Prisms Worksheet: Calculate surface area and volume of various geometric solids.

Let’s solve each problem one by one. We’ll find the surface area and volume for each solid.

---

Problem 1: Cube with side = 7 mi

A cube has 6 identical square faces.

- Surface Area = 6 × (side)² = 6 × 7² = 6 × 49 = 294 mi²
- Volume = (side)³ = 7³ = 343 mi³

✔ Check: 7×7=49, 49×6=294; 7×7×7=343 → Correct.

---

Problem 2: Cube with side = 9 cm

Same as above.

- Surface Area = 6 × 9² = 6 × 81 = 486 cm²
- Volume = 9³ = 729 cm³

✔ Check: 9×9=81, 81×6=486; 9×9×9=729 → Correct.

---

Problem 3: Rectangular Prism — 11 cm × 11 cm × 9 cm

This is a rectangular prism (not a cube). Dimensions: length=11, width=11, height=9.

Surface Area formula:
SA = 2(lw + lh + wh)
= 2(11×11 + 11×9 + 11×9)
= 2(121 + 99 + 99)
= 2(319) = 638 cm²

Volume = l × w × h = 11 × 11 × 9
First: 11×11=121, then 121×9 = 1089 cm³

✔ Check: 121+99+99=319, ×2=638; 121×9=1089 → Correct.

---

Problem 4: Rectangular Prism — 10 in × 5 in × 7 in

Dimensions: l=10, w=5, h=7

SA = 2(lw + lh + wh)
= 2(10×5 + 10×7 + 5×7)
= 2(50 + 70 + 35)
= 2(155) = 310 in²

Volume = 10 × 5 × 7 = 50 × 7 = 350 in³

✔ Check: 50+70+35=155, ×2=310; 10×5=50, 50×7=350 → Correct.

---

Problem 5: Triangular Prism — Base triangle: base=8 in, height=6 in; prism length=10 in

Wait — looking at diagram: it shows a triangular prism where the triangular face has sides 6 in, 8 in, 10 in? Actually, from the drawing, it looks like the triangular base is a right triangle with legs 6 in and 8 in, and hypotenuse 10 in (since 6-8-10 is a Pythagorean triple). The “length” of the prism (distance between triangles) is 10 in? Wait — no, let me re-read.

Actually, in the diagram:

- The triangular face has base 8 in, height 6 in (right angle marked), so area of triangle = (1/2)*8*6 = 24 in²
- The prism extends 10 in deep (the third dimension)

So this is a triangular prism with:

- Two triangular bases: each area = 24 in² → total for both = 48 in²
- Three rectangular lateral faces:
- One rectangle: 8 in × 10 in = 80 in²
- One rectangle: 6 in × 10 in = 60 in²
- One rectangle: 10 in (hypotenuse) × 10 in = 100 in²

Wait — but the hypotenuse is 10 in? Yes, because 6-8-10 triangle.

So lateral surface area = 80 + 60 + 100 = 240 in²

Total SA = 48 + 240 = 288 in²

Volume = Area of base × length = 24 × 10 = 240 in³

✔ Check: Triangle area = 0.5×8×6=24; rectangles: 8×10=80, 6×10=60, 10×10=100 → sum 240; total SA=24×2 + 240=48+240=288; volume=24×10=240 → Correct.

---

Problem 6: Triangular Prism — Base triangle: base=8 km, height=3 km? Wait — diagram shows:

Triangle with base 8 km, height 3 km? But also labeled 6 km and 10 km. Let’s interpret.

Looking at diagram: It appears to be a right triangle with legs 6 km and 8 km? Because 6-8-10 is again a Pythagorean triple. And the prism length is 3 km? Or is 3 km the height?

Actually, labels:

- Triangle side: 6 km, 8 km, 10 km → right triangle (legs 6 and 8, hypotenuse 10)
- The “depth” or length of prism is 3 km (labeled on the side)

So:

Area of triangular base = (1/2) × 6 × 8 = 24 km²

Two bases: 2 × 24 = 48 km²

Lateral faces:

- Rectangle 1: 6 km × 3 km = 18 km²
- Rectangle 2: 8 km × 3 km = 24 km²
- Rectangle 3: 10 km × 3 km = 30 km²

Lateral SA = 18 + 24 + 30 = 72 km²

Total SA = 48 + 72 = 120 km²

Volume = Base area × length = 24 × 3 = 72 km³

✔ Check: Same logic as #5. 6×8/2=24; rectangles: 6×3=18, 8×3=24, 10×3=30 → sum 72; total SA=48+72=120; volume=24×3=72 → Correct.

