This printable probability worksheet helps students understand chance by matching visual diagrams to descriptive terms and creating their own examples.
Probability worksheet featuring matching exercises with pie charts and terms like unlikely, equal chance, and more likely.
JPG
772×1000
124 KB
Free · Personal Use
Quality Assured by Worksheets Library Team
Reviewed for educational accuracy and age-appropriateness
ID: #466025
⭐
Show Answer Key & Explanations
Step-by-step solution for: Probability Worksheet
▼
Show Answer Key & Explanations
Step-by-step solution for: Probability Worksheet
Let’s solve this step by step.
---
## Part 1: Match each diagram to its correct probability
We are given 6 diagrams (circles divided into parts) and 6 probability descriptions. We need to match them based on how much of the circle is shaded or how the sections are divided.
Left Column (Top to Bottom):
1. Top-left diagram: A circle divided into 4 equal parts — all unshaded. But since it's divided equally, this represents equal chance — like 4 possible outcomes, each with same probability. However, note that in probability matching, we often look at *shaded area* as the “favorable” outcome. But here, none are shaded — so perhaps this is meant to represent a situation where outcomes are equally likely? Actually, let’s look again — maybe the lines indicate sections, not shading. Wait — looking at the right column, some have shaded areas.
Actually, re-examining — the key is the shaded region.
Let me reinterpret:
In probability circles, the shaded part usually represents the event we’re measuring.
So let’s look at right column first, since they have shading:
---
Right Column (Top to Bottom):
1. Top-right: Circle divided into 3 equal parts, 1 shaded → 1 in 3 chance
2. Middle-right: Circle divided into 2 equal parts, 1 shaded → 50-50 chance (or equal chance)
3. Bottom-right: Very small shaded wedge → unlikely or less likely
Now left column:
1. Top-left: Circle divided into 4 equal parts — no shading? But perhaps it’s meant to be “equal chance” because all sections are equal — but actually, if nothing is shaded, it’s 0 chance — which doesn’t fit. Wait — perhaps the diagram is showing division, and we’re to assume the shaded part is implied? This is ambiguous.
Wait — perhaps I misread. Let’s look at ALL diagrams carefully.
Actually, looking again — only the top-right and bottom-right have shading. The others have lines dividing the circle, but no shading. So maybe the shading is only in two diagrams?
That can’t be — there must be shading in more.
Wait — in the top-left diagram, it’s divided into 4 quadrants — but no shading. In middle-left, a circle with one large sector (about 1/3?) and two smaller ones — no shading. In bottom-left, a very small triangle shaded? Ah — yes! Look closely:
- Bottom-left: There is a small shaded triangle near the bottom — very small area → unlikely or less likely
- Middle-left: A circle with one large sector (maybe 120° or 1/3) — but no shading? Wait — perhaps the shaded part is the large sector? No — it’s just outlined.
This is confusing. Perhaps the shading is only in the right column, and the left column is just showing divisions without shading — meaning we interpret the *size of the section* as the probability.
But the instructions say “match each diagram to its correct probability” — so we must infer from the visual representation.
Let me try a different approach — match based on common interpretations:
---
✔ Top-right diagram: 3 equal slices, 1 shaded → 1 in 3 chance
✔ Middle-right: Half shaded → 50-50 chance
✔ Bottom-right: Tiny shaded slice → unlikely
Now left column:
✔ Top-left: 4 equal sections — if we assume one is “chosen”, it’s 1 in 4 — but that’s not listed. But “equal chance” could mean each outcome has equal probability — so this matches equal chance
✔ Middle-left: A circle with one large sector (looks like ~1/3) and two smaller ones — but if we consider the large sector as the event, it’s about 1/3 — but we already used “1 in 3” for top-right. Alternatively, if the large sector is >50%, then it’s more likely
✔ Bottom-left: Small shaded triangle — very small → less likely
But now we have conflict — both bottom-right and bottom-left are small — which is which?
Actually, bottom-right has a very thin vertical slice — even smaller than bottom-left’s triangle.
