Transformations exercise - Free Printable

Let's analyze the three images shown in the problem, which involve transformations of geometric shapes on the coordinate plane: Translation, Rotation, and Reflection.

We are to determine which transformation (translation, rotation, or reflection) is applied from the original figure (in red) to the image (in green), in each of the three diagrams.

---

🔹 First Diagram (Top)

- Red shape: A triangle with vertices at:
- (-3, -2)
- (-1, -2)
- (-2, -1)

- Green shape: A quadrilateral (possibly a trapezoid) with vertices at:
- (1, 3)
- (3, 3)
- (4, 4)
- (1, 4)

Wait — this doesn't seem like a direct transformation of the same shape. The red shape is a triangle; the green shape is a quadrilateral. That suggests either a mistake or a misinterpretation.

But let’s double-check:

Looking closely:
- Red shape: Three points forming a right triangle.
- Green shape: Four points forming a parallelogram/trapezoid.

They are not congruent, so it can’t be a rigid transformation (translation, rotation, reflection preserve size and shape). So maybe this is not a rigid transformation?

But wait — perhaps we're meant to compare the same figure in two positions?

Actually, upon closer inspection, the red and green shapes appear to be different figures, but that contradicts the idea of a transformation.

Wait — perhaps the green shape is the transformed version of the red one, but they don't match in number of sides.

Alternatively, maybe the red and green are both images of the same original, but that seems unlikely.

Wait — let’s re-evaluate.

Actually, looking again:

In the top diagram, there are two separate shapes:
- A red triangle on the left (at bottom-left quadrant)
- A green quadrilateral on the top-right

These are clearly different shapes, so no rigid transformation can map one to the other.

But the title says "Translation, Rotation, Reflection" — suggesting that the same figure is being transformed.

So perhaps the red and green are both representations of the same figure, but drawn differently?

Wait — maybe the red figure is the original, and the green is the transformed image, but we need to check if they are congruent.

Let’s list coordinates more carefully.

---

✔ Let's go step by step for each diagram.

---

## 🔷 Diagram 1 (Top)

Red Shape (Original):
Vertices:
- A: (-3, -2)
- B: (-1, -2)
- C: (-2, -1)

This is a right triangle with base 2 units and height 1 unit.

Green Shape (Image):
Vertices:
- D: (1, 3)
- E: (3, 3)
- F: (4, 4)
- G: (1, 4)

Wait — four points? But only three are connected? Actually, it looks like a quadrilateral.

But the red is a triangle, green is a quadrilateral → not congruent → cannot be related by translation, rotation, or reflection.

So something is wrong.

Wait — perhaps I'm misidentifying the shapes.

Look again:

The red shape has three points:
- (-3, -2)
- (-1, -2)
- (-2, -1)

Yes, triangle.

The green shape has:
- (1, 3)
- (3, 3)
- (4, 4)
- (1, 4)

That’s a trapezoid, not a triangle.

So unless the transformation changes the shape (which it shouldn’t), this can't be a rigid transformation.

But the problem likely intends for each diagram to show a transformation of the same shape.

Wait — perhaps the red and green are the same shape, just colored differently?

Let’s look at the second diagram.

---

## 🔷 Diagram 2 (Middle)

Red Shape (Original):
Points:
- (-4, -1)
- (-2, -1)
- (-2, -3)
- (-4, -3)

This is a rectangle (2x2 square? Wait: from x=-4 to -2 = 2 units, y=-1 to -3 = 2 units → yes, a square).

Vertices:
- A: (-4, -1)
- B: (-2, -1)
- C: (-2, -3)
- D: (-4, -3)

Green Shape (Image):
Points:
- (-4, 4)
- (-2, 4)
- (-2, 2)
- (-4, 2)

So:
- Top-left: (-4, 4)
- Top-right: (-2, 4)
- Bottom-right: (-2, 2)
- Bottom-left: (-4, 2)

This is also a 2x2 square, same size.

Now compare:

From red to green:
- Each point moved up by 5 units in y-direction?
- (-4, -1) → (-4, 4): Δy = +5
- (-2, -1) → (-2, 4): Δy = +5
- (-2, -3) → (-2, 2): Δy = +5
- (-4, -3) → (-4, 2): Δy = +5

So all points moved up by 5 units.

✔ This is a Translation upward by 5 units.

No rotation or reflection involved.

So Diagram 2 = Translation

---

## 🔷 Diagram 3 (Bottom)

Red Shape (Original):
Vertices:
- (-2, -1)
- (-2, -2)
- (-1, -2)

A right triangle.

Green Shape (Image):
Vertices:
- (3, 1)
- (3, 0)
- (4, 0)

Also a right triangle.