---

Problem 7: Trapezoidal Prism? Wait — diagram shows a quadrilateral base that is a trapezoid? Let’s see:

It shows a 3D shape with:

- Front face: trapezoid with parallel sides 4 m and 10 m, height 12 m? Wait — actually, looking closely:

The front face is a trapezoid with:

- Top base = 4 m
- Bottom base = 10 m
- Height (vertical distance between them) = 12 m? But wait — there’s a diagonal label “12 m” which might be the slant side? Also, there’s a perpendicular height marked as 3.9 m? That doesn’t make sense.

Wait — let me reinterpret.

Actually, the diagram shows a prism whose base is a trapezoid. The trapezoid has:

- Parallel sides: 4 m and 10 m
- Distance between them (height of trapezoid) = 12 m? But then why is there a 3.9 m labeled? And another 12 m?

Looking again: There are two 12 m labels — one vertical? One horizontal? And 3.9 m is probably the height of the trapezoid? That seems odd.

Wait — perhaps the 3.9 m is the height of the trapezoid, and the 12 m is the length of the prism? Let me check standard interpretation.

In many worksheets, when they show a trapezoidal prism, they give:

- Trapezoid bases: a and b
- Height of trapezoid: h_trap
- Length of prism: L

Here, likely:

- Trapezoid: top = 4 m, bottom = 10 m, height = 3.9 m (perpendicular distance)
- Prism length = 12 m (the depth)

Yes, that makes sense. The 12 m labeled vertically might be misleading — but the 3.9 m is marked with a right angle, so it’s the height of the trapezoid.

So:

Area of trapezoid base = (1/2) × (b1 + b2) × h = (1/2)(4 + 10) × 3.9 = (1/2)(14)(3.9) = 7 × 3.9 = 27.3 m²

Two bases: 2 × 27.3 = 54.6 m²

Now lateral faces: four rectangles? No — trapezoidal prism has 4 lateral faces? Actually, trapezoid has 4 sides, so 4 rectangular faces.

But we need the lengths of all four sides of the trapezoid.

We know:

- Top base = 4 m
- Bottom base = 10 m
- Height = 3.9 m

To find the non-parallel sides, we can assume it’s an isosceles trapezoid? Not specified. But in diagrams like this, often the overhang is equal on both sides.

Difference in bases: 10 - 4 = 6 m → so each side overhangs by 3 m.

Then each slanted side = sqrt(3² + 3.9²) = sqrt(9 + 15.21) = sqrt(24.21) ≈ 4.92 m

But the diagram doesn’t specify, and it’s messy. Alternatively, maybe the 12 m labeled is not the prism length but something else?

Wait — look again: In the diagram, there is a 12 m labeled along the bottom edge, and another 12 m labeled diagonally? And 3.9 m is the height.

Perhaps the base is a trapezoid with:

- Bases: 4 m and 10 m
- Legs: both 12 m? But that would be unusual.

Another possibility: This is not a trapezoidal prism but a different shape? Or perhaps it's a rectangular prism cut diagonally? But the instruction says "prisms", so likely trapezoidal.

Given the complexity and potential ambiguity, and since this is for a student, perhaps the intended interpretation is:

The solid is a prism with a trapezoidal base where:

- Parallel sides: 4 m and 10 m
- Height of trapezoid: 3.9 m
- Length of prism: 12 m (the dimension going into the page)

And for lateral surface area, we need the perimeter of the trapezoid times length? But we don't have the leg lengths.

Unless... in some problems, they only ask for volume if surface area is too complex, but here it asks for both.

Perhaps the 12 m labeled twice means the two non-parallel sides are each 12 m? Let's try that.

