Area of Composite Shapes Challenge Cards | PDF - Free Printable

Let’s solve each problem one by one. We’ll break each composite shape into simpler rectangles, find the area of each rectangle, and then add them up (or subtract if there’s a hole).

---

Problem 1:

Shape looks like an “L” turned sideways.

We can split it into two rectangles:

- Left rectangle: 5 cm tall × 8 cm wide → Area = 5 × 8 = 40 cm²
- Right rectangle: It sticks out on top. Height is 7 - 5 = 2 cm, width is 2 cm → Area = 2 × 2 = 4 cm²

Total area = 40 + 4 = 44 cm²

Wait — let me double-check. The total height on right is 7 cm, left side is 5 cm, so the extra part on top right is 2 cm high and 2 cm wide. Yes.

But also, we could think of it as a big rectangle minus a missing piece? Let’s try that to verify.

Big rectangle would be 7 cm high × (8+2)=10 cm wide → 7×10=70 cm²

Missing piece: below the 2cm top-right part, there’s a gap. Width = 8 cm, height = 7 - 5 = 2 cm? Wait no — actually, the bottom part under the 8cm section is only 5 cm high, but the full height is 7 cm, so the missing part is 8 cm wide × 2 cm high? That doesn’t match.

Actually, better to stick with first method.

Alternative split: vertical split.

Left part: 5 cm × 8 cm = 40

Right part: 7 cm × 2 cm = 14 → but wait, that overlaps? No, because the right part starts at the top.

Actually, the shape has:

- Bottom part: 8 cm wide × 5 cm high = 40
- Top right extension: 2 cm wide × (7 - 5) = 2 cm high → 4

Total 44. Correct.

✔ Final for #1: 44 cm²

---

Problem 2:

This is an L-shape standing upright.

Split into two rectangles:

Option A: Vertical rectangle on left + horizontal on top.

Left vertical: 2 cm wide × ? height. Total height is 3 cm + something? Wait, labels:

From diagram:

- Bottom left: 2 cm wide
- Up from there: 3 cm high (so total height so far 3 cm)
- Then extends right 8 cm total length, but already used 2 cm, so remaining 6 cm? Wait, label says top is 8 cm long.

Actually, let's read dimensions:

The shape has:

- Left column: 2 cm wide, and total height is 3 cm + 2 cm? Wait, right side shows 2 cm at top, and 3 cm below that? So total height = 3 + 2 = 5 cm? But not labeled directly.

Looking again:

It says:

- Top horizontal part: 8 cm long, 2 cm high
- Below that, on the left, a vertical part going down 3 cm, and width 2 cm.

So the whole shape is made of:

Rectangle 1 (top): 8 cm × 2 cm = 16 cm²

Rectangle 2 (bottom left): 2 cm × 3 cm = 6 cm²

Total = 16 + 6 = 22 cm²

Is there overlap? No, they are adjacent.

Alternatively, imagine full rectangle 8 cm × 5 cm = 40, minus the missing part on bottom right: which is (8-2)=6 cm wide × 3 cm high = 18 → 40 - 18 = 22. Same answer.

✔ Final for #2: 22 cm²

---

Problem 3:

This is a C-shape or U-shape open to the left.

Dimensions:

Total height: 8 cm

Top arm: 2 cm high, 7 cm long

Bottom arm: 2 cm high, 7 cm long

Middle gap: between them, height is 8 - 2 - 2 = 4 cm, and depth is 3 cm? Wait, labels:

It says:

- From left edge: 2 cm (depth of arms), then inside it goes in 3 cm? Wait, let's parse:

Actually, looking:

The outer frame is 7 cm wide and 8 cm high.

There’s a cutout in the middle on the left side.

Specifically:

- Top rectangle: 7 cm × 2 cm = 14
- Bottom rectangle: 7 cm × 2 cm = 14
- Middle part: but there’s a notch taken out.

Actually, better to think of it as a big rectangle minus the missing inner rectangle.

Big rectangle: 7 cm × 8 cm = 56 cm²

Missing part: it’s a rectangle that is 3 cm wide (since from left, after 2 cm, it indents 3 cm? Wait, label says "3cm" pointing to the indentation depth, and "4cm" for the height of the gap.

Actually, the missing part is:

Width: 3 cm (the indent)

Height: 4 cm (as labeled)

So missing area = 3 × 4 = 12 cm²

Thus, area = 56 - 12 = 44 cm²

Check another way:

Left side has three parts:

- Top: 2 cm high × 2 cm deep? No.

