Central Angles and Inscribed Angles worksheet - Free Printable

Let's solve each part of this worksheet step by step, using the key principles:

- Central Angle: The measure of a central angle is equal to the measure of its intercepted arc.
- Inscribed Angle: The measure of an inscribed angle is half the measure of its intercepted arc.
- A right angle (90°) indicates a semicircle or diameter-related arc.

---

Part A: Circle with center K

We have a circle centered at K, and several angles and arcs are labeled. Let’s analyze:

#### Given:
- ∠KPN = 58°
- ∠LKN has a right angle symbol → ∠LKN = 90°

##### 1. $ m\angle MKN = ? $

From the diagram:
- ∠MKN is a central angle.
- It intercepts arc MN.
- But we don’t know it directly.

Wait — let’s look carefully.

We know:
- ∠LKN = 90° (right angle)
- ∠KPN = 58° → This is a central angle, so arc PN = 58°

Now, since K is the center, and the total around point K is 360°, we can find other central angles.

But first, note that points L, M, N, P lie on the circle.

Let’s label what we know:

- ∠LKN = 90° → arc LN = 90° (central angle equals arc)
- ∠KPN = 58° → arc PN = 58°

We need to determine:

---

#### 1. $ m\angle MKN = ? $

This is the central angle from M to N through K.

We don’t yet know it. But perhaps we can use symmetry?

Wait — maybe we need to consider triangle or arc relationships.

But there's no direct info about arc MN.

Wait — look again: the diagram shows:

- Arc PN = 58°
- ∠LKN = 90° → arc LN = 90°

But we also see that angle at K between L and M might be related.

Wait — perhaps we need to assume that all radii are equal, and angles are marked.

Actually, let's re-analyze.

From the diagram:

- Point K is the center.
- ∠LKN = 90° (right angle) → So arc LN = 90°
- ∠KPN = 58° → arc PN = 58°

So arc LN = 90°, arc PN = 58°

But these two arcs may not be adjacent unless we know their positions.

Looking at the diagram:

- Points go: P → N → M → L → back to P?
- From K, lines go to P, N, M, L.

Arc PN = 58° → so central angle ∠PKN = 58°

Arc LN = 90° → central angle ∠LKN = 90°

So now, total central angles around K:

- ∠PKN = 58°
- ∠NKM = ?
- ∠MKL = ?
- ∠LKP = ?

Wait — actually, the order seems to be: P → N → M → L → P

So the full circle is divided into four parts:

- ∠PKN = 58° → arc PN
- ∠NKM = ? → arc NM
- ∠MKL = ? → arc ML
- ∠LKP = ? → arc LP

But we only know ∠LKN = 90°, which is from L to N via K.

So ∠LKN = ∠LKM + ∠MKN? Wait — no.

Wait: if K is the center, and we go from L to N, passing through M? Probably not.

Wait — looking at the diagram:

- From K, rays go to L, M, N, P.
- ∠LKN is shown as a right angle → so arc LN = 90°
- Also, arc PN = 58°

So the arc from P to N is 58°, and from L to N is 90°.

But where is M?

Perhaps M is between L and N?

Wait — let’s assume the points are arranged in order: P, N, M, L around the circle.

Then the arcs are:

- PN = 58°
- NM = ?
- ML = ?
- LP = ?

And ∠LKN = 90° → this is the central angle from L to N, so arc LN = 90°

But arc LN = arc LM + arc MN

So if arc LN = 90°, and arc PN = 58°, then we can find others.

But we need more.

Wait — perhaps the arc from P to L is the rest?

Total circle = 360°

We know:
- arc PN = 58°
- arc LN = 90°

But arc LN includes arc NM and arc ML?

Wait — if the points are in order: P → N → M → L → P

Then arc PN = 58°, arc NM = ?, arc ML = ?, arc LP = ?

But arc LN = arc NM + arc ML = 90°

Also, arc PL = arc PN + arc NL? No — arc from P to L can go via N or via M.

But arc LN = 90°, so the arc from L to N is 90°.

So arc LN = 90°

arc PN = 58°

Now, arc from P to L via N: arc PN + arc NL = 58° + 90° = 148°

Then arc from P to L the other way (via M) = 360° - 148° = 212°

But we don't have enough.

Wait — maybe we can find ∠MKN.

Let’s look at question 1: $ m\angle MKN = ? $

∠MKN is the central angle from M to N.

So it intercepts arc MN.

So $ m\angle MKN = \text{arc } MN $

But we don’t know it yet.

