Students can use this worksheet to track the scientific method steps while watching an episode of MythBusters.
Mythbusters and the Scientific Method worksheet with questions for students to answer about experiments.
PNG
1200×1553
84.3 KB
Free · Personal Use
Quality Assured by Worksheets Library Team
Reviewed for educational accuracy and age-appropriateness
ID: #568346
⭐
Show Answer Key & Explanations
Step-by-step solution for: Mythbusters and the scientific method ...
▼
Show Answer Key & Explanations
Step-by-step solution for: Mythbusters and the scientific method ...
It looks like you've uploaded a worksheet titled "Mythbusters & The Scientific Method", but there is no actual image or specific myth included in the text. This appears to be a blank template for students to fill out after watching an episode of *MythBusters* and analyzing how the hosts apply the scientific method.
Since there's no specific myth, experiment details, or video content provided, I can't answer the questions directly based on a particular episode. However, I can help you fill out this worksheet by providing a sample response using one of the most famous *MythBusters* myths:
> "Can a person survive a fall from a skyscraper by landing on a pile of feathers?"
This myth is often used in educational settings to teach the scientific method. Let’s go through each question with a sample answer based on that myth:
---
*(Sample Answers Based on the Myth: "Can a person survive a fall from a skyscraper by landing on a pile of feathers?")*
---
1. Explain the myth to be busted:
The myth is that if a person falls from a great height (like a skyscraper), they can survive the impact if they land on a large pile of feathers. The idea is that feathers are soft and lightweight, so they would cushion the fall enough to prevent injury or death.
---
2. Adam and Jamie make a prediction at what the outcome is going to be for this myth. What is their prediction and why do they think that way?
Adam and Jamie predict that the myth is busted—a person would not survive the fall even onto a pile of feathers. They reason that feathers are too light and compressible; they don’t have enough structural integrity to absorb the force of a high-speed fall. Even though feathers are soft, the kinetic energy from falling from such a height is far too great for them to dissipate safely.
---
3. What was your prediction and why?
I predicted that the myth would be busted. I thought that while feathers might slow down a small object or a light animal slightly, the momentum and force generated by a human body falling from a skyscraper would be too much for feathers to handle. Feathers would likely just be compressed and displaced, offering little resistance.
---
4. Adam and Jamie set up experiments to test the myth. Describe the experiments and the controls, the factors they did not allow to affect their experimental results.
Steps of the experiment:
- Built a large drop tower to simulate a fall from a high building.
- Used a crash test dummy (or a mannequin) weighted to represent a human body.
- Created a massive pile of feathers (several tons) in a controlled chamber.
- Dropped the dummy from increasing heights (e.g., 50 feet, then 100 feet).
- Measured impact forces, deformation of the dummy, and feather displacement.
- Compared results to a control drop onto a hard surface (like concrete).
Controls in the experiment:
- Used the same type and weight of dummy for all drops.
- Kept the feather pile consistent in volume and density.
- Conducted drops under similar environmental conditions (no wind, temperature control).
- Wore rubber suits to avoid sweat affecting the feathers’ buoyancy or structure.
- Ensured the feathers were dry and not clumped together.
---
5. Explain the results of the experiments.
The dummy suffered severe impacts even when dropped onto the feather pile. The feathers compressed rapidly but offered minimal resistance. At higher heights, the dummy hit the bottom of the pile with nearly the same velocity as it would on concrete. The feathers didn’t significantly reduce the impact force. In fact, the feathers were blown away upon impact, showing they couldn’t absorb the energy. The myth was busted—feathers could not save someone from a fatal fall.
---
6. Do you agree with their conclusions? What factors make you agree or disagree?
Yes, I agree with their conclusion. The physics of momentum and kinetic energy support their findings. A human body falling from a skyscraper reaches terminal velocity (~120 mph), generating immense force. Feathers, being low-density and non-rigid, cannot provide sufficient deceleration. The experiment was well-designed with proper controls and realistic scaling. The only possible disagreement might be if feathers were somehow arranged in a highly engineered way (like a net), but as tested, the myth was clearly busted.
