Ethos Pathos Logos Form ≡ Fill Out Printable PDF Forms Online - Free Printable
Educational worksheet: Ethos Pathos Logos Form ≡ Fill Out Printable PDF Forms Online. Download and print for classroom or home learning activities.
WEBP
850×1100
53.5 KB
Free · Personal Use
Quality Assured by Worksheets Library Team
Reviewed for educational accuracy and age-appropriateness
ID: #1242008
⭐
Show Answer Key & Explanations
Step-by-step solution for: Ethos Pathos Logos Form ≡ Fill Out Printable PDF Forms Online
▼
Show Answer Key & Explanations
Step-by-step solution for: Ethos Pathos Logos Form ≡ Fill Out Printable PDF Forms Online
Let’s go step by step to figure out whether each passage uses Ethos, Pathos, or Logos.
---
- Ethos = Appeal to credibility or character. The speaker tries to show they are trustworthy, experienced, or moral.
- Pathos = Appeal to emotion. Tries to make you feel something — anger, sadness, hope, fear — to persuade you.
- Logos = Appeal to logic or reason. Uses facts, numbers, data, or clear reasoning to support the argument.
---
## Passage 1: Barack Obama Speech (2008)
> “When I am the nominee, I will offer a clear choice. John McCain won’t be able to say that I ever supported this war in Iraq, because I opposed it from the beginning... Senator McCain said the other day that we might be mired for a hundred years in Iraq, which is reason enough to not give him four years in the White House.”
Then he talks about how if they had chosen differently, they could have finished in Afghanistan, fought bin Laden better, and spent money on schools, hospitals, roads — things Americans need now.
- He contrasts his own position (“I opposed it from the beginning”) with McCain’s — this builds credibility → Ethos? Maybe.
- But then he says: *“which is reason enough to not give him four years”* — that’s using logic: if someone predicts a bad outcome (100-year war), don’t elect them. That’s Logos.
- Then he lays out an alternative plan: finish job in Afghanistan, fight bin Laden, spend money on schools/hospitals/roads instead of Baghdad. This is all based on reasoning and consequences — showing cause and effect. Also mentions “hundreds of billions of dollars” — that’s factual/logical framing.
→ So while there’s a little bit of ethos (his past stance), the main force here is logical argumentation: comparing outcomes, costs, priorities.
Also note: He doesn’t try to make you cry or get angry — no strong emotional language like “our children suffer” or “we must act now before it’s too late.” It’s more about smart policy choices.
✔ So Method: Logos
Why? Because Obama uses logical comparisons — cost of war vs. investment in domestic needs, consequences of continuing vs. changing course — to argue why voters should choose him over McCain. He presents reasons and evidence (even if simplified) to support his claim.
---
## Passage 2: Brett Arends on Apple Stock (2011)
> “Apple has come down from $363 in February to $316 Monday... company is sitting on a ton of net cash... cash, securities and other liquid assets exceeded liabilities by $51 billion... around $55 a share... may top $60... cash-free stock price... around $260... barely 10 times forecast earnings... nine times next year’s... 2.3 times this year’s sales.”
This is full of numbers: stock prices, cash amounts, ratios (times earnings, times sales).
He’s making an argument that Apple might be undervalued — but he does it entirely through financial data and calculations.
No mention of Steve Jobs’ greatness (that would be ethos). No talk about how sad investors are or how exciting Apple products are (pathos). Just cold, hard numbers and multiples.
✔ So Method: Logos
Why? Because the entire argument rests on numerical data — stock prices, cash reserves, liability offsets, earnings multiples, sales ratios. These are objective figures used to logically conclude that Apple’s valuation might be low relative to its fundamentals.
---
## Final Check:
Passage 1: Logical comparison of policies and spending → Logos
Passage 2: Financial metrics and ratios → Logos
Both use Logos — which is fine! Not every passage has to use a different one.
---
Final Answer:
1. Method: Logos
Why: Obama uses logical reasoning to compare the consequences of continuing the Iraq War versus redirecting resources to Afghanistan and domestic needs like schools and infrastructure. He argues based on cause-and-effect and fiscal responsibility, not emotion or personal credibility alone.