Wait — maybe we can find it using the fact that ∠LKN = 90°, and ∠KPN = 58°

But without knowing the position of M relative to L and N, it’s hard.

Wait — perhaps the right angle is at K for ∠LKN, and there’s another angle?

Wait — let’s look at the diagram again.

The angle at K between L and N is marked with a right angle → ∠LKN = 90°

Also, ∠KPN = 58° → that's ∠PKN = 58°

So the central angles are:

- ∠PKN = 58°
- ∠NKM = ?
- ∠MKL = ?
- ∠LKP = ?

But ∠LKN = 90° → this is the angle from L to N, so it includes ∠LKM + ∠MKN?

Only if M is between L and N.

Yes! Likely M is between L and N.

So ∠LKN = ∠LKM + ∠MKN

But we don’t know either.

Wait — but we don’t have enough information unless we assume something.

Wait — perhaps the only given angle is ∠KPN = 58°, and ∠LKN = 90°

But we need to find:

1. $ m\angle MKN = ? $
2. $ m\angle LKN = ? $ → already given: 90°
3. $ m\widehat{LM} = ? $
4. $ m\widehat{MN} = ? $
5. $ m\widehat{LN} = ? $
6. $ m\widehat{LNP} = ? $

Ah! Now we can do it.

#### 2. $ m\angle LKN = ? $

It’s marked with a right angle → so 90°

✔ Answer: 90°

#### 5. $ m\widehat{LN} = ? $

Since ∠LKN is a central angle, it intercepts arc LN → so arc LN = ∠LKN = 90°

✔ Answer: 90°

#### 1. $ m\angle MKN = ? $

We don’t know yet. But notice: ∠MKN is a central angle intercepting arc MN.

We need to find arc MN.

But we know arc LN = 90°, and if M is between L and N, then arc LN = arc LM + arc MN

But we don’t know arc LM or arc MN.

Wait — we also know arc PN = 58°

Is there any other clue?

Wait — look at the diagram: Is there a triangle or anything?

Wait — perhaps the arc from P to N is 58°, and the arc from L to N is 90°, but we don’t know how they relate.

Unless we assume that the points are placed such that the arcs add up.

Wait — perhaps we can find arc NP = 58°, and arc LN = 90°, so arc from P to L via N is 58° + 90° = 148°, so the opposite arc from P to L via M is 360° - 148° = 212°

But still not helpful.

Wait — maybe I missed something.

Wait — look at the diagram: Is there a triangle or inscribed angle?

No — Part A is just central angles.

Wait — perhaps the only given is ∠KPN = 58° and ∠LKN = 90°

But we need more.

Wait — maybe the angle at K between P and N is 58°, and between L and N is 90°, but we don’t know the relationship.

Wait — perhaps the arc from P to N is 58°, and from L to N is 90°, but they share point N.

So the arc from P to L via N is 58° + 90° = 148°

Then the remaining arc from L to P via M is 360° - 148° = 212°

But we need arc LM and arc MN.

Still stuck.

Wait — maybe there’s a typo or missing info.

Wait — look at the diagram: Is there a line from K to M, and we need to find ∠MKN?

But without more angles, we can’t.

Wait — perhaps the arc from P to N is 58°, and the arc from L to N is 90°, and the total circle is 360°, but we need more.

Wait — maybe the angle at K between M and N is what we need.

But unless we know the position of M, we can’t.

Wait — perhaps M is such that KM is perpendicular to KN? No, only LKN is 90°.

Wait — maybe the arc from P to N is 58°, and the arc from L to N is 90°, and the arc from L to P is the rest.

But still.

Wait — perhaps the answer is that arc MN is unknown? That can’t be.

Wait — maybe I’m overcomplicating.

Let me try to list all answers based on what we can deduce.

Let’s start with what we know:

- ∠LKN = 90° → arc LN = 90°
- ∠KPN = 58° → arc PN = 58°

Now, arc LN = arc LM + arc MN = 90°

But we don’t know how it splits.

But wait — is there a possibility that arc PM is something?

No.

Wait — perhaps the diagram shows that arc PN = 58°, and arc LN = 90°, and the points are arranged as P, N, M, L, so the arc from P to L is P→N→M→L = arc PN + arc NM + arc ML

But arc LN = arc LM + arc MN = 90°

But we don’t know arc NM or arc LM.

Unless... is there a right angle at M or something? No.

Wait — perhaps the only way is to realize that the sum of all central angles is 360°.