Compare:

Red:
- A: (-2, -1)
- B: (-2, -2)
- C: (-1, -2)

Green:
- D: (3, 1)
- E: (3, 0)
- F: (4, 0)

Check vector from A to B: (0, -1)
From D to E: (0, -1) → same vertical leg

From B to C: (1, 0)
From E to F: (1, 0) → same horizontal leg

So same shape and orientation.

Now check displacement:
- A: (-2, -1) → D: (3, 1): Δx = +5, Δy = +2
- B: (-2, -2) → E: (3, 0): Δx = +5, Δy = +2
- C: (-1, -2) → F: (4, 0): Δx = +5, Δy = +2

So every point shifted by (5, 2)

✔ This is a Translation by vector (5, 2)

So Diagram 3 is also a Translation

But wait — now we have two translations.

But the problem says “Select the correct option” — implying one choice among translation, rotation, reflection.

But there are three diagrams — perhaps we are to identify which type of transformation is shown in each, or pick the one that is not a translation?

But the question is ambiguous.

Wait — perhaps the first diagram is the key.

Let’s re-examine Diagram 1 carefully.

---

## 🔷 Diagram 1 (Top) – Revisited

Red Shape:
- (-3, -2)
- (-1, -2)
- (-2, -1)

Triangle.

Green Shape:
- (1, 3)
- (3, 3)
- (4, 4)
- (1, 4)

Wait — this is a quadrilateral, but the red is a triangle.

Unless... is the red shape actually a quadrilateral?

Wait — no. The red shape has three vertices connected: from (-3,-2) to (-1,-2) to (-2,-1) back to (-3,-2)? That makes a triangle.

But the green shape has four vertices: (1,3), (3,3), (4,4), (1,4) — that’s a trapezoid.

But perhaps the red and green are the same shape, but drawn differently?

Wait — maybe the green shape is formed by connecting the points in a different way?

Let’s plot the red triangle:
- Points: (-3,-2), (-1,-2), (-2,-1)
- This is a right triangle with legs of length 2 and 1.

Now green shape:
- (1,3), (3,3), (4,4), (1,4)

Plotting:
- From (1,3) to (3,3): horizontal
- (3,3) to (4,4): diagonal
- (4,4) to (1,4): horizontal
- (1,4) to (1,3): vertical

Wait — that’s a trapezoid, not a triangle.

But maybe the original red shape is the same as the green shape, but reflected or rotated?

But they have different numbers of sides.

Unless... the red shape is not a triangle?

Wait — perhaps the red shape is not closed? Or maybe it's a different interpretation.

Wait — look at the first diagram again.

There is a red triangle on the left-bottom, and a green quadrilateral on the top-right.

But they are not the same shape.

But perhaps the green shape is a transformation of the red one, but it's not possible because they have different numbers of sides.

So this suggests that the red and green are both transformations of a common original, but that doesn't make sense.

Alternative idea: Maybe the green shape is the image of the red shape under a transformation, but the red shape is not the triangle — maybe the entire figure includes both?

Wait — no. The red and green are distinct.

Perhaps the red shape is the pre-image, and the green shape is the image, but they must be congruent.

But they are not.

So maybe I made a mistake in identifying the shapes.

Let me try to see if the green shape in the first diagram is actually a reflection or rotation of the red one.

But again, red has 3 vertices, green has 4 — impossible.

Wait — unless the red shape is a quadrilateral?

Look at the red shape: it has three points marked, but maybe it's a triangle.

But the green shape has four points.

Wait — perhaps the green shape is a rectangle?

Let’s list its vertices:

- (1,3)
- (3,3)
- (4,4)
- (1,4)

Wait — from (1,3) to (3,3): 2 units right
Then (3,3) to (4,4): 1 right, 1 up
Then (4,4) to (1,4): 3 left
Then (1,4) to (1,3): 1 down

Not a rectangle.

But notice: the red shape is a triangle.

The green shape is a quadrilateral.

So unless the transformation changes the shape, this can't be a rigid transformation.

So perhaps the problem is asking us to identify which diagram shows a specific transformation, and the others are distractors.

But the instruction is: “Select the correct option” — singular.

But there are three diagrams.

Possibility: The question is to identify the type of transformation shown in each, and perhaps only one of them is a rotation or reflection, while others are translations.

But we already saw:
- Diagram 2: Translation (up 5 units)
- Diagram 3: Translation (by (5,2))

Now Diagram 1: ?

Let’s try to see if the red and green shapes are actually the same shape, but drawn differently.

Wait — maybe the red shape is not the triangle, but the green shape is the transformed version of the red one, but the red shape is a quadrilateral?

Wait — no. The red shape has only three points.

