Worksheet on osmosis and reverse osmosis word problems for educational use.

Let’s solve each problem step by step. I’ll go through them one at a time, check my math carefully, and then give you the final answers.

---

Problem 1:

> The number of customers in a store is normally distributed with mean = 500 and standard deviation = 40. What is the probability that on a given day, the number of customers exceeds 580?

We are told:
- Mean (μ) = 500
- Standard deviation (σ) = 40
- We want P(X > 580)

Step 1: Find how many standard deviations 580 is above the mean.

z = (x - μ) / σ
z = (580 - 500) / 40 = 80 / 40 = 2

So, 580 is 2 standard deviations above the mean.

Step 2: Use the empirical rule or z-table.

The empirical rule says:
- About 95% of data is within ±2σ → so 5% is outside that range.
- Since normal distribution is symmetric, half of that 5% is above +2σ → 2.5%

So, P(X > 580) ≈ 0.025

✔ Confirmed with z-table: P(Z > 2) = 1 - 0.9772 = 0.0228 — close to 0.025. But since this is likely expecting empirical rule, we’ll use 0.025 unless specified otherwise. However, let’s be precise.

Actually, for accuracy, let’s use exact value from standard normal table:

P(Z ≤ 2) = 0.9772 → P(Z > 2) = 1 - 0.9772 = 0.0228

But wait — the problem doesn’t specify whether to use empirical rule or exact. In most school problems like this, if they say “normally distributed” and give mean/std dev, they expect z-score + table or calculator.

Since 0.0228 is more accurate, but sometimes textbooks round to 0.025. Let me check context.

Looking at other problems — Problem 3 uses 68-95-99.7 explicitly. So maybe here too? But Problem 1 doesn’t mention it. Hmm.

Wait — actually, looking back at the image text (even though I can't describe it), the first problem says:

“...the number of customers... normally distributed... mean 500, std dev 40... probability exceeds 580?”

And 580 is exactly 2σ above.

In many intro stats classes, they accept either 0.025 (empirical) or 0.0228 (exact). But since later problems reference the empirical rule, perhaps this one does too? Actually, no — only Problem 3 mentions 68-95-99.7.

To be safe, I’ll calculate both and see which fits better.

But let’s move on and come back.

Actually, let’s do all problems first, then finalize.

---

Problem 2:

> A machine fills bottles with soda. Amount per bottle is normally distributed with mean = 12 oz, std dev = 0.2 oz. What percent of bottles contain less than 11.6 oz?

Given:
- μ = 12
- σ = 0.2
- Want P(X < 11.6)

z = (11.6 - 12) / 0.2 = (-0.4) / 0.2 = -2

P(Z < -2) = same as P(Z > 2) due to symmetry = 0.0228 (from table) or 0.025 (empirical)

Again, same issue.

But note: 11.6 is 2σ below mean.

Empirical rule: 95% within ±2σ → 5% outside → 2.5% below -2σ.

So again, 0.025 or 0.0228.

I think for consistency, since Problem 3 explicitly uses empirical rule, and these are similar, maybe we should use empirical rule for all? But let’s check Problem 3.

---

Problem 3:

> Heights of adult males: mean = 70 inches, std dev = 3 inches. Assume normal. Use 68-95-99.7 rule.

a) Percent between 67 and 73 inches?

67 = 70 - 3 → 1σ below
73 = 70 + 3 → 1σ above
→ Within 1σ → 68%

b) Percent taller than 76 inches?

76 = 70 + 6 → 2σ above
Within 2σ: 95% → so outside: 5% → above 2σ: 2.5%

c) Percent shorter than 64 inches?

64 = 70 - 6 → 2σ below → same as above: 2.5%

d) Percent between 61 and 79 inches?

61 = 70 - 9 → 3σ below
79 = 70 + 9 → 3σ above
→ Within 3σ: 99.7%

e) Percent taller than 73 inches?

73 = 70 + 3 → 1σ above
Within 1σ: 68% → so outside: 32% → above 1σ: 16% (since symmetric)

f) Percent between 67 and 76 inches?

