Significant Figures Worksheet with exercises on identifying, rewriting, and rounding numbers to specific significant figures.
A worksheet titled "Significant Figures Worksheet" with four sections: determining significant figures, rewriting quantities in different significant figures, and rounding numbers to three significant figures.
JPG
495×640
21.9 KB
Free · Personal Use
Quality Assured by Worksheets Library Team
Reviewed for educational accuracy and age-appropriateness
ID: #373417
⭐
Show Answer Key & Explanations
Step-by-step solution for: Significant Figures Worksheet
▼
Show Answer Key & Explanations
Step-by-step solution for: Significant Figures Worksheet
Let's solve each part of the Significant Figures Worksheet step by step, explaining the rules and applying them correctly.
---
#### Rules for Significant Figures:
- All non-zero digits are significant.
- Zeros between non-zero digits are significant.
- Leading zeros (before the first non-zero digit) are not significant.
- Trailing zeros are significant only if there is a decimal point.
- For numbers in scientific notation, only the digits in the coefficient count.
---
a) 75.02 mm
- Digits: 7, 5, 0, 2 → all are significant (the zero is between non-zeros).
✔ 4 significant figures
b) 18.90 mL
- Digits: 1, 8, 9, 0 → trailing zero after decimal is significant.
✔ 4 significant figures
c) 12 test tubes
- This is a count, not a measurement. Counts are exact and have infinite significant figures.
But typically, we say such values have as many sig figs as written — here it’s 2 digits.
However, since it's a count, it's exact ⇒ infinite sig figs, but often treated as 2 sig figs unless specified.
But in most contexts like this worksheet, counts are considered to have infinite sig figs, so:
✔ Infinite significant figures (but sometimes listed as 2)
> However, in most high school/college worksheets, counts are considered exact, so they don't limit precision. But for counting purposes, 12 has 2 sig figs.
We’ll go with 2 unless otherwise stated.
✔ 2 significant figures
d) 0.0049 g
- Leading zeros are not significant.
- Non-zero digits: 4 and 9 → both significant.
✔ 2 significant figures
e) 150 cm
- No decimal point → trailing zero is ambiguous.
- Without decimal, trailing zeros are not significant.
→ So only 1 and 5 are significant.
✔ 2 significant figures
f) 150. Cm
- Note: There's a decimal point at the end → so the zero is significant.
- Also, the unit is "Cm" (likely typo for "cm"), but that doesn’t affect sig figs.
✔ 3 significant figures
---
| Letter | Value | Sig Figs |
|--------|------------------|----------|
| a) | 75.02 mm | 4 |
| b) | 18.90 mL | 4 |
| c) | 12 test tubes | 2 |
| d) | 0.0049 g | 2 |
| e) | 150 cm | 2 |
| f) | 150. Cm | 3 |
---
First, write in scientific notation:
827,000,000,000,000 = 8.27 × 10¹⁴ ps
Now round to different sig figs:
a) 1 sig fig:
→ Round 8.27 to 8 → 8 × 10¹⁴ ps
✔ 8 × 10¹⁴ ps
b) 2 sig figs:
→ Round 8.27 to 8.3 → 8.3 × 10¹⁴ ps
✔ 8.3 × 10¹⁴ ps
c) 3 sig figs:
→ Already 8.27 × 10¹⁴ → no rounding needed
✔ 8.27 × 10¹⁴ ps
d) 4 sig figs:
→ Need 4 sig figs, but original has only 3 → add one more digit? But we can’t invent data.
Wait: Original number is 827,000,000,000,000 → which is 8.27 × 10¹⁴, so only 3 sig figs.
So we cannot have 4 sig figs without extra info.
But the question says "rewrite to show", so we must assume the value is exact and we can express it with more digits?
No — we should round appropriately based on the original value.
But since the original has only 3 sig figs, we can't increase them.
Wait — actually, the number 827,000,000,000,000 could be interpreted as having 3 sig figs (since no decimal), but maybe it's exact?
But in this context, likely it's 827 trillion, so 3 sig figs.
So for 4 sig figs, we would need to write it as 8.270 × 10¹⁴, implying we know the next digit is 0.
But since we don’t, we can’t assume it.
But the problem asks us to “rewrite to show” — meaning we're allowed to add zeros to indicate precision.
So for 4 sig figs, we write: 8.270 × 10¹⁴ ps (assuming the zero is known or estimated).
Similarly, for 5 sig figs: 8.2700 × 10¹⁴ ps
But that assumes more precision than exists.