Assume trapezoid has:

- Bases: 4 m, 10 m
- Legs: both 12 m
- Height: 3.9 m (given)

Check if consistent: For a trapezoid with bases 4 and 10, difference 6, so each projection is 3 m. Then leg should be sqrt(3^2 + 3.9^2) = sqrt(9+15.21)=sqrt(24.21)≈4.92, not 12. So inconsistency.

Perhaps the 3.9 m is not the height? But it's marked with a right angle symbol, so it must be.

Another idea: Maybe the 12 m is the length of the prism, and the trapezoid has height 3.9 m, and the legs are not needed for volume, but for surface area we do need them.

This is problematic. Perhaps in this context, they expect us to use the given numbers as is.

Let me calculate volume first, which is straightforward:

Volume = Area of base × length = [ (4+10)/2 * 3.9 ] × 12 = [7 * 3.9] × 12 = 27.3 × 12

Calculate: 27.3 × 10 = 273, 27.3 × 2 = 54.6, total 327.6 m³

For surface area, if we assume the trapezoid has two legs of unknown length, we can't compute exactly. But perhaps in the diagram, the 12 m labeled on the side is the length of the prism, and the other 12 m is the length of the non-parallel side? Let's assume that.

Suppose the trapezoid has:

- Top: 4 m
- Bottom: 10 m
- Left leg: 12 m (diagonal)
- Right leg: ?
- Height: 3.9 m

But still missing information.

Perhaps it's not a trapezoid but a different shape. Looking back at the image description, problem 7 shows a shape that might be a wedge or a triangular prism with a rectangular base? Another thought: perhaps it's a rectangular prism with a triangular cut, but the instruction says "prism".

Given the time, and since this is for a student, I'll proceed with the volume calculation and for surface area, use the available data.

Perhaps the 12 m is the length of the prism, and the base is a trapezoid with bases 4 and 10, height 3.9, and the legs are calculated as above, but that gives approximately 4.92 m each.

Let me use that.

So legs ≈ 4.92 m each.

Perimeter of trapezoid = 4 + 10 + 4.92 + 4.92 = 23.84 m

Lateral SA = perimeter × length = 23.84 × 12 = 286.08 m²

Base areas: 2 × 27.3 = 54.6 m²

Total SA = 286.08 + 54.6 = 340.68 m²

But this is approximate, and the problem likely expects exact values.

Notice that 3.9 might be 39/10, and 4,10, etc.

Another approach: perhaps the 3.9 m is a red herring, and the height of the trapezoid is 12 m? But that doesn't match the right angle mark.

Let's look at the diagram description again: "7. 4 m, 12 m, 10 m, 3.9 m, 12 m" — and it's a prism.

Perhaps it's a triangular prism after all? If we consider the front face as a triangle with base 10 m, height 4 m, but then 3.9 m is there.

I think there might be a mistake in my interpretation. Let me search for common problems.

Upon second thought, in some worksheets, problem 7 is a trapezoidal prism with:

- Bases of trapezoid: 4 m and 10 m
- Height of trapezoid: 12 m (but then why 3.9?)
- Length of prism: 3.9 m? But 3.9 is small.

Perhaps the 3.9 m is the length of the prism, and the trapezoid has height 12 m.

Let me try that.

If trapezoid height = 12 m, bases 4 and 10, then area = (4+10)/2 * 12 = 7*12 = 84 m²

Prism length = 3.9 m

Volume = 84 * 3.9 = let's calculate: 84*4 = 336, minus 84*0.1=8.4, so 336-8.4=327.6 m³ — same as before!

Oh! So whether you swap the height and length, the volume is the same: 27.3 * 12 = 327.6, or 84 * 3.9 = 327.6.

So volume is 327.6 m³ regardless.

For surface area, it depends on which is which.

In the diagram, the 3.9 m is marked with a right angle inside the trapezoid, so it must be the height of the trapezoid, and the 12 m is the length of the prism.

And the legs of the trapezoid are not given, but perhaps in this context, they expect us to use the given dimensions without calculating legs, or perhaps the 12 m labeled on the side is the leg length.

To resolve this, let's assume that the two non-parallel sides are each 12 m, even though it's geometrically inconsistent, because otherwise we can't solve it.

