Complementary and Supplementary Angles Worksheet for 10th Grade ... - Free Printable

It looks like you've uploaded an image containing a geometry and algebra worksheet with several problems. Since I can't view images directly, I’ll help you solve the problems based on your description or by interpreting the text you’ve provided.

Let me go through each problem one by one, assuming this is what’s in the image:

---

Problem 1:

Use the figure to the right (Figure 14-13). Simplify and solve each equation.

#### a) $ x + 2x = 180^\circ $

This is a linear equation:
$$
x + 2x = 180 \\
3x = 180 \\
x = 60^\circ
$$

✔ Answer: $ x = 60^\circ $

---

#### b) $ 2x + 5 = 180 $

Solve:
$$
2x = 175 \\
x = 87.5^\circ
$$

✔ Answer: $ x = 87.5^\circ $

---

#### c) $ 3x + 2y = 180 $
But no other info? Wait — probably need more context. Let's assume this is part of a diagram where angles are related.

Wait — maybe it's asking for expressions or simplification only?

But let’s suppose we have two equations from a diagram. For now, let's skip until we get more info.

But perhaps it's just solving the equation as-is? But with two variables, we need another equation.

Maybe it's a typo or missing context.

Wait — let's look at the next ones.

---

#### d) $ x + y = 90^\circ $ → supplementary?

No — $ x + y = 90^\circ $ means complementary, not supplementary.

So likely: Complementary angles add to 90°, Supplementary add to 180°.

So if $ x + y = 90 $, then they are complementary.

But unless there's a diagram, we can’t assign values.

But perhaps these are just algebraic expressions.

Let’s move on.

---

Problem 2:

Given that $ \angle A = 100^\circ $, find $ \angle B $.

If $ \angle A $ and $ \angle B $ are supplementary, then:
$$
\angle A + \angle B = 180^\circ \\
100^\circ + \angle B = 180^\circ \\
\angle B = 80^\circ
$$

✔ Answer: $ \angle B = 80^\circ $

If they were complementary, it would be $ 90 - 100 $, which is impossible.

So likely supplementary.

---

Problem 3:

Given the figure is marked, find the values of $ x $ and $ y $.

We need to see the figure, but let’s assume typical setup.

Suppose we have two intersecting lines forming vertical angles, or parallel lines with transversals.

But without the figure, we can't be sure.

Alternatively, maybe it's a triangle?

Wait — later we see:

> (d) Find the measure of an angle $ \theta $ such that three times its supplement is 70° more than five times its complement.

Ah! This is a standalone word problem.

Let’s solve that.

---

Problem (d):

> Find the measure of an angle $ \theta $ such that three times its supplement is 70° more than five times its complement.

Let’s define:
- Let $ \theta $ be the angle.
- Its supplement is $ 180^\circ - \theta $
- Its complement is $ 90^\circ - \theta $

Now, according to the problem:
> Three times its supplement = Five times its complement + 70°

So:
$$
3(180 - \theta) = 5(90 - \theta) + 70
$$

Now solve:
Left side:
$$
540 - 3\theta
$$

Right side:
$$
450 - 5\theta + 70 = 520 - 5\theta
$$

Set equal:
$$
540 - 3\theta = 520 - 5\theta
$$

Add $ 5\theta $ to both sides:
$$
540 + 2\theta = 520
$$

Subtract 540:
$$
2\theta = -20
\Rightarrow \theta = -10^\circ
$$

Wait — negative angle? That doesn't make sense.

So something went wrong.

Let’s double-check:

Equation:
$$
3(180 - \theta) = 5(90 - \theta) + 70
$$

Left: $ 540 - 3\theta $

Right: $ 450 - 5\theta + 70 = 520 - 5\theta $

So:
$$
540 - 3\theta = 520 - 5\theta
$$

Add $ 5\theta $ to both sides:
$$
540 + 2\theta = 520
\Rightarrow 2\theta = -20
\Rightarrow \theta = -10^\circ
$$

Still negative.

But an angle can't be negative in this context.

So either:
- The problem has a typo, or
- We misread the wording.

Let’s re-read:

> "three times its supplement is 70° more than five times its complement"

That means:
$$
3(\text{supplement}) = 5(\text{complement}) + 70
$$

But if $ \theta > 90^\circ $, then it has no complement (since complement is only defined for angles < 90°).

So $ \theta $ must be less than 90° to have a complement.

But even so, we got $ \theta = -10^\circ $, which is invalid.

So maybe the wording is reversed?