But since the problem wants us to show different sig figs, we proceed accordingly.
So:
d) 4 sig figs:
→ 8.270 × 10¹⁴ ps
✔ 8.270 × 10¹⁴ ps
e) 5 sig figs:
→ 8.2700 × 10¹⁴ ps
✔ 8.2700 × 10¹⁴ ps
> Note: These imply higher precision than the original, but the problem is asking how to write it with that many sig figs.
---
| Part | Answer |
|------|--------------------------|
| a) | 8 × 10¹⁴ ps |
| b) | 8.3 × 10¹⁴ ps |
| c) | 8.27 × 10¹⁴ ps |
| d) | 8.270 × 10¹⁴ ps |
| e) | 8.2700 × 10¹⁴ ps |
---
Original: 0.0031904 kg
Convert to scientific notation: 3.1904 × 10⁻³ kg
Now round to:
a) 1 sig fig:
→ Look at first digit: 3 → next digit is 1 < 5 → round down → 3 × 10⁻³ kg
✔ 3 × 10⁻³ kg
b) 2 sig figs:
→ 3.1904 → look at third digit: 9 ≥ 5 → round up 1 to 2 → 3.2 × 10⁻³ kg
✔ 3.2 × 10⁻³ kg
c) 3 sig figs:
→ 3.1904 → look at fourth digit: 0 < 5 → keep 3.19 → 3.19 × 10⁻³ kg
✔ 3.19 × 10⁻³ kg
---
| Part | Answer |
|------|----------------------|
| a) | 3 × 10⁻³ kg |
| b) | 3.2 × 10⁻³ kg |
| c) | 3.19 × 10⁻³ kg |
---
a) 16.8477 L
→ Look at 4th digit: 4 < 5 → round down → 16.8 L
✔ 16.8 L
b) 5.6732
→ 4th digit: 2 < 5 → round down → 5.67
✔ 5.67
c) 0.14986 L
→ First non-zero is 1 → digits: 1, 4, 9 → 4th digit is 8 ≥ 5 → round up 9 → becomes 10 → carry over
→ 0.150 L (note: 150 has 3 sig figs, and trailing zero after decimal is significant)
✔ 0.150 L
d) 861.85
→ 4th digit: 8 ≥ 5 → round up → 862
✔ 862
e) 4.203 × 10⁴ km
→ Coefficient: 4.203 → 4th digit is 3 < 5 → round down → 4.20 × 10⁴ km
✔ 4.20 × 10⁴ km
f) 5.0981 × 10⁻³
→ Coefficient: 5.0981 → 4th digit: 8 ≥ 5 → round up 9 → becomes 10 → carry over
→ 5.10 × 10⁻³
✔ 5.10 × 10⁻³
g) 0.00318756 m
→ First non-zero: 3 → digits: 3,1,8 → 4th digit: 7 ≥ 5 → round up 8 → 9 → 3.19 × 10⁻³ m
✔ 3.19 × 10⁻³ m
h) 0.09025011
→ First non-zero: 9 → digits: 9,0,2 → 4th digit: 5 → round up 2 → 3 → 9.03 × 10⁻²
→ Because: 0.09025011 = 9.025011 × 10⁻² → round to 3 sig figs: 9.03 × 10⁻²
✔ 9.03 × 10⁻²
---
| Letter | Rounded Value |
|--------|----------------------------|
| a) | 16.8 L |
| b) | 5.67 |
| c) | 0.150 L |
| d) | 862 |
| e) | 4.20 × 10⁴ km |
| f) | 5.10 × 10⁻³ |
| g) | 3.19 × 10⁻³ m |
| h) | 9.03 × 10⁻² |
---
---
#### 1) Number of Significant Figures:
a) 4
b) 4
c) 2
d) 2
e) 2
f) 3
---
#### 2) Rewrite 827,000,000,000,000 ps:
a) 8 × 10¹⁴ ps
b) 8.3 × 10¹⁴ ps
c) 8.27 × 10¹⁴ ps
d) 8.270 × 10¹⁴ ps
e) 8.2700 × 10¹⁴ ps
---
#### 3) Rewrite 0.0031904 kg:
a) 3 × 10⁻³ kg
b) 3.2 × 10⁻³ kg
c) 3.19 × 10⁻³ kg
---
#### 4) Round to 3 sig figs:
a) 16.8 L
b) 5.67
c) 0.150 L
d) 862
e) 4.20 × 10⁴ km
f) 5.10 × 10⁻³
g) 3.19 × 10⁻³ m
h) 9.03 × 10⁻²
---
Let me know if you'd like this formatted as a printable answer sheet!
