Free. Exclusive. Just for you.
Four unique services that make learning easier, faster, and smarter - only on our website.

Visual explanation of gerrymandering using "packing and cracking" to influence election outcomes, highlighting wasted votes and efficiency gap.

Diagram illustrating gerrymandering techniques "packing and cracking" in a 10-district state with 500 pink and 500 green voters, showing how green votes are packed into one district and cracked across others, resulting in pink winning the election despite equal total votes.

Diagram illustrating gerrymandering techniques "packing and cracking" in a 10-district state with 500 pink and 500 green voters, showing how green votes are packed into one district and cracked across others, resulting in pink winning the election despite equal total votes.

PNG 1230×1266 532.9 KB Free · Personal Use
Quality Assured by Worksheets Library Team
Reviewed for educational accuracy and age-appropriateness
ID: #337021
Show Answer Key & Explanations Step-by-step solution for: How to Quantify (and Fight) Gerrymandering | Quanta Magazine
- The goal is to maximize the number of districts won by the pink party in a 10-district state with 500 pink and 500 green voters.
- The strategy involves "packing" 95 green voters into one district, ensuring green wins that district by a large margin (95 green vs. 5 pink).
- The remaining 405 green voters are "cracked" across the other nine districts, with 45 green voters in each.
- In each of these nine districts, there are 55 pink voters, allowing pink to win each by a small margin (55 pink vs. 45 green).
- This results in pink winning 9 out of 10 districts, despite an equal total number of voters for each party.
- The efficiency gap measures wasted votes: votes in losing districts or excess votes beyond the 50% threshold needed to win.
- For pink: 5 wasted votes in the losing district + 5 excess votes per winning district × 9 districts = 50 wasted votes.
- For green: 45 wasted votes per losing district × 9 districts + 45 excess votes in the winning district = 450 wasted votes.
- The efficiency gap is the absolute difference: 450 - 50 = 400 wasted votes, or 40% of the total population.
Parent Tip: Review the logic above to help your child master the concept of gerrymandering worksheet.
Print Download

How to use

Click Print to open a print-ready version directly in your browser, or use Download to save the file to your device. The ⭐ Answer button generates an AI answer key instantly - useful for teachers who need a quick reference. Need a different version? Our AI Worksheet Generator lets you create a custom worksheet on any topic in seconds.

(view all gerrymandering worksheet)

Gerrymandering and Redistricting Lesson Plan | American history ...
Gerrymandering and Redistricting Lesson Plan
How to Quantify (and Fight) Gerrymandering | Quanta Magazine
Gerrymandering Activity
Redistricting: Rigging Elections by Gerrymandering | Second Rate ...
Slaying the Gerrymander, Part 1: How to Attack the Beast ...
Slaying the Gerrymander, Part 1: How to Attack the Beast ...
Gerrymandering - JRMF
STEP 3: COMPLETING A GERRYMANDERING ACTIVITY (5 | Chegg.com
The Peoples House: Political Representation & Gerrymandering Activity