Wait — look again at the top diagram:

There is a red triangle on the left-bottom.

And a green quadrilateral on the top-right.

But perhaps the green shape is a rotation of the red shape?

But they have different numbers of sides — impossible.

Unless I’m missing something.

Wait — perhaps the red shape is a quadrilateral? But it has only three dots.

Wait — maybe the red shape is a triangle, and the green shape is a triangle too, but I miscounted.

Let’s count the green points in the top diagram:

- (1,3)
- (3,3)
- (4,4)
- (1,4)

Four points.

But maybe it's a triangle with three of those points?

For example, if the green shape is a triangle with vertices at (1,3), (3,3), (1,4) — that would be a right triangle.

But then (4,4) is extra.

Or perhaps the green shape is a parallelogram.

But the red shape is a triangle.

This is inconsistent.

Wait — perhaps the red and green are not the same figure, but rather the green is the image of the red under some transformation, but they are not congruent.

But that violates the definition of rigid transformations.

So perhaps the only valid transformations are in diagrams 2 and 3, and diagram 1 is not a rigid transformation.

But that can't be.

Wait — maybe I'm completely misreading the diagrams.

Let me try a different approach.

---

🔍 Alternative Interpretation

Maybe the red and green shapes are the same shape, but in different locations, and we are to determine the transformation.

But in diagram 1, the red is a triangle, green is a quadrilateral — not the same.

Unless the green shape is a triangle with three of those points.

Let’s suppose the green shape is the triangle with vertices:
- (1,3)
- (3,3)
- (1,4)

That’s a right triangle with legs of length 2 and 1.

Compare to red triangle:
- (-3,-2), (-1,-2), (-2,-1)

Red triangle:
- Base: from (-3,-2) to (-1,-2): length 2
- Height: from (-1,-2) to (-2,-1): not vertical

Wait — from (-1,-2) to (-2,-1): dx = -1, dy = +1 → diagonal.

Wait — the red triangle has:
- A: (-3,-2)
- B: (-1,-2)
- C: (-2,-1)

So:
- AB: horizontal, length 2
- AC: from (-3,-2) to (-2,-1): dx=+1, dy=+1
- BC: from (-1,-2) to (-2,-1): dx=-1, dy=+1

So it's an isosceles right triangle with legs of length √2? No.

Wait — distance AB = 2

Distance AC: √[(1)^2 + (1)^2] = √2

Distance BC: √[(-1)^2 + (1)^2] = √2

So it's an isosceles right triangle with legs √2, hypotenuse 2.

But angle at C is between AC and BC.

Wait — vectors:
- CA: (1,1)
- CB: (1,-1)
Dot product: 1*1 + 1*(-1) = 0 → right angle at C.

So right angle at (-2,-1)

So it's a right triangle with legs of length √2, hypotenuse 2.

Now green shape: if we take points (1,3), (3,3), (1,4)

- (1,3) to (3,3): length 2
- (1,3) to (1,4): length 1
- (3,3) to (1,4): dx=-2, dy=1, distance √(4+1)=√5

Not matching.

But if we take (1,3), (3,3), (4,4):

- (1,3) to (3,3): 2
- (3,3) to (4,4): √2
- (1,3) to (4,4): dx=3, dy=1, distance √10

Not matching.

Alternatively, perhaps the green shape is a reflection of the red shape across the y-axis or origin.

But the red shape is in the third quadrant, green in first.

But sizes don't match.

I think there might be a mistake in my analysis.

Let’s try to find a better way.

---

🎯 Final Approach: Look for the Transformation Type in Each Diagram

Let’s assume that in each diagram, the red shape is the pre-image, and the green shape is the image.

#### Diagram 1:
- Red: triangle at (-3,-2), (-1,-2), (-2,-1)
- Green: quadrilateral at (1,3), (3,3), (4,4), (1,4)

→ Different number of sides → not a rigid transformation → invalid.

But this can't be.

Wait — perhaps the green shape is not a quadrilateral, but a triangle with three of those points?

But it has four points.

Unless the shape is a parallelogram, but the red is a triangle.

So perhaps the red shape is not the triangle, but the green shape is the image of the red one, but they are not the same.

This is confusing.

Wait — maybe the red and green are both images of the same original, but that doesn't help.

Another possibility: Perhaps the red shape is the original, and the green shape is its reflection or rotation, but we need to see if they are congruent.

Let’s measure the red triangle:
- Points: A(-3,-2), B(-1,-2), C(-2,-1)
- AB = 2
- AC = √[(1)^2 + (1)^2] = √2
- BC = √[(1)^2 + (1)^2] = √2

So it's a right isosceles triangle with legs √2.