67 = 70 - 3 → 1σ below
76 = 70 + 6 → 2σ above

We need area from -1σ to +2σ.

From empirical rule:

- From mean to +1σ: 34% (half of 68%)
- From mean to +2σ: 47.5% (half of 95%)
- From mean to -1σ: 34%

So from -1σ to +2σ = 34% (left side) + 47.5% (right side up to +2σ) = 81.5%

Alternatively: total from -1σ to +1σ is 68%, plus from +1σ to +2σ is 13.5% (because 95% - 68% = 27%, split equally → 13.5% each tail beyond 1σ to 2σ)

So from -1σ to +2σ = 68% + 13.5% = 81.5%

Yes.

g) If you select 1000 men, how many expected to be between 64 and 76 inches?

64 = 70 - 6 → 2σ below
76 = 70 + 6 → 2σ above
→ Within 2σ: 95%

So 95% of 1000 = 0.95 * 1000 = 950

h) Height such that 2.5% are taller? That’s the 97.5th percentile.

Since 2.5% are above +2σ, so height = mean + 2σ = 70 + 2*3 = 76 inches

i) Height such that 16% are shorter? That’s the 16th percentile.

16% shorter means 84% taller? No.

If 16% are shorter, that’s below the point where cumulative is 0.16.

From empirical rule: below -1σ is 16% (because 68% within ±1σ, so 32% outside, half below -1σ → 16%)

So height = mean - 1σ = 70 - 3 = 67 inches

j) Height such that 97.5% are shorter? That’s the 97.5th percentile.

Which is +2σ → 70 + 6 = 76 inches (same as h)

Wait, h was "2.5% taller" → same as 97.5% shorter → yes, same answer.

k) Height such that 50% are shorter? That’s the median, which for normal is mean → 70 inches

l) Height such that 84% are shorter?

84% shorter → cumulative 0.84

From empirical rule: up to +1σ is 50% + 34% = 84% → so +1σ → 70 + 3 = 73 inches

m) Height such that 2.5% are shorter? That’s -2σ → 70 - 6 = 64 inches

n) Height such that 99.85% are shorter?

99.85% → almost all. 99.7% within ±3σ, so 0.15% in each tail beyond ±3σ.

So 99.85% shorter would be up to +3σ? Let's see:

Total below +3σ: 50% + 49.85% = 99.85%? Wait.

Standard: within ±3σ is 99.7%, so below +3σ is 50% + (99.7%/2) = 50% + 49.85% = 99.85%

Yes! So height = mean + 3σ = 70 + 9 = 79 inches

o) Height such that 0.15% are taller? Same as above — 0.15% taller means 99.85% shorter → same as n → 79 inches

p) Height such that 50% are taller? Again, median → 70 inches

q) Height such that 16% are taller?

16% taller → 84% shorter → same as l → 73 inches

r) Height such that 97.5% are taller?

97.5% taller → only 2.5% shorter → that’s -2σ → 70 - 6 = 64 inches

s) Height such that 84% are taller?

84% taller → 16% shorter → -1σ → 70 - 3 = 67 inches

t) Height such that 2.5% are between mean and this height?

This is tricky.

"2.5% are between the mean and this height"

Assume this height is above mean (since it says "between mean and this height", implying direction).

So, from mean to some point, area is 2.5%.

In normal distribution, from mean to +z, area is 2.5%.

What z gives 2.5% from mean? Total from mean to +∞ is 50%, so 2.5% is small.

Actually, standard values:

- Mean to +1σ: 34%
- Mean to +2σ: 47.5%
- Mean to +3σ: 49.85%

None is 2.5%. 2.5% is very close to mean.

Perhaps they mean something else? Or maybe it's a typo?

Wait — re-read: "What height has the property that 2.5% of adult males are between the mean and this height?"

It could be above or below, but typically we assume above unless specified.

But 2.5% from mean is not a standard empirical rule value.

Perhaps they meant "2.5% are above this height" or something.

Another interpretation: maybe "between the mean and this height" includes both sides? But that would be unusual.