---
1) Determine the number of significant figures in each of the following:
#### Rules for Significant Figures:
- All non-zero digits are significant.
- Zeros between non-zero digits are significant.
- Leading zeros (before the first non-zero digit) are not significant.
- Trailing zeros are significant only if there is a decimal point.
- For numbers in scientific notation, only the digits in the coefficient count.
---
a) 75.02 mm
- Digits: 7, 5, 0, 2 → all are significant (the zero is between non-zeros).
✔ 4 significant figures
b) 18.90 mL
- Digits: 1, 8, 9, 0 → trailing zero after decimal is significant.
✔ 4 significant figures
c) 12 test tubes
- This is a count, not a measurement. Counts are exact and have infinite significant figures.
But typically, we say such values have as many sig figs as written — here it’s 2 digits.
However, since it's a count, it's exact ⇒ infinite sig figs, but often treated as 2 sig figs unless specified.
But in most contexts like this worksheet, counts are considered to have infinite sig figs, so:
✔ Infinite significant figures (but sometimes listed as 2)
> However, in most high school/college worksheets, counts are considered exact, so they don't limit precision. But for counting purposes, 12 has 2 sig figs.
We’ll go with 2 unless otherwise stated.
✔ 2 significant figures
d) 0.0049 g
- Leading zeros are not significant.
- Non-zero digits: 4 and 9 → both significant.
✔ 2 significant figures
e) 150 cm
- No decimal point → trailing zero is ambiguous.
- Without decimal, trailing zeros are not significant.
→ So only 1 and 5 are significant.
✔ 2 significant figures
f) 150. Cm
- Note: There's a decimal point at the end → so the zero is significant.
- Also, the unit is "Cm" (likely typo for "cm"), but that doesn’t affect sig figs.
✔ 3 significant figures
---
✔ Answers for #1:
| Letter | Value | Sig Figs |
|--------|------------------|----------|
| a) | 75.02 mm | 4 |
| b) | 18.90 mL | 4 |
| c) | 12 test tubes | 2 |
| d) | 0.0049 g | 2 |
| e) | 150 cm | 2 |
| f) | 150. Cm | 3 |
---
2) Re-write the quantity 827,000,000,000,000 picoseconds to show:
First, write in scientific notation:
827,000,000,000,000 = 8.27 × 10¹⁴ ps
Now round to different sig figs:
a) 1 sig fig:
→ Round 8.27 to 8 → 8 × 10¹⁴ ps
✔ 8 × 10¹⁴ ps
b) 2 sig figs:
→ Round 8.27 to 8.3 → 8.3 × 10¹⁴ ps
✔ 8.3 × 10¹⁴ ps
c) 3 sig figs:
→ Already 8.27 × 10¹⁴ → no rounding needed
✔ 8.27 × 10¹⁴ ps
d) 4 sig figs:
→ Need 4 sig figs, but original has only 3 → add one more digit? But we can’t invent data.
Wait: Original number is 827,000,000,000,000 → which is 8.27 × 10¹⁴, so only 3 sig figs.
So we cannot have 4 sig figs without extra info.
But the question says "rewrite to show", so we must assume the value is exact and we can express it with more digits?
No — we should round appropriately based on the original value.
But since the original has only 3 sig figs, we can't increase them.
Wait — actually, the number 827,000,000,000,000 could be interpreted as having 3 sig figs (since no decimal), but maybe it's exact?
But in this context, likely it's 827 trillion, so 3 sig figs.
So for 4 sig figs, we would need to write it as 8.270 × 10¹⁴, implying we know the next digit is 0.
But since we don’t, we can’t assume it.
But the problem asks us to “rewrite to show” — meaning we're allowed to add zeros to indicate precision.
So for 4 sig figs, we write: 8.270 × 10¹⁴ ps (assuming the zero is known or estimated).
Similarly, for 5 sig figs: 8.2700 × 10¹⁴ ps
But that assumes more precision than exists.
But since the problem wants us to show different sig figs, we proceed accordingly.
So:
d) 4 sig figs:
→ 8.270 × 10¹⁴ ps
✔ 8.270 × 10¹⁴ ps
e) 5 sig figs:
→ 8.2700 × 10¹⁴ ps
✔ 8.2700 × 10¹⁴ ps
> Note: These imply higher precision than the original, but the problem is asking how to write it with that many sig figs.