2. Method: Logos
Why: The author supports his argument with specific financial data — stock prices, cash reserves, liability offsets, and valuation multiples (earnings, sales) — to logically demonstrate that Apple may be undervalued as a stock.
---
First, quick reminder of what these mean:
- Ethos = Appeal to credibility or character. The speaker tries to show they are trustworthy, experienced, or moral.
- Pathos = Appeal to emotion. Tries to make you feel something — anger, sadness, hope, fear — to persuade you.
- Logos = Appeal to logic or reason. Uses facts, numbers, data, or clear reasoning to support the argument.
---
## Passage 1: Barack Obama Speech (2008)
> “When I am the nominee, I will offer a clear choice. John McCain won’t be able to say that I ever supported this war in Iraq, because I opposed it from the beginning... Senator McCain said the other day that we might be mired for a hundred years in Iraq, which is reason enough to not give him four years in the White House.”
Then he talks about how if they had chosen differently, they could have finished in Afghanistan, fought bin Laden better, and spent money on schools, hospitals, roads — things Americans need now.
Step-by-step analysis:
- He contrasts his own position (“I opposed it from the beginning”) with McCain’s — this builds credibility → Ethos? Maybe.
- But then he says: *“which is reason enough to not give him four years”* — that’s using logic: if someone predicts a bad outcome (100-year war), don’t elect them. That’s Logos.
- Then he lays out an alternative plan: finish job in Afghanistan, fight bin Laden, spend money on schools/hospitals/roads instead of Baghdad. This is all based on reasoning and consequences — showing cause and effect. Also mentions “hundreds of billions of dollars” — that’s factual/logical framing.
→ So while there’s a little bit of ethos (his past stance), the main force here is logical argumentation: comparing outcomes, costs, priorities.
Also note: He doesn’t try to make you cry or get angry — no strong emotional language like “our children suffer” or “we must act now before it’s too late.” It’s more about smart policy choices.
✔ So Method: Logos
Why? Because Obama uses logical comparisons — cost of war vs. investment in domestic needs, consequences of continuing vs. changing course — to argue why voters should choose him over McCain. He presents reasons and evidence (even if simplified) to support his claim.
---
## Passage 2: Brett Arends on Apple Stock (2011)
> “Apple has come down from $363 in February to $316 Monday... company is sitting on a ton of net cash... cash, securities and other liquid assets exceeded liabilities by $51 billion... around $55 a share... may top $60... cash-free stock price... around $260... barely 10 times forecast earnings... nine times next year’s... 2.3 times this year’s sales.”
This is full of numbers: stock prices, cash amounts, ratios (times earnings, times sales).
He’s making an argument that Apple might be undervalued — but he does it entirely through financial data and calculations.
No mention of Steve Jobs’ greatness (that would be ethos). No talk about how sad investors are or how exciting Apple products are (pathos). Just cold, hard numbers and multiples.
✔ So Method: Logos
Why? Because the entire argument rests on numerical data — stock prices, cash reserves, liability offsets, earnings multiples, sales ratios. These are objective figures used to logically conclude that Apple’s valuation might be low relative to its fundamentals.
---
## Final Check:
Passage 1: Logical comparison of policies and spending → Logos
Passage 2: Financial metrics and ratios → Logos
Both use Logos — which is fine! Not every passage has to use a different one.
---
Final Answer:
1. Method: Logos
Why: Obama uses logical reasoning to compare the consequences of continuing the Iraq War versus redirecting resources to Afghanistan and domestic needs like schools and infrastructure. He argues based on cause-and-effect and fiscal responsibility, not emotion or personal credibility alone.
2. Method: Logos
Why: The author supports his argument with specific financial data — stock prices, cash reserves, liability offsets, and valuation multiples (earnings, sales) — to logically demonstrate that Apple may be undervalued as a stock.
Parent Tip: Review the logic above to help your child master the concept of ethos pathos logos examples worksheet.