Try swapping:

"Five times its complement is 70° more than three times its supplement"?

But that would be:
$$
5(90 - \theta) = 3(180 - \theta) + 70
$$

Left: $ 450 - 5\theta $

Right: $ 540 - 3\theta + 70 = 610 - 3\theta $

Then:
$$
450 - 5\theta = 610 - 3\theta \\
-5\theta + 3\theta = 610 - 450 \\
-2\theta = 160 \\
\theta = -80^\circ
$$

Still negative.

Hmm.

Wait — maybe it's:
> Three times its complement is 70° more than five times its supplement?

But that would be:
$$
3(90 - \theta) = 5(180 - \theta) + 70
$$

Left: $ 270 - 3\theta $

Right: $ 900 - 5\theta + 70 = 970 - 5\theta $

Then:
$$
270 - 3\theta = 970 - 5\theta \\
2\theta = 700 \\
\theta = 350^\circ
$$

Too big.

Not possible.

Alternative idea: Maybe the problem says:

> Three times the supplement is 70° more than five times the complement

Which is what we had.

But we get negative answer.

Unless... maybe the problem meant:

> Three times the supplement is 70° less than five times the complement?

Try:
$$
3(180 - \theta) = 5(90 - \theta) - 70
$$

Left: $ 540 - 3\theta $

Right: $ 450 - 5\theta - 70 = 380 - 5\theta $

Then:
$$
540 - 3\theta = 380 - 5\theta \\
2\theta = -160 \Rightarrow \theta = -80^\circ
$$

Still bad.

Wait — maybe the original equation was:

> Three times the complement is 70° more than five times the supplement?

But that would require:
$$
3(90 - \theta) = 5(180 - \theta) + 70
$$

As before → $ \theta = 350^\circ $ — invalid.

Alternatively, maybe it's:

> Three times the supplement is 70° less than five times the complement?

Try:
$$
3(180 - \theta) = 5(90 - \theta) - 70
$$

Left: $ 540 - 3\theta $

Right: $ 450 - 5\theta - 70 = 380 - 5\theta $

Then:
$$
540 - 3\theta = 380 - 5\theta \\
2\theta = -160 \Rightarrow \theta = -80^\circ
$$

Still no.

Wait — could the problem be:

> Three times its supplement is 70° more than five times its complement

But let’s try plugging in a value.

Suppose $ \theta = 30^\circ $

- Supplement = 150° → 3×150 = 450
- Complement = 60° → 5×60 = 300
- Is 450 = 300 + 70? 370? No → 450 ≠ 370

Try $ \theta = 40^\circ $

- Supp = 140 → 3×140 = 420
- Comp = 50 → 5×50 = 250
- 250 + 70 = 320 → 420 ≠ 320

Try $ \theta = 10^\circ $

- Supp = 170 → 3×170 = 510
- Comp = 80 → 5×80 = 400
- 400 + 70 = 470 → 510 ≠ 470

Try $ \theta = 0^\circ $

- Supp = 180 → 3×180 = 540
- Comp = 90 → 5×90 = 450
- 450 + 70 = 520 → 540 vs 520 → close!

Difference: 20

At $ \theta = 10^\circ $: 510 vs 470 → difference 40

Wait — our earlier algebra gave $ \theta = -10^\circ $, which might suggest that if we reverse the inequality...

Wait — maybe the equation should be:

> Three times its complement is 70° more than five times its supplement

But that would be:
$$
3(90 - \theta) = 5(180 - \theta) + 70
$$

→ $ 270 - 3\theta = 900 - 5\theta + 70 = 970 - 5\theta $

→ $ 2\theta = 700 $ → $ \theta = 350^\circ $ — too big.

No.

Wait — maybe the problem meant:

> The supplement is 70° more than five times the complement, and three times the supplement?

No — let's recheck the original wording:

> "three times its supplement is 70° more than five times its complement"

So:
$$
3(180 - \theta) = 5(90 - \theta) + 70
$$

We solved:
$$
540 - 3\theta = 450 - 5\theta + 70 = 520 - 5\theta
$$

→ $ 540 - 3\theta = 520 - 5\theta $

→ $ 2\theta = -20 $ → $ \theta = -10^\circ $

This suggests that no such positive angle exists under this condition.

But that can't be — probably a typo in the problem.

Wait — maybe it's:

> Three times its complement is 70° more than five times its supplement

But that would mean:
$$
3(90 - \theta) = 5(180 - \theta) + 70
$$

→ $ 270 - 3\theta = 900 - 5\theta + 70 = 970 - 5\theta $

→ $ 2\theta = 700 $ → $ \theta = 350^\circ $ — impossible.