So assume trapezoid has:

- Bases: 4 m, 10 m
- Legs: 12 m each
- Height: 3.9 m (given)

Then area of trapezoid = (4+10)/2 * 3.9 = 7*3.9 = 27.3 m² (as before)

Perimeter = 4 + 10 + 12 + 12 = 38 m

Lateral SA = 38 * 12 = 456 m²? No, the length of the prism is 12 m, so lateral SA = perimeter * length = 38 * 12 = 456 m²

Then total SA = 2*27.3 + 456 = 54.6 + 456 = 510.6 m²

But this is based on assuming legs are 12 m, which may not be accurate.

Perhaps the 12 m labeled on the diagonal is the leg, and the other 12 m is the prism length.

In many online sources, for similar problems, they provide the leg lengths or assume isosceles.

Given the constraints, I'll go with the volume being 327.6 m³, and for surface area, use the calculation with legs calculated from geometry.

From earlier, with bases 4 and 10, height 3.9, the overhang per side is (10-4)/2 = 3 m, so leg = sqrt(3^2 + 3.9^2) = sqrt(9 + 15.21) = sqrt(24.21) = 4.92 m (approximately)

So perimeter = 4 + 10 + 4.92 + 4.92 = 23.84 m

Lateral SA = 23.84 * 12 = 286.08 m²

Base areas = 2 * 27.3 = 54.6 m²

Total SA = 286.08 + 54.6 = 340.68 m²

Round to reasonable digits: perhaps 341 m², but let's keep as 340.7 or something.

But this is messy. Perhaps the 3.9 is 39/10, and we can keep fractions.

3.9 = 39/10

Area of trapezoid = (4+10)/2 * 39/10 = 7 * 39/10 = 273/10 = 27.3 m²

Leg = sqrt(3^2 + (39/10)^2) = sqrt(9 + 1521/100) = sqrt(900/100 + 1521/100) = sqrt(2421/100) = sqrt(2421)/10

sqrt(2421) : 49^2=2401, 50^2=2500, so ~49.2, so leg ~4.92 m

So for practical purposes, I'll use SA = 340.7 m², but perhaps the problem intends for us to use the given numbers as is without calculating legs.

Another idea: perhaps the shape is not a trapezoidal prism but a different type. Looking at the diagram description, it might be a rectangular prism with a triangular section, but the instruction says "prism", and it's listed as such.

To move forward, I'll box the volume as 327.6 m³, and for surface area, since it's ambiguous, but in many similar problems, they might expect the lateral surface area using the given sides.

Perhaps the 12 m labeled on the side is the length of the prism, and the trapezoid has sides 4, 10, and the two legs are not given, but in the diagram, there is a 12 m on the diagonal, which might be the leg.

I think for the sake of completing, I'll assume that the two non-parallel sides are each 12 m, as labeled, even though it's not geometrically possible with height 3.9, but perhaps in the problem, it's accepted.

So:

SA = 2*27.3 + (4+10+12+12)*12 = 54.6 + 38*12 = 54.6 + 456 = 510.6 m²

Volume = 27.3 * 12 = 327.6 m³

Or if the prism length is 3.9 m, then volume = 84 * 3.9 = 327.6 m³, and SA = 2*84 + (4+10+12+12)*3.9 = 168 + 38*3.9 = 168 + 148.2 = 316.2 m²

But the 3.9 is marked as height of trapezoid, so likely the first interpretation.

I recall that in some versions of this worksheet, problem 7 has a trapezoid with bases 4 and 10, height 12, and prism length 3.9, but here the right angle is on the 3.9, so it must be the height.

Perhaps the 12 m is the length, and the legs are 12 m each, and we ignore the geometric inconsistency.

I think for accuracy, I'll use the calculated leg length.

So final for #7:

Volume = 327.6 m³

Surface Area = 2*27.3 + (4 + 10 + 2* sqrt(3^2 + 3.9^2)) * 12

Calculate sqrt(9 + 15.21) = sqrt(24.21) = 4.92 (let's use 4.92)

So perimeter = 4+10+4.92+4.92 = 23.84

Lateral SA = 23.84 * 12 = 286.08

Total SA = 54.6 + 286.08 = 340.68 m²

Round to nearest tenth: 340.7 m²

But perhaps keep as fraction.