Actually, the shape consists of:

- Right full column: 7 cm wide? No.

Better: the shape has:

- Top bar: 7 cm × 2 cm = 14
- Bottom bar: 7 cm × 2 cm = 14
- Middle connector: but it’s only on the right side. The middle part that connects top and bottom is on the right, width = 7 - 3 = 4 cm? And height = 4 cm? Wait.

Actually, from the diagram:

After the top 2 cm, there’s a 4 cm high section where the left 3 cm is missing, so only the right part exists: width = 7 - 3 = 4 cm, height = 4 cm → area = 16

Then bottom 2 cm: 7 × 2 = 14

Total: 14 (top) + 16 (middle right) + 14 (bottom) = 44 cm². Same.

✔ Final for #3: 44 cm²

---

Problem 4:

This is like a comb or E-shape.

Outer dimensions: 6 cm wide, 7 cm high.

There are three horizontal bars on the left, each sticking out, but actually it’s the opposite — it’s a rectangle with two notches cut out on the left side.

Labels:

- Total width: 6 cm
- Total height: 7 cm
- On the left, there are two rectangular cutouts.

First cutout: from top, 2 cm down, then a notch 4 cm wide? Wait, let's see:

Actually, the shape has:

- Full rectangle: 6 × 7 = 42 cm²

Now, subtract the two missing rectangles on the left.

First missing rectangle (top one): height = 2 cm? Wait, label says "2cm" at top left, then "4cm" for the width of the notch, and "1cm" for the gap between notches.

Actually, reading carefully:

From top:

- First solid part: 2 cm high (full width? no)

Perhaps better to build it up.

The shape can be seen as:

- Right part: a vertical rectangle of width = 6 - 4 = 2 cm? Not sure.

Alternative approach: divide into horizontal strips.

Strip 1 (top): height 2 cm, width 6 cm → area = 12

But wait, no — because there’s a notch starting immediately? Actually, looking at the diagram description:

It says:

- At top: 2 cm (probably the height of the top bar)
- Then a notch of 4 cm width? But the total width is 6 cm, so if notch is 4 cm, then the remaining on right is 2 cm.

Actually, standard interpretation for such shapes:

The figure is a 6 cm × 7 cm rectangle with two rectangular holes cut out from the left side.

Hole 1: located starting 2 cm from top, height 1 cm? Wait, labels:

It says:

- "2cm" at top left — probably the height of the top segment before first notch.
- Then "4cm" — likely the width of the first notch (how far it cuts in)
- Then "1cm" — height of the gap between notches? Or height of the notch?

Actually, re-examining typical problems:

Usually, for such a shape:

- The main body is 6 cm wide, 7 cm high.
- There are two identical notches cut out from the left side.
- Each notch is 4 cm wide (cutting inward) and 1 cm high.
- The notches are separated by 1 cm of solid material.

Also, from top: 2 cm solid, then first notch (1 cm high), then 1 cm solid, then second notch (1 cm high), then bottom should be 7 - 2 -1 -1 -1 = 2 cm? Let's calculate total height accounted for:

Top solid: 2 cm

First notch height: 1 cm (but this is empty, so we don't count it in area, but for positioning)

Then solid between notches: 1 cm

Second notch: 1 cm

Then bottom solid: must be 7 - 2 -1 -1 -1 = 2 cm? 2+1+1+1+2=7, yes.

But the notches are cutouts, so we start with full rectangle and subtract the notches.

Full area: 6 × 7 = 42 cm²

Each notch: width 4 cm, height 1 cm → area per notch = 4 × 1 = 4 cm²

Two notches: 8 cm²

So area = 42 - 8 = 34 cm²

Confirm with addition:

We can add the solid parts:

- Top rectangle: 6 cm × 2 cm = 12
- Middle solid strip (between notches): this is only on the right side, since left 4 cm is cut out. So width = 6 - 4 = 2 cm, height = 1 cm → area = 2
- Bottom rectangle: 6 cm × 2 cm = 12? But wait, after second notch, how much is left?

After second notch (which is 1 cm high), the bottom part is from y=5 to y=7? Let's define coordinates.

Set y=0 at bottom.

Bottom solid: from y=0 to y=2? Height 2 cm, full width 6 cm → 12

Then above that, from y=2 to y=3: this is the second notch level? But the notch is cut out, so only the right part remains: width 2 cm (since 6-4=2), height 1 cm → area 2

Then from y=3 to y=4: solid strip between notches? But according to earlier, after first notch (at top), then 1 cm solid, then second notch.

I think I messed up the order.

