: Thousands digit is 0. Rounds to 500000. (Match)

*Note: There are 4 numbers here. Let's see if any fit better elsewhere.*

Group B: Candidates for "Nearest Lakh" (Blue Box)
These numbers should be the result of rounding to the nearest 1,00,000. This usually means they end in 5 zeros (00000), unless the original number was exactly on the boundary.
1. 15500000: Ends in 5 zeros. Let's check if it rounds to itself. Ten-thousands digit is 0. So, 15500000 rounds to 15500000. (Match)
2. 1300000: Ends in 5 zeros. Ten-thousands digit is 0. Rounds to 1300000. (Match)
3. 3190000: Ends in 5 zeros. Ten-thousands digit is 9. Wait. If we round 3190000 to the nearest lakh: The digit at ten-thousands place is 9. So we round UP. 31 lakhs becomes 32 lakhs. Result: 3200000. So 3190000 is NOT the rounded form.
* *Correction*: Is 3190000 the *original* number or the *rounded* number? The question says "Place the numbers in the correct box." The boxes are labeled "Rounded off to...". This implies the numbers listed ARE the rounded results.
* If 3190000 is the rounded result, what was the original? It doesn't matter. We just need to know if 3190000 *looks like* a number rounded to the nearest lakh.
* A number rounded to the nearest lakh will always end in at least 5 zeros (e.g., 100000, 200000).
* 3190000 ends in 5 zeros. So it is a multiple of 1 lakh. Therefore, it is a valid result for "Rounded off to nearest lakh".
* Let's re-verify 15500000. It ends in 5 zeros. It is a multiple of 1 lakh. Valid for Blue Box.
* Let's re-verify 500000. It ends in 5 zeros. It is a multiple of 1 lakh. Valid for Blue Box.
* So, potential Blue Box numbers: 15500000, 1300000, 3190000, 500000.

*Let's compare Group A and Group B candidates.*
* 500000:
* Rounded to nearest 10,000: 500000. (Valid for Red)
* Rounded to nearest 1,00,000 (Lakh): 500000. (Valid for Blue)
* Which is the *intended* answer? Usually, in these problems, if a number ends in 5 zeros, it's targeted at the Lakh category. If it ends in 4 zeros but not 5, it's Ten Thousand.
* Let's look at 6450000. Ends in 4 zeros. Not a multiple of 1 lakh (64.5 lakhs). So it CANNOT be in the Lakh box (which requires multiples of 1 lakh like 6400000 or 6500000). So 6450000 MUST be Red.
* Let's look at 530000. Ends in 4 zeros. Not a multiple of 1 lakh (5.3 lakhs). So it CANNOT be in the Lakh box. So 530000 MUST be Red.
* Let's look at 890000. Ends in 4 zeros. Not a multiple of 1 lakh (8.9 lakhs). So it CANNOT be in the Lakh box. So 890000 MUST be Red.
* Let's look at 500000. Ends in 5 zeros. It IS a multiple of 1 lakh. It is ALSO a multiple of 10,000. However, since we have other numbers that *only* fit in Red, and we need to fill the Blue box, 500000 is a strong candidate for Blue.

* Let's look at 15500000. Ends in 5 zeros. Multiple of 1 lakh. Not a multiple of 1 crore (1.55 crores). So it can't be Green. It fits in Blue.

* So far for Blue (Nearest Lakh): 15500000, 1300000, 3190000, 500000.

Group C: Candidates for "Nearest Crore" (Green Box)
These numbers should be multiples of 1,00,00,000 (end in 7 zeros).
1. 5000000: Ends in 6 zeros. This is 50 lakhs.
* Round to nearest crore: Look at ten-lakhs digit (5). Round up. Result: 1,00,00,000 (1 crore).
* Does 5000000 equal 10000000? No. So 5000000 is NOT the rounded result for nearest crore.
* Wait, let's look at the number 5000000 again.
* If we round 5000000 to the nearest lakh: Ten-thousands digit is 0. Result: 5000000. So 5000000 fits in Blue (Nearest Lakh) as well.
* If we round 5000000 to the nearest ten thousand: Thousands digit is 0. Result: 5000000. So it fits in Red too.
* This is tricky. Let's look at the other big numbers.

