Geometry worksheet focusing on triangle congruence using SSS, SAS, and ASA criteria.

Let’s go through each problem one by one. We’re checking if the two triangles in each diagram are congruent using SSS, SAS, ASA, AAS, or HL. If not enough info is given, we write “None”.

---

Problem 1:
We see two triangles sharing a vertex (like an X shape). There are tick marks on two sides of each triangle — meaning those sides are equal. Also, the angles where they cross are vertical angles → so they’re equal.

That gives us: Side-Angle-Side? Wait — let’s check order.

Actually, we have:
- One side marked equal (tick mark)
- Vertical angle between them → equal
- Another side marked equal (another tick mark)

So yes — SAS works here. The angle is *between* the two sides.

✔ Answer: SAS

---

Problem 2:
Two right triangles sharing a common side (the altitude from top to base). Both have right angles (marked with squares), and the shared side is common. Also, the two bottom segments are marked equal (same number of ticks).

So:
- Right angle (90°) → same for both
- Shared leg (altitude) → same length
- Base halves are equal → other legs equal

This is HL? Wait — HL is for hypotenuse-leg in right triangles. But here, we know two legs are equal → that’s actually SAS again (right angle between the two legs).

But also — since it’s a right triangle, and we know two legs → that’s sufficient for congruence via SAS, or even LL (which isn’t standard, but SAS covers it).

Wait — actually, looking at the diagram: the two small triangles share the height, and their bases are equal, and both have right angles → so yes, SAS.

Alternatively, if you consider the hypotenuses — but we don’t know if they’re equal yet. So better stick with what’s given.

Actually — another way: we have two sides and included angle (the right angle) → definitely SAS.

✔ Answer: SAS

*(Note: Some might say HL if they assume hypotenuses are equal, but we aren’t told that — only legs and right angle. So SAS is correct.)*

---

Problem 3:
Two separate triangles. Each has:
- One side with double tick marks → equal
- One angle marked with arc → equal
- Another side with single tick mark → equal

BUT — is the angle *between* the two sides? Let’s look.

In left triangle: angle is between the single-tick side and the double-tick side? Actually, no — the angle is adjacent to the double-tick side, but not between the two marked sides.

Wait — let’s label mentally:

Left triangle: side AB (single tick), angle at B, side BC (double tick) → angle is between them? Yes! If the angle is at the vertex connecting the two marked sides, then it’s SAS.

Looking at diagram: yes — the angle is between the two sides that have tick marks.

Same for right triangle.

So → SAS

✔ Answer: SAS

---

Problem 4:
Parallelogram split by diagonal. Two triangles formed.

In parallelogram:
- Opposite sides equal → so two pairs of sides equal
- Diagonal is common → third side equal

So all three sides equal → SSS

Also, could use SAS — because opposite angles equal, etc. But SSS is direct.

✔ Answer: SSS

---

Problem 5:
Two right triangles. One has legs marked: one with single tick, one with double tick. Other triangle has same: single and double tick on legs.

Right angle is between them → so SAS

Even though oriented differently, the correspondence holds.

✔ Answer: SAS

---

Problem 6:
Isosceles triangle split down middle. Two right triangles.

Given:
- Right angles (from perpendicular bisector)
- Common side (height)
- Base halves equal (since it’s bisected)

Again — two legs and included right angle → SAS

Or, since it’s right triangle, and we know two legs → still SAS.

Could also be HL if we knew hypotenuses, but we don’t need to — SAS suffices.

✔ Answer: SAS

---

Problem 7:
Two triangles sitting on a line. Each has:
- One angle marked (arc) → equal
- One side marked (tick) → equal
- Another angle marked (different arc?) → wait, are the angles corresponding?

Actually, looking: each triangle has two angles marked — and the side between them is marked.

So: Angle-Side-Angle → ASA

Yes — the side is between the two angles.

✔ Answer: ASA

---

Problem 8:
Two triangles. One large, one smaller inside? Or overlapping?

Marks:
- One side with double tick → equal in both?
- One angle marked → equal
- Another side with single tick → equal

Check position: Is the angle between the two sides?

