Prefix and Suffix Worksheets - Free Printable
Educational worksheet: Prefix and Suffix Worksheets. Download and print for classroom or home learning activities.
PNG
612×792
5.5 KB
Free · Personal Use
Quality Assured by Worksheets Library Team
Reviewed for educational accuracy and age-appropriateness
ID: #1034490
⭐
Show Answer Key & Explanations
Step-by-step solution for: Prefix and Suffix Worksheets
▼
Show Answer Key & Explanations
Step-by-step solution for: Prefix and Suffix Worksheets
Let's solve the Matching Prefixes Worksheet step by step.
---
Match each prefix in the left column with the word in the right column that contains the same prefix.
---
A prefix is a letter or group of letters added to the beginning of a word to change its meaning.
For example:
- "un-" in "unhappy" means "not"
- "re-" in "rewrite" means "again"
We need to match the prefixes on the left with words on the right that start with that prefix.
---
1. ex-
2. inter-
3. anti-
4. pre-
5. counter-
6. en-
7. extra-
8. trans-
9. under-
10. semi-
11. over-
12. extra-
(Note: "extra-" appears twice — likely a typo, but we'll handle it.)
---
- underestimate
- overcompensate
- semi-truck
- transcontinental
- expand
- antigravity backpack
- extraordinary
- enlighten
- pre-game
- counterattack
- interstate highway
- underappreciate
---
Now let’s go one by one and find the correct matches.
---
Wait! “expand” starts with ex-, yes!
But note: The worksheet already has a line drawn from "ex-" to "expand", so that’s correct.
✔ Match: ex- → expand
---
“Interstate” means “between states” — “inter-” = between
✔ Match: inter- → interstate highway
---
“Anti-” means “against” — “antigravity” means against gravity
✔ Match: anti- → antigravity backpack
---
“Pre-” means “before” — “pre-game” means before the game
✔ Match: pre- → pre-game
---
“Counter-” means “opposite” or “against” — “counterattack” means an attack in response
✔ Match: counter- → counterattack
---
“En-” is a prefix meaning “into” or “cause to become” — “enlighten” means to cause to become light/knowledgeable
✔ Match: en- → enlighten
---
“Extra-” means “beyond” or “additional” — “extraordinary” means beyond ordinary
✔ Match: extra- → extraordinary
---
“Trans-” means “across” — “transcontinental” means across continents
✔ Match: trans- → transcontinental
---
“Under-” means “less than” or “below” — “underestimate” means to estimate too low
✔ Match: under- → underestimate
---
“Semi-” means “half” — “semi-truck” is a truck with a trailer (half of a full vehicle)
✔ Match: semi- → semi-truck
---
“Over-” means “too much” — “overcompensate” means to compensate excessively
✔ Match: over- → overcompensate
---
We already used extra- for “extraordinary”.
But there are two “extra-” entries in the list — probably a mistake.
Looking at the remaining word:
- underappreciate — this has “under-”, but we already matched “under-” to “underestimate”
Wait — let’s check all words:
Used words:
- expand ✔
- interstate highway ✔
- antigravity backpack ✔
- pre-game ✔
- counterattack ✔
- enlighten ✔
- extraordinary ✔
- transcontinental ✔
- underestimate ✔
- semi-truck ✔
- overcompensate ✔
That leaves only one word unassigned: underappreciate
But we already have “under-” matched to “underestimate” — so can’t use again.
Wait — let’s double-check.
The right column has 12 words:
1. underestimate
2. overcompensate
3. semi-truck
4. transcontinental
5. expand
6. antigravity backpack
7. extraordinary
8. enlighten
9. pre-game
10. counterattack
11. interstate highway
12. underappreciate
So all 12 words are listed.
We’ve matched 11 so far.
Wait — we have two “extra-” prefixes in the left column?
Look:
> 7. extra-
> 12. extra-
So two entries for “extra-” — but only one word starting with “extra-”: extraordinary
That’s a problem.
But maybe it's a typo? Let’s see if any other word could be matched.
Wait — look at underappreciate — it has under-, which we already used.
But we have two “under-” prefixes?
No — only one “under-” in the list: #9.
Let’s list the prefixes again:
1. ex-
2. inter-
3. anti-
4. pre-
5. counter-
6. en-
7. extra-
8. trans-
9. under-
10. semi-
11. over-
12. extra- ← duplicate?
Yes — two “extra-” entries.
But only one word: extraordinary
So either:
- It’s a typo, or
- One of the “extra-” should be something else.
But looking at the words, perhaps “underappreciate” is meant to be paired with under-, but we already used “under-” with “underestimate”.
Wait — no! We have only one “under-” in the list: #9.
And “underestimate” and “underappreciate” both start with “under-”.
So both should be matched to “under-”?
But the instruction says: match each prefix in the right column with the word...
Wait — actually, the directions say:
> Match each prefix in the right column with the word with the same prefix in the left column.
Wait — that doesn't make sense.
Let me re-read:
> Directions: Match each prefix in the right column with the word with the same prefix in the left column.
But that's backwards.
Actually, looking at the layout:
Left column: prefixes (1–12)
Right column: words
So the prefixes are on the left, words are on the right.
So direction should be: Match each prefix (left) with the word (right) that contains that prefix.
But the instruction says:
> Match each prefix in the right column with the word...
That must be a typo.
Because the right column has words, not prefixes.
So the correct interpretation is:
> Match each prefix in the left column with the word in the right column that contains that prefix.
That makes sense.
So now, back to the issue: we have two entries for “extra-” in the left column (7 and 12), but only one word with “extra-” — extraordinary.
Similarly, we have two words with “under-”: underestimate and underappreciate
But only one “under-” prefix in the list (#9).
So likely, the worksheet has a typo — probably the second “extra-” should be “under-”.
Alternatively, maybe the second “extra-” is meant to be “over-” or something else.
But let’s count:
- Prefixes: 12 items
- Words: 12 items
So we need to match each prefix to a unique word.
Let’s list all prefixes and their possible matches:
| Prefix | Possible Word(s) |
|--------|------------------|
| ex- | expand |
| inter- | interstate highway |
| anti- | antigravity backpack |
| pre- | pre-game |
| counter- | counterattack |
| en- | enlighten |
| extra- | extraordinary |
| trans- | transcontinental |
| under- | underestimate, underappreciate |
| semi- | semi-truck |
| over- | overcompensate |
| extra- | ??? |
We have two “extra-” prefixes, but only one word with “extra-”.
We have one “under-” prefix, but two words with “under-”.
So the most logical fix is that #12 “extra-” should be “under-” — since “underappreciate” is still unmatched.
Alternatively, #12 might be “under-” instead of “extra-”.
Given that, let’s assume:
- #12 is under- (typo)
Then we can match:
- #9 under- → underestimate
- #12 under- → underappreciate
But wait — we can’t have two “under-” prefixes unless the worksheet allows it.
But since the list shows only one “under-”, and two “extra-”, it’s likely a copy-paste error.
Another possibility: #12 is “under-”, and #7 is “extra-”.
But both are written as “extra-”.
Looking at the image: it says:
> 12. extra-
> underappreciate
But “underappreciate” does not start with “extra-” — it starts with “under-”.
So clearly, #12 should be “under-”, not “extra-”.
Therefore, the worksheet has a typo — #12 should be “under-”, not “extra-”.
So corrected list:
1. ex-
2. inter-
3. anti-
4. pre-
5. counter-
6. en-
7. extra-
8. trans-
9. under-
10. semi-
11. over-
12. under- ← typo: should be “under-” (but currently labeled “extra-”)
But we only have one “under-” in the list — #9.
So perhaps the second “extra-” is a typo and should be “under-”.
Thus, #12 should be “under-”, and the word “underappreciate” goes with it.
But then we have two “under-” prefixes: #9 and #12 — which is fine if they’re both “under-”.
But the original says “extra-” for #12.
So the best conclusion is: #12 is mislabeled — it should be “under-”.
Therefore, final matching:
---
1. ex- → expand
2. inter- → interstate highway
3. anti- → antigravity backpack
4. pre- → pre-game
5. counter- → counterattack
6. en- → enlighten
7. extra- → extraordinary
8. trans- → transcontinental
9. under- → underestimate
10. semi- → semi-truck
11. over- → overcompensate
12. under- → underappreciate ← (assuming typo: “extra-” should be “under-”)
But since the worksheet says #12 is “extra-”, and “underappreciate” does not have “extra-”, we cannot match them.
Therefore, the worksheet has an error.
But let’s check: is there any word with “extra-” besides “extraordinary”? No.
Is there any word with “under-” besides “underestimate” and “underappreciate”? Yes — both.
So the only way to fix it is to change #12 from “extra-” to “under-”.
---
| Prefix | Matched Word |
|-------|--------------|
| 1. ex- | expand |
| 2. inter- | interstate highway |
| 3. anti- | antigravity backpack |
| 4. pre- | pre-game |
| 5. counter- | counterattack |
| 6. en- | enlighten |
| 7. extra- | extraordinary |
| 8. trans- | transcontinental |
| 9. under- | underestimate |
| 10. semi- | semi-truck |
| 11. over- | overcompensate |
| 12. under- | underappreciate |
(Note: #12 should be “under-”, not “extra-”)
---
If we assume the last prefix (#12) is a typo and should be “under-”, then the correct matches are:
1. ex- → expand
2. inter- → interstate highway
3. anti- → antigravity backpack
4. pre- → pre-game
5. counter- → counterattack
6. en- → enlighten
7. extra- → extraordinary
8. trans- → transcontinental
9. under- → underestimate
10. semi- → semi-truck
11. over- → overcompensate
12. under- → underappreciate
---
There is a typo in the worksheet:
- Prefix #12 is labeled “extra-”, but should be “under-” to match the word underappreciate.
Otherwise, the matching is impossible because:
- “extra-” only appears once (in “extraordinary”), but is listed twice.
- “under-” appears twice in words, but only once in prefixes.
So the intended answer is as above, assuming the typo is corrected.
---
The worksheet has a small error, but the correct matching is:
- ex- → expand
- inter- → interstate highway
- anti- → antigravity backpack
- pre- → pre-game
- counter- → counterattack
- en- → enlighten
- extra- → extraordinary
- trans- → transcontinental
- under- → underestimate
- semi- → semi-truck
- over- → overcompensate
- under- → underappreciate *(correcting #12 from “extra-” to “under-”)*
---
Let me know if you'd like a printable version or explanation for students!
---
Objective:
Match each prefix in the left column with the word in the right column that contains the same prefix.
---
Step 1: Understand what a prefix is.
A prefix is a letter or group of letters added to the beginning of a word to change its meaning.
For example:
- "un-" in "unhappy" means "not"
- "re-" in "rewrite" means "again"
We need to match the prefixes on the left with words on the right that start with that prefix.
---
List of Prefixes (Left Column):
1. ex-
2. inter-
3. anti-
4. pre-
5. counter-
6. en-
7. extra-
8. trans-
9. under-
10. semi-
11. over-
12. extra-
(Note: "extra-" appears twice — likely a typo, but we'll handle it.)
---
Words in Right Column:
- underestimate
- overcompensate
- semi-truck
- transcontinental
- expand
- antigravity backpack
- extraordinary
- enlighten
- pre-game
- counterattack
- interstate highway
- underappreciate
---
Now let’s go one by one and find the correct matches.
---
1. ex- → expand
Wait! “expand” starts with ex-, yes!
But note: The worksheet already has a line drawn from "ex-" to "expand", so that’s correct.
✔ Match: ex- → expand
---
2. inter- → interstate highway
“Interstate” means “between states” — “inter-” = between
✔ Match: inter- → interstate highway
---
3. anti- → antigravity backpack
“Anti-” means “against” — “antigravity” means against gravity
✔ Match: anti- → antigravity backpack
---
4. pre- → pre-game
“Pre-” means “before” — “pre-game” means before the game
✔ Match: pre- → pre-game
---
5. counter- → counterattack
“Counter-” means “opposite” or “against” — “counterattack” means an attack in response
✔ Match: counter- → counterattack
---
6. en- → enlighten
“En-” is a prefix meaning “into” or “cause to become” — “enlighten” means to cause to become light/knowledgeable
✔ Match: en- → enlighten
---
7. extra- → extraordinary
“Extra-” means “beyond” or “additional” — “extraordinary” means beyond ordinary
✔ Match: extra- → extraordinary
---
8. trans- → transcontinental
“Trans-” means “across” — “transcontinental” means across continents
✔ Match: trans- → transcontinental
---
9. under- → underestimate
“Under-” means “less than” or “below” — “underestimate” means to estimate too low
✔ Match: under- → underestimate
---
10. semi- → semi-truck
“Semi-” means “half” — “semi-truck” is a truck with a trailer (half of a full vehicle)
✔ Match: semi- → semi-truck
---
11. over- → overcompensate
“Over-” means “too much” — “overcompensate” means to compensate excessively
✔ Match: over- → overcompensate
---
12. extra- → ???
We already used extra- for “extraordinary”.
But there are two “extra-” entries in the list — probably a mistake.
Looking at the remaining word:
- underappreciate — this has “under-”, but we already matched “under-” to “underestimate”
Wait — let’s check all words:
Used words:
- expand ✔
- interstate highway ✔
- antigravity backpack ✔
- pre-game ✔
- counterattack ✔
- enlighten ✔
- extraordinary ✔
- transcontinental ✔
- underestimate ✔
- semi-truck ✔
- overcompensate ✔
That leaves only one word unassigned: underappreciate
But we already have “under-” matched to “underestimate” — so can’t use again.
Wait — let’s double-check.
The right column has 12 words:
1. underestimate
2. overcompensate
3. semi-truck
4. transcontinental
5. expand
6. antigravity backpack
7. extraordinary
8. enlighten
9. pre-game
10. counterattack
11. interstate highway
12. underappreciate
So all 12 words are listed.
We’ve matched 11 so far.
Wait — we have two “extra-” prefixes in the left column?
Look:
> 7. extra-
> 12. extra-
So two entries for “extra-” — but only one word starting with “extra-”: extraordinary
That’s a problem.
But maybe it's a typo? Let’s see if any other word could be matched.
Wait — look at underappreciate — it has under-, which we already used.
But we have two “under-” prefixes?
No — only one “under-” in the list: #9.
Let’s list the prefixes again:
1. ex-
2. inter-
3. anti-
4. pre-
5. counter-
6. en-
7. extra-
8. trans-
9. under-
10. semi-
11. over-
12. extra- ← duplicate?
Yes — two “extra-” entries.
But only one word: extraordinary
So either:
- It’s a typo, or
- One of the “extra-” should be something else.
But looking at the words, perhaps “underappreciate” is meant to be paired with under-, but we already used “under-” with “underestimate”.
Wait — no! We have only one “under-” in the list: #9.
And “underestimate” and “underappreciate” both start with “under-”.
So both should be matched to “under-”?
But the instruction says: match each prefix in the right column with the word...
Wait — actually, the directions say:
> Match each prefix in the right column with the word with the same prefix in the left column.
Wait — that doesn't make sense.
Let me re-read:
> Directions: Match each prefix in the right column with the word with the same prefix in the left column.
But that's backwards.
Actually, looking at the layout:
Left column: prefixes (1–12)
Right column: words
So the prefixes are on the left, words are on the right.
So direction should be: Match each prefix (left) with the word (right) that contains that prefix.
But the instruction says:
> Match each prefix in the right column with the word...
That must be a typo.
Because the right column has words, not prefixes.
So the correct interpretation is:
> Match each prefix in the left column with the word in the right column that contains that prefix.
That makes sense.
So now, back to the issue: we have two entries for “extra-” in the left column (7 and 12), but only one word with “extra-” — extraordinary.
Similarly, we have two words with “under-”: underestimate and underappreciate
But only one “under-” prefix in the list (#9).
So likely, the worksheet has a typo — probably the second “extra-” should be “under-”.
Alternatively, maybe the second “extra-” is meant to be “over-” or something else.
But let’s count:
- Prefixes: 12 items
- Words: 12 items
So we need to match each prefix to a unique word.
Let’s list all prefixes and their possible matches:
| Prefix | Possible Word(s) |
|--------|------------------|
| ex- | expand |
| inter- | interstate highway |
| anti- | antigravity backpack |
| pre- | pre-game |
| counter- | counterattack |
| en- | enlighten |
| extra- | extraordinary |
| trans- | transcontinental |
| under- | underestimate, underappreciate |
| semi- | semi-truck |
| over- | overcompensate |
| extra- | ??? |
We have two “extra-” prefixes, but only one word with “extra-”.
We have one “under-” prefix, but two words with “under-”.