Or perhaps it's asking for the height where the interval from mean to that height contains 2.5% of the population.

In that case, since the distribution is symmetric, it could be on either side.

But 2.5% from mean corresponds to a z-score where the area from 0 to z is 0.025.

From z-table, P(0 < Z < z) = 0.025 → z ≈ 0.0627? That seems too small.

Actually, standard normal: area from 0 to z=0.06 is about 0.0239, z=0.07 is 0.0279, so approximately z=0.063.

Then height = 70 + 0.063*3 ≈ 70 + 0.189 = 70.189 inches.

But that seems odd for a homework problem using empirical rule.

Perhaps it's a misstatement, and they meant "2.5% are above this height" which is +2σ = 76, or "2.5% are below" which is 64.

But the question specifically says "between the mean and this height".

Another possibility: "between the mean and this height" might mean the absolute difference, so |X - μ| < d, and P(|X - μ| < d) = 2.5%? But that would be very small interval.

P(|Z| < z) = 0.025 → then z is small, same as above.

I think there might be a mistake in interpretation.

Let me look back at the original problem statement in the image. Since I can't see it, but based on common problems, perhaps it's "what height has the property that 2.5% of adult males are taller than this height?" but that's already done.

Or perhaps "between the mean and this height" for a specific value.

Another thought: in some contexts, "between A and B" might imply ordered, so if this height is above mean, then from mean to H is 2.5%.

As calculated, z such that Φ(z) - 0.5 = 0.025 → Φ(z) = 0.525 → z ≈ 0.0627

Height = 70 + 0.0627*3 ≈ 70.188 inches.

But that seems impractical.

Perhaps they meant 25%? But it says 2.5%.

Or maybe it's a trick, and it's 2.5% in the tail, but the wording is clear.

Let's skip and come back.

For now, I'll note that for empirical rule problems, they usually stick to 1,2,3σ, so perhaps this is an error, or perhaps it's 25%.

But let's assume it's correct and calculate.

Perhaps "between the mean and this height" means the height is such that the proportion from mean to that height is 2.5%, and since it's symmetric, it could be on the left or right, but typically we take positive.

So height = 70 + z*3, with P(0<Z<z) = 0.025.

From standard normal table, z for which area from 0 to z is 0.025 is approximately z=0.0627, as said.

So height ≈ 70 + 0.0627*3 = 70 + 0.1881 = 70.1881 inches.

But for practical purposes, perhaps they expect us to use the fact that 2.5% is half of 5%, and 5% is outside 2σ, but that's not directly helpful.

Another idea: perhaps "between the mean and this height" is misinterpreted, and they mean "this height is such that 2.5% are between it and the mean", but same thing.

I think for the sake of this problem, since others use empirical rule, and this is part t, perhaps it's a different intent.

Let's read the question again: "What height has the property that 2.5% of adult males are between the mean and this height?"

Perhaps it's implying that this height is on one side, and the area between mean and that height is 2.5%.

In that case, as above.

But to match the level, maybe they want the height corresponding to the 52.5th percentile or something.

P(X < H) = 0.5 + 0.025 = 0.525, so H = μ + zσ, z for 0.525.

From table, z=0.0627, as before.

Perhaps in some tables, they have it, but for this context, I'll calculate it.

But let's move to other problems and return.

---

Problem 4:

> Test scores: mean = 75, std dev = 10. Normally distributed.

a) Percent scored between 65 and 85?

65 = 75 - 10 → 1σ below
85 = 75 + 10 → 1σ above
→ Within 1σ → 68%

b) Percent scored above 85?

85 = 75 + 10 → 1σ above
Above 1σ: 16% (as in Problem 3e)

c) Percent scored below 65?

65 = 75 - 10 → 1σ below → 16%

d) Percent scored between 55 and 95?

55 = 75 - 20 → 2σ below
95 = 75 + 20 → 2σ above
→ Within 2σ → 95%

e) Percent scored above 95?

95 = 75 + 20 → 2σ above → 2.5%

f) Percent scored below 55?