In left triangle: angle is at end of single-tick side, and double-tick side is opposite? Not between.

Actually — looks like SSA situation — which is NOT valid for congruence.

Wait — let’s see:

Triangle 1: side A (single tick), angle at one end, side B (double tick) — but angle is not between them.

Similarly for triangle 2.

So this is SSA — which does NOT guarantee congruence.

Unless it’s a right triangle — but no right angle marked.

So → None

✔ Answer: None

---

Problem 9:
Two triangles. Marks:
- One angle marked (arc) → equal
- One side marked (tick) → equal
- Another angle marked (same arc style?) → probably equal

And the side is *not* between the angles — it’s adjacent to one.

So: Angle-Angle-Side → AAS

Yes — if two angles and a non-included side are equal, triangles are congruent.

✔ Answer: AAS

---

Now Problems 10–12: Use given info to mark picture and decide shortcut. Could be more than one.

---

Problem 10:
Given: ∠A ∠D, AB ≅ CD

Diagram: quadrilateral with diagonal AC? Wait — points labeled A,B,C,D — looks like triangle ABC and triangle CDA? Or ABD and CBD?

Actually, diagram shows two triangles sharing side BD? Wait — labels: A-B-C-D, with diagonals? Hmm.

Wait — given: ∠A ≅ ∠D, AB ≅ CD

Assuming triangles are △ABD and △CDB? Or △ABC and △DCB?

Looking at typical setup: probably △ABD and △CDB, with BD common.

But given AB ≅ CD, ∠A ≅ ∠D.

If we assume the triangles are △ABD and △CDB, then:

- AB ≅ CD (given)
- ∠A ∠D (given)
- BD ≅ DB (common side)

But is the angle between the sides? In △ABD: angle at A is between AB and AD. In △CDB: angle at D is between CD and DB.

Not matching directly.

Wait — perhaps the triangles are △ABC and △DCB? Not clear.

Alternative interpretation: maybe it's △ABD and △DCA? This is messy.

Wait — let’s think differently. Given AB ≅ CD and ∠A ≅ ∠D. If we can find another pair...

Perhaps the diagram shows two triangles sharing a side, and we have two sides and non-included angle? That would be SSA — invalid.

But maybe there’s a common side.

Actually, re-examining: likely the two triangles are △ABD and △CDB, with BD common.

Then:

- AB ≅ CD (given)
- BD ≅ DB (reflexive)
- ∠A ≅ ∠D (given)

But ∠A is in △ABD, ∠D is in △CDB — and they are not corresponding unless we map A→D, B→C, D→B.

Then side AB corresponds to DC, angle at A corresponds to angle at D, and side BD corresponds to DB.

But the angle is not between the two sides — in △ABD, angle at A is between AB and AD, not AB and BD.

So again — SSA → not valid.

Unless... is there a right angle? No.

So probably None — but wait, maybe I’m misreading.

Another possibility: if the figure is a parallelogram or something, but not stated.

Given only two pieces: one angle, one side — not enough for any postulate.

Wait — but there might be a common side implied.

Actually, in many such diagrams, when two triangles share a side, it’s considered.

But even then: AB ≅ CD, ∠A ≅ ∠D, and say AD ≅ CB? Not given.

I think without more info, we can't prove congruence.

But let’s suppose the triangles are △ABD and △CDB, and we have:

- AB = CD
- ∠BAD = ∠CDB
- BD = DB

This is SSA — which is ambiguous.

So → None

But wait — perhaps the angle is included? Unlikely.

Maybe the diagram shows that AD and BC are parallel or something — but not stated.

I think safest is None

But let me double-check standard problems.

Actually, upon second thought — if it's △ABC and △DCB, with BC common, AB=CD, ∠A=∠D — still not helping.

Perhaps it's △ABD and △DCA — too confusing.

Given the ambiguity, and only two givens, likely None

But wait — problem says "if any, could be used" — implying possibly multiple.

Another idea: if we assume the figure is symmetric, but no.

I recall that in some textbooks, if you have two sides and non-included angle, and it's obtuse or something, but not specified.

I think for this level, if it's SSA, answer is None.

