Identify each type of logical fallacy with this educational worksheet.
Worksheet titled "Identify Each Type of Logical Fallacy" with numbered list of fallacy definitions and blank lines for answers, featuring a cartoon character and the 15Worksheets.com logo.
PNG
416×539
21.2 KB
Free · Personal Use
Quality Assured by Worksheets Library Team
Reviewed for educational accuracy and age-appropriateness
ID: #380591
⭐
Show Answer Key & Explanations
Step-by-step solution for: Fallacy Worksheets - 15 Worksheets Library
▼
Show Answer Key & Explanations
Step-by-step solution for: Fallacy Worksheets - 15 Worksheets Library
The task is to identify each type of logical fallacy described in the list. Below, I will provide the correct name for each fallacy along with a brief explanation.
---
- Fallacy Name: Ad Hominem
- Explanation: Attacking the person rather than addressing the argument or evidence they present.
---
- Fallacy Name: Straw Man Fallacy
- Explanation: Misrepresenting someone's argument to make it easier to attack.
---
- Fallacy Name: Appeal to Ignorance (Argumentum ad Ignorantiam)
- Explanation: Assuming something is true because it has not been proven false, or vice versa.
---
- Fallacy Name: False Dilemma (False Dichotomy)
- Explanation: Presenting only two options as if they are the only possibilities, ignoring other alternatives.
---
- Fallacy Name: Slippery Slope
- Explanation: Arguing that one small step will inevitably lead to a chain of related events culminating in some significant impact.
---
- Fallacy Name: Circular Reasoning (Circular Argument)
- Explanation: Restating the conclusion as part of the premise, creating a loop without providing new evidence.
---
- Fallacy Name: Hasty Generalization
- Explanation: Drawing broad conclusions based on insufficient or limited evidence.
---
- Fallacy Name: Red Herring
- Explanation: Introducing an irrelevant topic to divert attention from the original issue.
---
- Fallacy Name: Tu Quoque (Appeal to Hypocrisy)
- Explanation: Dismissing someone's argument by pointing out their own hypocrisy, rather than addressing the argument itself.
---
- Fallacy Name: Post Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc (After This, Therefore Because of This)
- Explanation: Assuming that because one event followed another, the first event caused the second.
---
- Fallacy Name: Sunk Cost Fallacy
- Explanation: Continuing a behavior or endeavor as a result of previously invested resources (time, money, effort) even when it is irrational to do so.
---
- Fallacy Name: Appeal to Authority
- Explanation: Using the opinion of an authority figure as evidence, even when the authority is not an expert in the relevant field or when other evidence contradicts their opinion.
---
- Fallacy Name: Equivocation
- Explanation: Using ambiguous language to mislead or confuse the audience, often by switching between different meanings of a term.
---
- Fallacy Name: Appeal to Pity (Appeal to Emotion)
- Explanation: Evoking pity or sympathy to persuade someone, rather than presenting a rational argument.
---
- Fallacy Name: Bandwagon Fallacy (Appeal to Common Practice)
- Explanation: Asserting that something is correct or acceptable simply because many people believe it or do it.
---
1. Ad Hominem
2. Straw Man Fallacy
3. Appeal to Ignorance
4. False Dilemma
5. Slippery Slope
6. Circular Reasoning
7. Hasty Generalization
8. Red Herring
9. Tu Quoque
10. Post Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc
11. Sunk Cost Fallacy
12. Appeal to Authority
13. Equivocation
14. Appeal to Pity
15. Bandwagon Fallacy
Boxed Final Answer:
$$
\boxed{
\text{Ad Hominem, Straw Man, Appeal to Ignorance, False Dilemma, Slippery Slope, Circular Reasoning, Hasty Generalization, Red Herring, Tu Quoque, Post Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc, Sunk Cost Fallacy, Appeal to Authority, Equivocation, Appeal to Pity, Bandwagon Fallacy}
}
$$
---
1. Personal Attack
- Fallacy Name: Ad Hominem
- Explanation: Attacking the person rather than addressing the argument or evidence they present.