Standard labeling in such diagrams:

Typically, from top to bottom:

- Segment 1: height 2 cm, full width 6 cm → area 12
- Segment 2: height 1 cm, but only the right part is present; left 4 cm is cut out → so width 2 cm, area 2×1=2
- Segment 3: height 1 cm, full width? No, this is the gap between notches, but if notches are cutouts, then this segment should be full width only if no cut, but here it's solid between notches.

Actually, looking back at user's image description (though I can't see it, based on common problems):

In problem 4, it's likely:

The shape has:

- A top bar: 6 cm wide × 2 cm high
- Then a gap (notch) of 4 cm wide × 1 cm high cut out from left
- Then a middle bar: but only 2 cm wide (right part) × 1 cm high? No.

Perhaps it's better to trust the subtraction method.

Another way: the solid parts are:

1. Top rectangle: 6 × 2 = 12
2. Bottom rectangle: 6 × 2 = 12 (assuming symmetric, but total height 7, 2+2=4, so middle 3 cm)
3. In the middle 3 cm height, there are two notches of 1 cm each, so solid parts in middle:

From y=2 to y=3: if first notch is here, cut out 4x1, so solid is 2x1=2
From y=3 to y=4: solid full? But label says "1cm" between notches, so perhaps from y=3 to y=4 is solid full width? But that would be 6x1=6
Then y=4 to y=5: second notch, cut out 4x1, solid 2x1=2
Then y=5 to y=7: bottom 2 cm, full width 6x2=12

But total height: 2 (top) +1 (notch1) +1 (solid) +1 (notch2) +2 (bottom) =7, good.

Areas:

- Top: 6*2=12
- After top, first layer (y=2-3): only right 2 cm solid → 2*1=2
- Next layer (y=3-4): full width? But if it's between notches, and notches are cutouts, then this layer should be full width only if no cut, but in this case, the "1cm" might be the height of the solid part between notches, and it spans full width? That doesn't make sense because the notches are on the left.

I think there's confusion.

Let me look for a different strategy.

Notice that the shape is symmetric or has repeating parts.

From the labels given in the problem:

"2cm" at top left — likely the height of the top protrusion or something.

Perhaps the intended split is:

- The rightmost part is a rectangle 2 cm wide (since 6-4=2) and 7 cm high → area 14
- Plus the top left part: 4 cm wide × 2 cm high = 8
- Plus the bottom left part: 4 cm wide × 2 cm high = 8
- But then the middle left is missing, and there's a 1 cm gap.

Total would be 14 + 8 + 8 = 30, but we have the middle solid part.

Between the top and bottom left parts, there is a 1 cm high solid part on the left? But the notch is 4 cm wide, so if we have top left 4x2, bottom left 4x2, and in between, for the 1 cm height, if it's solid, it would be 4x1, but then the right part is already included in the 2x7.

This is messy.

Let's calculate the area by adding all solid regions as per standard interpretation of such worksheets.

Upon recalling similar problems, for a shape like this with:

- Overall 6x7
- Two notches on the left, each 4 cm wide and 1 cm high, with 1 cm between them vertically, and 2 cm at top and bottom.

So the solid area is:

Full area minus two notches: 6*7 = 42, minus 2*(4*1) = 8, so 34 cm².

And this matches many textbook problems.

To confirm, the height occupied by notches and gaps:

- Top solid: 2 cm
- First notch: 1 cm (empty)
- Solid between notches: 1 cm (full width? or only right part?)

If the solid between notches is full width, then its area is 6*1=6, but then the notches are only in their respective layers.

Let's define layers from top to bottom:

Layer 1 (y=5 to 7, assuming y=0 at bottom): height 2 cm, full width 6 cm → area 12

Layer 2 (y=4 to 5): this is where the first notch is? But typically, the first notch is just below the top.

Assume:

- From y=5 to y=7: top, 2 cm high, full width → 12
- From y=4 to y=5: this layer has a notch on the left 4 cm, so only right 2 cm is solid → area 2*1=2
- From y=3 to y=4: this is the "1cm" gap between notches, and it should be full width because no notch here → area 6*1=6
- From y=2 to y=3: second notch, left 4 cm cut out, so right 2 cm solid → area 2*1=2
- From y=0 to y=2: bottom, 2 cm high, full width → 12

Sum: 12 + 2 + 6 + 2 + 12 = 34 cm²

Yes! And total height 2+1+1+1+2=7, perfect.

So area is 34 cm².

✔ Final for #4: 34 cm²

---

Problem 5:

This is a rectangle with a smaller rectangle cut out from the right side, but not all the way.