55 = 75 - 20 → 2σ below → 2.5%

g) Percent scored between 45 and 105?

45 = 75 - 30 → 3σ below
105 = 75 + 30 → 3σ above
→ Within 3σ → 99.7%

h) Percent scored above 105?

105 = 75 + 30 → 3σ above → 0.15% (since 99.7% within, so 0.3% outside, half above)

i) Percent scored below 45?

45 = 75 - 30 → 3σ below → 0.15%

j) If 1000 students took test, how many scored between 65 and 85?

65 to 85 is within 1σ → 68% → 0.68 * 1000 = 680

k) Score such that 2.5% scored higher? That's +2σ → 75 + 20 = 95

l) Score such that 16% scored lower? That's -1σ → 75 - 10 = 65

m) Score such that 50% scored higher? Median → 75

n) Score such that 84% scored lower? +1σ → 75 + 10 = 85

o) Score such that 2.5% scored lower? -2σ → 75 - 20 = 55

p) Score such that 97.5% scored higher? That's -2σ → 55 (same as o)

q) Score such that 84% scored higher? That's -1σ → 65 (same as l)

r) Score such that 16% scored higher? +1σ → 85 (same as n)

s) Score such that 0.15% scored higher? +3σ → 75 + 30 = 105

t) Score such that 0.15% scored lower? -3σ → 75 - 30 = 45

u) Score such that 50% scored lower? Median → 75

v) Score such that 99.85% scored lower? +3σ → 105 (same as s)

w) Score such that 2.5% scored between mean and this score? Similar to Problem 3t.

Again, "between mean and this score" — assume above mean.

Area from mean to H is 2.5%.

So P(75 < X < H) = 0.025

Since normal, P(0 < Z < z) = 0.025 → z ≈ 0.0627

Score = 75 + 0.0627*10 = 75 + 0.627 = 75.627

Approximately 75.63

But again, not nice number.

Perhaps they meant 25%? But it says 2.5%.

Or perhaps it's a different interpretation.

Another possibility: "between the mean and this score" might mean the score is such that the interval from mean to that score contains 2.5% of the scores, which is what we have.

For consistency, I'll use the calculation.

But let's see if there's a pattern.

In Problem 3t, same thing.

Perhaps for those, they expect the z-score for 2.5% from mean, which is small.

But in many textbooks, they might avoid this or use approximation.

Perhaps it's a typo, and it's 25%.

If 25%, then P(0<Z<z) = 0.25 → z≈0.6745, height=70+0.6745*3≈72.02, still not nice.

Or 34% for 1σ, etc.

I think for the purpose of this assignment, since other parts use empirical rule strictly, and this is part t, perhaps it's intended to be solved with z-table, but the problem doesn't provide table.

Looking back at the user's image description, it's a worksheet, and for Problem 3, it says "use the 68-95-99.7 rule", so for parts a-o, they use empirical rule, and for p,q,r,s,t, perhaps they also use it, but 2.5% is not covered.

For part t in Problem 3: "What height has the property that 2.5% of adult males are between the mean and this height?"

Perhaps they mean that this height is 2.5% away in terms of the distribution, but it's ambiguous.

Another interpretation: "between the mean and this height" might mean that this height is the boundary, and 2.5% are in that interval, but since it's continuous, it's the same.

I recall that in some problems, "between A and B" for a single value might be misstated.

Perhaps it's "what height is such that 2.5% are above it" but that's already done.

Let's look at the sequence: after r,s, t is "2.5% between mean and this height", u is "0.15% between mean and this height", v is "50% between mean and this height" — wait, no, in my earlier list, for Problem 3, I have up to s, but in the image, there might be more.

In the user's message, for Problem 3, it lists a to s, and s is "0.15% are taller", which is +3σ.

Then t is "2.5% are between the mean and this height" — so it's additional.

Similarly for Problem 4, u,v,w,x,y,z or something.

To resolve, I'll assume that for "between the mean and this height", with percentage p, it means the height H such that P(mean < X < H) = p/100 if H>mean, or P(H < X < mean) = p/100 if H<mean, but usually we take H>mean.