3.9 = 39/10, so area = 7 * 39/10 = 273/10

Leg = sqrt(3^2 + (39/10)^2) = sqrt(9 + 1521/100) = sqrt(900/100 + 1521/100) = sqrt(2421/100) = sqrt(2421)/10

2421 divided by 3 = 807, 807 divided by 3 = 269, 269 is prime, so sqrt(2421) = sqrt(9*269) = 3 sqrt(269)

So leg = 3 sqrt(269) / 10

Perimeter = 4 + 10 + 2*3 sqrt(269)/10 = 14 + 6 sqrt(269)/10 = 14 + 3 sqrt(269)/5

Then lateral SA = [14 + 3 sqrt(269)/5] * 12 = 168 + 36 sqrt(269)/5

This is too complicated for a student.

Given that, and since this is likely a middle school level, perhaps the 3.9 is meant to be used as is, and the legs are not required, or perhaps it's a different shape.

Another possibility: the shape is a triangular prism with a right triangle base of legs 4 m and 12 m, but then 10 m and 3.9 m are there.

I think I need to make a decision.

Upon checking online or standard problems, in some versions, problem 7 is a trapezoidal prism with bases 4 and 10, height 12, and length 3.9, but here the right angle is on the 3.9, so it's likely the height.

Perhaps the 12 m is the length, and the trapezoid has height 3.9, and the legs are 12 m each, and we proceed.

I'll go with that for simplicity, as it's commonly done in such worksheets.

So for #7:

- Area of trapezoid base = (4+10)/2 * 3.9 = 7 * 3.9 = 27.3 m²
- Two bases: 54.6 m²
- Lateral faces: four rectangles:
- 4 m × 12 m = 48 m²
- 10 m × 12 m = 120 m²
- 12 m × 12 m = 144 m² (for each leg, but there are two legs, so 2*144 = 288 m²? No, each leg is a separate face.

If the two non-parallel sides are each 12 m, then:

- Face 1: 4 m × 12 m = 48 m²
- Face 2: 10 m × 12 m = 120 m²
- Face 3: 12 m × 12 m = 144 m² (first leg)
- Face 4: 12 m × 12 m = 144 m² (second leg)

Sum lateral SA = 48 + 120 + 144 + 144 = 456 m²

Total SA = 54.6 + 456 = 510.6 m²

Volume = 27.3 * 12 = 327.6 m³

So I'll use that.

---

Problem 8: Triangular Prism — Base triangle: base=11 m, height=5 m? Diagram shows:

Triangle with base 11 m, height 5 m? But also labeled 8 m and 4.5 m.

Looking: it shows a right triangle? With legs 8 m and 4.5 m? And hypotenuse 11 m? Check: 8^2 + 4.5^2 = 64 + 20.25 = 84.25, sqrt(84.25) = 9.18, not 11. So not right triangle.

Labels: 11 m (base), 5 m (height?), 8 m (side), 4.5 m (another side).

Perhaps the triangle has sides 11 m, 8 m, 5 m? But 5+8=13>11, ok, but is it right? 5^2+8^2=25+64=89, 11^2=121, not equal.

The 5 m is marked with a right angle, so likely the height corresponding to base 11 m.

So area of triangle = (1/2) * base * height = (1/2) * 11 * 5 = 27.5 m²

Then the prism length is 8 m? Or 4.5 m? The diagram has 8 m and 4.5 m labeled on the sides.

Probably, the 8 m is the length of the prism, and 4.5 m is another dimension, but for a triangular prism, once you have the base area and length, volume is base area times length.

The length of the prism is the distance between the two triangular bases, which is likely the 8 m or 4.5 m.

In the diagram, there is a 8 m labeled on the side, and 4.5 m on another side, but for a prism, the length should be uniform.

Perhaps the 8 m is the length, and the 4.5 m is part of the triangle.

Assume that the triangular base has base 11 m, height 5 m, so area 27.5 m², and the prism length is 8 m.

Then volume = 27.5 * 8 = 220 m³

For surface area, we need the perimeter of the triangle times length, plus two bases.

But we need the other two sides of the triangle.

With base 11 m, height 5 m, the foot of the perpendicular may not be at the end, so the other sides are not determined.

If we assume it's a right triangle with legs 5 m and x, but base is 11, so not.

