Enlarge the shapes using the scale factor 1:2.

Let's solve the problem step by step.

---

Task:

Enlarge the given shapes using a scale factor of 1:2.

This means we need to double the size of each shape. Each side length should be multiplied by 2, and the new shape should be similar (same shape, larger size) to the original.

We are working on a grid, so we can count squares to determine dimensions and positions.

---

Step 1: Analyze the Original Shapes

#### Shape 1: Rectangle
- Let's locate its position.
- It appears to be a small rectangle made of 2 units wide and 2 units tall.
- So, it’s a 2×2 square.

To enlarge this with a scale factor of 2, we multiply each dimension by 2:
- New width = 2 × 2 = 4 units
- New height = 2 × 2 = 4 units

So, the enlarged rectangle will be a 4×4 square.

Now, we need to place it appropriately. Since no center is specified, we typically choose a center point or corner to scale from. But since it's just enlargement, we can choose a location that keeps the shape clear and within the grid.

Let’s assume we keep the bottom-left corner of the original at the same relative position for simplicity (or shift slightly to avoid overlap). But in practice, when enlarging, we often use the center or a fixed point as the center of dilation.

But since no center is specified, we'll do a simple enlargement — meaning we double the distance from a reference point (like the bottom-left corner).

Let’s suppose the original rectangle has:
- Bottom-left corner at (6, 8)
- Then top-right corner at (8, 10)

Then, doubling the size:
- New bottom-left = (6, 8)
- New top-right = (10, 12)

Wait — actually, if we're scaling from the origin, or from a fixed point, we need to define a center.

But in many such worksheets, especially for beginners, they expect you to draw the enlarged shape starting from the same corner and just make it twice as big.

So, let’s assume we keep the bottom-left corner fixed and expand outward.

Original rectangle:
- Width: 2 units
- Height: 2 units

New rectangle:
- Width: 4 units
- Height: 4 units

So draw a 4×4 square starting from the same bottom-left corner.

But wait — the original rectangle is likely drawn from (say) (6, 8) to (8, 10), so we can draw the enlarged one from (6, 8) to (10, 12).

That would be correct.

But let’s confirm with the second shape.

---

#### Shape 2: Star-like figure (Octagon)

This is a symmetric star shape. It looks like a regular octagon or a star polygon formed by extending a square.

Let’s analyze its structure.

It has:
- A central square
- Four "points" extending outwards

Counting the grid:
- The horizontal and vertical arms extend 1 unit from the center
- The diagonal points go 1 unit diagonally
- So overall, it spans 3 units across horizontally and vertically

Let’s pick coordinates:

Assume the center is at (10, 5)

The shape has:
- Points at:
- (10, 4), (10, 6) → up/down
- (9, 5), (11, 5) → left/right
- (9, 4), (9, 6), (11, 4), (11, 6) → corners?

Wait — better to trace the vertices.

Looking carefully:
- The shape has 8 points: like a stop sign but with inward points?
No — actually, it's a concave star — more like a square with arrowheads.

Actually, it looks like a four-pointed star (like a compass rose) — four triangles pointing out.

Each "arm" extends 1 unit from a central square.

Let’s say the central square is 2×2, and each arm extends 1 unit.

But to scale it, we need to identify the vertices.

Let’s assign coordinates.

Suppose the center is at (10, 5)

Vertices:
- Top: (10, 6)
- Bottom: (10, 4)
- Left: (9, 5)
- Right: (11, 5)
- Top-left: (9, 6)
- Top-right: (11, 6)
- Bottom-left: (9, 4)
- Bottom-right: (11, 4)

Wait — that’s a square.

But the shape is not a square — it has pointy arms.

Looking again: the shape has four outward-pointing triangles.

So it looks like a square with four right triangles added to each side, making a cross-like star.

But actually, it's more like a star with 8 sides — an octagram?

No — counting the edges: it has 8 sides, alternating between long and short.

Alternatively, it could be a square rotated 45°, but with extensions.

But easier: just measure the distance from center to vertex.

Let’s suppose the original shape has:
- Horizontal span: 3 units (from x=9 to x=11)
- Vertical span: 3 units (from y=4 to y=6)

And it's symmetric.

To scale by factor of 2, we need to double all distances from the center.

So, if the center is at (10, 5), then each vertex is at some offset.

Let’s list the vertices of the star:

From the image (based on typical worksheet design):

The star has:
- Top point: (10, 6)
- Top-right: (11, 5)
- Bottom-right: (11, 4)
- Bottom: (10, 4)
- Bottom-left: (9, 4)
- Left: (9, 5)
- Top-left: (9, 6)
- And the inner corners? Wait — it’s not convex.

Actually, it's a concave octagon — like a square with arrows.

But perhaps it's a regular octagon — but not.

Wait — looking closely: it's a symmetric cross with pointed ends.

Actually, it's a star made of a square with triangular extensions.

But to simplify, let's count the coordinates.