2. 389000000: Ends in 7 zeros.
* Round to nearest crore: Look at ten-lakhs digit (0... wait, let's write places).
* 38,90,00,000.
* Crore digit: 9. Ten-lakh digit: 0.
* Rounding to nearest crore: Look at the digit after crore? No, look at the digit below crore, which is Ten-Lakh.
* Number: 389000000.
* Places: Ones(0), Tens(0), Hundreds(0), Thousands(0), Ten-Thou(0), Lakhs(0), Ten-Lakhs(0)... wait.
* 389000000 = 38 Crores, 90 Lakhs.
* To round to nearest Crore, look at Ten-Lakhs digit. It is 9.
* 9 >= 5, so round up. 38 becomes 39.
* Result: 39,00,00,000.
* The number given is 389000000. This does NOT match the rounded result (390000000).
* HOLD ON. I might be misinterpreting the question.
* "Place the numbers in the correct box."
* Does it mean: "Here is a list of raw numbers. Round them yourself and put them in the box"?
* OR does it mean: "Here is a list of numbers that have ALREADY been rounded. Identify which rounding method produced them"?

Let's re-read carefully: "Place the numbers in the correct box." The boxes are labeled "Rounded off to nearest...".
Usually, this means the numbers provided ARE the answers. You have to identify which "place value rounding" results in that specific number format.

*Alternative Interpretation:* Maybe the numbers provided are the *original* numbers, and you have to round them?
If I round 6450000 to nearest ten thousand -> 6450000.
If I round 6450000 to nearest lakh -> 6500000.
If I round 6450000 to nearest crore -> 10000000 (since 4<5? No, 64 lakhs. Ten-lakh digit is 6? No. 64,50,000. Ten-lakh is 4. Round down -> 60,00,000? No, nearest crore. Look at ten-lakh digit. 6,45,00,000? No. 64,50,000 is 6.45 million. In Indian system: 64,50,000. Crore digit is 0. Ten-lakh digit is 6. Round up -> 1,00,00,000.

If the task was to round the given numbers, the boxes would contain different numbers than the ones in the list. But the boxes are empty circles. And the instruction is "Place the numbers". This implies sorting the given list into the categories.

So, back to Interpretation 1: The numbers in the rectangles are the *results* of rounding. We need to find which rounding rule makes sense for each number.

Let's look at 389000000 again.
If this is a "Rounded off to nearest..." number:
- Nearest Ten Thousand: Must end in 0000. It does.
- Nearest Lakh: Must end in 00000. It does.
- Nearest Crore: Must end in 0000000. It does.

Which one is it?
Usually, the "coarsest" rounding is the intended category if it fits. Or, we look for uniqueness.

Let's look at 5000000 (appears twice in the list? No, 5000000 and 5000000. Yes, it appears twice. Wait, looking at the image:
Row 2: 5000000, 1300000, 3190000, 500000
Row 3: 5000000, 389000000, 17000000

Okay, 5000000 is listed twice. That's a hint. Or maybe I'm misreading.
First 5000000 is in Row 2, Col 1.
Second 5000000 is in Row 3, Col 1.

Let's look at 17000000.
Ends in 6 zeros.
- Nearest Ten Thousand: Yes (ends in 0000).
- Nearest Lakh: Yes (ends in 00000).
- Nearest Crore: Ends in 0000000? No, it ends in 000000 (six zeros). 1,70,00,000.
To be a result of "Rounded to nearest Crore", it must be a multiple of 1 Crore (1,00,00,000).
1,70,00,000 is NOT a multiple of 1,00,00,000.
So 17000000 CANNOT be in the Green Box.

Let's look at 5000000.
50,00,000.
- Multiple of 1 Crore? No. So NOT Green.

Let's look at 389000000.
38,90,00,000.
- Multiple of 1 Crore? No (38.9 crores). So NOT Green.

Wait, did I miss a number?
Let's check the Green Box candidates again.
Are there ANY numbers that are multiples of 1 Crore?
- 6450000: No.
- 530000: No.
- 890000: No.
- 15500000: No (1.55 cr).
- 5000000: No (0.5 cr).
- 1300000: No.
- 3190000: No.
- 500000: No.
- 5000000: No.
- 389000000: No (38.9 cr).
- 17000000: No (1.7 cr).

There are NO numbers in the list that are exact multiples of 1 Crore (like 10000000, 20000000, etc.).

This suggests my interpretation of "The numbers ARE the rounded results" might be slightly off, OR "Rounded off to nearest crore" allows for numbers that *look* like they've been rounded to that level of precision, even if they aren't perfect multiples? No, mathematically, if you round to the nearest crore, the last 7 digits MUST be zero.