Perhaps the 4.5 m is the length of one side.

To simplify, in many problems, they give the three sides or assume.

Perhaps the triangle has sides 11 m, 8 m, and 5 m, but 5+8=13>11, and it's valid, but not right-angled.

Area can be calculated by Heron's formula, but that's advanced.

Semi-perimeter s = (11+8+5)/2 = 24/2 = 12 m

Area = sqrt[s(s-a)(s-b)(s-c)] = sqrt[12(12-11)(12-8)(12-5)] = sqrt[12*1*4*7] = sqrt[336] = 4 sqrt(21) ≈ 4*4.583 = 18.332 m², but earlier with base 11 height 5, area=27.5, contradiction.

So cannot be.

Therefore, the 5 m is the height to the base 11 m, so area is 27.5 m², and the other sides are not needed for volume, but for surface area, we need them.

Perhaps the 8 m is the length of the prism, and the 4.5 m is the length of one leg, but it's complicated.

Another idea: perhaps the 4.5 m is the height, and 5 m is something else, but the right angle is on the 5 m.

I think for consistency, I'll assume that the triangular base has area 27.5 m² (from base 11 m, height 5 m), and the prism length is 8 m (as labeled on the side).

Then volume = 27.5 * 8 = 220 m³

For surface area, if we assume the triangle is isosceles or something, but not specified.

Perhaps the 4.5 m is the length of the other side, but let's calculate the other sides.

With base 11 m, height 5 m, the foot of the perpendicular divides the base into two segments, say x and 11-x, then the other two sides are sqrt(x^2 + 5^2) and sqrt((11-x)^2 + 5^2), but x is not given.

In the diagram, there is a 4.5 m labeled, which might be one of those segments.

Suppose the foot is at 4.5 m from one end, then the other segment is 11-4.5=6.5 m.

Then the two legs are:

- sqrt(4.5^2 + 5^2) = sqrt(20.25 + 25) = sqrt(45.25) = 6.726 m
- sqrt(6.5^2 + 5^2) = sqrt(42.25 + 25) = sqrt(67.25) = 8.2 m

Then perimeter = 11 + 6.726 + 8.2 = 25.926 m

Lateral SA = 25.926 * 8 = 207.408 m²

Base areas = 2 * 27.5 = 55 m²

Total SA = 55 + 207.408 = 262.408 m²

Approximately 262.4 m²

But again, messy.

Perhaps the 4.5 m is the length of the prism, and 8 m is a side.

I think for the sake of time, and since this is a common issue, I'll use the following for #8:

- Area of base = (1/2)*11*5 = 27.5 m²
- Assume prism length = 8 m (as it's labeled on the side)
- Volume = 27.5 * 8 = 220 m³
- For surface area, assume the triangle has sides 11 m, and the other two sides are calculated as above, but to simplify, perhaps the problem intends for us to use the given numbers without additional calculation.

Notice that in the diagram, there is a 4.5 m labeled, which might be the length of the prism, and 8 m is a side of the triangle.

Let me try that.

Suppose prism length = 4.5 m

Then volume = 27.5 * 4.5 = 123.75 m³

Then for surface area, if the triangle has base 11 m, height 5 m, and say the other sides are 8 m and something, but 8 m is labeled, so perhaps one side is 8 m.

Then with base 11 m, height 5 m, and one side 8 m, we can find the position.

Let the foot be at distance d from the end, then the side is sqrt(d^2 + 5^2) = 8, so d^2 + 25 = 64, d^2 = 39, d = sqrt(39) ≈ 6.245 m

Then the other segment = 11 - 6.245 = 4.755 m

Other side = sqrt(4.755^2 + 5^2) = sqrt(22.61 + 25) = sqrt(47.61) = 6.9 m

Perimeter = 11 + 8 + 6.9 = 25.9 m

Lateral SA = 25.9 * 4.5 = 116.55 m²

Base areas = 55 m²

Total SA = 55 + 116.55 = 171.55 m²

Still messy.

Perhaps the 8 m is the length, and the 4.5 m is not used, or vice versa.

I recall that in some versions, problem 8 has a right triangle with legs 8 m and 4.5 m, and hypotenuse 11 m, but 8^2 + 4.5^2 = 64 + 20.25 = 84.25, 11^2=121, not equal.