---
✔ Answers for #2:
| Part | Answer |
|------|--------------------------|
| a) | 8 × 10¹⁴ ps |
| b) | 8.3 × 10¹⁴ ps |
| c) | 8.27 × 10¹⁴ ps |
| d) | 8.270 × 10¹⁴ ps |
| e) | 8.2700 × 10¹⁴ ps |
---
3) Rewrite the quantity 0.0031904 kg to show:
Original: 0.0031904 kg
Convert to scientific notation: 3.1904 × 10⁻³ kg
Now round to:
a) 1 sig fig:
→ Look at first digit: 3 → next digit is 1 < 5 → round down → 3 × 10⁻³ kg
✔ 3 × 10⁻³ kg
b) 2 sig figs:
→ 3.1904 → look at third digit: 9 ≥ 5 → round up 1 to 2 → 3.2 × 10⁻³ kg
✔ 3.2 × 10⁻³ kg
c) 3 sig figs:
→ 3.1904 → look at fourth digit: 0 < 5 → keep 3.19 → 3.19 × 10⁻³ kg
✔ 3.19 × 10⁻³ kg
---
✔ Answers for #3:
| Part | Answer |
|------|----------------------|
| a) | 3 × 10⁻³ kg |
| b) | 3.2 × 10⁻³ kg |
| c) | 3.19 × 10⁻³ kg |
---
4) Round each of the following to 3 significant figures:
a) 16.8477 L
→ Look at 4th digit: 4 < 5 → round down → 16.8 L
✔ 16.8 L
b) 5.6732
→ 4th digit: 2 < 5 → round down → 5.67
✔ 5.67
c) 0.14986 L
→ First non-zero is 1 → digits: 1, 4, 9 → 4th digit is 8 ≥ 5 → round up 9 → becomes 10 → carry over
→ 0.150 L (note: 150 has 3 sig figs, and trailing zero after decimal is significant)
✔ 0.150 L
d) 861.85
→ 4th digit: 8 ≥ 5 → round up → 862
✔ 862
e) 4.203 × 10⁴ km
→ Coefficient: 4.203 → 4th digit is 3 < 5 → round down → 4.20 × 10⁴ km
✔ 4.20 × 10⁴ km
f) 5.0981 × 10⁻³
→ Coefficient: 5.0981 → 4th digit: 8 ≥ 5 → round up 9 → becomes 10 → carry over
→ 5.10 × 10⁻³
✔ 5.10 × 10⁻³
g) 0.00318756 m
→ First non-zero: 3 → digits: 3,1,8 → 4th digit: 7 ≥ 5 → round up 8 → 9 → 3.19 × 10⁻³ m
✔ 3.19 × 10⁻³ m
h) 0.09025011
→ First non-zero: 9 → digits: 9,0,2 → 4th digit: 5 → round up 2 → 3 → 9.03 × 10⁻²
→ Because: 0.09025011 = 9.025011 × 10⁻² → round to 3 sig figs: 9.03 × 10⁻²
✔ 9.03 × 10⁻²
---
✔ Answers for #4:
| Letter | Rounded Value |
|--------|----------------------------|
| a) | 16.8 L |
| b) | 5.67 |
| c) | 0.150 L |
| d) | 862 |
| e) | 4.20 × 10⁴ km |
| f) | 5.10 × 10⁻³ |
| g) | 3.19 × 10⁻³ m |
| h) | 9.03 × 10⁻² |
---
✔ Final Answers Summary:
---
#### 1) Number of Significant Figures:
a) 4
b) 4
c) 2
d) 2
e) 2
f) 3
---
#### 2) Rewrite 827,000,000,000,000 ps:
a) 8 × 10¹⁴ ps
b) 8.3 × 10¹⁴ ps
c) 8.27 × 10¹⁴ ps
d) 8.270 × 10¹⁴ ps
e) 8.2700 × 10¹⁴ ps
---
#### 3) Rewrite 0.0031904 kg:
a) 3 × 10⁻³ kg
b) 3.2 × 10⁻³ kg
c) 3.19 × 10⁻³ kg
---
#### 4) Round to 3 sig figs:
a) 16.8 L
b) 5.67
c) 0.150 L
d) 862
e) 4.20 × 10⁴ km
f) 5.10 × 10⁻³
g) 3.19 × 10⁻³ m
h) 9.03 × 10⁻²
---
Let me know if you'd like this formatted as a printable answer sheet!
Parent Tip: Review the logic above to help your child master the concept of sig figs worksheet.