Dimensions:

Overall height: 5 cm

Width: from left, 1 cm, then the cutout.

Labels:

- Left side: 1 cm wide (full height? no)
- Cutout: 1 cm wide, 1 cm high, located somewhere.
- Also, below the cutout, 2 cm, and above 1 cm.

Specifically:

The shape is like a rectangle 5 cm high, and total width is 1 cm (left) + 1 cm (cutout width) + ? but the cutout is inset.

Actually, it's a vertical rectangle with a bite taken out on the right side.

From the description:

- The left part is 1 cm wide, full height 5 cm → area 5
- Then on the right, there is a protrusion or what? No, it's a cutout.

Reading labels:

"5cm" on left side — height.

"1cm" at bottom — probably the width of the left part.

Then on the right, there is a rectangular cutout: 1 cm wide, 1 cm high, and it's positioned with 1 cm above it and 2 cm below it.

So, the overall shape can be seen as a large rectangle minus the cutout.

What is the large rectangle?

Height is 5 cm.

Width: the left part is 1 cm, and the cutout is 1 cm wide, but the cutout is within the shape, so the total width must be at least 1 cm (left) + 1 cm (cutout) = 2 cm? But is there more?

Actually, looking at the labels: after the cutout, there might be nothing, so the shape is 2 cm wide overall? But let's see.

The cutout is 1 cm wide and 1 cm high, and it's on the right side, so the shape has:

- A left rectangle: 1 cm wide × 5 cm high = 5 cm²
- Plus, above the cutout: a small rectangle on the right: 1 cm wide × 1 cm high = 1 cm² (since 1 cm above cutout)
- Plus, below the cutout: 1 cm wide × 2 cm high = 2 cm²

The cutout itself is empty, so we don't include it.

So total area = left part + top right + bottom right = 5 + 1 + 2 = 8 cm²

Is that correct?

The left part is 1x5=5.

Then on the right, from top: 1 cm high (above cutout) × 1 cm wide =1

Then the cutout is 1x1, empty.

Then below cutout: 2 cm high × 1 cm wide =2

So yes, total 5+1+2=8.

As a single rectangle minus cutout: if the bounding box is 2 cm wide × 5 cm high =10, minus cutout 1x1=1, so 9? But that's not matching.

Why? Because the cutout is not in the corner; it's inset, but in this case, the shape does not have material to the right of the cutout; the cutout is on the edge.

In my first calculation, I have only the left 1 cm full height, and on the right, only the parts above and below the cutout, each 1 cm wide.

So the total width varies: at the cutout level, the width is only 1 cm (left part), while above and below, it's 2 cm (left 1 cm + right 1 cm).

So area is indeed 5 (left) + 1 (top right) + 2 (bottom right) = 8 cm².

To visualize: imagine a 2x5 rectangle, but with a 1x1 square removed from the right side, but not from the top or bottom; specifically, removed from the middle right.

In a 2x5 rectangle, area 10.

Remove a 1x1 square from the right side, say from y=2 to y=3 (if y=0 at bottom), then area =10-1=9.

But in this problem, the labels suggest that above the cutout is 1 cm, below is 2 cm, so if cutout is 1 cm high, then from bottom: 2 cm solid, then 1 cm cutout, then 1 cm solid, then top? 2+1+1=4, but height is 5, so missing 1 cm.

Perhaps the cutout is not spanning the full depth.

I think I need to interpret the diagram as described.

From the user's text: "5cm" on left, "1cm" at bottom (width of left part), then on the right, "1cm" (width of cutout), "1cm" (height of cutout), "1cm" (above cutout), "2cm" (below cutout).

So, the shape has:

- A vertical stem on the left: 1 cm wide, 5 cm high.
- Attached to it on the right, at the top, a small rectangle 1 cm wide × 1 cm high (since 1 cm above cutout, but the cutout is below that?).

Let's define positions.

Assume the bottom of the shape is y=0.

From y=0 to y=2: the shape has width 2 cm? Or only 1 cm?

Label "2cm" is below the cutout, so likely from y=0 to y=2, the shape extends 1 cm to the right of the left stem.

Similarly, "1cm" above cutout, so from y=3 to y=4, it extends 1 cm right.

Cutout from y=2 to y=3, 1 cm wide, so no extension there.

And the left stem is always there, 1 cm wide, from y=0 to y=5.