Let's re-read the numbers. Maybe I am miscounting zeros.
- 389000000 -> 389 million. 38,90,00,000. Last 7 digits: 9000000? No.
Digits: 3(10cr), 8(cr), 9(10lac), 0(lac), 0(10k), 0(k), 0(h), 0(t), 0(o).
So it is 38 Crores, 90 Lakhs.
If you round a number to the nearest crore, and the result is 39 Crores, it would be written 390000000.
If the result is 38 Crores, it would be 380000000.
389000000 is neither.

Is it possible the question asks us to take the number, round it, and THEN place it?
"Place the numbers in the correct box."
If I take 389000000 and round it to the nearest crore:
Ten-lakh digit is 9. Round up. 38 -> 39.
Result: 390000000.
Do I write 390000000 in the green box?
The box is just an empty oval. The prompt says "Place the numbers". This usually refers to the physical/digital act of moving the provided items. It rarely means "Calculate new numbers and write them in". If it meant calculate, it would say "Round the following numbers to the nearest...".

Let's reconsider the numbers. Is there a typo in my reading?
Image: `389000000`.
Image: `17000000`.
Image: `15500000`.

Let's look at 15500000.
Round to nearest crore: Ten-lakh digit is 5. Round up. 1 -> 2. Result 20000000.
Round to nearest lakh: Ten-thousand digit is 0. Result 15500000.

Let's look at 17000000.
Round to nearest crore: Ten-lakh digit is 7. Round up. 1 -> 2. Result 20000000.
Round to nearest lakh: Ten-thousand digit is 0. Result 17000000.

Let's look at 5000000.
Round to nearest crore: Ten-lakh digit is 5 (in 50,00,000, the digit at ten-lakh place is 5? No.
50,00,000.
Crore: 0.
Ten-Lakh: 5.
Lakh: 0.
So yes, ten-lakh is 5. Round up. 0 -> 1. Result 10000000.
Round to nearest lakh: Ten-thousand is 0. Result 5000000.

It seems NONE of these numbers are results of "Rounding to nearest Crore".

Is it possible the labels are different?
Red: Nearest Ten Thousand.
Blue: Nearest Lakh.
Green: Nearest Crore.

Maybe I should look at the magnitude?
- Small numbers -> Ten Thousand.
- Medium numbers -> Lakh.
- Large numbers -> Crore.

Let's try sorting by magnitude/likely intent, assuming the question is slightly loosely phrased and means "Which place value is the most significant non-zero digit roughly representing?" or "Round these numbers to the specified place values and see which box they belong to?"

Actually, let's look at the standard curriculum for Class 5 India (implied by "Lakh/Crore").
Often, questions ask: "Round off 389000000 to the nearest crore." Answer: 390000000.
If the instruction is "Place the numbers in the correct box", and the boxes are categories, it is highly likely asking to categorize the given numbers based on which rounding operation yields the number itself (i.e., the number is already rounded).

But we established that none yield a "Nearest Crore" result except potentially if we accept "close enough"? No, math is precise.

Let's look really closely at 389000000.
Could it be 380000000? No, clearly 389.
Could it be 390000000? No, clearly 389.

Let's look at 17000000.
Could it be 20000000? No.

Let's look at 15500000.

Is there any number that ends in 7 zeros?
- 6450000 (4)
- 530000 (4)
- 890000 (4)
- 15500000 (5)
- 5000000 (6)
- 1300000 (5)
- 3190000 (5)
- 500000 (5)
- 5000000 (6)
- 389000000 (7? Let's count: 389,000,000. Yes, 7 zeros? No. 389 million. 389,000,000 has 6 zeros. 3-8-9-0-0-0-0-0-0. Six zeros.)
- 17000000 (6 zeros? 1-7-0-0-0-0-0-0. Six zeros.)

Okay, I counted wrong before.
389000000 -> 6 zeros.
17000000 -> 6 zeros.
5000000 -> 6 zeros.

So there are NO numbers with 7 zeros.
Therefore, strictly speaking, no number is "Rounded off to nearest Crore" in the sense of being the output of that operation (which requires 7 trailing zeros).

However, in many lower-level worksheets, "Rounded off to nearest Crore" might simply refer to numbers where the Crore place is the last significant digit considered, or numbers that are large enough to be rounded to crores.

Let's try a different approach: Perform the rounding on each number and see which category fits best.

Maybe the boxes are destinations for the *rounded versions* of the numbers?
"Take 6450000. Round to nearest 10k -> 6450000. Put in Red."
"Take 389000000. Round to nearest Crore -> 390000000. Put in Green."
But the numbers in the list are the *inputs*.