---
2. Affects a position the opponent doesn't really hold
- Fallacy Name: Straw Man Fallacy
- Explanation: Misrepresenting someone's argument to make it easier to attack.
---
3. A claim that truth/facts are unknown
- Fallacy Name: Appeal to Ignorance (Argumentum ad Ignorantiam)
- Explanation: Assuming something is true because it has not been proven false, or vice versa.
---
4. Limiting options to two when they are actually many
- Fallacy Name: False Dilemma (False Dichotomy)
- Explanation: Presenting only two options as if they are the only possibilities, ignoring other alternatives.
---
5. Moving from a benign premise to an improbable extreme
- Fallacy Name: Slippery Slope
- Explanation: Arguing that one small step will inevitably lead to a chain of related events culminating in some significant impact.
---
6. Repeating what has already been assumed
- Fallacy Name: Circular Reasoning (Circular Argument)
- Explanation: Restating the conclusion as part of the premise, creating a loop without providing new evidence.
---
7. Making a general statement without sufficient evidence to support it
- Fallacy Name: Hasty Generalization
- Explanation: Drawing broad conclusions based on insufficient or limited evidence.
---
8. Using something that isn't really relevant to distract from the argument
- Fallacy Name: Red Herring
- Explanation: Introducing an irrelevant topic to divert attention from the original issue.
---
9. Meaning "you too" – it is an appeal to hypocrisy
- Fallacy Name: Tu Quoque (Appeal to Hypocrisy)
- Explanation: Dismissing someone's argument by pointing out their own hypocrisy, rather than addressing the argument itself.
---
10. Any logical breakdown when identifying a cause
- Fallacy Name: Post Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc (After This, Therefore Because of This)
- Explanation: Assuming that because one event followed another, the first event caused the second.
---
11. Believing we should continue with something because we already have so much invested in it
- Fallacy Name: Sunk Cost Fallacy
- Explanation: Continuing a behavior or endeavor as a result of previously invested resources (time, money, effort) even when it is irrational to do so.
---
12. The misuse of authority to steer away from other evidence
- Fallacy Name: Appeal to Authority
- Explanation: Using the opinion of an authority figure as evidence, even when the authority is not an expert in the relevant field or when other evidence contradicts their opinion.
---
13. Using a word phrase or sentence deliberately to confuse-deceive-or mislead
- Fallacy Name: Equivocation
- Explanation: Using ambiguous language to mislead or confuse the audience, often by switching between different meanings of a term.
---
14. Distracting from the argument by trying to get someone to feel sorry for you
- Fallacy Name: Appeal to Pity (Appeal to Emotion)
- Explanation: Evoking pity or sympathy to persuade someone, rather than presenting a rational argument.
---
15. Arguing that something is right or good because everyone is doing it
- Fallacy Name: Bandwagon Fallacy (Appeal to Common Practice)
- Explanation: Asserting that something is correct or acceptable simply because many people believe it or do it.
---
Final Answer:
1. Ad Hominem
2. Straw Man Fallacy
3. Appeal to Ignorance
4. False Dilemma
5. Slippery Slope
6. Circular Reasoning
7. Hasty Generalization
8. Red Herring
9. Tu Quoque
10. Post Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc
11. Sunk Cost Fallacy
12. Appeal to Authority
13. Equivocation
14. Appeal to Pity
15. Bandwagon Fallacy
Boxed Final Answer:
$$
\boxed{
\text{Ad Hominem, Straw Man, Appeal to Ignorance, False Dilemma, Slippery Slope, Circular Reasoning, Hasty Generalization, Red Herring, Tu Quoque, Post Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc, Sunk Cost Fallacy, Appeal to Authority, Equivocation, Appeal to Pity, Bandwagon Fallacy}
}
$$
Parent Tip: Review the logic above to help your child master the concept of logical fallacy worksheet.