So:

- For y=0 to 2: width = 1 (left) + 1 (right) = 2 cm, height 2 cm → area 4
- For y=2 to 3: only left 1 cm, since cutout on right → area 1*1=1
- For y=3 to 4: width 2 cm (left + right), height 1 cm → area 2
- For y=4 to 5: only left 1 cm? But label says "1cm" above cutout, and cutout is 1 cm high, so if cutout is from y=2 to 3, then above is y=3 to 4, and then from y=4 to 5, is there anything? The total height is 5, so y=4 to 5 must be included.

The label "1cm" above cutout probably means the distance from top of cutout to top of shape is 1 cm, so if cutout ends at y=3, then top is at y=4, but height is 5, contradiction.

Perhaps the cutout is from y=1 to y=2 or something.

Let's use the given numbers:

Total height: 5 cm

Below cutout: 2 cm

Cutout height: 1 cm

Above cutout: 1 cm

So 2 + 1 + 1 = 4 cm, but total is 5 cm, so there's 1 cm unaccounted for. Probably, the "above cutout" includes up to the top, but 2+1+1=4<5, so maybe the cutout is not at the bottom.

Perhaps the 2 cm below is from bottom to start of cutout, cutout 1 cm, then 1 cm above to top, but 2+1+1=4, still short.

Unless the left stem is 5 cm, and the right parts are additional.

I think the correct interpretation is:

The shape consists of:

- A rectangle on the left: 1 cm wide × 5 cm high = 5 cm²
- A rectangle on the top right: 1 cm wide × 1 cm high = 1 cm² (attached to the top of the left rectangle)
- A rectangle on the bottom right: 1 cm wide × 2 cm high = 2 cm² (attached to the bottom of the left rectangle)
- And between them, from y=2 to y=3 (if bottom is y=0), there is a gap on the right, which is the cutout, 1 cm wide × 1 cm high, but since it's empty, we don't add it.

So total area = 5 + 1 + 2 = 8 cm²

And the cutout is the space between the top-right and bottom-right rectangles on the right side.

So yes, 8 cm².

To verify, the bounding box would be 2 cm wide × 5 cm high = 10 cm², minus the cutout 1x1=1 cm², so 9 cm², but that would be if the cutout is within the 2x5, but in this case, the top-right and bottom-right are only 1 cm high and 2 cm high respectively, so the cutout is not removing from a full 2x5; rather, the shape is not filling the entire 2x5.

In fact, in the region y=2 to y=3, the shape has only the left 1 cm, so the right 1 cm is missing, which is the cutout.

So the area is:

- y=0 to 2: 2 cm wide × 2 cm high = 4
- y=2 to 3: 1 cm wide × 1 cm high = 1
- y=3 to 4: 2 cm wide × 1 cm high = 2 (since above cutout is 1 cm, and cutout is 1 cm high, so if cutout is from y=2 to 3, then y=3 to 4 is above)
- y=4 to 5: 1 cm wide × 1 cm high = 1 (only left part, since no right part mentioned)

Sum: 4 + 1 + 2 + 1 = 8 cm²

Yes, and the "1cm" above cutout is y=3 to 4, "2cm" below is y=0 to 2, cutout y=2 to 3, and then y=4 to 5 is additional 1 cm with only left part.

So total 8 cm².

✔ Final for #5: 8 cm²

---

Problem 6:

This is a more complex shape, like a rectangle with extensions or cutouts.

Labels:

- Left side: 4 cm high
- Bottom: various segments
- Right side: 4 cm high
- Top: has a bump or something.

Specifically:

From the description:

- Left vertical: 4 cm
- Then at bottom, from left: 1 cm, then 2 cm, then 1 cm, then 3 cm — but these are widths.
- Also, on top, there is a 4 cm wide part, with 2 cm on sides.

Let's try to sketch mentally.

It seems like a central rectangle with arms.

Perhaps it's symmetric.

Notice that the total width can be calculated from bottom: 1 + 2 + 1 + 3 = 7 cm? But let's see.

From the labels:

At the bottom, from left to right:

- 1 cm (width)
- then 2 cm (width)
- then 1 cm (width)
- then 3 cm (width)

But these might be the widths of different parts.

Also, heights: left side 4 cm, right side 4 cm.

On top, there is a section that is 4 cm wide, with 2 cm on left and 2 cm on right? Label says "2cm" on top right, and "1cm" on top left.

Perhaps the shape has a base and then a tower.

Another way: divide into rectangles.

Let me identify the components.

From the bottom:

- There is a bottom row: but it's not flat.

Perhaps it's composed of several rectangles.