So let’s assume the central angles are:

- ∠PKN = 58° (given)
- ∠NKM = x
- ∠MKL = y
- ∠LKP = z

Then: 58 + x + y + z = 360

Also, ∠LKN = 90° → this is the angle from L to N, which is ∠LKM + ∠MKN = y + x = 90°

So:
- x + y = 90°
- 58 + x + y + z = 360
- Substitute: 58 + 90 + z = 360 → 148 + z = 360 → z = 212°

So ∠LKP = 212° → arc LP = 212°

But that’s huge — possible.

Now, we can find:

#### 1. $ m\angle MKN = ? $

That’s ∠MKN = x

But we don’t know x individually — only x + y = 90°

So unless we have more, we can’t find x.

But wait — is there a mistake?

Wait — perhaps the arc from P to N is 58°, and the arc from L to N is 90°, but they are on different sides.

Wait — maybe the arc from P to N is 58°, and from L to N is 90°, and if we go from P to L via N, it’s 58° + 90° = 148°, so the other arc from P to L via M is 212°, as before.

But still, we can’t split arc LN into LM and MN.

Unless — is there a triangle or something?

Wait — maybe the answer is that arc MN is not determined? But that can’t be.

Wait — perhaps I misread the diagram.

Look at the diagram: There is a radius from K to M, and from K to N, and from K to L, and from K to P.

And ∠LKN = 90°, ∠KPN = 58°

But is there any indication of the position of M?

Wait — perhaps M is such that KM is perpendicular to KN? No.

Wait — maybe the arc from P to N is 58°, and the arc from L to N is 90°, and the arc from L to P is the rest, but we need to find arc MN.

But without additional info, it’s impossible.

Wait — perhaps the problem assumes that the only given angles are those, and we need to find what we can.

Let’s skip to Part B — maybe it’s easier.

---

Part B: Circle with points A, B, C, D, E, F

Given:
- ∠BCE = 36°
- ∠FED = 27°
- ∠FEA = 90° (right angle at E)

Wait — at point E, there is a right angle — so ∠FEA = 90°

Also, ∠BCE = 36°, ∠FED = 27°

We need to find various angles and arcs.

First, recall:
- Inscribed angle = half the intercepted arc
- Central angle = arc

But here, most angles are inscribed.

Let’s identify:

#### 1. $ m\angle BEF = ? $

Angle at E, between B, E, F.

So ∠BEF is an inscribed angle.

It intercepts arc BF.

So $ m\angle BEF = \frac{1}{2} m\widehat{BF} $

But we don’t know arc BF.

Wait — but we know ∠BCE = 36°

∠BCE is at C, between B, C, E.

So it intercepts arc BE.

So $ m\angle BCE = \frac{1}{2} m\widehat{BE} $

So 36° = (1/2) arc BE → arc BE = 72°

Similarly, ∠FED = 27° → inscribed angle at E, intercepts arc FD

So $ m\angle FED = \frac{1}{2} m\widehat{FD} $ → 27° = (1/2) arc FD → arc FD = 54°

Also, ∠FEA = 90° → this is at E, between F, E, A.

So it intercepts arc FA.

So $ m\angle FEA = \frac{1}{2} m\widehat{FA} $ → 90° = (1/2) arc FA → arc FA = 180°

Oh! So arc FA = 180° → so FA is a semicircle → so chord FA is a diameter.

That’s important.

So FA is a diameter.

Now, we can use this.

Now, let’s find:

#### 1. $ m\angle BEF = ? $

This is angle at E, between B, E, F.

It intercepts arc BF.

So $ m\angle BEF = \frac{1}{2} m\widehat{BF} $

But we know arc BE = 72°, arc FD = 54°, arc FA = 180°

But arc FA = arc FB + arc BA? Not necessarily.

Wait — points: A, B, C, D, E, F

From diagram: likely order is A, F, E, D, C, B, A

But let’s assume the points are on the circle in order: A, B, C, D, E, F, A

But arc FA = 180°, so F and A are endpoints of diameter.

So the circle is symmetric.

Now, arc FA = 180°

Now, arc BE = 72°

But we need arc BF.

Let’s try to find arc BF.

But we know arc FD = 54°, arc BE = 72°

But we need to see how they fit.

Also, since FA is diameter, any angle subtended by FA is 90°.

But we already used that.

Now, let’s find:

#### 1. $ m\angle BEF = ? $

We need arc BF.

But we don’t know it directly.

Wait — we know arc BE = 72°, arc ED = ? arc DF = 54°

But we don’t know arc EF.