So:
- Bottom-right: Smallest shaded area → unlikely
- Bottom-left: Small but larger than bottom-right → less likely
And middle-left: Large sector (probably >50%) → more likely
Top-left: 4 equal parts → equal chance (each part has equal probability)
---
Left Column:
- Top-left → equal chance
- Middle-left → more likely
- Bottom-left → less likely
Right Column:
- Top-right → 1 in 3 chance
- Middle-right → 50-50 chance
- Bottom-right → unlikely
---
✔ So the correct matches are:
- Top-left diagram → equal chance
- Middle-left diagram → more likely
- Bottom-left diagram → less likely
- Top-right diagram → 1 in 3 chance
- Middle-right diagram → 50-50 chance
- Bottom-right diagram → unlikely
---
## Part 2: Write an event with that chance
Now, for each probability term, write a real-life example.
> Example: Winning the lottery.
*(Because the chance is extremely low — e.g., 1 in millions)*
> Example: Rolling a 3 on a fair 6-sided die.
*(Each number has 1/6 chance — equal among outcomes)*
> Example: Picking a red marble from a bag with 7 red and 3 blue marbles.
*(7 out of 10 — more than half — so more likely)*
> Example: Spinning a spinner divided into 3 equal sections and landing on a specific color.
*(Exactly 1 out of 3 outcomes)*
> Example: Flipping a fair coin and getting heads.
*(Exactly half chance)*
> Example: Drawing a king from a standard deck of 52 cards.
*(4 kings out of 52 = 1/13 — less than 50% — so less likely than not)*
---
## ✔ Final Answer Summary:
- Top-left diagram → equal chance
- Middle-left diagram → more likely
- Bottom-left diagram → less likely
- Top-right diagram → 1 in 3 chance
- Middle-right diagram → 50-50 chance
- Bottom-right diagram → unlikely
- unlikely → Winning the lottery
- equal chance → Rolling a 3 on a fair die
- more likely → Picking a red marble from a bag with 7 red and 3 blue
- 1 in 3 chance → Spinning a 3-section spinner and landing on one specific section
- 50-50 chance → Flipping a coin and getting heads
- less likely → Drawing a king from a standard deck of cards
---
Let me know if you’d like this formatted as a worksheet answer key!
---
## Part 1: Match each diagram to its correct probability
We are given 6 diagrams (circles divided into parts) and 6 probability descriptions. We need to match them based on how much of the circle is shaded or how the sections are divided.
Diagram Analysis:
Left Column (Top to Bottom):
1. Top-left diagram: A circle divided into 4 equal parts — all unshaded. But since it's divided equally, this represents equal chance — like 4 possible outcomes, each with same probability. However, note that in probability matching, we often look at *shaded area* as the “favorable” outcome. But here, none are shaded — so perhaps this is meant to represent a situation where outcomes are equally likely? Actually, let’s look again — maybe the lines indicate sections, not shading. Wait — looking at the right column, some have shaded areas.
Actually, re-examining — the key is the shaded region.
Let me reinterpret:
In probability circles, the shaded part usually represents the event we’re measuring.
So let’s look at right column first, since they have shading:
---
Right Column (Top to Bottom):
1. Top-right: Circle divided into 3 equal parts, 1 shaded → 1 in 3 chance
2. Middle-right: Circle divided into 2 equal parts, 1 shaded → 50-50 chance (or equal chance)
3. Bottom-right: Very small shaded wedge → unlikely or less likely
Now left column:
1. Top-left: Circle divided into 4 equal parts — no shading? But perhaps it’s meant to be “equal chance” because all sections are equal — but actually, if nothing is shaded, it’s 0 chance — which doesn’t fit. Wait — perhaps the diagram is showing division, and we’re to assume the shaded part is implied? This is ambiguous.
Wait — perhaps I misread. Let’s look at ALL diagrams carefully.
Actually, looking again — only the top-right and bottom-right have shading. The others have lines dividing the circle, but no shading. So maybe the shading is only in two diagrams?
That can’t be — there must be shading in more.