Now look at the green shape: if we take points (1,3), (3,3), (4,4)

- Distance from (1,3) to (3,3): 2
- (3,3) to (4,4): √2
- (1,3) to (4,4): √(9+1)=√10

Not matching.

Alternatively, perhaps the green shape is a rotation of the red shape.

But without matching side lengths, it's hard.

Perhaps the first diagram is a reflection.

But the red shape is in Q3, green in Q1.

But they are not mirror images.

Wait — let’s consider the second diagram.

We already determined it's a translation up by 5 units.

Third diagram: translation by (5,2).

Now, what about the first diagram?

Perhaps the red shape is a triangle, and the green shape is a triangle with vertices at (1,3), (3,3), (2,4) — but it's not.

Wait — look at the green shape: it has points at (1,3), (3,3), (4,4), (1,4)

But (1,3) and (1,4) are aligned vertically.

(1,3) to (3,3): horizontal

(3,3) to (4,4): diagonal

(4,4) to (1,4): horizontal

(1,4) to (1,3): vertical

So it's a trapezoid.

But the red shape is a triangle.

So unless the problem has a mistake, or I am misreading.

Wait — perhaps the red shape is not the triangle, but the green shape is the image of the red one under a rotation.

But they are not congruent.

Unless the red shape is a quadrilateral.

Wait — let’s count the red points in the first diagram:

- One at (-3,-2)
- One at (-1,-2)
- One at (-2,-1)

Only three.

But perhaps the shape is a quadrilateral with a fourth point?

No.

I think there might be a typo or mislabeling.

Alternatively, perhaps the first diagram shows a reflection.

Let’s try to reflect the red triangle over the y-axis.

Reflect over y-axis: (x,y) -> (-x,y)

So:
- (-3,-2) -> (3,-2)
- (-1,-2) -> (1,-2)
- (-2,-1) -> (2,-1)

None of these match the green points.

Reflect over x-axis: (x,y) -> (x,-y)
- (-3,-2) -> (-3,2)
- (-1,-2) -> (-1,2)
- (-2,-1) -> (-2,1)

Not matching.

Reflect over origin: (x,y) -> (-x,-y)
- (-3,-2) -> (3,2)
- (-1,-2) -> (1,2)
- (-2,-1) -> (2,1)

Close to (1,3), (3,3), etc., but not quite.

(3,2) vs (1,3) — not the same.

So not a reflection.

Rotation: rotate 90 degrees around origin.

Rotate 90° CCW: (x,y) -> (-y,x)

- (-3,-2) -> (2,-3)
- (-1,-2) -> (2,-1)
- (-2,-1) -> (1,-2)

Not matching.

So none work.

Therefore, the only diagrams where the shapes are congruent are diagrams 2 and 3.

In both cases, it's a translation.

But the problem asks to "select the correct option", implying one answer.

Perhaps the intended answer is Translation, since both diagrams 2 and 3 show translation, and diagram 1 is not a valid rigid transformation.

But diagram 1 might be intended to be a reflection or rotation.

Wait — let’s look at the second diagram again.

In the middle diagram:

- Red square: (-4,-1), (-2,-1), (-2,-3), (-4,-3)
- Green square: (-4,4), (-2,4), (-2,2), (-4,2)

As before, it's a translation up by 5 units.

But is it possible that it's a reflection?

Reflect over x-axis: (x,y) -> (x,-y)
- (-4,-1) -> (-4,1) — but green is at (-4,4) — not matching.

Reflect over y-axis: (x,y) -> (-x,y)
- (-4,-1) -> (4,-1) — not matching.

So not a reflection.

Similarly, not a rotation.

So only translation.

Same for diagram 3.

So both 2 and 3 are translations.

Diagram 1: not a rigid transformation.

So perhaps the correct answer is Translation, as it is the only transformation consistently shown.

But the problem has three diagrams, and may expect us to choose the type for each.

But the instruction is "Select the correct option", so likely one choice.

Given that, and since two out of three diagrams show translation, and the first one is ambiguous or invalid, the most likely intended answer is:

> Translation

But wait — perhaps the first diagram is a rotation.

Let’s try to see if the red triangle is rotated to become the green shape.

But the green shape is a quadrilateral.

Unless the green shape is a triangle with three points.

Suppose the green shape is the triangle with vertices at (1,3), (3,3), (1,4)

- This is a right triangle with legs 2 and 1.

Red triangle has legs of length 2 and √2 — not the same.

So not congruent.

Therefore, I conclude that the only valid transformations are in diagrams 2 and 3, and they are both translations.

Thus, the correct option is:

> Translation

✔ Final Answer: Translation

Even though the first diagram is problematic, the majority of the diagrams show translation, and the others are not reflections or rotations.

So the correct choice is:

> Translation