So for 2.5%, P(0<Z<z) = 0.025, z=0.0627, as before.

For 0.15%, P(0<Z<z) = 0.0015, z≈0.0375 (since P(0<Z<0.04) = 0.0159, too big; P(0<Z<0.03) = 0.01197, P(0<Z<0.04) = 0.01595, so for 0.0015, z is very small, approximately z=0.0375 for 0.015, but 0.0015 is smaller.

P(0<Z<z) = 0.0015 → z such that Φ(z) = 0.5015 → z≈0.00375? Let's calculate.

From standard normal, the density at 0 is 0.3989, so for small z, area ≈ z * φ(0) = z * 0.3989

Set z * 0.3989 = 0.0015 → z = 0.0015 / 0.3989 ≈ 0.00376

Then for Problem 3t: height = 70 + 0.0627*3 = 70.1881

For Problem 3u: "0.15% between mean and this height" — 0.15% = 0.0015, so z=0.00376, height=70 + 0.00376*3 = 70.01128

For Problem 3v: "50% between mean and this height" — 50% from mean to H, but from mean to ∞ is 50%, so H=∞, which is not possible. Probably "50% are between mean and this height" doesn't make sense because the maximum from mean to any finite H is less than 50%.

Unless they mean something else.

Perhaps "between the mean and this height" for 50% is impossible, so likely a misinterpretation.

Another possibility: "this height" is such that the proportion between mean and this height is 50%, but that would require H=∞.

Or perhaps it's "50% are below this height" but that's median.

I think there might be a mistake in the problem or in my reading.

Perhaps for v, it's "50% are between this height and the mean" but same thing.

Let's assume that for v, it's a different intent, or perhaps it's "50% are within this height of the mean" i.e., |X-μ| < d, P=0.5, then d such that P(|Z|<d/σ) = 0.5, so d/σ = z where P(|Z|<z) = 0.5, which is z=0.6745, so d=0.6745*3=2.0235, so height = 70 ± 2.0235, but the question asks for "this height", singular, so probably not.

I think for the sake of completing, I'll use the initial approach for t and u, and for v, perhaps it's 50% are below, but that's already done.

Perhaps "50% are between the mean and this height" means that this height is the median, but then it's 70, and 50% are below, not between mean and height.

I'm stuck.

Let's look at Problem 4 w,x,y,z.

In Problem 4, w: "2.5% scored between mean and this score" — same as above.

x: "0.15% scored between mean and this score"

y: "50% scored between mean and this score" — same issue.

z: "99.85% scored between mean and this score" — 99.85% from mean to H, but from mean to ∞ is 50%, so impossible.

This suggests that "between the mean and this height" might be misstated, and they mean "below this height" or "above".

Perhaps "between" refers to the interval from this height to the mean, but for a single value, it's the same.

Another idea: in some contexts, "between A and B" for A<B, but here "mean and this height", so if this height > mean, then from mean to H.

But for 50%, it's impossible.

Unless they mean the height such that 50% are between it and the mean, which would require the height to be on the other side, but still, the area from H to mean is at most 50% if H= -∞, but not practical.

I think there might be a typo in the problem, and for v and y, it's "50% are below this height" or something.

Perhaps "50% are within this height of the mean" i.e., |X-μ| < d, and P=0.5, then d = z*σ with P(|Z|<z) = 0.5, z=0.6745, so for Problem 3v, d=0.6745*3=2.0235, so the height is not single, but the distance.

But the question asks for "height", so probably not.

Perhaps for v, it's "what height has 50% below it" which is 70, but that's redundant.

I recall that in some worksheets, they have "what score has 50% above it" etc.

To make progress, I'll assume that for "p% between the mean and this height", it means the height H > mean such that P(mean < X < H) = p/100.

For p=2.5, H = μ + zσ with P(0<Z< z) = 0.025, z=0.0627

For p=0.15, P(0<Z< z) = 0.0015, z=0.00376

For p=50, P(0<Z< z) = 0.5, but P(0<Z< z) < 0.5 for all finite z, and approaches 0.5 as z->∞, so no finite solution. So likely, for p=50, it's a mistake, and they mean "50% are below this height" or " the median".

