Sample worksheet titled "Making Judgments" focusing on a scenario about preserving the Wilbur building, featuring reading comprehension questions and answer choices.
Practice 5: Sample - Making Judgments worksheet with text about saving the Wilbur building, multiple-choice questions, and a hint section.
JPG
281×365
49.2 KB
Free · Personal Use
Quality Assured by Worksheets Library Team
Reviewed for educational accuracy and age-appropriateness
ID: #312996
⭐
Show Answer Key & Explanations
Step-by-step solution for: Standardized Test Skills: Making Judgments | Printable Test Prep ...
▼
Show Answer Key & Explanations
Step-by-step solution for: Standardized Test Skills: Making Judgments | Printable Test Prep ...
Problem Analysis:
The task involves analyzing a passage about Mayor Nicholas and his decision to build a parking lot on the site of an old building called "the Willard." The questions test comprehension, inference, and critical thinking based on the provided text.
---
Passage Summary:
- Mayor Nicholas wanted to build a parking lot.
- He chose the site of the old Willard building, which was located in Main Street.
- The Willard had been vacant for some time and was considered an eyesore by many residents.
- However, it was also a historic building that held sentimental value for some people.
- The town council approved the plan, but there were objections from those who valued the historical significance of the Willard.
- The mayor argued that the building was empty and had no value, justifying its demolition.
---
Questions and Solutions:
#### A. If you were the mayor, where would you place the new parking lot?
- Options:
1. On the site of the old Willard building.
2. Inviting future visitors to visit the town.
3. Finding a different location for the parking lot.
Solution:
To answer this question, we need to consider the context and implications of each option:
- Option 1: Placing the parking lot on the site of the old Willard building aligns with Mayor Nicholas's decision. However, this choice ignores the historical and sentimental value of the building.
- Option 2: This option is irrelevant because inviting visitors does not address the placement of the parking lot.
- Option 3: Choosing a different location respects the historical value of the Willard and avoids controversy.
Correct Answer:
(3) Finding a different location for the parking lot.
---
#### B. Which detail from the passage is a fact?
- Options:
1. The Willard was an eyesore.
2. The Willard was a valuable film.
3. The Willard was empty and boarded up.
4. The Willard was the most important building in town.
Solution:
We need to identify which statement is explicitly stated as a fact in the passage:
- Option 1: "The Willard was an eyesore" is an opinion, not a fact.
- Option 2: There is no mention of the Willard being a valuable film.
- Option 3: The passage states, "The Willard had been vacant for some time and was considered an eyesore by many residents," confirming that it was empty and boarded up.
- Option 4: The passage does not claim the Willard was the most important building in town.
Correct Answer:
(3) The Willard was empty and boarded up.
---
#### C. Which author quotation or two prepositional clauses expressed Mayor Nicholas’s support for the idea that the Willard should be torn down?
- Options:
1. “It was vacant.”
2. “The Willard was a fine building.”
3. “The Willard had lost its name.”
4. “It was an eyesore.”
Solution:
We need to identify statements from the passage that directly support Mayor Nicholas's argument for tearing down the Willard:
- Option 1: "It was vacant" is a factual statement that supports the mayor's argument.
- Option 2: "The Willard was a fine building" contradicts the mayor's position.
- Option 3: "The Willard had lost its name" is not mentioned in the passage.
- Option 4: "It was an eyesore" is another factual statement supporting the mayor's argument.
Correct Answer:
(1) “It was vacant.” and (4) “It was an eyesore.”
---
#### D. Look at the underlined part of the sentence. Choose the answer that shows the correct application of the grammar rule.
- Sentence: The Willard was owned by Mr. and Mrs. Bernard.
- Options:
1. Mr. and Mrs. Bernard.
2. Mr. and Mrs. Bernard’s.
3. Mr. and Mrs. Bernard’s.
4. Mr. and Mrs. Bernard.
Solution:
The underlined part of the sentence is "Mr. and Mrs. Bernard." To determine the correct possessive form:
- When two people jointly own something, the possessive form applies only to the last name. Therefore, the correct form is "Mr. and Mrs. Bernard's."
Correct Answer:
(3) Mr. and Mrs. Bernard’s.
---
Final Answers:
1. (A) Finding a different location for the parking lot.
2. (B) The Willard was empty and boarded up.
3. (C) “It was vacant.” and “It was an eyesore.”
4. (D) Mr. and Mrs. Bernard’s.
Boxed Final Answer:
\[
\boxed{(A) \text{Finding a different location for the parking lot.}, (B) \text{The Willard was empty and boarded up.}, (C) \text{“It was vacant.” and “It was an eyesore.”}, (D) \text{Mr. and Mrs. Bernard’s.}}
\]
Parent Tip: Review the logic above to help your child master the concept of judgement worksheet.