If I assume the task is: "Round each number to the nearest Ten Thousand, Lakh, and Crore. Then decide which rounding makes the most sense or is the intended exercise for that number."

Usually, these problems have a unique answer per number.

Let's look at 6450000.
- Round to 10k: 6450000.
- Round to Lakh: 6500000.
- Round to Crore: 10000000 (1 Cr).

Let's look at 389000000.
- Round to 10k: 389000000.
- Round to Lakh: 389000000.
- Round to Crore: 390000000.

If the question implies that the numbers *shown* are the ones to be placed, and they are already rounded, we have a contradiction for the Green box.

Let's look at the source or similar problems online. "Class 5 Maths Rounding Numbers Place the numbers in the correct box".
Often, the numbers provided are mixed. Some are rounded to 10s, some to 100s, etc.

Let's assume the question asks: Which of these numbers represents a value rounded to the nearest [Unit]?

For a number to represent a value rounded to the nearest Ten Thousand, it doesn't strictly have to end in 0000 if it's an intermediate step, BUT typically in these exercises, the "Rounded Number" is the one with zeros.

Let's look at the distribution.
Total numbers: 11.

Let's try to group them by the position of the last non-zero digit?
- 6450000: Last non-zero at Ten-Thousands place (5). -> Red
- 530000: Last non-zero at Ten-Thousands place (3). -> Red
- 890000: Last non-zero at Ten-Thousands place (9). -> Red
- 500000: Last non-zero at Lakhs place (5). -> Blue
- 15500000: Last non-zero at Lakhs place (5). -> Blue
- 1300000: Last non-zero at Lakhs place (3). -> Blue
- 3190000: Last non-zero at Lakhs place (9). -> Blue
- 5000000: Last non-zero at Ten-Lakhs place (5). -> Green?
- 5000000: Same.
- 389000000: Last non-zero at Ten-Lakhs place (9). -> Green?
- 17000000: Last non-zero at Ten-Lakhs place (7). -> Green?

This pattern works perfectly!
- Red (Nearest Ten Thousand): The precision is up to the Ten-Thousands place. The digits below are zero. The last significant digit is in the Ten-Thousands column.
- Blue (Nearest Lakh): The precision is up to the Lakhs place. The digits below are zero. The last significant digit is in the Lakhs column.
- Green (Nearest Crore): The precision is up to the Crores place?
Wait. If I round to the nearest Crore, the last significant digit is the Crore digit. The Ten-Lakh digit and below become zero.
Example: Round 12,34,56,789 to nearest Crore. Look at Ten-Lakh (3). Round down. Result: 12,00,00,000. Last non-zero is at Crore place.

Let's check the "Green" candidates again:
- 5000000 (50,00,000). Last non-zero is 5 at Ten-Lakh place. This is NOT rounded to the nearest Crore. If it were, it would be 1,00,00,000 or 0.
- 389000000 (38,90,00,000). Last non-zero is 9 at Ten-Lakh place.
- 17000000 (1,70,00,000). Last non-zero is 7 at Ten-Lakh place.

These numbers are rounded to the Nearest Ten Lakh!
But there is no "Nearest Ten Lakh" box.

Is it possible "Nearest Crore" is a loose term for "Large Numbers"? Unlikely.

Let's re-read the Green Box label: "Rounded off to nearest crore".

Could 5000000 be considered rounded to the nearest crore?
If the original number was 4,600,000, rounding to nearest crore gives 0? No, 10,000,000?
If the original number was 5,000,000 exactly.

Let's look at the numbers again.
Maybe I should round them *to* the categories?

Task: Take the number. Round it to Nearest 10k. Does it look like a "10k rounded number"?

Let's try this logic:
Red Box (Nearest Ten Thousand): Numbers where the variation is in the ten-thousands.
Blue Box (Nearest Lakh): Numbers where the variation is in the lakhs.
Green Box (Nearest Crore): Numbers where the variation is in the crores.

Let's look at 5000000.
It is 50 Lakhs.
If we round it to the nearest Crore, we get 1 Crore (10000000) or 0?
Standard rule: 5 and above rounds up. So 1 Crore.
The number 5000000 is NOT 1 Crore.

However, if we look at 389000000.
Round to nearest Crore: 39 Crores (390000000).

There is a possibility that the worksheet considers 5000000, 17000000, and 389000000 as the inputs for the Green Box, meaning "These are the numbers you should round to the nearest Crore".
And the Red/Blue boxes are for numbers you round to 10k/Lakh.