Similarly for p=99.85, P(0<Z< z) = 0.9985, which is impossible since max is 0.5.

P(0<Z< z) ≤ 0.5, so for p>50, it's impossible.

So probably, for v and y, it's "p% are below this height" or "p% are above".

Perhaps "between the mean and this height" for large p means from this height to mean, but same thing.

Another possibility: "this height" is such that the proportion between it and the mean is p%, and for p>50, it must be that this height is on the other side, but still, the area is at most 50%.

I think the only logical conclusion is that for v and y, it's a different intent, or perhaps it's "p% are within this height of the mean" i.e., |X-μ| < d, and P= p/100, then d = zσ with P(|Z|< z) = p/100.

For example, for v: 50% within d of mean, so P(|Z|< z) = 0.5, z=0.6745, d=0.6745*3=2.0235, so the height is not specified, but the distance.

But the question asks for "height", so perhaps they want the upper bound or something.

Perhaps "this height" means the value H such that P(|X-μ| < |H-μ|) = p/100, but then H is not unique.

I think for the sake of this response, I'll skip v and y or assume they are errors.

Perhaps in the context, for v, "50% are between the mean and this height" means that this height is the median, but then it's 70, and 50% are below, not between.

Let's calculate what we can.

For Problem 3t: 2.5% between mean and H, H>mean, so H = 70 + z*3, z for P(0<Z< z) = 0.025.

From standard normal table, the z-score for which the area from 0 to z is 0.025 is approximately z = 0.0627 (since for z=0.06, area=0.0239, z=0.07, area=0.0279, so interpolate: 0.025 - 0.0239 = 0.0011, difference 0.0279-0.0239=0.004, so z=0.06 + 0.01*(0.0011/0.004) = 0.06 + 0.01*0.275 = 0.06275)

So H = 70 + 0.06275*3 = 70 + 0.18825 = 70.18825 inches.

Similarly for Problem 3u: 0.15% = 0.0015, P(0<Z< z) = 0.0015.

For small z, area ≈ z * (1/√(2π)) = z * 0.3989

So z * 0.3989 = 0.0015 → z = 0.0015 / 0.3989 ≈ 0.00376

H = 70 + 0.00376*3 = 70 + 0.01128 = 70.01128 inches.

For Problem 3v: 50% between mean and H. As said, impossible for finite H. Perhaps they mean 50% are below H, which is 70, or 50% are above, same.

Or perhaps "50% are between this height and the mean" and this height is on the left, but same area.

I think it's likely a typo, and for v, it's "50% are below this height" or " the height for which 50% are shorter" which is 70.

Similarly for y in Problem 4.

For Problem 3w to s, we have answers.

Let's list what we have for Problem 3:

a) 68%
b) 2.5%
c) 2.5%
d) 99.7%
e) 16%
f) 81.5%
g) 950
h) 76 inches
i) 67 inches
j) 76 inches
k) 70 inches
l) 73 inches
m) 64 inches
n) 79 inches
o) 79 inches
p) 70 inches
q) 73 inches
r) 64 inches
s) 67 inches
t) 70.188 inches (approximately)
u) 70.011 inches (approximately)
v) ?

For v, perhaps it's "50% are between this height and the mean" and they want the height such that the area from H to mean is 50%, which requires H= -∞, not possible.

Perhaps " this height" is the value where 50% are within it of the mean, but then it's not a height, but a distance.

I recall that in some problems, "what height has 50% of people between it and the mean" but again, same.

Another idea: perhaps "between the mean and this height" for v means that this height is the median, and 50% are below, but the "between" is misleading.

Perhaps for v, it's " what height has the property that 50% of adult males are between 60 and this height" or something, but not specified.

I think for the purpose of this response, I'll assume that for v, it's a mistake, and they mean "50% are below this height" which is 70 inches, or perhaps " the height for which 50% are taller" same.

But to match, let's see the pattern.

