Practice identifying congruent triangles using various proof methods including SSS, SAS, ASA, AAS, and HL theorems

Let’s go through each problem one by one. We’re looking for congruent triangles — meaning they have the same size and shape. The rules we use are:

- SSS (Side-Side-Side): All three sides match.
- SAS (Side-Angle-Side): Two sides and the angle between them match.
- ASA (Angle-Side-Angle): Two angles and the side between them match.
- AAS (Angle-Angle-Side): Two angles and a non-included side match.
- HL (Hypotenuse-Leg): Only for right triangles — hypotenuse and one leg match.

If none of these apply, or if parts don’t match up correctly, then the triangles are not congruent.

---

Problem 1:

We see two rectangles split diagonally. Each rectangle has opposite sides equal (marked with single and double tick marks). The diagonal is shared? No — actually, it’s two separate triangles from two different rectangles? Wait — no, looking again: it’s one rectangle split into two triangles by a diagonal. But the question says “each pair” — so maybe it’s comparing left triangle to right triangle in the same figure?

Actually, re-examining: Figure 1 shows a rectangle divided by a diagonal into two triangles. Both triangles share the diagonal as a common side. Also, the rectangle’s opposite sides are equal — so each triangle has:

- One side = length of rectangle (say, marked with double ticks)
- One side = width of rectangle (single ticks)
- Included angle = 90° (since it’s a rectangle)

So both triangles have: side (double), angle (90°), side (single) → that’s SAS.

✔ So, △ABC ≅ △CDA by SAS? Wait — labels aren’t given, but since it’s symmetric, yes.

But wait — the diagram doesn’t label vertices. However, based on markings: both triangles have two sides and included angle matching → SAS

Answer for #1: SAS

Wait — let me check again. Actually, in many textbooks, when you draw a diagonal in a rectangle, the two triangles formed are congruent by SSS too — because all three sides correspond: two sides of rectangle + diagonal (common). But here, the diagonal isn’t marked as equal — but it’s the same line segment, so it’s automatically equal.

Actually, better way: since it’s a rectangle, opposite sides equal, and diagonal is common → so SSS also works. But which one is intended?

Looking at tick marks: the vertical sides are marked with single ticks (equal), horizontal with double ticks (equal), and the diagonal is not marked — but it’s the same segment for both triangles. So for triangle on top-left and bottom-right? Wait — no, it’s split into two triangles sharing the diagonal.

Actually, perhaps the figure is showing two separate triangles? No — it looks like one rectangle split into two triangles.

I think the intent is: the two triangles formed by the diagonal of a rectangle are congruent. Since they share the diagonal, and the other two pairs of sides are equal (rectangle properties), then SSS applies.

But also, the included angle is 90°, so SAS also applies.

Which one should we pick? Usually, if right angle is present and legs are known, SAS is fine.

But let’s look at standard answer keys — often for rectangle diagonal, they say SSS or SAS. Here, since angles aren't marked except implicitly, and sides are marked, probably SSS is safer? Wait — the diagonal isn't marked with ticks, so maybe not considered "given" as equal via marking? But geometrically, it's the same segment.

Actually, in such diagrams, if a side is shared, it’s automatically congruent. So both triangles have:

- Side AB = CD (horizontal, double ticks)
- Side AD = BC (vertical, single ticks)
- Diagonal AC = CA (same segment)

→ So SSS.

But some might argue SAS using the right angle.

However, in this worksheet, they likely expect us to use the markings. The right angle is shown with square corner, so it’s given.

In fact, for #1, most sources would say SAS because you have two sides and the included right angle.

Let me confirm with logic: if I take triangle ABC and triangle CDA in rectangle ABCD, then AB=CD, BC=DA, angle B = angle D = 90°, so SAS with the right angle between the two sides.

Yes — so SAS

Final decision for #1: SAS

---

Problem 2:

Two triangles intersecting. Markings: each has two sides with double ticks, and the included angle? Let’s see.

Left triangle: two sides marked with double ticks, and the angle between them is vertical angle? Actually, the two triangles share a vertex, and the angles at that vertex are vertical angles — which are always equal.

So: each triangle has two sides equal (double ticks), and the included angle (vertical angles) equal → so SAS

Yes.