Wait — in the top-left diagram, it’s divided into 4 quadrants — but no shading. In middle-left, a circle with one large sector (about 1/3?) and two smaller ones — no shading. In bottom-left, a very small triangle shaded? Ah — yes! Look closely:
- Bottom-left: There is a small shaded triangle near the bottom — very small area → unlikely or less likely
- Middle-left: A circle with one large sector (maybe 120° or 1/3) — but no shading? Wait — perhaps the shaded part is the large sector? No — it’s just outlined.
This is confusing. Perhaps the shading is only in the right column, and the left column is just showing divisions without shading — meaning we interpret the *size of the section* as the probability.
But the instructions say “match each diagram to its correct probability” — so we must infer from the visual representation.
Let me try a different approach — match based on common interpretations:
---
✔ Top-right diagram: 3 equal slices, 1 shaded → 1 in 3 chance
✔ Middle-right: Half shaded → 50-50 chance
✔ Bottom-right: Tiny shaded slice → unlikely
Now left column:
✔ Top-left: 4 equal sections — if we assume one is “chosen”, it’s 1 in 4 — but that’s not listed. But “equal chance” could mean each outcome has equal probability — so this matches equal chance
✔ Middle-left: A circle with one large sector (looks like ~1/3) and two smaller ones — but if we consider the large sector as the event, it’s about 1/3 — but we already used “1 in 3” for top-right. Alternatively, if the large sector is >50%, then it’s more likely
✔ Bottom-left: Small shaded triangle — very small → less likely
But now we have conflict — both bottom-right and bottom-left are small — which is which?
Actually, bottom-right has a very thin vertical slice — even smaller than bottom-left’s triangle.
So:
- Bottom-right: Smallest shaded area → unlikely
- Bottom-left: Small but larger than bottom-right → less likely
And middle-left: Large sector (probably >50%) → more likely
Top-left: 4 equal parts → equal chance (each part has equal probability)
---
Final Matching:
Left Column:
- Top-left → equal chance
- Middle-left → more likely
- Bottom-left → less likely
Right Column:
- Top-right → 1 in 3 chance
- Middle-right → 50-50 chance
- Bottom-right → unlikely
---
✔ So the correct matches are:
- Top-left diagram → equal chance
- Middle-left diagram → more likely
- Bottom-left diagram → less likely
- Top-right diagram → 1 in 3 chance
- Middle-right diagram → 50-50 chance
- Bottom-right diagram → unlikely
---
## Part 2: Write an event with that chance
Now, for each probability term, write a real-life example.
1. unlikely
> Example: Winning the lottery.
*(Because the chance is extremely low — e.g., 1 in millions)*
2. equal chance
> Example: Rolling a 3 on a fair 6-sided die.
*(Each number has 1/6 chance — equal among outcomes)*
3. more likely
> Example: Picking a red marble from a bag with 7 red and 3 blue marbles.
*(7 out of 10 — more than half — so more likely)*
4. 1 in 3 chance
> Example: Spinning a spinner divided into 3 equal sections and landing on a specific color.
*(Exactly 1 out of 3 outcomes)*
5. 50-50 chance
> Example: Flipping a fair coin and getting heads.
*(Exactly half chance)*
6. less likely
> Example: Drawing a king from a standard deck of 52 cards.
*(4 kings out of 52 = 1/13 — less than 50% — so less likely than not)*
---
## ✔ Final Answer Summary:
Part 1: Matching
- Top-left diagram → equal chance
- Middle-left diagram → more likely
- Bottom-left diagram → less likely
- Top-right diagram → 1 in 3 chance
- Middle-right diagram → 50-50 chance
- Bottom-right diagram → unlikely
Part 2: Events
- unlikely → Winning the lottery
- equal chance → Rolling a 3 on a fair die
- more likely → Picking a red marble from a bag with 7 red and 3 blue
- 1 in 3 chance → Spinning a 3-section spinner and landing on one specific section
- 50-50 chance → Flipping a coin and getting heads
- less likely → Drawing a king from a standard deck of cards
---
Let me know if you’d like this formatted as a worksheet answer key!
Parent Tip: Review the logic above to help your child master the concept of probability maths worksheet.