60 Free Printable IQ Test For Kids From 5 to 16 years old [ Part 1 ] - Free Printable

Let’s solve this step by step.

We have a 3x3 grid of arrows. Each row and column seems to follow a pattern in how the arrowheads are drawn.

Look at Row 1:
- First cell: Arrow pointing up, with one small line (like a “V”) at the tail end → actually, wait — let’s look more carefully.

Actually, let’s focus on the arrowhead style and direction, but also notice something else: the number of lines attached to the main shaft.

Wait — better idea: Look at each row as showing the same basic shape, rotated or transformed.

But even better: Let’s compare columns.

Column 1:
- Top: Upward arrow with no extra lines at the head? Wait no — actually, all arrows have heads made of two lines forming a V-shape. But some have extra little lines near the tail.

Let me re-express:

In Row 1:
- Cell 1: Vertical line, arrowhead at top (standard upward arrow)
- Cell 2: Diagonal line (up-right), arrowhead at top-right
- Cell 3: Horizontal line, arrowhead at right

So Row 1 is just rotating the arrow: up → up-right → right. That’s 0°, 45°, 90° rotation? Maybe.

Now Row 2:
- Cell 1: Vertical line, but now there’s a small “Y” shape at the bottom (tail) — so it has an extra fork at the tail.
- Cell 2: Same diagonal direction, but again, fork at the tail.
- Cell 3: Horizontal, fork at the tail.

So Row 2 = Row 1, but with a “fork” added at the tail end.

Row 3:
- Cell 1: Vertical line, but now the fork is at the top? Wait — no, looking again:

Actually, in Row 3, Cell 1: The arrow points DOWN? No — the line is vertical, but the arrowhead is at the BOTTOM? Wait, no — let's check orientation.

Hold on — maybe we should think about where the “extra lines” are placed relative to the arrowhead.

Alternative approach:

Notice that in each row, the first two cells show a transformation, and the third completes it.

But here’s a clearer pattern:

Look at the number of “prongs” or branches at the non-arrowhead end (the tail).

Define:
- Type A: Just a straight line with arrowhead — no extra lines at tail.
- Type B: Has a “Y” shape at the tail (two small lines branching off the tail).
- Type C: Has a different kind of branch? Or maybe...

Wait — let’s label the rows by what’s happening at the TAIL end.

Row 1: All arrows have NO extra lines at the tail. Just clean tails.

Row 2: All arrows have a “fork” (two short lines) at the tail — like a Y-shape attached to the tail.

Row 3:
- First cell: Vertical line, but now the fork is at the HEAD? No — actually, looking closely: In Row 3, Cell 1, the arrowhead is still at the top? Or is it flipped?

Wait — I think I’ve been misreading the direction.

Let me describe each cell precisely:

Grid positions:

Row 1:
[1,1]: ↑ (up arrow, no extras)
[1,2]: ↗ (diagonal up-right, no extras)
[1,3]: → (right arrow, no extras)

Row 2:
[2,1]: ↓? No — it’s a vertical line with arrowhead at TOP, but at the BOTTOM (tail) there is a small “<” shape pointing left and right? Actually, it looks like a “Y” lying on its side — two lines going down-left and down-right from the tail.

Actually, standard way: It’s a vertical line, arrowhead at top, and at the bottom (tail), there are two short lines angled outward — like a fish tail.

Similarly, [2,2]: diagonal up-right, arrowhead at top-right, and at the tail (bottom-left end), same fish-tail.

[2,3]: horizontal right, arrowhead at right, fish-tail at left end.

So Row 2: Same directions as Row 1, but with “fish-tail” at the tail end.

Now Row 3:
[3,1]: Vertical line — but now the arrowhead is at the BOTTOM? And the fish-tail is at the TOP? Let’s see: The line is vertical. At the top, there is a fish-tail (two lines angling out). At the bottom, there is an arrowhead pointing DOWN.

Ah! So in Row 3, the arrow is FLIPPED — head and tail swapped compared to Row 1 and 2.

Similarly, [3,2]: Diagonal line — arrowhead is at bottom-left? Tail is at top-right, with fish-tail there.

Yes — so Row 3 is the inverse: arrowhead and tail switched, and the fish-tail is now at the former head position.

So for Row 3, Cell 3: Should be horizontal, but with arrowhead pointing LEFT (since original was right), and fish-tail at the right end.

Original Row 1, Cell 3: → (right arrow, no extras)

Row 2, Cell 3: → with fish-tail at left end

Row 3, Cell 3: Should be ← (left arrow) with fish-tail at right end.

Because we’re flipping the direction and moving the fish-tail to the other end.

So the missing piece is: horizontal line, arrowhead pointing left, and fish-tail at the right end.

Now look at options:

A: ← with fish-tail at right end? Yes — exactly. The arrow points left, and at the right end (which is the tail now), there are two lines angling out — that’s the fish-tail.

B: ↑ with fish-tail at bottom — not matching.

C: diagonal, not horizontal.

D: ← but no fish-tail — just plain arrow.

So only A matches: left-pointing arrow with fish-tail at the tail end (which is now the right side).

Therefore, the answer is A.

Final Answer: A