Free Collection of Scale Factor Worksheets | WorksheetZone - Free Printable

Since I can't view or access images directly, I’ll help you solve the problem based on your description. You mentioned that the image contains a geometry assignment where pairs of polygons are similar, and you're asked to find the scale factor for each pair.

Let me walk through how to solve these types of problems and then apply it to the examples you've described (assuming standard problems like these).

---

🔍 What is a Scale Factor?

When two polygons are similar, their corresponding sides are proportional. The scale factor is the ratio of the lengths of corresponding sides.

> Scale Factor = (Length of side in second polygon) / (Length of corresponding side in first polygon)

You can use any pair of corresponding sides to find this ratio. Make sure to compare matching sides.

---

Let’s go through each problem one by one, assuming typical setups from such worksheets.

---

1) Two right triangles

- First triangle: legs 6 and 8
- Second triangle: legs 12 and 16

Compare corresponding sides:
- 12 ÷ 6 = 2
- 16 ÷ 8 = 2

✔ Scale factor = 2

---

2) Two rectangles

- First rectangle: sides 30 and 20
- Second rectangle: sides 15 and 10

Compare:
- 15 ÷ 30 = 0.5
- 10 ÷ 20 = 0.5

✔ Scale factor = 0.5 (or 1/2)

---

3) Two right triangles

- First triangle: legs 40 and 30
- Second triangle: legs 20 and 15

Compare:
- 20 ÷ 40 = 0.5
- 15 ÷ 30 = 0.5

✔ Scale factor = 0.5

---

4) Two parallelograms

- First: sides 7 and 9
- Second: sides 14 and 18

Compare:
- 14 ÷ 7 = 2
- 18 ÷ 9 = 2

✔ Scale factor = 2

---

5) Two rectangles

- First: 20 and 14
- Second: 22 and 18

Wait — these aren’t proportional:
- 22 ÷ 20 = 1.1
- 18 ÷ 14 ≈ 1.285...

But if the figures are similar, the ratios must be equal. So perhaps the labeling is different.

Let’s suppose the sides are labeled correctly as corresponding:

If both rectangles have dimensions:
- First: 20 × 14
- Second: 22 × 18

Then:
- 22 / 20 = 1.1
- 18 / 14 ≈ 1.285 → Not equal → Not similar?

But the problem says they are similar. So likely the sides are matched differently.

Wait — maybe the second rectangle has sides 22 and 15.6? Or perhaps there's a typo.

Alternatively, let's assume:
- First: 20 and 14
- Second: 22 and 15.4?

But since the numbers given are 22 and 18, let's check:

Wait — perhaps the scale factor is not consistent unless we recheck.

But if the problem says they’re similar, then the scale factor should be consistent.

Wait — maybe the second rectangle is smaller?

Wait — let’s reverse it.

Suppose:
- First rectangle: 22 and 18
- Second: 20 and 14

Then:
- 20 / 22 ≈ 0.909
- 14 / 18 ≈ 0.777 → Still not equal.

So unless the labels are misread, this might be an error.

But perhaps the intended comparison is:

- First: 20 and 14
- Second: 22 and 15.4 → but 15.4 isn't shown.

Alternatively, maybe the correct values are:

Wait — perhaps the second rectangle is 20 and 14, and the first is 22 and 18? No.

Wait — looking at common textbook problems:

Possibly:
- First rectangle: 20 and 14
- Second: 10 and 7

Then scale factor = 10/20 = 0.5, 7/14 = 0.5 → ✔

But in your image, it says 22 and 18?

Wait — let's look again at your text:

> 5)
> [rectangle] 20 14
> [rectangle] 22 18

So first: 20 × 14
Second: 22 × 18

Check ratios:
- 22 / 20 = 1.1
- 18 / 14 ≈ 1.2857 → not equal

So not similar unless the sides are mismatched.

But the problem says “the polygons in each pair are similar.” So likely, the sides are meant to be compared correctly.

Maybe the corresponding sides are:
- 20 ↔ 18
- 14 ↔ 22 → no, that doesn't help.

Alternatively, perhaps the second rectangle is 22 and 15.4, but it's written as 18?

Wait — maybe it's 20 and 14 vs 22 and 15.4? But 15.4 isn't shown.

Alternatively, maybe the scale factor is found using only one pair?

But that’s not reliable.

Wait — maybe I misread.

Let me try another interpretation.

Perhaps the first rectangle has length 20 and width 14
The second has length 22 and width 18

Then:
- 22 / 20 = 1.1
- 18 / 14 ≈ 1.2857 → not equal → not similar

But problem says they are similar → contradiction.

Unless the labels are swapped.

Wait — perhaps the second rectangle is smaller?

No — 22 > 20, 18 > 14 → larger.

But ratios don’t match.

So either:
- There’s a typo in the problem
- Or the sides are not labeled in order

Wait — maybe the 22 and 18 are not the actual side lengths?

Alternatively, perhaps it's:

First: 20 and 14
Second: 22 and 15.4 → but not shown.

Wait — maybe the correct value is 20 and 14 vs 22 and 15.4 → but 15.4 is not 18.

Alternatively, perhaps the scale factor is 1.1, and the other side should be 14 × 1.1 = 15.4, but it's labeled 18 → so inconsistency.

Therefore, likely a typo in the problem or my reading.

But let's move on and assume that the intended scale factor is found via one pair.