Wait — we know arc FA = 180°

And arc FD = 54°, so arc DA = arc FA - arc FD = 180° - 54° = 126°? No — depends on direction.

If F to A is 180°, and F to D is 54°, then arc FD = 54°, so arc DA = 180° - 54° = 126° only if D is between F and A.

But from diagram, likely order is F, E, D, C, B, A

So from F to A: F→E→D→C→B→A

But arc FA = 180°, so it’s a semicircle.

Now, arc FD = 54°, so from F to D is 54°

Then arc DE = ? arc EC = ? arc CB = ? arc BA = ?

But we know arc BE = 72°

Arc BE = arc BC + arc CE

But we don't know.

Alternatively, let's use the fact that arc FA = 180°

And arc FD = 54°, so arc DA = 180° - 54° = 126°? Only if D is between F and A.

Yes, if F→D→A, then arc FD + arc DA = arc FA = 180°

So arc DA = 180° - 54° = 126°

But we also know arc BE = 72°

But we need arc BF.

Wait — arc BF = arc BE + arc EF

But we don't know arc EF.

Wait — we know arc FD = 54°, but arc EF is part of it.

From F to D: F→E→D, so arc FD = arc FE + arc ED

So arc FE + arc ED = 54°

But we know ∠FED = 27°, which is at E, intercepts arc FD, so yes, arc FD = 54°, so arc FE + arc ED = 54°

But we don't know the split.

Similarly, arc BE = 72°, which is from B to E.

Now, ∠BEF is at E, between B, E, F.

So it intercepts arc BF.

So $ m\angle BEF = \frac{1}{2} m\widehat{BF} $

But arc BF = arc BE + arc EF = 72° + arc EF

But we don't know arc EF.

Wait — is there another way?

Wait — we know ∠FEA = 90°, which is at E, between F, E, A.

So it intercepts arc FA.

Yes, arc FA = 180°, so (1/2)(180) = 90°, correct.

Now, let’s look at the entire circle.

Total circle = 360°

We know arc FA = 180°

So the other semicircle is arc F-B-C-D-E-A? No.

Wait — arc FA is one semicircle, so the other semicircle is from F to A the other way.

But we have points B, C, D, E.

So likely, the circle is divided into two semicircles: one is F→E→D→C→B→A, the other is F→A directly.

But since FA is diameter, the circle is symmetric.

Now, arc FD = 54°, so from F to D along the arc is 54°.

Then from D to A is 180° - 54° = 126°

Similarly, arc BE = 72°, so from B to E is 72°.

But we need arc BF.

Wait — perhaps we can find arc EF.

But we don't have enough.

Wait — maybe we can use the fact that the sum of arcs is 360°.

But let’s try to find arc BF.

Another idea: perhaps ∠BEF and ∠BDF or something.

Wait — let’s look at the diagram: at point E, we have several angles.

We have:
- ∠BCE = 36°
- ∠FED = 27°
- ∠FEA = 90°

So at point E, the total angle around is 360°, but we have three angles meeting.

Wait — the angles at E are:
- ∠BEF
- ∠FED = 27°
- ∠DEB? No.

Wait — the rays from E are to B, C, D, F, A.

But likely, the angles at E are:
- ∠BEF
- ∠FED = 27°
- ∠DEA? But we have ∠FEA = 90°

Wait — ∠FEA = 90°, which is between F, E, A.

So the angle from F to A at E is 90°.

Also, ∠FED = 27°, so from F to D at E is 27°.

So if we go from F to D to A, then ∠FED + ∠DEA = ∠FEA = 90°

So 27° + ∠DEA = 90° → ∠DEA = 63°

But ∠DEA is an inscribed angle, intercepting arc DA.

So $ m\angle DEA = \frac{1}{2} m\widehat{DA} $ → 63° = (1/2) arc DA → arc DA = 126°

Earlier we had arc FD = 54°, arc DA = 126°, so arc FA = 54° + 126° = 180°, good.

Now, we also have arc BE = 72°, from earlier.

Now, we want arc BF.

But arc BF = arc BE + arc EF

We know arc BE = 72°

We need arc EF.

But arc EF is part of arc FD = 54°

And arc FD = arc FE + arc ED

We know arc ED = ?

But we know ∠FED = 27°, which is at E, intercepts arc FD, so arc FD = 54°, as before.

But we don't know how it splits.

However, we can find arc EF if we know arc ED.

But we don't.

Wait — perhaps we can find arc BF using other means.

Wait — let’s try to find arc AB or