Let's list all given dimensions:

- Leftmost vertical: 4 cm high
- At the bottom, from left: a 1 cm wide segment, then a 2 cm wide segment, then a 1 cm wide segment, then a 3 cm wide segment — but this sums to 7 cm width.
- Also, there is a "4 cm" labeled horizontally in the middle, probably the width of a central part.
- "2 cm" on top right, "1 cm" on top left.
- "4 cm" on right side.

Perhaps the shape is:

- A large rectangle in the center: 4 cm wide (as labeled) and some height.
- With extensions.

Notice that the left and right sides are both 4 cm high, so perhaps the main body is 4 cm high.

But there are parts above or below.

Let's assume the shape can be divided as follows:

1. Left rectangle: 1 cm wide × 4 cm high = 4 cm² (since left side is 4 cm)
2. Right rectangle: 3 cm wide × 4 cm high = 12 cm²? But label says right side 4 cm, and "3cm" at bottom right, so perhaps.
3. Middle part: but there is a cutout or something.

From the bottom labels: "1cm", "2cm", "1cm", "3cm" — likely the widths of four columns at the bottom.

But the height may vary.

Also, there is a "4 cm" labeled horizontally, which might be the width of the top part or something.

Another clue: "2 cm" on top right, and "1 cm" on top left, and "4 cm" in the middle top.

Perhaps the top has a rectangle 4 cm wide, with 1 cm on left and 2 cm on right, but 1+4+2=7 cm, matching the bottom sum 1+2+1+3=7? 1+2+1+3=7, yes.

So total width is 7 cm.

Now, heights:

- The leftmost 1 cm column: height 4 cm (given)
- The next 2 cm column: what height?
- Then 1 cm column:
- Then 3 cm column: height 4 cm (given)

Also, on top, there is a part that is higher.

Specifically, the "4 cm" labeled horizontally is probably the width of a raised section in the middle.

And "2 cm" on top right might be the height of the right part of the top, but it's labeled on the side.

Let's look for standard decomposition.

Perhaps the shape has a base of height h, and then a top part.

Notice that there is a "1 cm" labeled vertically on the left top, and "2 cm" on the right top, suggesting that the top is not flat.

Another idea: the shape is made of three parts:

- Bottom rectangle: but it's irregular.

Let's calculate the area by adding rectangles based on the labels.

From the diagram description, it's likely that:

- There is a central rectangle that is 4 cm wide and 2 cm high or something.

Let's use the following approach:

Divide the shape into vertical strips or horizontal.

Since the bottom has segments, perhaps divide into columns.

Column 1 (leftmost): width 1 cm, height 4 cm → area 4

Column 2: width 2 cm, but what height? If the shape is uniform, but probably not.

From the top labels: "1cm" on top left, which might mean that above the left part, there is an additional 1 cm height.

Similarly, "2cm" on top right.

And "4cm" in the middle top.

Also, "4cm" on left and right sides suggest that the main height is 4 cm, but with additions on top.

Perhaps the 4 cm is the height from bottom to the start of the top features.

Assume that from y=0 to y=4, the shape has certain widths, and above y=4, there are additional parts.

For example:

- From y=0 to y=4:
- Column 1 (x=0 to 1): full height 4 cm
- Column 2 (x=1 to 3): width 2 cm, height 4 cm? But then there is a "1cm" labeled, which might be a cutout.
- This is complicated.

Let's look for the answer by considering the shape as a combination.

Notice that the shape might be symmetric or have a specific form.

Another thought: the "4 cm" labeled horizontally in the middle is the width of a rectangle that is 2 cm high or something.

Let's try to add the areas as per common problems.

Perhaps:

- The bottom part is a rectangle 7 cm wide × 1 cm high? But not specified.

Let's list all given lengths and see how they fit.

From the user's text for problem 6:

"1cm" at top left (vertical? or horizontal?)

"2cm" at top right (vertical?)

"4cm" on left side (vertical)

"4cm" on right side (vertical)

"4cm" in the middle horizontal

"2cm" on top right horizontal?

"1cm" at bottom left, "2cm" next, "1cm" next, "3cm" at bottom right — these are likely horizontal widths at the bottom.

Also, "1cm" and "2cm" might be heights of top parts.

Assume that the shape has a main body from y=0 to y=4, with width varying, and then on top, from y=4 to y=5 or y=6, there are additional parts.

Specifically:

- At y=4 to y=5: a rectangle 4 cm wide (the "4cm" labeled) , and it is centered or positioned with 1 cm on left and 2 cm on right, but 1+4+2=7, so it spans from x=1 to x=5 if total width 7.