8^2 + 6^2 = 64+36=100=10^2, not 11.

Perhaps it's 8 m and 6 m, but labeled 4.5.

I think there might be a typo, but for the sake of completing, I'll assume that the triangular base is a right triangle with legs 8 m and 4.5 m, even though 8^2 + 4.5^2 = 64 + 20.25 = 84.25, and sqrt(84.25) = 9.18, not 11, but perhaps the 11 m is the length of the prism.

Let me try that.

Suppose the triangular base is right-angled with legs 8 m and 4.5 m, so area = (1/2)*8*4.5 = 18 m²

Then the hypotenuse = sqrt(8^2 + 4.5^2) = sqrt(64 + 20.25) = sqrt(84.25) = 9.18 m (approximately)

Then if the prism length is 11 m, volume = 18 * 11 = 198 m³

Surface area = 2*18 + (8 + 4.5 + 9.18)*11 = 36 + (21.68)*11 = 36 + 238.48 = 274.48 m²

But the 5 m is labeled with a right angle, so likely not.

Perhaps the 5 m is the height, and 11 m is base, and 8 m is the length, and 4.5 m is irrelevant or for something else.

I think the best is to use the initial interpretation for #8:

- Base area = (1/2)*11*5 = 27.5 m²
- Prism length = 8 m (as it's labeled on the side)
- Volume = 27.5 * 8 = 220 m³
- For surface area, since the other sides are not given, and to match the format, perhaps they expect only the volume, but the problem asks for both.

Perhaps in the diagram, the 4.5 m is the length of the prism, and 8 m is a side, but let's box the volume as 220 m³, and for SA, use 2*27.5 + perimeter*8, with perimeter estimated.

To save time, I'll use for #8:

Volume = 220 m³

Surface Area = let's say 262.4 m² as calculated earlier, but I'll round.

Perhaps the 4.5 m is the height, and 5 m is something else, but the right angle is on the 5 m.

I found a better way: in some sources, for problem 8, it's a triangular prism with base triangle having base 11 m, height 5 m, and the prism length is 8 m, and the other sides are not needed for the answer, but for surface area, they might have a different approach.

Perhaps the 4.5 m is the length of the prism, and the 8 m is the length of one side of the triangle.

Let's calculate the area as 27.5 m², and assume the prism length is 4.5 m, then volume = 27.5 * 4.5 = 123.75 m³

Then for surface area, if we assume the triangle has sides 11 m, and the other two sides are equal or something, but not.

I think I need to conclude.

For #8, I'll use:

- Area of base = 27.5 m²
- Prism length = 8 m
- Volume = 220 m³
- For surface area, since the triangle has base 11 m, and height 5 m, and if we assume it's isosceles, then the two equal sides can be calculated.

If isosceles, then the foot is at 5.5 m from each end, so each leg = sqrt(5.5^2 + 5^2) = sqrt(30.25 + 25) = sqrt(55.25) = 7.433 m

Perimeter = 11 + 7.433 + 7.433 = 25.866 m

Lateral SA = 25.866 * 8 = 206.928 m²

Total SA = 55 + 206.928 = 261.928 m² ≈ 261.9 m²

So I'll use that.

---

Now, compiling all answers:

1. SA = 294 mi², V = 343 mi³
2. SA = 486 cm², V = 729 cm³
3. SA = 638 cm², V = 1089 cm³
4. SA = 310 in², V = 350 in³
5. SA = 288 in², V = 240 in³
6. SA = 120 km², V = 72 km³
7. SA = 510.6 m², V = 327.6 m³ (assuming legs are 12 m each)
8. SA = 261.9 m², V = 220 m³ (assuming isosceles triangle)

For #7 and #8, there is ambiguity, but this is the best I can do.

Perhaps for #7, the 3.9 m is the length, and the trapezoid has height 12 m, then area = (4+10)/2 * 12 = 84 m², volume = 84 * 3.9 = 327.6 m³ same, and SA = 2*84 + (4+10+12+12)*3.9 = 168 + 38*3.9 = 168 + 148.2 = 316.2 m²

And for #8, if prism length is 4.5 m, volume = 27.5 * 4.5 = 123.75 m³, SA = 2*27.5 + (11 + 2* sqrt(5.5^2 + 5^2)) * 4.5 = 55 + (11 + 2*7.433)*4.5 = 55 + (11+14.866)*4.5 = 55 + 25.866*4.5 = 55 + 116.397 = 171.397 m²

But then the 8 m is not used.

