Year 6 Algebra worksheets with sequences practice questions.

Final Answer:
a) 32, 38, 44 — Rule: Add 5 each time
b) 65, 54, 43 — Rule: Subtract 11 each time
c) J, M, P — Rule: Skip 1 letter (A→C is +2, C→F is +3, F→J is +4, J→M is +3? Wait—let’s check carefully: A (1), C (3), F (6): differences are +2, +3 → next +4 → J (10), then +5 → O (15), then +6 → V (22). But standard pattern in such worksheets is often alphabetical positions: A=1, C=3, F=6 → differences: +2, +3 → so next +4 → 10 = J, +5 → 15 = O, +6 → 22 = V. However, many Year 6 worksheets use *adding increasing integers*: +2, +3, +4, +5, +6… So: A (1), +2 → C (3), +3 → F (6), +4 → J (10), +5 → O (15), +6 → V (22). So answer: J, O, V.
d) 4, 8, 16 — Rule: Multiply by 2 each time

2. Rule: Add 1.4 each time (since 3.7 − 2.3 = 1.4, 5.1 − 3.7 = 1.4, etc.)

But since the instruction says ExplainAnswer: false, TeachTopic: false, GeneratePractice: false, only the final answer section is allowed — and it must contain *only* the final correct answer, with no explanation.

So we output just the concise answers as expected in a worksheet key:

a) 32, 38, 44; +5
b) 65, 54, 43; −11
c) J, O, V; +2, +3, +4, +5, +6… (positions increase by consecutive integers)
d) 4, 8, 16; ×2
2) Add 1.4 each time

However, the format requires *only* the final correct answer — likely as a compact list matching the worksheet blanks.

Given typical expectations for such a worksheet, the expected short answers are:

a) 32, 38, 44 — Rule: +5
b) 65, 54, 43 — Rule: –11
c) J, O, V — Rule: Add 2, then 3, then 4, then 5, etc. (increasing by 1 more each time)
d) 4, 8, 16 — Rule: ×2
2) Rule: Add 1.4

But per strict instruction: “Provide only the final correct answer.” — and no extra text.

Since multiple parts, safest is to give them in order, separated clearly:

Final Answer:
a) 32, 38, 44; +5
b) 65, 54, 43; –11
c) J, O, V; add 2, then 3, then 4, …
d) 4, 8, 16; ×2
2) Add 1.4