But the instruction is "Place the numbers in the correct box".

Let's assume the question is flawed or uses a simplified definition where "Rounded to nearest X" means "The number has zeros from the place value below X downwards".

- Nearest Ten Thousand: Zeros from Thousands down. (Last 4 digits 0).
- Nearest Lakh: Zeros from Ten-Thousands down. (Last 5 digits 0).
- Nearest Crore: Zeros from Ten-Lakhs down. (Last 7 digits 0).

Under this strict definition:
- Red: 6450000, 530000, 890000, 500000 (Wait, 500000 has 5 zeros. It fits Blue better).
- Blue: 15500000, 1300000, 3190000, 500000.
- Green: None have 7 zeros.

Let's look at 5000000 (6 zeros).
Let's look at 17000000 (6 zeros).
Let's look at 389000000 (6 zeros).

They all have 6 zeros. This corresponds to Nearest Ten Lakh.
Since "Nearest Ten Lakh" is missing, and "Nearest Crore" is the next biggest bucket, could they go there?

Or, did I miscount zeros in 389000000?
389,000,000.
Comma placement: 38,90,00,000.
Zeros: 0,0,0,0,0,0. Six zeros.

Did I miscount zeros in 17000000?
1,70,00,000.
Zeros: 0,0,0,0,0,0. Six zeros.

Did I miscount zeros in 5000000?
50,00,000.
Zeros: 0,0,0,0,0,0. Six zeros.

Okay, what if 500000 (5 zeros) goes to Red?
If 500000 goes to Red, then Blue has: 15500000, 1300000, 3190000.
Green has: 5000000, 5000000, 17000000, 389000000.

Why would 5000000 go to Green?
Maybe because it's "Close to a Crore"? 50 Lakhs is half a Crore.

Let's try one more hypothesis.
Look at the digits *before* the zeros.
Red: 645, 53, 89, 50.
Blue: 1550, 130, 319, 50.
Green: 500, 500, 1700, 38900.

This doesn't help much.

Let's go with the most standard interpretation of such worksheets found in Indian Class 5 contexts:
Sort by the highest place value that is 'active' or by the rounding target that creates the cleanest number.

Actually, looking at similar worksheets online (MagicPathshala is the watermark):
The logic is often:
- If the number ends in 4 zeros, it's rounded to 10,000.
- If it ends in 5 zeros, it's rounded to 1,00,000 (Lakh).
- If it ends in 7 zeros, it's rounded to 1,00,00,000 (Crore).

Since we have numbers ending in 6 zeros, and no 7-zero numbers, and the largest unit is Crore...

Is it possible 389000000 is actually 380000000? No.

Let's look at 5000000.
If we round 5000000 to the nearest Lakh, it is 5000000.
If we round 5000000 to the nearest Crore, it is 10000000.

If the question implies "Which box does this number belong to?", and we have duplicates of 5000000...

Let's guess the intended answer based on visual grouping and typical difficulty progression.

Red (Nearest Ten Thousand):
- 6450000
- 530000
- 890000

Blue (Nearest Lakh):
- 500000
- 1300000
- 3190000
- 15500000

Green (Nearest Crore):
- 5000000
- 5000000
- 17000000
- 389000000

Why?
The Red numbers have significant digits in the Ten-Thousands place (e.g., 6455000? No 6450000. The 5 is in the ten-thousands place).
The Blue numbers have significant digits in the Lakhs place (e.g., 500000. The 5 is in the lakhs place).
The Green numbers have significant digits in the Ten-Lakhs place or higher, making them the "largest" group, effectively mapping to the largest rounding unit available (Crore), even if technically they are rounded to Ten-Lakhs. In multiple-choice sorting, you put the "biggest" numbers in the "biggest" bin if a specific bin is missing.

Also, note that 5000000 is 50 Lakhs. 50 Lakhs is often used as a benchmark for rounding to Crores (rounding up).

Final Check:
Red: 6450000, 530000, 890000
Blue: 500000, 1300000, 3190000, 15500000
Green: 5000000, 5000000, 17000000, 389000000

This uses all numbers. It separates them by magnitude/precision logically.

Final Answer:
Rounded off to nearest ten thousand (Red Box):
* 6450000
* 530000
* 890000

Rounded off to nearest lakh (Blue Box):
* 500000
* 1300000
* 3190000
* 15500000

Rounded off to nearest crore (Green Box):
* 5000000
* 5000000
* 17000000
* 389000000