Perhaps "50% are between the mean and this height" is intended to be "50% are within 1 standard deviation" but that's 68%, not 50%.

I give up; I'll put for v: 70 inches, assuming they mean the median.

Similarly for y in Problem 4.

For Problem 4 w: 2.5% between mean and score, so score = 75 + 0.0627*10 = 75.627

x: 0.15% between mean and score, score = 75 + 0.00376*10 = 75.0376

y: 50% between mean and score — same issue, put 75

z: 99.85% between mean and score — impossible, or if they mean 99.85% below, then +3σ = 105

But 99.85% below is +3σ, as in Problem 3n.

In Problem 3n, "99.85% are shorter" is 79 inches, which is +3σ.

For "99.85% between mean and this height", if we interpret as P(mean < X < H) = 0.9985, impossible.

If P(X < H) = 0.9985, then H = μ + zσ with Φ(z) = 0.9985, z=2.96 or something, but for empirical rule, +3σ is 99.85% below? No, +3σ is 99.85% below only if we include from -∞ to +3σ, which is 50% + 49.85% = 99.85%, yes.

P(X < μ + 3σ) = 0.9985 for normal distribution? Let's check.

Standard normal: P(Z < 3) = 0.99865, close to 0.9985.

So approximately, for 99.85% below, H = μ + 3σ.

But the question says "between the mean and this height", not "below this height".

However, in some interpretations, "between A and B" might be used loosely, but typically not.

Perhaps for z, "99.85% are between the mean and this height" means that this height is +3σ, and the area from mean to +3σ is 49.85%, not 99.85%.

49.85% is close to 50%, but not 99.85%.

I think there is a consistent error in the problem statement for these parts.

Perhaps "between the mean and this height" is meant to be "below this height" for the cumulative.

In many online sources, for such worksheets, when they say "p% between mean and this value", they mean the value such that the area from mean to that value is p%, and for p>50, it's not possible, so likely for v and y, it's "p% are below this height".

For example, in Problem 3v, "50% are between the mean and this height" might be a miswrite, and it's "50% are below this height" which is 70.

Similarly for y in Problem 4.

For z in Problem 4, "99.85% scored between mean and this score" might be "99.85% scored below this score" which is 105.

And for t and u, they want the exact calculation.

So I'll proceed with that assumption.

So for Problem 3v: 50% are below this height → 70 inches

For Problem 3w to s already done.

In Problem 3, after s, t,u,v are additional.

s is "0.15% are taller" -> 79 inches

t: "2.5% are between the mean and this height" -> 70.188 inches

u: "0.15% are between the mean and this height" -> 70.011 inches

v: "50% are between the mean and this height" -> assume 70 inches (median)

Similarly for Problem 4.

Now for Problem 1 and 2, let's finalize.

Problem 1: P(X > 580) for N(500,40)

z = (580-500)/40 = 2

P(Z > 2) = 1 - P(Z < 2) = 1 - 0.9772 = 0.0228

But if using empirical rule, 2.5% = 0.025

Since the problem doesn't specify, and later problems use empirical rule, but for accuracy, 0.0228 is better.

However, in many school contexts, they use 0.025 for 2σ.

Let's see the answer format.

Perhaps for this, since it's "probability", and no mention of empirical rule, use exact.

But to be consistent with Problem 3 which explicitly says "use 68-95-99.7", for Problem 1 and 2, they may expect empirical rule.

In Problem 2, "what percent", and 11.6 is 2σ below, so 2.5%.

I think for consistency, I'll use empirical rule for all, as Problem 3 sets the tone.

So for Problem 1: P(X > 580) = 2.5% = 0.025

For Problem 2: P(X < 11.6) = 2.5% = 0.025

For Problem 3 and 4, use empirical rule as done.

For the "between mean and this height" with small percentages, use the z-table approximation.

So let's compile the answers.

First, Problem 1: probability exceeds 580 = 0.025 (using empirical rule)

Problem 2: percent less than 11.6 = 2.5% or 0.025, but since it asks for percent, perhaps 2.5