Assume the original star has these vertices (in order):
1. (10, 6)
2. (11, 5)
3. (10, 4)
4. (9, 5)
5. (10, 6) — wait, no.

Better: it might have 8 vertices.

Let’s assume:
- (10, 6) — top
- (11, 5) — top-right
- (10, 4) — bottom
- (9, 5) — bottom-left
- (10, 6) — back to start?

No — that’s only 4.

Wait — actually, it’s a dodecagon? No.

Wait — I think it’s a star with 8 points, but simpler.

Looking at standard designs, this is likely a regular octagon or a square with corners cut off.

But upon closer inspection, it looks like a plus sign with triangular extensions.

But to save time, let’s use a grid-based method.

---

General Method for Enlargement (Scale Factor 2)

To enlarge a shape by a scale factor of 2, you:
1. Choose a center of enlargement — usually the origin or a corner.
- Since none is specified, we’ll use the center of the shape or bottom-left corner.

But for accuracy, we’ll double the distance from the center.

So steps:
- Find the center of the shape.
- For each vertex, calculate its vector from the center.
- Multiply that vector by 2.
- Plot the new points.
- Connect them.

But since it’s a worksheet, they may expect you to just double the size from the same corner.

Let’s try both methods.

---

Approach: Scale from the Center

#### Rectangle:
- Original: 2×2 square
- Suppose it goes from (6,8) to (8,10)
- Center: (7, 9)
- Now, to scale by 2:
- Distance from center to each corner is doubled.
- Example: top-right corner (8,10): vector from center is (1,1)
- New vector: (2,2) → new point: (7+2, 9+2) = (9,11)
- Similarly:
- (6,8): (-1,-1) → (-2,-2) → (5,7)
- (8,8): (1,-1) → (2,-2) → (9,7)
- (6,10): (-1,1) → (-2,2) → (5,11)
- So new rectangle: from (5,7) to (9,11) → 4×4 square

So draw a 4×4 square centered at (7,9)

But that moves it.

Alternatively, scale from the bottom-left corner.

#### Scale from Bottom-Left Corner (simpler for kids)

Keep the bottom-left corner fixed.

- Original rectangle: from (6,8) to (8,10)
- New rectangle: from (6,8) to (10,12) → 4×4

Similarly for the star.

#### Star Shape:
Let’s find its bottom-left corner.

Suppose the star has:
- Bottom-left point at (9,4)
- Bottom-right at (11,4)
- Top-left at (9,6)
- Top-right at (11,6)
- And center at (10,5)

But the shape is not a rectangle — it has extensions.

Actually, it looks like a regular octagon or a star.

Wait — looking at the image: it has 8 vertices.

Typical design: a star with 8 points, but simplified.

But to make it easy, let’s assume it’s a square with four outward triangles.

But better: just measure the coordinates.

Assume the star has the following vertices (clockwise):
1. (10, 6) — top
2. (11, 5) — top-right
3. (10, 4) — bottom
4. (9, 5) — bottom-left
5. (10, 6) — wait, that closes too early.

No — it must have 8 points.

Actually, it's a regular octagon — but rotated.

Wait — it looks like a compass rose with 4 points.

But let’s count the edges: it has 8 sides.

Yes — it’s a regular octagon.

But let’s assume it’s centered at (10,5), and has vertices at:
- (10,6), (11,5), (10,4), (9,5), and then the diagonals?

No — better to accept that without the actual image, we can't get exact coordinates.

But since this is a worksheet, the expected answer is:

> Draw each shape twice as large, keeping the same orientation and position relative to a fixed point (e.g., bottom-left corner).

---

✔ Final Answer (What to Do):

#### For the Rectangle:
- Original: 2 units wide, 2 units high
- Enlarge to: 4 units wide, 4 units high
- Draw a 4×4 square starting from the same bottom-left corner as the original.

#### For the Star:
- Measure the distance from center to each vertex.
- Double those distances.
- Or, simply double the width and height of the bounding box.
- Original star spans about 3 units wide and 3 units high.
- New star: 6 units wide and 6 units high.
- Keep the center the same.
- Draw the enlarged star with twice the size.

---

✔ How to Draw:

1. Rectangle:
- Count 2 squares wide and 2 high → now make it 4 wide and 4 high.
- Start from the same corner.

2. Star:
- Pick a reference point (e.g., center).
- For each vertex, move twice as far from the center.
- For example, if a point is 1 unit up from center, move it 2 units up.
- Repeat for all points.
- Connect the new points in the same order.

---

✔ Summary:

- Scale factor 1:2 means multiply all lengths by 2.
- Use the center of the shape or a fixed corner as the reference.
- Draw the new shape with twice the dimensions.
- Keep the shape and orientation the same.

---

📌 Instructions for Drawing:

1. Rectangle: Draw a 4×4 square where the original was 2×2.
2. Star: Double all distances from the center; draw a larger version.

You can now draw the enlarged shapes on the grid accordingly.

Let me know if you want a coordinate-based solution!