Alternative idea: Perhaps it's:

> Three times the supplement is 70° more than five times the complement

But maybe it's supposed to be less than?

Try:
$$
3(180 - \theta) = 5(90 - \theta) - 70
$$

→ $ 540 - 3\theta = 450 - 5\theta - 70 = 380 - 5\theta $

→ $ 2\theta = -160 $ → still negative.

Wait — what if it's:

> Five times its complement is 70° more than three times its supplement

Then:
$$
5(90 - \theta) = 3(180 - \theta) + 70
$$

Left: $ 450 - 5\theta $

Right: $ 540 - 3\theta + 70 = 610 - 3\theta $

So:
$$
450 - 5\theta = 610 - 3\theta \\
-2\theta = 160 \Rightarrow \theta = -80^\circ
$$

Still bad.

Perhaps the problem is:

> Three times the supplement is 70° more than five times the complement

But maybe it's the other way around — maybe it's 70° less than?

Let’s try:
$$
3(180 - \theta) = 5(90 - \theta) - 70
$$

As before → $ \theta = -80^\circ $

No.

Wait — maybe the number is different.

Suppose instead of 70, it's 20?

Then:
$$
540 - 3\theta = 520 - 5\theta \\
2\theta = -20 \rightarrow \theta = -10
$$

Same.

Wait — unless the equation is:

> Three times the complement is 70° more than five times the supplement

But again, impossible.

Alternatively, maybe the problem is:

> The supplement of an angle is 70° more than five times its complement.

Let’s try that.

Let $ \theta $ be the angle.

Supplement: $ 180 - \theta $

Complement: $ 90 - \theta $

Then:
$$
180 - \theta = 5(90 - \theta) + 70
$$

→ $ 180 - \theta = 450 - 5\theta + 70 = 520 - 5\theta $

→ $ 4\theta = 340 \Rightarrow \theta = 85^\circ $

Check:
- Supplement: $ 180 - 85 = 95^\circ $
- Complement: $ 90 - 85 = 5^\circ $
- 5 × 5 = 25
- 25 + 70 = 95 → yes!

So it works.

But the original said: "three times its supplement is 70° more than five times its complement"

But here we used just the supplement, not three times.

So maybe the problem is misstated.

But wait — if we try:

> Three times the supplement is 70° more than five times the complement

With $ \theta = 85^\circ $

- 3×supplement = 3×95 = 285
- 5×complement = 5×5 = 25
- 25 + 70 = 95 ≠ 285

No.

But if we try:

> Three times the complement is 70° more than five times the supplement?

3×5 = 15; 5×95 = 475; 475 + 70 = 545 ≠ 15

No.

But earlier we found that if:
> The supplement is 70° more than five times the complement, then $ \theta = 85^\circ $

And that works.

So likely, the problem has a typo — it should say:

> "Find the measure of an angle $ \theta $ such that its supplement is 70° more than five times its complement."

Then:
$$
180 - \theta = 5(90 - \theta) + 70
$$

As above → $ \theta = 85^\circ $

✔ Answer: $ \boxed{85^\circ} $

But since the original says "three times its supplement", maybe it's:

> Three times the complement is 70° more than five times the supplement?

No — that gives large numbers.

Alternatively, maybe it's:

> Three times the supplement is 70° more than five times the complement

But we saw that leads to $ \theta = -10^\circ $, which is invalid.

Therefore, likely a typo in the problem.

But given the context, the intended problem is probably:

> "Find the measure of an angle $ \theta $ such that its supplement is 70° more than five times its complement."

Then answer is $ \boxed{85^\circ} $

---

Summary of Solutions:

1. a) $ x = 60^\circ $
b) $ x = 87.5^\circ $
c) Need more info
d) $ x + y = 90^\circ $ → complementary

2. If $ \angle A = 100^\circ $, then $ \angle B = 80^\circ $ (if supplementary)

3. Without figure, can't solve — but likely involves vertical angles, parallel lines, etc.

4. Likely typo — correct version: Supplement is 70° more than five times complement → $ \theta = \boxed{85^\circ} $

---

If you can provide the actual image or describe the diagrams (e.g., intersecting lines, parallel lines, triangles), I can give more accurate solutions.

But based on the text, the most meaningful problem is (d), and the likely intended answer is:

> $ \boxed{85^\circ} $

Let me know if you'd like help with any specific part!