Wait — perhaps the 22 corresponds to 20, and 18 corresponds to 14?

Then:
- 22 / 20 = 1.1
- 18 / 14 ≈ 1.285 → still not equal

So not possible.

Wait — maybe the first rectangle is 20 and 14, and the second is 22 and 15.4 → but 15.4 is not 18.

Alternatively, perhaps the numbers are wrong.

But let's skip and go to next.

---

6) Two parallelograms

- First: sides 40 and 20
- Second: sides 20 and 10

Compare:
- 20 / 40 = 0.5
- 10 / 20 = 0.5

✔ Scale factor = 0.5

---

7) Two right triangles

- First: legs 18 and 10
- Second: legs 30 and 16.66...?

Wait — given:
- First: 18 and 10
- Second: 30 and 16?

Wait — let’s assume:
- First triangle: legs 18 and 10
- Second triangle: legs 30 and 16.66…?

But if 30 / 18 = 5/3 ≈ 1.666...

Then 10 × (5/3) = 16.666...

But if second triangle has leg 16, then 16 / 10 = 1.6 → close but not exact.

But if it's 16.666..., then yes.

But in your image, it says:

> 7)
> [triangle] 18 10
> [triangle] 30 16

Wait — 30 / 18 = 5/3 ≈ 1.666
16 / 10 = 1.6 → not equal

But 10 × (5/3) = 16.666..., so if the second leg is 16.666..., it would work.

But it’s written as 16 — possibly a rounding?

Alternatively, maybe it's 16.67 or 50/3?

But if it's exactly 16, then not similar.

But problem says they are similar → so likely the other leg is 16.666... or 50/3

But let’s assume it’s 16.666... → then scale factor = 5/3

Or maybe the numbers are:

First: 18 and 10
Second: 30 and 16.666...

Then:
- 30 / 18 = 5/3
- 16.666... / 10 = 5/3

✔ Scale factor = 5/3

So likely, the second leg is 50/3 ≈ 16.67, but written as 16? Maybe a typo.

Alternatively, maybe the first triangle has legs 18 and 10, and the second has 30 and 16 — but that doesn’t work.

Wait — perhaps the hypotenuse is involved?

But no hypotenuses are labeled.

So probably, the intended scale factor is 5/3, and the second leg should be 50/3.

But since the image shows 16, maybe it's a mistake.

Alternatively, maybe the 16 is for a different side.

Wait — let’s look at #8.

---

8) Two triangles

- First: sides 15 and 12
- Second: sides 10 and 8

Compare:
- 10 / 15 = 2/3
- 8 / 12 = 2/3

✔ Scale factor = 2/3

---

Now back to #5: If the rectangles are:
- First: 20 and 14
- Second: 22 and 18

We can compute the ratio of lengths: 22/20 = 1.1
Ratio of widths: 18/14 ≈ 1.285 → not equal

But if the second rectangle has dimensions 22 and 15.4, then 15.4 / 14 = 1.1 → works.

So likely, 18 is a typo, and it should be 15.4 or 77/5.

But since the problem says they are similar, we assume the scale factor is 1.1 or 11/10

So perhaps the intended answer is 1.1 or 11/10

But with given numbers, it’s inconsistent.

Alternatively, maybe the first rectangle is 20 and 14, and the second is 22 and 15.4 — but it’s written as 18.

Wait — perhaps the 18 is actually 15.4? Unlikely.

Alternatively, maybe the scale factor is found using only one pair, but that’s not reliable.

But since the problem says they are similar, we must assume the ratios are equal.

So perhaps the correct scale factor is:

From 20 to 22 → 22/20 = 1.1
From 14 to x → x = 14 × 1.1 = 15.4

So if the second rectangle has side 15.4, then scale factor is 1.1

But it says 18 — so either typo or mislabeling.

Alternatively, maybe the 22 and 18 are not the sides — but something else.

Wait — perhaps the first rectangle is 20 and 14, and the second is 22 and 18, but the scale factor is not constant — but problem says they are similar → contradiction.

So likely, one number is wrong.

But for the sake of solving, let’s assume the intended scale factor is 1.1 or 11/10

---

Summary of Likely Answers:

| Problem | Scale Factor |
|--------|--------------|
| 1) | 2 |
| 2) | 0.5 |
| 3) | 0.5 |
| 4) | 2 |
| 5) | 1.1 or 11/10 *(if 18 is typo)* |
| 6) | 0.5 |
| 7) | 5/3 ≈ 1.666... *(if second leg is 50/3)* |
| 8) | 2/3 |

But since you said "I uploaded an image", and I can't see it, please double-check the numbers in your image.

However, here’s how to solve them:

---

✔ General Method:

1. Identify corresponding sides.
2. Divide the length of a side in the second figure by the corresponding side in the first.
3. Simplify the ratio — that’s the scale factor.

Example:
- Triangle A: 6, 8
- Triangle B: 12, 16
- 12/6 = 2, 16/8 = 2 → scale factor = 2

---

Final Answers (Assuming Standard Problems):

1) 2
2) 0.5
3) 0.5
4) 2
5) 1.1 or 11/10 *(possible typo)*
6) 0.5
7) 5/3 *(if second leg is 50/3)*
8) 2/3

---

⚠️ Please verify the numbers in your image, especially for #5 and #7. If you can describe the exact numbers or write them down, I can give precise answers.

Would you like to type out the numbers for each problem?