Answer: SAS

---

Problem 3:

Large triangle with an altitude drawn to base, creating two smaller triangles. The altitude is perpendicular (right angle marked), and the two segments of the base are marked equal (single ticks). Also, the altitude is common to both small triangles.

So for the two small triangles:

- Right angle (given)
- Leg (altitude) common
- Other leg (half-base) equal (tick marks)

→ This is SAS? Or HL?

Since they are right triangles, and we have hypotenuse? Wait — no, we have two legs: the altitude and half-base. So actually, it’s SAS (two legs and included right angle).

But also, since they are right triangles, and we have leg-leg, that’s equivalent to SAS.

Some might call it LL, but standard is SAS or HL.

Here, we don’t have hypotenuse — we have two legs. So SAS is correct.

Alternatively, if we consider the whole thing, but the question is about the two small triangles.

Yes — so SAS

Wait — but the two small triangles: do they have the hypotenuse marked? No. But they share the altitude, and bases are equal, and right angles.

So sides: leg1 (altitude) common, leg2 (base half) equal, included angle 90° → SAS.

Answer: SAS

---

Problem 4:

Two right triangles. One has legs marked: one leg single tick, other leg double tick. The other triangle has same: one leg single, one leg double. And both have right angles.

So: two legs equal, included right angle → SAS

Also, since right triangles, could be LL, but SAS covers it.

Answer: SAS

---

Problem 5:

Parallelogram? With diagonal. Opposite sides marked equal: one pair single ticks, other pair double ticks. Diagonal is common.

So for the two triangles formed:

- Side AB = CD (double ticks)
- Side AD = BC (single ticks)
- Diagonal AC = CA (common)

→ SSS

Also, could use SAS if we knew angles, but here sides are marked, so SSS is direct.

Answer: SSS

---

Problem 6:

Two triangles sharing a vertex, with some sides marked. Left triangle: one side single tick, another side double tick. Right triangle: one side single tick, another side double tick. But the angles? Not marked. Also, the way they are arranged, the equal sides may not be corresponding.

Specifically: in left triangle, the single-tick side and double-tick side are adjacent. In right triangle, similarly. But the angle between them? Not marked equal. Also, the third sides are not marked.

Moreover, the orientation suggests that the equal sides might not be in corresponding positions. For example, the single-tick side in left triangle might correspond to the double-tick side in right triangle? No, markings suggest otherwise.

Actually, looking closely: both triangles have a side with single tick and a side with double tick, but the angle between them is not indicated to be equal. Also, there’s no information about other angles or sides.

Furthermore, the triangles appear to be oriented differently — one might be flipped.

Without knowing that the included angle is equal, we cannot use SAS. And no other criteria fit.

Also, the third sides are not marked, so SSS doesn’t apply.

Angles not marked, so ASA/AAS no.

Not right triangles, so HL no.

Thus, not congruent

Answer: not congruent

---

Problem 7:

Two separate triangles. First triangle: angles marked 80° and 50°, so third angle is 50° (since 180-80-50=50). Second triangle: angles marked 50° and 50°, so third is 80°. So both have angles 50°,50°,80° — so similar, but are they congruent?

Congruent requires same size, not just shape. Here, no sides are marked equal. So even though angles match, sizes could be different.

For AAS or ASA, we need a side to be equal. Here, no side markings.

So, not congruent

Answer: not congruent

---

Problem 8:

Quadrilateral divided into two triangles by a diagonal. One triangle has a right angle marked, and sides: one leg single tick, hypotenuse double tick? Wait.

Actually, left triangle: right angle, one leg marked single tick, hypotenuse marked double tick. Right triangle: no right angle marked? Wait, looking back.

In figure 8: it’s a quadrilateral with a diagonal. The left triangle has a right angle at bottom-left, and sides: vertical leg single tick, hypotenuse double tick. The right triangle: has a side marked double tick (which might be the same as hypotenuse of left?), and another side... wait.

Actually, upon closer inspection: the diagonal is common. The left triangle has: right angle, leg (vertical) single tick, hypotenuse (diagonal?) no.

Perhaps better: the two triangles share the diagonal. Left triangle: angles? It has a right angle, and sides: one leg (say, bottom) not marked, other leg (left) single tick, hypotenuse (diagonal) not marked. Right triangle: has a side marked double tick (top side?), and another side...

This is messy. Let me think differently.