Total width from bottom: 1+2+1+3=7 cm, so x from 0 to 7.

If the top rectangle is 4 cm wide, and "1cm" on left means from x=0 to 1 is not covered, "2cm" on right means from x=5 to 7 is not covered, so the top rectangle is from x=1 to x=5, width 4 cm, height say h.

What is h? The "1cm" and "2cm" might be the heights, but they are on different sides.

Perhaps the top part has different heights on left and right.

This is tricky.

Another idea: the shape is composed of:

- A large rectangle 7 cm wide × 4 cm high = 28 cm²
- Minus some cutouts, plus some additions.

But let's calculate the area by parts.

From the bottom up:

- The very bottom: there is a strip that is 7 cm wide, but height? Not given.

Perhaps the "1cm", "2cm", etc. at bottom are the widths, and the height is uniform for the bottom part.

Let's assume that the shape can be divided into the following rectangles:

1. Left rectangle: 1 cm wide × 4 cm high = 4 cm²
2. Right rectangle: 3 cm wide × 4 cm high = 12 cm²
3. Middle bottom rectangle: between them, width 2 cm + 1 cm = 3 cm? But there is a "2cm" and "1cm" at bottom, so perhaps two parts.
4. Top middle rectangle: 4 cm wide × 2 cm high = 8 cm²? But why 2 cm.

Notice that there is a "2 cm" labeled on the top right, and "1 cm" on top left, and "4 cm" in the middle, so perhaps the top part has height 2 cm on the right, 1 cm on the left, but that doesn't make sense for a single rectangle.

Perhaps the top part is a rectangle 4 cm wide and 2 cm high, and it is placed such that on the left, there is 1 cm of the main body exposed, on the right 2 cm exposed, but then the height of the main body is 4 cm, so the top part adds 2 cm height.

So, the main body is 7 cm wide × 4 cm high = 28 cm²

Then on top, a rectangle 4 cm wide × 2 cm high = 8 cm², but is it added or is it part of the main body?

If it's added, then total 36, but probably not, because the main body may not include the top part.

In many such problems, the "4 cm" on left and right is the height of the sides, and the top part is additional.

Moreover, the "1 cm" and "2 cm" on top might indicate that the top part is not full width.

Let's calculate the area as:

- The lower part: from y=0 to y=4, the shape has width 7 cm everywhere? But then why the bottom segments.

Perhaps the lower part has cutouts.

Let's consider the following decomposition based on standard solutions for such shapes:

The shape can be seen as:

- A rectangle on the left: 1 cm × 4 cm = 4
- A rectangle on the right: 3 cm × 4 cm = 12
- A rectangle in the middle bottom: 2 cm × 1 cm = 2 (since "2cm" at bottom, and perhaps height 1 cm)
- A rectangle in the middle top: 4 cm × 2 cm = 8 ( the "4cm" wide and "2cm" high)
- But then there is a "1cm" at bottom between, and "1cm" on top left.

This is not working.

Let's add the areas using the given numbers without overcomplicating.

From online sources or memory, for a similar shape, the area is often calculated as:

Sum of:

- Left: 1*4 = 4
- Right: 3*4 = 12
- Bottom middle: 2*1 = 2 ( the "2cm" width at bottom, height 1 cm)
- Top middle: 4*2 = 8 ( the "4cm" width, height 2 cm)
- And the "1cm" at bottom between left and middle, and "1cm" on top left, but perhaps they are included.

Total 4+12+2+8=26, but missing some.

Perhaps the "1cm" at bottom is a separate rectangle 1 cm × 1 cm =1, and "1cm" on top left is 1 cm × 1 cm =1, but then double-counting.

Let's think differently.

Notice that the shape might be:

- A base of 7 cm × 1 cm = 7 cm² (bottom layer)
- Then above that, from y=1 to y=4, the shape has width: left 1 cm, then a gap, then right 3 cm, but with a connection.

From the bottom labels: "1cm", "2cm", "1cm", "3cm" — these might be the widths of the columns at the bottom, but for the entire height, but that can't be because of the top features.

Perhaps the "2cm" and "1cm" at bottom are the widths of the parts that are only 1 cm high, and the rest is taller.

Assume that:

- The very bottom layer (y=0 to 1): full width 7 cm? Or only the labeled parts.

Suppose that at y=0 to 1, the shape has four segments: 1cm, 2cm, 1cm, 3cm wide, so area = (1+2+1+3)*1 = 7*1 = 7 cm²

Then from y=1 to y=4, the shape has only the left 1 cm and right 3 cm, so width 1+3=4 cm, height 3 cm, area 12 cm²

Then from y=4 to y=5 or y=6, there is a top part.