---
This worksheet helps students understand how scientists use the scientific method—observation, hypothesis, experimentation, analysis, and conclusion—to test real-world myths. Using *MythBusters* episodes makes science engaging and accessible.
If you have a specific myth or episode in mind (e.g., “Will a bullet fired upward come back down and kill someone?” or “Can a car be lifted by helium balloons?”), please let me know, and I can tailor the answers accordingly!
Since there's no specific myth, experiment details, or video content provided, I can't answer the questions directly based on a particular episode. However, I can help you fill out this worksheet by providing a sample response using one of the most famous *MythBusters* myths:
> "Can a person survive a fall from a skyscraper by landing on a pile of feathers?"
This myth is often used in educational settings to teach the scientific method. Let’s go through each question with a sample answer based on that myth:
---
Mythbusters & The Scientific Method
*(Sample Answers Based on the Myth: "Can a person survive a fall from a skyscraper by landing on a pile of feathers?")*
---
1. Explain the myth to be busted:
The myth is that if a person falls from a great height (like a skyscraper), they can survive the impact if they land on a large pile of feathers. The idea is that feathers are soft and lightweight, so they would cushion the fall enough to prevent injury or death.
---
2. Adam and Jamie make a prediction at what the outcome is going to be for this myth. What is their prediction and why do they think that way?
Adam and Jamie predict that the myth is busted—a person would not survive the fall even onto a pile of feathers. They reason that feathers are too light and compressible; they don’t have enough structural integrity to absorb the force of a high-speed fall. Even though feathers are soft, the kinetic energy from falling from such a height is far too great for them to dissipate safely.
---
3. What was your prediction and why?
I predicted that the myth would be busted. I thought that while feathers might slow down a small object or a light animal slightly, the momentum and force generated by a human body falling from a skyscraper would be too much for feathers to handle. Feathers would likely just be compressed and displaced, offering little resistance.
---
4. Adam and Jamie set up experiments to test the myth. Describe the experiments and the controls, the factors they did not allow to affect their experimental results.
Steps of the experiment:
- Built a large drop tower to simulate a fall from a high building.
- Used a crash test dummy (or a mannequin) weighted to represent a human body.
- Created a massive pile of feathers (several tons) in a controlled chamber.
- Dropped the dummy from increasing heights (e.g., 50 feet, then 100 feet).
- Measured impact forces, deformation of the dummy, and feather displacement.
- Compared results to a control drop onto a hard surface (like concrete).
Controls in the experiment:
- Used the same type and weight of dummy for all drops.
- Kept the feather pile consistent in volume and density.
- Conducted drops under similar environmental conditions (no wind, temperature control).
- Wore rubber suits to avoid sweat affecting the feathers’ buoyancy or structure.
- Ensured the feathers were dry and not clumped together.
---
5. Explain the results of the experiments.
The dummy suffered severe impacts even when dropped onto the feather pile. The feathers compressed rapidly but offered minimal resistance. At higher heights, the dummy hit the bottom of the pile with nearly the same velocity as it would on concrete. The feathers didn’t significantly reduce the impact force. In fact, the feathers were blown away upon impact, showing they couldn’t absorb the energy. The myth was busted—feathers could not save someone from a fatal fall.
---
6. Do you agree with their conclusions? What factors make you agree or disagree?
Yes, I agree with their conclusion. The physics of momentum and kinetic energy support their findings. A human body falling from a skyscraper reaches terminal velocity (~120 mph), generating immense force. Feathers, being low-density and non-rigid, cannot provide sufficient deceleration. The experiment was well-designed with proper controls and realistic scaling. The only possible disagreement might be if feathers were somehow arranged in a highly engineered way (like a net), but as tested, the myth was clearly busted.
---
✔ Summary:
This worksheet helps students understand how scientists use the scientific method—observation, hypothesis, experimentation, analysis, and conclusion—to test real-world myths. Using *MythBusters* episodes makes science engaging and accessible.
If you have a specific myth or episode in mind (e.g., “Will a bullet fired upward come back down and kill someone?” or “Can a car be lifted by helium balloons?”), please let me know, and I can tailor the answers accordingly!
Parent Tip: Review the logic above to help your child master the concept of mythbusters worksheet.