Notice that in the left triangle, there is a right angle, and one leg is marked (single tick). In the right triangle, there is no right angle marked, but there is a side marked double tick. Also, the diagonal is common.

But without more markings, it’s hard. Perhaps the double-tick side in right triangle corresponds to something.

Another approach: maybe the figure intends that the two triangles have:

- Common side (diagonal)
- One pair of sides equal (but which?)

Actually, looking at standard problems, sometimes in such figures, if it’s a kite or something.

But here, only markings are: in left triangle, one leg single tick; in right triangle, one side double tick. Not the same.

Moreover, no angles marked equal except possibly the right angle, but only one triangle has it.

So likely, not enough information.

But wait — perhaps the double-tick side is the hypotenuse of the right triangle? No.

Let me assume vertices. Suppose quadrilateral ABCD, diagonal AC. Triangle ABC and ADC.

Suppose in triangle ABC, angle B is 90°, AB is single tick. In triangle ADC, DC is double tick. Not helpful.

Perhaps the side marked double tick in right triangle is equal to the hypotenuse of left triangle? But not marked.

I think there’s insufficient evidence for congruence. No criterion satisfied.

So not congruent

But let me double-check. Some might argue that if it’s a specific shape, but based on markings alone, no.

Answer: not congruent

---

Problem 9:

Two triangles sharing a common vertex, with vertical angles. Markings: in left triangle, side opposite to angle is marked? Actually, sides: one side single tick, another side double tick. Similarly in right triangle.

Specifically: both triangles have a side with single tick and a side with double tick. Also, the vertical angles at the intersection are equal.

Now, are the equal sides adjacent to the equal angle? In left triangle, the single-tick and double-tick sides meet at the vertex where the vertical angle is. Same for right triangle.

So: two sides and included angle equal → SAS

Yes.

Answer: SAS

---

Problem 10:

Right triangle and another triangle. Left: right triangle with legs marked: one leg single tick, other leg double tick. Right: triangle with sides marked: one side single tick, one side double tick, and the included angle? Not marked.

In the right triangle, the right angle is between the two legs. In the other triangle, the angle between the single-tick and double-tick sides is not marked as equal to 90°.

So, for SAS, we need the included angle to be equal. Here, in left triangle, included angle is 90°, in right triangle, unknown.

So unless specified, we can’t assume.

Moreover, the right triangle has hypotenuse not marked, while the other triangle has third side not marked.

So no criterion satisfied.

Thus, not congruent

Answer: not congruent

---

Now, summarizing:

1. SAS
2. SAS
3. SAS
4. SAS
5. SSS
6. not congruent
7. not congruent
8. not congruent
9. SAS
10. not congruent

But let me verify problem 3 again. In problem 3, the two small triangles: they are both right triangles, with legs: one leg is the altitude (common), the other leg is half the base (equal by tick marks). So yes, SAS.

Problem 8: I said not congruent, but let me see if there’s a trick. In some interpretations, if the quadrilateral is symmetric, but based on markings, only one right angle and different side marks, so probably not.

Similarly, problem 10: clear.

Now, for the answers, we need to write them as per the format.

Also, note that in problem 1, some might say SSS, but I think SAS is acceptable and commonly used.

To be precise, let's list:

After careful analysis:

1. The two triangles share the diagonal, and have two sides equal (from rectangle) and included right angle → SAS
2. Two sides equal (double ticks) and included vertical angle equal → SAS
3. Two legs equal (one common altitude, one half-base equal) and included right angle → SAS
4. Two legs equal and included right angle → SAS
5. Three sides equal (opposite sides of parallelogram and common diagonal) → SSS
6. Sides marked but no included angle or other correspondence → not congruent
7. Angles equal but no sides marked → not congruent
8. Insufficient markings; only one right angle and different side marks → not congruent
9. Two sides and included vertical angle → SAS
10. Right triangle vs non-right; included angle not confirmed equal → not congruent

Final Answers:

1. SAS
2. SAS
3. SAS
4. SAS
5. SSS
6. not congruent
7. not congruent
8. not congruent
9. SAS
10. not congruent

I think that's consistent.

Final Answer:
1. SAS
2. SAS
3. SAS
4. SAS
5. SSS
6. not congruent
7. not congruent
8. not congruent
9. SAS
10. not congruent