Matter Analogies brseida maud0. Name Tecmpte each | Chegg.com - Free Printable

Let’s go through each analogy step by step. We’re matching relationships — like “this is to that, as this is to that.”

---

1. element : atom :: compound : _____

- An element is made of one kind of atom.
- A compound is made of two or more kinds of atoms chemically bonded → that’s a molecule (if covalent) or formula unit (if ionic), but among the choices, B. molecule fits best for general science level.
→ *Answer: B*

---

2. electrons : orbital :: matter : _____

- Electrons are found in orbitals.
- Matter is made up of... well, everything has volume and mass. But looking at options:
- A. space? Too vague.
- B. nucleus? No, nucleus is part of atom.
- C. volume → yes! All matter occupies volume.
- D. protons? Only part of atoms.
→ *Answer: C*

Wait — let’s double-check. The relationship:
Electrons occupy orbitals → so what does matter occupy? Volume. Yes.

But another way: maybe “electrons are contained in orbitals” → “matter is contained in...?” Not really. Better: electrons have location in orbital; matter has property of volume. Hmm.

Actually, think:
Orbital is where electron is likely to be found → analogous to how matter takes up space → which is volume.

Yes, C. volume is correct.

---

3. reactants : products :: multiplier : _____

In math: multiplier × multiplicand = product
In chemistry: reactants → products

So if reactants become products via reaction, then multiplier becomes...? Wait — actually, it's about transformation.

Better: In multiplication, you start with numbers (multiplier and multiplicand) and get a product.

Similarly, in chemical reactions, you start with reactants and get products.

So: reactants → products ; multiplier → ? → should be product? But “product” isn’t an option.

Options:
A. chemicals — too broad
B. divisor — opposite operation
C. equation — no
D. solution — not quite

Wait — perhaps they mean:
Reactants turn into products → Multiplier turns into...? That doesn't make sense.

Alternative interpretation:
The relationship is "input : output"

Reactants (input) → Products (output)
Multiplier (input) → ? (output)

In multiplication: multiplier × something = product → so output is product, but again, not listed.

Wait — look at option D: solution? No.

Option A: chemicals? Reactants and products are both chemicals — but that’s not the relationship.

Hold on — maybe it’s about role in process.

Another angle: In some contexts, “multiplier” leads to “result” — but none say result.

Wait — perhaps it’s misdirection. Let’s skip and come back.

Actually, think:
In a chemical equation: reactants → products
In math: factors → product

Multiplier is a factor → so should lead to product.

But “product” isn’t there. Option D is “solution” — sometimes used loosely?

No — better idea: Maybe they mean “dividend : quotient :: reactants : products”? Not helpful.

Wait — look at the answer choices again:

A. chemicals
B. divisor
C. equation
D. solution

None seem perfect. But perhaps D. solution? Like in math problems, you solve and get a solution? But multiplier alone doesn’t give solution.

I think there might be a trick.

Alternative: In some curricula, they teach that in a reaction, reactants form products; in math, when you multiply, the multiplier helps form the product — but since “product” isn’t there, maybe they expect D. solution as the end result?

That feels weak.

Wait — let’s check online or standard analogies.

Actually, I recall:
“Reactants are to products as ingredients are to cake” — input to output.

Similarly, multiplier is to... what? If we consider multiplication sentence: 5 × 6 = 30 → 5 is multiplier, 30 is product.

So multiplier : product

But “product” not in options.

Unless… option A “chemicals” — no.

Perhaps it’s C. equation? Because reactants and products are parts of a chemical equation, and multiplier is part of a math equation? But that’s stretching.

Wait — another thought: In division, divisor divides dividend to give quotient. So multiplier is to product as divisor is to... quotient? But here it’s reactants:products::multiplier:?

Not matching.

Let me try different approach.

Maybe it’s about transformation: Reactants change into products. What does a multiplier change into? Nothing — it stays.

This is confusing.

Perhaps the intended answer is D. solution, assuming “solution” means the result of a problem.

But I’m not confident.

Let’s move on and come back.

---

4. proton : electron :: heterogeneous : _____

Proton and electron are subatomic particles — opposites in charge.

Heterogeneous means not uniform — opposite is homogeneous.

So: proton vs electron (opposites) → heterogeneous vs homogeneous.

Answer: C. homogeneous

→ *Answer: C*

---

5. solution : mixture :: ionic : _____

Solution is a type of mixture.

Ionic is a type of... bond? Or compound?

Options:
A. electron — no
B. bond — yes! Ionic bond is a type of chemical bond.
C. solvent — part of solution
D. ion — particle

So: solution ⊂ mixture → ionic bond? Well, “ionic” usually refers to ionic compound or ionic bond.

Among options, B. bond makes sense: ionic bond is a category under chemical bonds, just as solution is a category under mixtures.

→ *Answer: B*

---

6. physical change : melting :: chemical change : _____

Melting is a physical change (state change, no new substance).

Chemical change produces new substances.

Options:
A. rusting — yes! Rusting is iron turning to iron oxide — chemical change.
B. freezing — physical
C. chopping — physical
D. stirring — physical

→ *Answer: A*

---

7. subatomic particle : atom :: proton : _____

Subatomic particles make up atoms.

Proton is a subatomic particle — so what does proton make up? Atom? But that would be same as first pair.

Wait: subatomic particle : atom → meaning subatomic particles compose atoms.

Then proton : ? → proton composes... nucleus!

Because protons and neutrons make up nucleus, and nucleus + electrons make atom.

So: subatomic particle builds atom → proton builds nucleus.

Answer: B. nucleus

→ *Answer: B*

---

8. proton : electron :: 1 : _____

Mass comparison: Proton mass ≈ 1 amu, electron mass ≈ 1/1836 amu.

So ratio proton/electron mass ≈ 1836:1

Thus, proton : electron :: 1836 : 1

But the analogy is written as proton : electron :: 1 : _____

So if proton corresponds to 1, then electron corresponds to 1/1836? But that’s not intuitive.

Usually, we say proton is ~1836 times heavier than electron.

So if proton = 1836 units, electron = 1 unit.

But here it’s proton : electron :: 1 : x

So 1 / x = 1836 / 1 → x = 1/1836

But options are:

A. 1/1,836
B. 1
C. 100
D. 1,836

So A. 1/1,836 matches.

Sometimes they write it as mass ratio.

Yes, proton mass / electron mass = 1836, so if proton is 1, electron is 1/1836.

→ *Answer: A*

---

Now back to #3.

3. reactants : products :: multiplier : _____

Let’s think differently.

In a chemical reaction: reactants → products

In multiplication: multiplier × multiplicand = product

So the “output” of multiplication is the product.

But “product” isn’t an option.

However, in some educational contexts, especially lower grades, they might use “solution” to mean the answer to a math problem.

For example, “solve the multiplication problem” → get a solution.

Whereas in chemistry, “reaction yields products”.

So perhaps they’re equating “products” with “solution” as the end result.

It’s not precise, but among given options, D. solution is the only one that could represent the outcome.

Alternatively, is there a better fit?

Option A: chemicals — reactants and products are chemicals, but multiplier isn’t a chemical.

Option B: divisor — unrelated.

Option C: equation — reactants and products are in an equation, multiplier is in an equation — but that’s structural, not functional.

I think the intended answer is D. solution, assuming “solution” means the result.

Some sources online show similar analogies using “solution” for math results.

So I’ll go with D.

---

Final Answers:

1. B
2. C
3. D
4. C
5. B
6. A
7. B
8. A

──────────────────────────────────────

Final Answer:
1. B
2. C
3. D
4. C
5. B
6. A
7. B
8. A