✔ Answer: None

Wait — let’s look back at user instruction: "Use the given information to mark your picture and decide which shortcut, if any, could be used..."

Given: ∠A ≅ ∠D, AB ≅ CD

If the triangles are △ABD and △CDB, and if we assume that AD and CB are the other sides, but not given equal.

Perhaps there is a common angle or side.

I found a better approach: in many such problems, when two triangles share a side, and you have two parts, but here only two givens.

Actually, let's count: we have one angle and one side — that's only two pieces; we need three for congruence.

Unless the shared side is the third piece.

Suppose the two triangles share side BD.

Then for △ABD and △CDB:

- AB ≅ CD (given)
- BD ≅ DB (common)
- ∠A ≅ ∠D (given)

But as said, this is SSA — not valid.

However, if the angle were between the sides, it would be SAS, but it's not.

So I think None is correct.

But let me confirm with logic: SSA doesn't work because you can have two different triangles with same two sides and non-included angle.

So yes.

✔ Problem 10: None

---

Problem 11:
Given: ∠A ≅ ∠C, ∠B ≅ ∠A — wait, ∠B ≅ ∠A? That would mean all angles equal? Probably typo.

Look: "Given: ∠A ≅ ∠C, ∠B ≅ ∠A"

That would imply ∠A ∠B ≅ ∠C — equiangular.

But in a quadrilateral? Diagram shows a square-like shape with diagonal.

Points A,B,C,D — probably rectangle or square.

Given ∠A ≅ ∠C, ∠B ≅ ∠A — so all angles equal? But in a quad, sum is 360, so each 90? Possible.

But for triangles: likely △ABD and △CBD or something.

Assume diagonal AC or BD.

Say diagonal BD, forming △ABD and △CBD.

Given ∠A ≅ ∠C — angles at A and C.

∠B ≅ ∠A — angle at B equals angle at A.

This is messy.

Perhaps it's △ABC and △ADC.

Given ∠A ∠C — but ∠A is at vertex A, ∠C at C.

If diagonal AC, then triangles are △ABC and △ADC.

Then ∠BAC and ∠DCA? Not clear.

Another interpretation: perhaps "∠B ≅ ∠A" means angle at B in one triangle equals angle at A in the other.

Standard notation: in △ABD and △CDB, ∠A means angle at A in first triangle, etc.

But given ∠A ≅ ∠C and ∠B ≅ ∠A — so ∠B ≅ ∠A ≅ ∠C.

Then if we have two angles equal, the third must be equal too (since sum 180).

So AAA — but AAA doesn't prove congruence, only similarity.

We need a side.

Is there a common side? Probably BD or AC.

Suppose diagonal BD is common.

Then for △ABD and △CDB:

- ∠A ≅ ∠C (given)
- ∠B ≅ ∠A — wait, ∠B in which triangle?

This is poorly worded.

Perhaps "∠B ≅ ∠D" or something.

Let me read carefully: "Given: ∠A ≅ ∠C, ∠B ≅ ∠A"

Probably a typo, and it's meant to be ∠B ≅ ∠D or something.

In many problems, for a parallelogram or rectangle, with diagonal, you have alternate interior angles.

Assume it's a rectangle, so all angles 90, and diagonal creates two triangles.

Then for △ABD and △CDB:

- AB = CD (opposite sides)
- AD = CB
- BD common → SSS

But not given.

Given only angles: ∠A ≅ ∠C (both 90), ∠B ≅ ∠A — if ∠B is also 90, then all angles 90.

But still, for congruence, we need a side.

Unless the diagonal is common, and we have two angles.

For example, in △ABD and △CDB:

- ∠A = ∠C = 90°
- ∠ABD = ∠CDB (alternate interior if AB||CD)
- BD common

Then AAS or ASA.

But given says ∠B ≅ ∠A — which would be 90≅90, true, but not helpful.

Perhaps "∠B ≅ ∠D" is intended.

I think there might be a typo in the problem.

Common problem: in rectangle ABCD, diagonal BD, then △ABD ≅ △CDB by SAS or SSS.

But given only angles.

Another possibility: "∠B ≅ ∠A" means angle at B in first triangle equals angle at A in second, but that's unusual.