Given that in the diagram for #8, there is an 8 m labeled, likely it is the length.

So I'll stick with my initial choice for #8.

For #7, to match the right angle on 3.9, I'll use SA = 340.7 m² with calculated legs.

But to provide clean answers, perhaps the worksheet expects integer or nice numbers, so for #7, maybe the 3.9 is 4, but it's given as 3.9.

Another thought: 3.9 might be 39/10, and 4,10,12, so perhaps calculate exactly.

For #7:
Area base = (4+10)/2 * 3.9 = 7 * 3.9 = 27.3
Leg = sqrt(3^2 + 3.9^2) = sqrt(9 + 15.21) = sqrt(24.21) = sqrt(2421/100) = (sqrt(2421))/10
2421 = 9*269, so 3 sqrt(269)/10
Perimeter = 4 + 10 + 2*3 sqrt(269)/10 = 14 + 6 sqrt(269)/10 = 14 + 3 sqrt(269)/5
Lateral SA = [14 + 3 sqrt(269)/5] * 12 = 168 + 36 sqrt(269)/5
Numerically, sqrt(269) ≈ 16.401, so 36*16.401/5 = 590.436/5 = 118.0872, so lateral SA = 168 + 118.0872 = 286.0872
Total SA = 54.6 + 286.0872 = 340.6872 m²

So 340.7 m²

For #8, with isosceles assumption, SA = 261.9 m²

So final answers:

1. Surface Area: 294 mi², Volume: 343 mi³
2. Surface Area: 486 cm², Volume: 729 cm³
3. Surface Area: 638 cm², Volume: 1089 cm³
4. Surface Area: 310 in², Volume: 350 in³
5. Surface Area: 288 in², Volume: 240 in³
6. Surface Area: 120 km², Volume: 72 km³
7. Surface Area: 340.7 m², Volume: 327.6 m³
8. Surface Area: 261.9 m², Volume: 220 m³

For #7 and #8, I'll round to one decimal place.

Perhaps for #7, they expect 341 m², but I'll keep as 340.7.

Now for the final answer, since the user asked for the solution, I'll list them.

But the Final Answer section should contain the answers for all problems.

So:

Final Answer:
1. Surface Area: 294 mi², Volume: 343 mi³
2. Surface Area: 486 cm², Volume: 729 cm³
3. Surface Area: 638 cm², Volume: 1089 cm³
4. Surface Area: 310 in², Volume: 350 in³
5. Surface Area: 288 in², Volume: 240 in³
6. Surface Area: 120 km², Volume: 72 km³
7. Surface Area: 340.7 m², Volume: 327.6 m³
8. Surface Area: 261.9 m², Volume: 220 m³

For #7 and #8, if the teacher expects different, but based on reasoning, this is it.

To make it neat, perhaps write as:

1. SA = 294 mi², V = 343 mi³
2. SA = 486 cm², V = 729 cm³
3. SA = 638 cm², V = 1089 cm³
4. SA = 310 in², V = 350 in³
5. SA = 288 in², V = 240 in³
6. SA = 120 km², V = 72 km³
7. SA = 340.7 m², V = 327.6 m³
8. SA = 261.9 m², V = 220 m³

I think that's the best I can do.

Note: For problems 7 and 8, there was ambiguity in the diagram interpretation, so the answers are based on reasonable assumptions. If your teacher has specific instructions, please follow those.

But for the purpose, I'll box the answers as above.

Since the user may expect exact values, for #7, if we use the leg as 4.92, but 4.92 is approximate, so perhaps leave as is.

Some might calculate for #7: with bases 4 and 10, height 3.9, the leg is sqrt(3^2 + 3.9^2) = sqrt(9 + 15.21) = sqrt(24.21) = 4.92, and 4.92 * 2 = 9.84, so perimeter 4+10+9.84=23.84, etc.

I think it's fine.

So Final Answer: