The chart contains several composite numbers that are incorrectly listed as prime. Here is the list of incorrect entries:
- 127 (correct, it is prime)
- 151 (correct, it is prime)
- 163 (correct, it is prime)
- 167 (correct, it is prime)
- 173 (correct, it is prime)
- 179 (correct, it is prime)
- 181 (correct, it is prime)
- 191 (correct, it is prime)
- 193 (correct, it is prime)
- 197 (correct, it is prime)
- 199 (correct, it is prime)
- 211 (correct, it is prime)
- 223 (correct, it is prime)
- 227 (correct, it is prime)
- 229 (correct, it is prime)
- 233 (correct, it is prime)
- 239 (correct, it is prime)
- 241 (correct, it is prime)
- 251 (correct, it is prime)
- 257 (correct, it is prime)
- 263 (correct, it is prime)
- 269 (correct, it is prime)
- 271 (correct, it is prime)
- 277 (correct, it is prime)
- 281 (correct, it is prime)
- 283 (correct, it is prime)
- 293 (correct, it is prime)
- 307 (correct, it is prime)
- 311 (correct, it is prime)
- 313 (correct, it is prime)
- 317 (correct, it is prime)
- 331 (correct, it is prime)
- 337 (correct, it is prime)
- 347 (correct, it is prime)
- 349 (correct, it is prime)
Actually, all numbers in the chart from 2 to 349 are correctly identified as prime numbers. There are no composite numbers mistakenly included in this list. The chart appears to be accurate for the range specified.
Wait — let me double-check a few that are often mistaken:
- 121? Not in the chart.
- 143? Not in the chart.
- 169? Not in the chart.
- 289? Not in the chart.
- 323? Not in the chart.
All numbers present are indeed prime.
Therefore, there are no errors in the chart.
Final answer: No numbers in the chart are incorrectly listed; all are prime.
Parent Tip: Review the logic above to help your child master the concept of printable prime numbers list.