Perhaps it's ∠ABD ≅ ∠CDB or something.

To make progress, assume that with the diagonal, and given two angles, and common side, we can use AAS.

For example, if ∠A ∠C, and ∠ADB ≅ ∠CBD, and BD common, then AAS.

But given says ∠B ≅ ∠A — which might mean ∠ABD ≅ ∠BAC or something.

I think for the sake of time, and since it's likely a standard problem, probably they intend that with two angles and a common side, it's AAS.

Moreover, in the diagram, if it's a parallelogram, opposite angles equal, and diagonal creates congruent triangles.

So likely AAS or ASA.

Given ∠A ≅ ∠C, and if we assume ∠ABD ≅ ∠CDB (which might be what "∠B ≅ ∠A" means, but poorly written), then with BD common, AAS.

Perhaps "∠B ≅ ∠D" is meant.

I'll go with AAS assuming two angles and non-included side.

But to be precise, let's say if we have two angles and any side, it's AAS or ASA.

Here, if BD is common, and ∠A = ∠C, and say ∠ABD = ∠CDB, then AAS.

Since the problem says "∠B ≅ ∠A", and if ∠A is 90, ∠B is 90, then in the triangles, the angles at B and D might be equal.

I think it's safe to say AAS

✔ Problem 11: AAS

---

Problem 12:
Given: AB ≅ CD, AB ≅ CD — wait, twice? Probably typo.

"Given: AB ≅ CD, AB ≅ CD" — same thing.

Diagram: quadrilateral with both diagonals, forming four triangles, but likely comparing △ABC and △CDA or something.

Points A,B,C,D — probably parallelogram, with diagonals intersecting.

Given AB ≅ CD — which is always true in parallelogram, but here given.

Also, since it's parallelogram, AD ≅ BC, and diagonals bisect each other.

But for congruence of which triangles? Likely △AOB and △COD or something, but not specified.

The diagram shows two triangles: probably △ABC and △CDA, or △ABD and △CDB.

Given AB ≅ CD, and if we assume it's a parallelogram, then AD ≅ BC, and AC common, so SSS.

But only AB ≅ CD is given — twice, so perhaps redundant.

Also, in parallelogram, opposite sides equal, so AB=CD, AD=BC, and diagonal AC common, so △ABC ≅ △CDA by SSS.

Yes.

So SSS

Additionally, could use SAS: AB=CD, BC=DA, angle B = angle D? Not necessarily given, but in parallelogram, opposite angles equal, but not stated.

With only AB≡CD given, and if we assume the figure implies parallelogram, but strictly speaking, with only one pair of sides equal, not enough.

But the diagram likely shows a parallelogram, and "AB ≡ CD" is given, and since it's parallelogram, other sides equal, but for the proof, we need to use given.

Perhaps the two triangles share diagonal AC.

Then for △ABC and △CDA:

- AB ≡ CD (given)
- BC ≡ DA? Not given
- AC ≡ CA (common)

So only two sides — not enough.

Unless we have angle.

In parallelogram, angle B = angle D, but not given.

So with only AB≡CD, and common diagonal, not sufficient.

But the problem says "AB ≡ CD" twice — perhaps it's a mistake, and it's AB≡CD and AD≡BC or something.

Maybe "AB ≡ CD" and "AD ≡ BC" is implied, but not stated.

Another possibility: the given is for the sides, and in the diagram, it's clear that it's a parallelogram, so we can use properties.

But for rigor, with only AB≡CD given, and no other info, can't prove congruence.

However, in context, likely they intend SSS or SAS.

Perhaps the triangles are △ABD and △CDB, with BD common, AB=CD, and AD=CB (if parallelogram), so SSS.

I think for this level, it's SSS

✔ Problem 12: SSS

---

Now compiling all answers:

1. SAS
2. SAS
3. SAS
4. SSS
5. SAS
6. SAS
7. ASA
8. None
9. AAS
10. None
11. AAS
12. SSS

Final Answer:
1. SAS
2. SAS
3. SAS
4. SSS
5. SAS
6. SAS
7. ASA
8. None
9. AAS
10. None
11. AAS
12. SSS