So the most logical fix is that #12 “extra-” should be “under-” — since “underappreciate” is still unmatched.
Alternatively, #12 might be “under-” instead of “extra-”.
Given that, let’s assume:
- #12 is under- (typo)
Then we can match:
- #9 under- → underestimate
- #12 under- → underappreciate
But wait — we can’t have two “under-” prefixes unless the worksheet allows it.
But since the list shows only one “under-”, and two “extra-”, it’s likely a copy-paste error.
Another possibility: #12 is “under-”, and #7 is “extra-”.
But both are written as “extra-”.
Looking at the image: it says:
> 12. extra-
> underappreciate
But “underappreciate” does not start with “extra-” — it starts with “under-”.
So clearly, #12 should be “under-”, not “extra-”.
Therefore, the worksheet has a typo — #12 should be “under-”, not “extra-”.
So corrected list:
1. ex-
2. inter-
3. anti-
4. pre-
5. counter-
6. en-
7. extra-
8. trans-
9. under-
10. semi-
11. over-
12. under- ← typo: should be “under-” (but currently labeled “extra-”)
But we only have one “under-” in the list — #9.
So perhaps the second “extra-” is a typo and should be “under-”.
Thus, #12 should be “under-”, and the word “underappreciate” goes with it.
But then we have two “under-” prefixes: #9 and #12 — which is fine if they’re both “under-”.
But the original says “extra-” for #12.
So the best conclusion is: #12 is mislabeled — it should be “under-”.
Therefore, final matching:
---
✔ Final Correct Matches:
1. ex- → expand
2. inter- → interstate highway
3. anti- → antigravity backpack
4. pre- → pre-game
5. counter- → counterattack
6. en- → enlighten
7. extra- → extraordinary
8. trans- → transcontinental
9. under- → underestimate
10. semi- → semi-truck
11. over- → overcompensate
12. under- → underappreciate ← (assuming typo: “extra-” should be “under-”)
But since the worksheet says #12 is “extra-”, and “underappreciate” does not have “extra-”, we cannot match them.
Therefore, the worksheet has an error.
But let’s check: is there any word with “extra-” besides “extraordinary”? No.
Is there any word with “under-” besides “underestimate” and “underappreciate”? Yes — both.
So the only way to fix it is to change #12 from “extra-” to “under-”.
---
✔ Best Solution (Assuming Typo):
| Prefix | Matched Word |
|-------|--------------|
| 1. ex- | expand |
| 2. inter- | interstate highway |
| 3. anti- | antigravity backpack |
| 4. pre- | pre-game |
| 5. counter- | counterattack |
| 6. en- | enlighten |
| 7. extra- | extraordinary |
| 8. trans- | transcontinental |
| 9. under- | underestimate |
| 10. semi- | semi-truck |
| 11. over- | overcompensate |
| 12. under- | underappreciate |
(Note: #12 should be “under-”, not “extra-”)
---
✔ Final Answer (with correction):
If we assume the last prefix (#12) is a typo and should be “under-”, then the correct matches are:
1. ex- → expand
2. inter- → interstate highway
3. anti- → antigravity backpack
4. pre- → pre-game
5. counter- → counterattack
6. en- → enlighten
7. extra- → extraordinary
8. trans- → transcontinental
9. under- → underestimate
10. semi- → semi-truck
11. over- → overcompensate
12. under- → underappreciate
---
⚠️ Note:
There is a typo in the worksheet:
- Prefix #12 is labeled “extra-”, but should be “under-” to match the word underappreciate.
Otherwise, the matching is impossible because:
- “extra-” only appears once (in “extraordinary”), but is listed twice.
- “under-” appears twice in words, but only once in prefixes.
So the intended answer is as above, assuming the typo is corrected.
---
✔ Summary:
The worksheet has a small error, but the correct matching is:
- ex- → expand
- inter- → interstate highway
- anti- → antigravity backpack
- pre- → pre-game
- counter- → counterattack
- en- → enlighten
- extra- → extraordinary
- trans- → transcontinental
- under- → underestimate
- semi- → semi-truck
- over- → overcompensate
- under- → underappreciate *(correcting #12 from “extra-” to “under-”)*
---
Let me know if you'd like a printable version or explanation for students!
Parent Tip: Review the logic above to help your child master the concept of prefix suffix worksheet 6th grade.