The "4cm" labeled horizontally is probably the width of the top part, and "2cm" on top right might be the height, "1cm" on top left might be the height on left, but likely the top part is a rectangle 4 cm wide and 2 cm high, placed on top of the middle.

So from y=4 to y=6, a rectangle 4 cm wide × 2 cm high = 8 cm²

But where is it positioned? If it's centered, and total width 7 cm, then it might be from x=1.5 to x=5.5, but usually integer.

With "1cm" on left and "2cm" on right, so if the top rectangle is 4 cm wide, and it starts at x=1 (after the left 1 cm), and ends at x=5, then on the right, from x=5 to x=7 is 2 cm, which matches "2cm" on top right.

On the left, from x=0 to x=1 is 1 cm, which is the "1cm" on top left, but that is already included in the lower part.

For the top part, from y=4 to y=6, only the rectangle from x=1 to x=5, width 4 cm, height 2 cm, area 8 cm².

Now, for the lower part:

From y=0 to y=1: full width 7 cm? But in the bottom, we have segments, but if it's a solid layer, area 7*1=7

From y=1 to y=4: only left 1 cm and right 3 cm are present, so area = (1+3)*3 = 4*3 = 12 cm²

Then top: 8 cm²

Total = 7 + 12 + 8 = 27 cm²

But is the bottom layer full width? The labels "1cm", "2cm", "1cm", "3cm" at bottom might indicate that at y=0 to 1, the shape has those widths, but since they sum to 7, and if it's continuous, it's fine.

However, in the region y=1 to 4, only left and right are present, so the middle is empty, which makes sense for the "cutout".

Also, the "1cm" and "2cm" on top are probably referring to the exposure, not additional area.

So area = bottom layer 7*1 = 7

Middle layer (y=1 to 4): left 1cm *3cm high =3, right 3cm*3cm high=9, total 12

Top layer (y=4 to 6): 4cm*2cm=8

Sum 7+12+8=27 cm²

But is the top layer from y=4 to 6? Height 2 cm, yes.

And the left and right sides are 4 cm high, which matches y=0 to 4 for the sides, and the top is additional.

So yes.

To confirm, the left side: from y=0 to 4, 1 cm wide, area 4, which is included in bottom and middle: in bottom y=0-1: 1*1=1, in middle y=1-4:1*3=3, total 4, good.

Right side: y=0-1:3*1=3, y=1-4:3*3=9, total 12, but earlier I said right rectangle 3*4=12, yes.

Bottom middle: in y=0-1, the 2cm and 1cm parts: 2*1 +1*1=3, but in my calculation, bottom layer is 7*1=7, which includes left 1, then 2, then 1, then 3, so 1+2+1+3=7, good.

Then in y=1-4, only left and right, so the middle 3 cm (2+1) is missing, which is correct for the cutout.

Then top: 4*2=8.

Total 7+12+8=27.

But is there any overlap or missing part?

The top part is from y=4 to 6, x=1 to 5, which is above the cutout area, so no overlap.

So area is 27 cm².

But let's see if the "1cm" on top left is accounted for; it's the left part from x=0 to 1, y=4 to 6, but in this region, is there material? In my calculation, from y=4 to 6, only x=1 to 5 has the top rectangle, so x=0 to 1 and x=5 to 7 have no material above y=4, which is consistent with the left and right sides being only 4 cm high.

The "1cm" on top left might be indicating that the left side stops at y=4, so above that, only the middle top is present.

Similarly for right.

So yes.

Therefore, area = 27 cm².

But let's double-check with another method.

Imagine the shape as:

- A rectangle 7 cm × 4 cm = 28 cm² for the lower part up to y=4.
- But in this rectangle, there is a cutout in the middle from y=1 to y=4, width 3 cm ( the 2cm +1cm at bottom), so cutout area = 3 cm wide × 3 cm high = 9 cm².
- So lower part area = 28 - 9 = 19 cm²? But earlier I had 7 (bottom) +12 (middle) =19, yes.
- Then add the top part: 4 cm × 2 cm = 8 cm².
- Total 19 + 8 = 27 cm².

Perfect.

So ✔ Final for #6: 27 cm²

---

Now, compiling all answers:

1. 44 cm²
2. 22 cm²
3. 44 cm²
4. 34 cm²
5. 8 cm²
6. 27 cm²

Final Answer:
1. 44
2. 22
3. 44
4. 34
5. 8
6. 27